Undisputed
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 62 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 22 | 35 | 42 | 58 |
| 1440p QHD | 35 | 55 | 66 | 92 |
| 1080p Full HD | 49 | 76 | 91 | 127 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Undisputed with Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus + Intel Arc B390, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus paired with the Intel Arc B390 integrated graphics presents a highly specific performance profile in Undisputed. The benchmark data shows a configuration where the CPU is a top-tier performer, but the graphics solution dramatically limits the gaming experience. The results across all resolutions indicate that the primary bottleneck is the GPU, making settings selection critical for achieving playable frame rates.
Settings Recommendations
The benchmark rows reveal a clear pattern: the Intel Arc B390 is the constraining factor in this combo, and the choice of graphics preset has a more significant impact on performance than resolution changes. At 1080p, the difference between the lowest and highest settings is substantial, with the Low preset delivering an average of 127 FPS, which is more than double the 49 FPS average seen at the Ultra preset. The data suggests that for players prioritizing smooth, responsive gameplay, the Low preset is the only option that fully utilizes the display's potential at 1080p, providing a wide margin above the 60 FPS threshold.
However, the Medium preset at 1080p still offers a very playable experience, averaging 91 FPS with a minimum of 78 FPS recorded. This preset likely provides a better visual balance than Low while maintaining a frame rate that is well-suited for a sports title where consistent motion is important. The High preset at 1080p drops the average to 76 FPS, which remains acceptable but shows a significant cost for the visual uplift over Medium. The Ultra preset at 1080p, with an average of 49 FPS, falls below the ideal smoothness target and is difficult to recommend given the steep performance penalty.
Moving to 1440p, the same hierarchy exists but with lower overall performance. The Low preset remains the top performer with an average of 92 FPS, still comfortably above 60 FPS. The Medium preset at 1440p produces an average of 66 FPS with a minimum of 56 FPS, which is borderline for a consistently smooth experience but could be acceptable for some users. The High preset at 1440p drops to 55 FPS, and the Ultra preset falls to 35 FPS, both of which are less ideal for competitive or fast-paced play.
At 4K, the limitations become severe. The Low preset is the only setting that achieves a playable average, hitting 58 FPS. The Medium preset at 4K averages 42 FPS, which is noticeably less smooth, and the High preset drops to 35 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K is effectively unplayable, with an average of just 22 FPS. For the best experience per the measured data, the Medium preset at 1080p appears to be the sweet spot, offering a good compromise between visual fidelity and a frame rate (91 FPS) that is high enough to feel responsive. If maximum smoothness is the absolute priority, the Low preset at 1080p is the clear choice, delivering 127 FPS. At 1440p, the Low preset is recommended for a solid 60+ FPS experience, while at 4K, users will need to stick to the Low preset for the only playable frame rates.
GPU Role
The Intel Arc B390 is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) based on the Xe3-LPG architecture, and its role in this combo is overwhelmingly the limiting factor. The GPU's benchmark data underscores this: its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1482, placing it in the 9th percentile of all GPUs. This is a very low score, and the nearest rivals are legacy mobile parts like the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX, which it leads by a mere 1.3%, and the NVIDIA GeForce 800M, which it surpasses by 1.5%. These comparisons highlight that the Arc B390's raw graphics processing power is on par with very old, entry-level dedicated GPUs, making it unsuitable for demanding modern games at high settings.
The GPU's specification sheet reveals its integrated nature. It has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2500 MHz, with 1536 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 24 ROPs. Crucially, its memory is "System Shared," meaning it relies on the system's DDR5 RAM rather than dedicated VRAM. The memory bandwidth is listed as "System Dependent," which means performance is heavily tied to the speed and configuration of the host system's memory. The GPU's 80 W TDP and "IGP" slot width confirm it is not a discrete card but is built into the processor package. While it supports modern APIs like DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4, its raw throughput of 7.680 TFLOPS FP32 is insufficient for the demands of Undisputed at higher settings, as the frame rate data clearly shows.
In practical terms, the GPU's performance ceiling is reached quickly. The 3DMark score and its low percentile ranking directly correlate with the in-game results. The B390's inability to maintain high frame rates at 4K Ultra (22 FPS) or even 1440p Ultra (35 FPS) is a direct consequence of its limited processing power and reliance on shared system memory. The data indicates that this GPU is designed for basic computing tasks, not high-end gaming, and its performance in Undisputed reflects that.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate data from 1080p to 4K shows the classic signs of a GPU-bound scenario. When the resolution increases, the rendering load on the GPU increases significantly, and the Intel Arc B390's performance degrades predictably. At the Low preset, the average frame rate drops from 127 FPS at 1080p to 92 FPS at 1440p, a 27.5% decrease, and then further to 58 FPS at 4K, a 37% decrease from 1440p. This steep and consistent drop-off indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck; the CPU is not able to compensate for the increased pixel count.
The scaling is even more pronounced at higher settings. At the Medium preset, the average FPS falls from 91 at 1080p to 66 at 1440p and then to 42 at 4K. The Ultra preset shows the most dramatic decline, from 49 FPS at 1080p to 35 FPS at 1440p and finally to a mere 22 FPS at 4K. This behavior is characteristic of a system where the graphics processor is saturated. If the system were CPU-bound, the frame rates would remain relatively flat across resolutions, as the CPU workload for game logic and physics would not change. The fact that frame rates drop by roughly 40-55% between 1080p and 4K across all settings confirms that the Intel Arc B390 is working at its maximum capacity and its limitations are the defining factor in this combo's gaming performance.
