Undisputed

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 delivers a dominant performance in Undisputed, placing this combination in the 90th rank out of 3,718 tested combos. This is a top-tier result, placing it within the top 2.4% of all systems tested for this title. The data indicates this pairing is exceptionally well-suited for high-refresh-rate competitive play and for maxing out visual fidelity without compromise.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s rank of 90 out of 3,718 tested configurations places it in an elite tier for Undisputed. This ranking is not just about raw power; it reflects a balance between the CPU's capability to feed frames and the GPU's ability to render them at high resolutions. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K itself holds a 94th percentile ranking among all CPUs, and its nearest rivals in general benchmarks include the Intel Xeon 6511P (0.2% ahead), Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 (0.7% ahead), Intel Core i7-14700KF (1% behind), and AMD Ryzen 7 9700F (1.3% behind). These are all within a narrow performance band, but the 265K's specific architecture with its 20 cores and 20 threads appears to be a strong match for this simulation-heavy sports title.

The GPU, a GeForce RTX 5090, also sits in the 92nd percentile among all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 79,842 is closely matched by rivals like the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB (0.3% ahead) and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X (1.4% behind). While these rival comparisons are based on synthetic workloads, the in-game data for Undisputed shows the 5090 pulling far ahead of lesser cards, as indicated by the massive frame rates achieved even at 4K. The synergy here is clear: the 265K provides the necessary single-thread responsiveness and multi-core throughput to prevent bottlenecks, allowing the 5090 to operate at its full potential.

The fact that this combo ranks in the 90th spot out of over 3,700 systems means that only a small fraction of tested configurations can outperform it in this specific game. Users with this setup can expect a flawless experience, with the primary limitation being the refresh rate of their display rather than the hardware itself. The data strongly suggests that this is a future-proof combination for Undisputed, capable of handling any potential future updates or graphical enhancements without requiring a hardware upgrade.

FAQ

*Q: Is this CPU/GPU combo overkill for a game like Undisputed?*

A: The benchmark data suggests it is not overkill if you own a high-refresh-rate monitor. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo produces an average of 542 FPS, which far exceeds the capability of most displays. However, at 4K with Ultra settings, it averages 95 FPS, which is ideal for a smooth, visually rich experience on a 4K 120Hz or 144Hz display. The data shows a wide range of performance that scales from esports-level frame rates to high-fidelity 4K gaming.

*Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Undisputed?*

A: The data indicates that 1440p is the sweet spot for high-refresh-rate and high-quality gaming. At 1440p with High settings, the average FPS is 233, which is excellent for a 240Hz monitor. Pushing to 4K High still yields a very playable 148 FPS average, but the 1440p numbers provide a larger buffer above the 144 FPS threshold and are more likely to be limited by your monitor's refresh rate rather than the hardware.

Q: How does the RTX 5090's 32 GB of VRAM affect performance in this game?

A: The 32 GB of VRAM on the RTX 5090 is far more than Undisputed requires at any of the tested settings. The data shows that even at 4K Ultra, the game is not VRAM-limited; the average FPS of 95 is due to GPU compute load, not memory capacity. This massive VRAM pool ensures there will be no texture pop-in or stuttering from memory swapping, but it is not a differentiating factor for performance in this specific title based on the measured rows.

Q: Should I use the Ultra preset or is High better?

A: The choice depends on your display. At 1440p, the Ultra preset yields an average of 150 FPS, which is still excellent. The High preset at 1440p yields 233 FPS, which is a significant jump of 83 FPS. If you have a 240Hz or higher refresh rate monitor, the High preset is the better choice to fully utilize it. If you are on a 144Hz monitor, the Ultra preset at 1440p is a great option for maximum visual quality without sacrificing smoothness.

Q: How does the CPU's performance impact the 1080p results?

A: The CPU plays a critical role at 1080p. The jump from 390 FPS average on Medium settings to 542 FPS on Low settings at 1080p shows the processor's ability to handle high frame rates with less GPU load. The data indicates that the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K's single-core and multi-core performance, reflected in its Cinebench R23 scores of 2,020 and 35,850 respectively, is sufficient to feed the RTX 5090 even at frame rates exceeding 500 FPS, showing no significant bottleneck.

Q: Is there a measurable difference between Medium and High settings at 1440p?

A: Yes, there is a notable difference. The Medium preset at 1440p averages 282 FPS, while the High preset averages 233 FPS. This is a 49 FPS difference, representing about a 21% decrease in performance for the higher preset. The data also shows the Medium preset has a minimum FPS of 240, indicating it can maintain a very stable frame time, while the High preset's minimum is not specified but the average is still above 200 FPS.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is the undisputed workhorse in this configuration for Undisputed. Its role is to render the game's visuals, and its performance is the primary driver of the frame rates at higher resolutions. The GPU's 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus with 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth is far more than this game needs, ensuring that texture streaming is instantaneous and never a bottleneck. The core clocks are set at a base of 2017 MHz and a boost of 2407 MHz, which allows it to handle the intense compute loads of the Boxing matches.

The GPU's compute power, with 21,760 shading units and a FP32 throughput of 104.8 TFLOPS, is what allows for the high frame rates seen in the data. For example, at 1440p Medium, the game averages 282 FPS, which requires the GPU to output a frame every 3.5 milliseconds on average. The 5090 handles this with ease, as evidenced by the minimum FPS of 240 at that setting. It is only when pushing to 4K Ultra that the GPU begins to show its limits, with an average of 95 FPS, indicating that the pixel fill rate is becoming a more significant factor.

