Undisputed

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER presents a compelling case study in bottleneck dynamics for Undisputed. This combination of a modern 20-core processor with an older, end-of-life GPU creates a performance profile where the graphics card is the clear limiting factor, a conclusion strongly supported by the resolution scaling data. The benchmark results reveal a system that is surprisingly playable at higher resolutions, yet leaves substantial performance on the table at 1080p.

Resolution Scaling

The most revealing aspect of this data is how frame rates scale as resolution increases. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 229 FPS. Moving to 1440p on Low drops this to 166 FPS, a significant reduction of 63 FPS. The trend continues to 4K on Low, where the average falls to 105 FPS. This pattern of declining performance with increasing pixel count is classic behavior when the GPU is the limiting factor; the CPU is capable of feeding frames quickly at lower resolutions, but the RTX 2060 SUPER's rendering workload grows faster than the resolution increase.

The scaling from 1080p to 1440p at High settings shows a drop from 136 FPS to 99 FPS, while the jump to 4K High results in 62 FPS. The Ultra preset tells a similar story: 88 FPS at 1080p, 63 FPS at 1440p, and 40 FPS at 4K. The consistent pattern across all settings indicates a GPU-bound scenario. The CPU's headroom is not the issue; the RTX 2060 SUPER's fill rate and shading power simply cannot keep pace with the increasing pixel workload. The data implies that for competitive play at high refresh rates, 1080p is the only viable resolution, while 4K is only suitable for turning down settings to Low or Medium.

The gap between Low and Ultra settings at 4K is particularly stark. The 105 FPS at Low drops to just 40 FPS at Ultra, a 65 FPS swing. This huge performance cost for higher visual fidelity confirms that the GPU is under heavy stress at 4K, and the settings menu becomes a critical tool for balancing visual quality with playability. The data suggests that the limiting component is unambiguously the GPU, as the CPU's performance headroom at lower resolutions is not the reason for the frame rate collapse at higher ones.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the database of tested combinations for Undisputed, this pairing holds a combo rank of 2008 out of 2813 combos. This places it in the lower third of all tested configurations, which is expected given the age and tier of the GPU. The RTX 2060 SUPER, with a GPU percentile of 62, is a mid-range performer by current standards, and its ranking reflects that. The CPU, in contrast, is a high-end part, sitting in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs.

The discrepancy between the CPU's high percentile and the combo's low rank reinforces the notion that the GPU is the bottleneck. The system's overall performance is dragged down by the GPU, preventing the powerful processor from showcasing its full potential in this specific game. A more balanced pairing, with a stronger GPU, would likely score significantly higher. The rank of 2008 out of 2813 indicates that this is not a top-tier setup for Undisputed, but it is also not the worst, with many lower-performing configurations existing below it.

The data implies that the system's performance is held back by its graphics card. While the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is a strong processor, its capabilities are not fully utilized in this configuration. The combo rank serves as a clear indicator that for a game like Undisputed, the GPU is the primary determinant of overall performance, and this pairing leaves performance on the table.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER is the central figure in this performance story. Its specifications—8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s—are adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming but become strained at 4K. The GPU's base clock is 1470 MHz, with a boost clock of 1650 MHz. These clocks, combined with its 2176 shading units, determine its raw rendering power. The GPU's FP32 performance is rated at 7.181 TFLOPS, a figure that explains its difficulty maintaining high frame rates at 4K Ultra.

The 8 GB VRAM capacity is a critical factor. At 4K resolution, texture data and geometry can easily exceed this amount, potentially leading to performance degradation or texture pop-in. While the benchmark data does not provide direct evidence of VRAM overflow, the significant drop in performance from Medium (75 FPS) to Ultra (40 FPS) at 4K suggests that the GPU is struggling to manage the increased memory demands and shading complexity of the Ultra preset. The RTX 2060 SUPER's 64 ROPs and a pixel rate of 105.6 GPixel/s are also limiting factors at high resolutions.

Comparing it to its nearest rivals, the RTX 2060 SUPER's average benchmark score is 18093. It sits very close to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile, which has a deltaPct of -0.4, and the AMD Radeon Pro 5700, with a deltaPct of -0.5. This indicates that its raw compute performance is on par with a mobile RTX 3060 and a professional Radeon card. However, its position is slightly below the AMD Radeon RX 460 and Intel Arc A770M, which are -1.5 and -1.6 percent faster in average benchmark scores, respectively. This data shows the RTX 2060 SUPER is a competent, but not exceptional, performer in its class.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a granular look at performance across all settings and resolutions. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers an average of 229 FPS on Low, 165 FPS on Medium, 136 FPS on High, and 88 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset shows a minimum of 140 FPS and a maximum of 190 FPS, indicating a stable experience. These numbers show that 1080p is where this system shines, with even the Ultra preset remaining playable.

