Undisputed

Undisputed, a sports title released on 2023-10-10, has a measured FPS dataset for the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile. The CPU was released on 2023-12-13 with a launch MSRP of $503, while the GPU launched on 2023-01-02. The dataset covers three resolutions and four settings tiers, and the combo is listed at rank 2014 of 3718 tested combinations.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is a mobile processor from the Core Ultra Series 1, built on Intel's Meteor Lake architecture at a 7 nm process node. It has 16 cores and 22 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The package is Intel BGA 2049, the TDP is 28 W, and the chip uses Intel as its foundry. Cache is organized as 112 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. Memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU also includes integrated Arc Xe-LPG graphics with 128 execution units, and it is marked as a mobile market segment part.

In synthetic CPU benchmarks, the Core Ultra 7 155H produces a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15028 and a single-core score of 1743. Its Cinebench R20 scores are 8754 multicore and 1235 single-core, while Cinebench R15 results are 2450 multicore and 255 single-core. PassMark results include a multithread score of 24873, a single-thread score of 3468, integer math at 86870, floating point math at 63703, and data compression at 277353. Its average benchmark score is 32697, and it sits at the 83rd percentile against all CPUs.

The nearest rival list for the CPU includes four parts with very close average scores. The Intel Core i5-14600T has an average score of 32707 and a deltaPct of 0. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 32662 with a deltaPct of 0.1. The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F scores 32750 with a deltaPct of -0.2. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32812 with a deltaPct of -0.4. These deltaPct values are all within a fraction of a point, meaning the Core Ultra 7 155H is positioned in a tightly grouped performance band.

How does this relate to Undisputed's measured results? The highest average frame rate in the entire dataset is 271 fps at 1920x1080 Low. That is a very high output for a mobile processor, and it appears while the GPU is being asked to do less work at the lowest settings tier. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 1743 in Cinebench R23 and its PassMark single-thread score of 3468 help explain why the combo can reach such high frame rates at low resolution. The CPU-side foundation does not appear to cap the frame rate at the low end of the GPU workload.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is part of the GeForce 40-series, using the AD106 chip with the Ada Lovelace architecture. It is built by TSMC on a 5 nm process, with 22,900 million transistors and a die size of 188 mm². The GPU has a base clock of 1395 MHz and a boost clock of 1695 MHz. Memory is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, with a memory clock of 2000 MHz and 16 Gbps effective speed, yielding 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The TDP is 115 W, and the interface is PCIe 4.0 x8. The GPU's display outputs are listed as portable device dependent, and it is designed as an integrated graphics package for mobile systems.

The shader configuration is substantial for a mobile part: 4608 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. It also includes 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores. The pixel rate is 81.36 GPixel/s, the texture rate is 244.1 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance is 15.62 TFLOPS. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. In synthetic GPU workloads, the RTX 4070 Mobile scores 109197 in Geekbench OpenCL and 108367 in Geekbench Vulkan. PassMark results include a G3D score of 19587, a G2D score of 763, GPU compute at 8399, DirectX 9 at 223, DirectX 10 at 116, DirectX 11 at 179, and DirectX 12 at 85. Its average benchmark score is 27435, placing it at the 73rd percentile against all GPUs.

The nearest GPU rivals are also closely matched. The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT has an average score of 27425 and a deltaPct of 0. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 scores 27565 with a deltaPct of -0.5. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell scores 27135 with a deltaPct of 1.1. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 scores 27839 with a deltaPct of -1.5. This places the RTX 4070 Mobile in a performance neighborhood that includes both desktop and pro mobile parts, despite its mobile form factor.

In Undisputed, the GPU role is most visible at high resolution and high settings. The measured 4K Ultra average is 48 fps, the lowest value recorded for this combo. At 4K Medium, the average rises to 89 fps, and at 4K Low it reaches 124 fps. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth are the GPU-side specifications that scale most directly with resolution demands. The dataset shows a clear relationship: raising resolution while keeping settings fixed produces a consistent frame-rate drop, which is the signature of increasing GPU workload.

FAQ

Q: What is the combo's rank in Undisputed, and how many tested combinations appear in the database?

A: The comboRankInGame field lists rank 2014 of 3718 tested combos. That places this pairing below the midpoint of the overall leaderboard in this game.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The Core Ultra 7 155H has an average benchmark score of 32697. The nearest rivals are the Intel Core i5-14600T at 32707 with deltaPct 0, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 at 32662 with deltaPct 0.1, the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F at 32750 with deltaPct -0.2, and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H at 32812 with deltaPct -0.4.

Q: How does the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The RTX 4070 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 27435. The nearest GPU rival is the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT at 27425 with deltaPct 0. Also close are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 at 27565 with deltaPct -0.5, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell at 27135 with deltaPct 1.1, and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 at 27839 with deltaPct -1.5.

Q: What average frame rates does this combo produce at 4K across settings?

A: At 3840x2160, the measured averages are 124 fps on Low, 89 fps on Medium, 74 fps on High, and 48 fps on Ultra. The Medium row also includes a minimum of 76 fps and a maximum of 103 fps.

Q: Which settings rows include min/max FPS data?