The data suggests that the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is more than capable of feeding the GPU with data; the bottleneck is purely the graphics rendering. This is a common situation with integrated graphics, where the CPU is a high-end desktop part but is paired with a graphics solution that is only suitable for light or older titles. For Undisputed, the only way to achieve higher frame rates at higher resolutions is to lower the graphical settings, as the resolution scaling shows the GPU cannot handle the increased workload.
FAQ
*Q: What is the best resolution to play Undisputed with this combo for a smooth experience?*
A: Based on the measured data, 1080p is the only resolution where the combo can consistently achieve high frame rates. At 1080p Low, the average is 127 FPS, and at Medium it is 91 FPS. At 1440p, only the Low preset manages an average above 60 FPS (92 FPS), while at 4K, even the Low preset only reaches 58 FPS.
*Q: Can this system handle Undisputed at 4K resolution?*
A: Yes, but with significant compromises. The data shows that at 4K, the Low preset is the only one that is potentially playable, with an average of 58 FPS. The Medium preset drops to 42 FPS, and the High and Ultra presets are not recommended, averaging 35 and 22 FPS respectively.
Q: How does the Intel Arc B390's performance compare to other GPUs?
A: The Intel Arc B390's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1482 places it in the 9th percentile of all GPUs. It is only 1.3% faster than a NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX and 1.5% faster than a NVIDIA GeForce 800M, indicating its performance level is comparable to very old, entry-level graphics solutions.
*Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus the reason for the low frame rates in Undisputed?*
A: No. The benchmark data indicates the GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU is a high-end 24-core processor with a 96th percentile ranking among all CPUs. The frame rates drop significantly as resolution increases, which is a classic sign of a GPU bottleneck, not a CPU one.
Q: What is the most balanced settings preset for this combo at 1440p?
A: According to the measurements, the Low preset at 1440p is the most balanced, providing an average of 92 FPS. The Medium preset is the next step up, averaging 66 FPS with a minimum of 56 FPS, which is acceptable but closer to the lower boundary of smooth gameplay.
Q: What kind of memory does the Intel Arc B390 use?
A: The Intel Arc B390 uses "System Shared" memory, meaning it does not have its own dedicated VRAM. It utilizes the system's DDR5 memory, and its bandwidth is listed as "System Dependent," which means its performance is tied to the system's memory configuration.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and the Intel Arc B390 ranks 2491st out of 2813 tested combos in Undisputed. This places it in the bottom 11% of all configurations, which is a very low ranking. This poor standing is almost entirely attributable to the GPU, as the CPU itself is a high-end part. The ranking highlights a significant mismatch in the system's capabilities: the processor is capable of high-end computing, but the graphics solution severely bottlenecks the gaming experience.
The combo's rank of 2491 is a direct result of the low frame rates measured in the game. Despite having a powerful CPU, the system cannot overcome the limitations of the Intel Arc B390. The GPU's 9th percentile ranking among all GPUs is the primary driver of the combo's low position. This situation is a clear illustration of how a system's overall gaming performance is only as strong as its weakest link. In this case, the Intel Arc B390 is a very weak link, dragging down the entire combo's ranking to near the bottom of the database. The data shows that any other tested combination with a more capable graphics card would likely rank significantly higher, even if paired with a weaker processor.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is a powerhouse processor that plays a minimal role in the frame rate limits seen in Undisputed. It features 24 cores and 24 threads, based on the Arrow Lake Refresh architecture, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. Its benchmark scores are exceptional; for example, it achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44253 and a single-core score of 2439. This performance places the CPU in the 96th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 93785. Its nearest rivals in terms of raw CPU performance are server-class processors like the Intel Xeon 6520P, which it matches with a 0% delta, and the AMD EPYC 4564P, which is only 1.5% faster.
Given this level of processing power, the CPU is not the limiting factor in this gaming combo. The evidence for this lies in the resolution scaling of the frame rates. In a CPU-bound scenario, the frame rate would be similar across different resolutions because the CPU is handling the game logic and physics, which do not change with resolution. However, the data for Undisputed shows a dramatic drop in FPS as resolution increases. For instance, at High settings, the average FPS falls from 76 at 1080p to 55 at 1440p and then to 35 at 4K. This steep decline is the definitive signature of a GPU bottleneck, confirming that the Intel Arc B390 is unable to render frames fast enough to keep pace with the CPU's calculations.
The CPU's role here is to prepare and submit draw calls, handle game simulation, and manage the overall system. With its high core count and clock speeds, it performs these tasks with ease, ensuring that the GPU is always fed with data. However, the GPU's inability to process that data quickly enough results in the low frame rates observed. The CPU's high performance also means it is likely to have significant headroom, and the system's performance in Undisputed would improve dramatically if the integrated graphics were replaced with a more powerful discrete GPU. The data confirms that the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is a future-proof and high-end component that is being held back by the Intel Arc B390, making the combo's performance in this game a pure reflection of the GPU's capabilities.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
Intel Arc B390
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus + Intel Arc B390 in Undisputed
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 58.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 42.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 35.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 22.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 92.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 66.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 55.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 35.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 127.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 91.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 76.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 49.0 |
Undisputed with iUltra 7 270K Plus + Other GPUs
See how Undisputed performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Undisputed with Arc B390 + Other CPUs
See how Undisputed performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 7 270K Plus + Arc B390
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.