Moving to 2560x1440, the averages are 166 FPS on Low, 119 FPS on Medium, 99 FPS on High, and 63 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset has a min of 101 FPS and a max of 137 FPS. This resolution offers a good balance, with High settings providing a smooth experience above 90 FPS. At 3840x2160 (4K), the performance drops significantly. The averages are 105 FPS on Low, 75 FPS on Medium, 62 FPS on High, and 40 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset shows a min of 64 FPS and a max of 87 FPS. This data clearly shows that 4K is only viable with Low or Medium settings for a consistent 60+ FPS experience.

The data also reveals the performance cost of each settings tier. At 1080p, moving from Low to Ultra costs 141 FPS on average. At 1440p, that cost is 103 FPS. At 4K, the cost is 65 FPS. This indicates that the absolute performance penalty of Ultra settings decreases as resolution increases, but the relative impact becomes more severe, as the frame rates at 4K are already low. The frame time consistency, as seen in the min/max figures for Medium, suggests that the experience is generally stable without major stutters.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to achieve a consistent 60 FPS?

A: The data shows that at 2560x1440 on High settings, the combo averages 99 FPS, and at 3840x2160 on Medium, it averages 75 FPS. For a locked 60 FPS experience, 1440p High or 4K Medium are the most demanding options that still meet this target.

*Q: How does the combo rank in performance for Undisputed?*

A: This specific CPU and GPU combination ranks 2008 out of 2813 tested combos for the game. This places it in the lower half of all configurations, indicating that while it is not a top-tier performer, it is also not the weakest.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the main bottleneck for this game?

A: The benchmark results indicate the GPU is the limiting component. The frame rate drops significantly as resolution increases from 1080p to 4K, which is a classic sign of GPU limitation, while the CPU has a high performance percentile.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves an average of 229 FPS, while the Ultra preset achieves an average of 88 FPS. This is a difference of 141 FPS, showing a major performance cost for maximum visual quality.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: Yes, but with limitations. At 4K, the combo averages 105 FPS on Low settings and 75 FPS on Medium. However, on Ultra settings, the average drops to just 40 FPS, making it unplayable for smooth gameplay.

Q: How does the RTX 2060 SUPER's performance compare to its closest rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score is 18093, which is 0.4% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile and 0.5% lower than the AMD Radeon Pro 5700. It is 1.5% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 460 and 1.6% slower than the Intel Arc A770M.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is a powerhouse processor, and its specifications suggest it should not be a limiting factor in Undisputed. With 20 cores and 20 threads, a base clock of 2.40 GHz, and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, it has immense processing power for gaming. Its 30 MB of shared L3 cache is ample for game logic and physics calculations. The CPU's performance percentile of 93 indicates it outperforms 93% of all CPUs in the database, and its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42216 confirms its high multi-threaded capability.

The benchmark data supports the theory that the CPU is not the bottleneck. At 1080p Low, the frame rate of 229 FPS is exceptionally high, suggesting the CPU is capable of feeding frames to the GPU at a rapid rate. If the CPU were the limiting factor, we would expect to see similar frame rates across different resolutions, as the CPU's workload would not change. However, the frame rates drop consistently with increasing resolution, proving the GPU is the one struggling to keep up.

The CPU's role is to prepare frames for the GPU, and it does so with ease in this title. Its nearest rivals, such as the AMD EPYC 4464P and Intel Core Ultra 7 265F, have average scores that differ by less than 1%, indicating that this level of CPU performance is more than sufficient for the game. The data shows that the processor is a capable partner, but its potential is largely untapped due to the GPU's limitations. A user looking to improve performance should look to upgrade the graphics card, not the CPU.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend heavily on the user's target resolution and refresh rate. For a high-refresh-rate 1080p monitor, the High preset is an excellent choice. It delivers an average of 136 FPS, which is smooth and responsive for a sports title. The Ultra preset, at 88 FPS, is also playable but offers diminishing returns for the 48 FPS cost. The Low preset at 229 FPS is only necessary for the most competitive players who prioritize maximum frame rate above all else.

At 1440p, the Medium preset is the sweet spot. It provides an average of 119 FPS with a minimum of 101 FPS, ensuring a consistently smooth experience. The High preset, at 99 FPS, is also a strong option for those who want slightly better visuals. The Ultra preset at 63 FPS is usable, but it may feel less fluid, and the High settings offer a better balance of quality and performance.

For 4K gaming, the user must make significant sacrifices. The Medium preset is the highest quality option that maintains a comfortable frame rate, averaging 75 FPS with a minimum of 64 FPS. The High preset at 62 FPS is on the edge of playability, and the Ultra preset at 40 FPS should be avoided for any serious gameplay. The Low preset, while fast at 105 FPS, will look noticeably less detailed. The data suggests that the best experience for this combo is to play at 1440p with High settings or 4K with Medium settings, depending on whether the user prioritizes smoothness or resolution.