A: Only the Medium preset rows include min and max values. At 1920x1080 Medium, the min is 166 and the max is 225. At 2560x1440 Medium, the min is 120 and the max is 162. At 3840x2160 Medium, the min is 76 and the max is 103. The Low, High, and Ultra rows have no recorded min/max values in the dataset.

Q: What is the highest measured average FPS in the dataset?

A: The highest average FPS is 271, recorded at 1920x1080 with Low settings. The second-highest is 196 at 2560x1440 Low, and the third-highest is 195 at 1920x1080 Medium.

How This Combo Ranks

The in-game combo rank is 2014, and the database contains 3718 tested combos. This is a central placement rather than a top-tier one. The CPU holds an 83rd percentile position against all CPUs, and the GPU holds a 73rd percentile position against all GPUs. Both component percentiles are above the midpoint of their respective distributions, yet the combined rank in Undisputed sits near the middle of the tested field.

That difference is informative. Synthetic component averages do not always map directly to a specific game's measured results. The CPU's nearest rivals are all within a deltaPct range of -0.4 to 0.1, and the GPU's nearest rivals are within -1.5 to 1.1. Those are tight clusterings, so small shifts in game optimization or driver behavior can move a combo several positions in the ranking. In this game, the combo's rank of 2014 suggests that the pairing is neither a standout nor a weak performer; it lands among the many mid-pack combinations.

The measured FPS data supports that interpretation. The combo is capable of 271 fps at 1080p Low, but it also drops to 48 fps at 4K Ultra. A combo that sat near the top of the overall ranking would likely produce higher minimum returns at the most demanding preset. Instead, the measured data shows a wide spread from low settings to ultra settings, and it is that spread that pushes the rank toward the middle of the field.

Settings Recommendations

The measured rows provide a clear view of how each preset behaves. At 1920x1080, the average FPS values are 271 on Low, 195 on Medium, 162 on High, and 104 on Ultra. At 2560x1440, they are 196 on Low, 141 on Medium, 117 on High, and 75 on Ultra. At 3840x2160, they are 124 on Low, 89 on Medium, 74 on High, and 48 on Ultra.

Medium stands out as the most balanced preset in the dataset. It is the only settings tier that delivers 89 fps at 4K while also maintaining 141 fps at 1440p and 195 fps at 1080p. The Medium rows are also the only ones with min/max data, and those values are solid: 166 to 225 at 1080p, 120 to 162 at 1440p, and 76 to 103 at 4K. That gives the preset a known floor in the measured data, rather than an unquantified minimum.

Low produces the highest frame rates at every resolution, reaching 271 fps at 1080p and 124 fps at 4K. For users who prioritize maximum performance over visual fidelity, Low is the clear choice in this dataset. High sits between Medium and Ultra, with 162 fps at 1080p, 117 fps at 1440p, and 74 fps at 4K. Ultra is playable at 1080p with 104 fps, but it falls to 75 fps at 1440p and 48 fps at 4K. The data suggests that Medium is the best trade-off for users who want a settings tier above Low while keeping 4K above the level delivered by High or Ultra.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The full measured matrix for this combo is shown below. All values are average FPS unless labeled as min or max. Only Medium rows have min and max values in the dataset.

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

|---|---|---|---|---|

| 3840x2160 | High | 74 | — | — |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 124 | — | — |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 89 | 76 | 103 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 48 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | High | 117 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 196 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 141 | 120 | 162 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 75 | — | — |

| 1920x1080 | High | 162 | — | — |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 271 | — | — |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 195 | 166 | 225 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 104 | — | — |

The shape of the dataset is consistent: average FPS decreases as settings are raised and as resolution increases. The strongest result is 271 fps at 1080p Low, and the weakest is 48 fps at 4K Ultra. The Medium rows provide the only complete min/max picture, and those min values never fall below 76 fps across all three resolutions.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS progression from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 to 3840x2160 shows a steady drop at every settings tier. On Low, the measured averages are 271, then 196, then 124. On Medium, they are 195, then 141, then 89. On High, they are 162, then 117, then 74. On Ultra, they are 104, then 75, then 48. The Medium min values follow the same direction: 166 at 1080p, 120 at 1440p, and 76 at 4K.

One notable point in the data is that 4K Low, at 124 fps, is still higher than 1080p Ultra, at 104 fps. This means the settings tier has a significant effect even when resolution is quadrupled in pixel count. It also indicates that the combo retains substantial headroom when the GPU is not pushed to its maximum visual workload.

The frame-rate scaling points to the GPU as the limiting component at the high end. The CPU's synthetic percentile is 83, while the GPU's is 73. The largest FPS drops occur when both resolution and settings rise, which is the portion of the workload that stresses the GPU's memory interface and shading resources. The GPU specification includes 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, a 128-bit bus, and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth, and the lowest measured result in the dataset is 48 fps at 4K Ultra. By contrast, the 1080p Low result of 271 fps shows that when the GPU load is light, the combo can produce very high frame rates. The resolution scaling behavior therefore reads as a GPU-limited curve at higher presets, with the CPU still able to feed a high frame rate at the low end.