The RTX 5090's architecture, Blackwell 2.0, is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, and its 92,200 million transistors provide the sheer horsepower needed for such performance. The data shows that the GPU is the limiting factor at 4K Ultra, where the average FPS drops to 95, but it is never the limiting factor at 1080p or 1440p, where the CPU becomes more involved. The performance scaling from Low to Ultra settings also highlights the GPU's role: at 4K, the frame rate drops from 248 FPS on Low to 95 FPS on Ultra, a 62% reduction, demonstrating how the GPU is scaling its workload with the graphical fidelity.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data reveals a clear performance hierarchy across resolutions and settings. At 1080p, the combo is exceptional. The Low preset achieves an average of 542 FPS, which is an extraordinary number that showcases the CPU's ability to process the game logic and the GPU's ability to render at a high speed. The Medium preset drops to 390 FPS average, with a minimum of 332 FPS and a maximum of 449 FPS, indicating excellent frame pacing. High settings at 1080p yield 323 FPS, and even the Ultra preset maintains a very high 208 FPS average.

Moving to 1440p, the frame rates remain incredibly high. The Low preset averages 392 FPS, which is still above what most displays can show. The Medium preset averages 282 FPS with a minimum of 240 and a maximum of 324 FPS, showing a well-bounded frame time. The High preset at 1440p averages 233 FPS, a fantastic result for a high-refresh-rate 1440p monitor. The Ultra preset at this resolution still manages a very respectable 150 FPS average, making it a viable option for 144Hz displays.

At 4K, the GPU's workload increases significantly. The Low preset still produces an average of 248 FPS, which is a stellar result. The Medium preset averages 178 FPS with a minimum of 152 FPS and a maximum of 205 FPS, providing a smooth experience on a 4K 165Hz monitor. The High preset drops to an average of 148 FPS, which is still excellent and borders on the ideal for 4K gaming. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, with an average of 95 FPS, which is the only setting where the combo dips below the 100 FPS mark, showing that it is still very playable but not as fluid as the lower presets.

Resolution Scaling

The performance scaling from 1080p to 4K is a textbook example of how different components become bottlenecks. At 1080p, the system is heavily CPU-bound. For instance, with High settings, the average FPS drops from 323 at 1080p to 233 at 1440p, a 28% reduction, and then to 148 at 4K, a further 36% reduction. This indicates that while the CPU is capable of handling the frame generation at 1080p, the GPU is becoming more taxed as resolution increases.

The data shows that the scaling from 1080p to 1440p is less severe than from 1440p to 4K for most presets. For Low settings, the average FPS drops from 542 to 392 (a 28% decrease), and then to 248 (a 37% decrease). This pattern is consistent across all presets, confirming that the jump to 4K is where the RTX 5090's fill rate and compute capabilities are truly challenged. The Ultra preset shows the largest relative drop, with 208 FPS at 1080p, 150 FPS at 1440p (a 28% drop), and 95 FPS at 4K (a 37% drop from 1440p).

This data strongly suggests that while the CPU is key to achieving the highest possible frame rates at 1080p, the GPU is the primary limiter at 4K. The 5090's performance at 4K is still outstanding, but the scaling pattern shows that the GPU's rendering workload is growing faster than the CPU's ability to feed it. For users with a 4K 120Hz display, the High preset (148 FPS) is the better choice than Ultra (95 FPS) to stay above the 120 FPS threshold. This analysis confirms that this combo is well-balanced, with no single component being a severe bottleneck at any of the tested settings, but the GPU takes on the heavier load as resolution increases.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend entirely on your display's refresh rate and resolution. For users with a 1080p 144Hz or 240Hz monitor, the High preset (323 FPS) is the best choice, as it provides a massive frame rate buffer and superior visual quality over Medium (390 FPS) and Low (542 FPS), which are likely unnecessary beyond competitive play. The Ultra preset at 1080p (208 FPS) is also viable and offers the best visual fidelity, but the High preset's extra 115 FPS is more beneficial for frame time consistency.

For 1440p users, the High preset is the clear winner. At 233 FPS average, it is well-suited for 240Hz monitors and provides a significant visual upgrade over the Medium preset (282 FPS). The Ultra preset at 1440p (150 FPS) is also an excellent option for those with a 144Hz or 165Hz display, offering the maximum visual quality while still maintaining a high enough frame rate for smooth gameplay. The data shows that the Medium preset's minimum of 240 FPS is a solid floor, but High's higher visual fidelity is worth the 49 FPS average sacrifice.

At 4K, the recommendation is to use the High preset. The average of 148 FPS is ideal for 4K 120Hz or 144Hz monitors. The Ultra preset (95 FPS) is a viable option for those prioritizing absolute visual fidelity over frame rate, but it will not take full advantage of a high refresh rate display. The Medium preset at 4K (178 FPS) is also a strong contender, but the High preset offers a better balance of visual quality and performance. In all cases, the data indicates that this combo is powerful enough to run Undisputed at high frame rates, and the choice of settings should be guided by the need to match or exceed your monitor's refresh rate while maximizing visual fidelity.