Undisputed

# Undisputed with Intel Core Ultra 5 245 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

Undisputed, the boxing simulation from 2023, demonstrates remarkably scalable performance across resolutions with this combination of Intel's Core Ultra 5 245 and NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 5080. The measured data shows a system that is overwhelmingly GPU-bound at 4K, but transitions into a more balanced workload as resolution drops, with frame rates ranging from a playable 87 FPS at 4K Ultra to a blistering 497 FPS at 1080p Low. This pairing occupies the 182nd spot out of 2813 tested combinations for this game, placing it in the top 6.5% of all tested systems, a strong showing for a sports title that rewards high refresh rate displays.

Resolution Scaling

The scaling behavior across resolutions reveals a classic GPU-bound curve, though the magnitude of the drops is unusually steep due to the sheer headroom at lower resolutions. At High settings, the average frame rate falls from 296 FPS at 1080p to 214 FPS at 1440p, a drop of 82 FPS, and then to 135 FPS at 4K, another 79 FPS decline. This progression indicates that the RTX 5080 is the dominant limiting factor at every step, with the CPU providing ample headroom even at 1080p.

The scaling factor from 1080p to 4K at High settings is 45.6% of the original frame rate, meaning 4K delivers roughly 46% of the 1080p performance. This is a significant reduction, but the absolute numbers remain high enough that the game is perfectly playable at all resolutions. At Low settings, the pattern is even more pronounced: 497 FPS at 1080p drops to 359 FPS at 1440p and then to 227 FPS at 4K. The 4K Low figure is still more than double the 1080p High result, showing that the GPU has substantial compute resources to spare when visual fidelity is reduced.

The Medium preset shows the most complete dataset, with min and max FPS recorded at all three resolutions. At 4K Medium, the average is 163 FPS with a minimum of 139 FPS and a maximum of 188 FPS, a spread of 49 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the average rises to 258 FPS with a min of 219 and max of 297, while at 1080p Medium the average reaches 357 FPS with a min of 304 and max of 411. The min-to-max spread narrows proportionally as resolution drops, suggesting that frame time consistency improves when the GPU is less saturated.

Ultra settings represent the most demanding scenario, and the scaling here is the steepest. The 4K Ultra average of 87 FPS is less than half of the 1080p Ultra result of 190 FPS. This 103 FPS difference between 1080p and 4K at Ultra settings indicates that the 4K Ultra configuration is pushing the RTX 5080 near its limits, though the 87 FPS average remains well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.

The data suggests that 1440p is the sweet spot for this combination, offering 214 FPS at High and 137 FPS at Ultra, both of which are excellent for high-refresh-rate monitors. At 4K, the High preset's 135 FPS is the recommended target for those prioritizing visual quality without sacrificing fluidity.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB203 chip, is clearly the performance driver in this configuration. Its 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus delivers 960.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which proves more than sufficient for Undisputed at any resolution tested. The memory subsystem is never the bottleneck; even at 4K Ultra, the game's demands are comfortably met by the available bandwidth.

The GPU's clock behavior shows a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2617 MHz, with memory running at 1875 MHz (30 Gbps effective). These clocks, combined with 10752 shading units and 112 ROPs, produce a pixel rate of 293.1 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 879.3 GTexel/s. For a sports title like Undisputed, which relies heavily on character models and arena environments rather than complex particle effects, these specifications translate directly into the high frame rates observed.

The RTX 5080's FP32 compute of 56.28 TFLOPS is substantial, and the 1:1 FP16 ratio of 56.28 TFLOPS indicates that the GPU can handle any compute workload the game might throw at it. The ray tracing cores (84) and tensor cores (336) are present but likely underutilized in this title, as Undisputed is not known for heavy RT effects. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) ensures full feature compatibility with the game's rendering pipeline.

In synthetic benchmarks, the RTX 5080 achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8637, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 235901, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 255450. The Passmark G3D score of 36565 places it at the 87th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Radeon 8060S (0.6% faster), the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (0.7% faster), and the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE (2.2% slower), while the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X trails by 2.3%. These margins are remarkably tight, indicating that the RTX 5080 sits in a highly competitive performance tier.

The measured FPS data reinforces the GPU's dominance. At 4K Medium, the GPU maintains a 163 FPS average with a 139 FPS minimum, showing that even in the most demanding settings, the frame rate never dips below what would be considered comfortably playable. The GPU's 360 W TDP and 750 W suggested PSU requirement are consistent with the performance delivered, though no power consumption figures are measured here.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245, with its 14 cores and 14 threads, plays a supporting role in this configuration, but an important one. Its base clock of 3.50 GHz and boost clock of 5.10 GHz provide the single-thread performance necessary to feed the RTX 5080 at high frame rates. The 24 MB of shared L3 cache and 3 MB per-core L2 cache help reduce memory latency, which is critical for maintaining consistent frame pacing in a game like Undisputed.

The CPU's benchmark scores illustrate its capabilities: a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32924 and a single-core score of 4648, a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 13828 and single-core of 1952, and a Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 3318 with a single-core of 468. The Passmark multi-thread score of 38706 and single-thread score of 4394 (also recorded as 4394 in the singlethread test) place it at the 90th percentile of all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 48995 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals: the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (0.4% faster), the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (0.5% faster), and the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H (0.6% slower), while the Intel Core i5-14600K trails by 0.8%.

In the context of Undisputed, the CPU's role becomes more apparent at lower resolutions where the GPU has less work to do. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 497 FPS, a frame rate that demands excellent single-thread performance to avoid CPU bottlenecks. The 5.10 GHz boost clock is likely the key factor here, as the game's simulation and AI logic are typically single-threaded. The 14-core configuration provides ample multi-threading headroom for background tasks, but the game itself likely doesn't scale beyond a few cores.

The Arrow Lake architecture, built on TSMC's 3 nm process, brings efficiency improvements that help maintain high boost clocks under sustained loads. The 65 W TDP is modest for a desktop CPU, and the DDR5 memory support with dual-channel configuration and 102.4 GB/s bandwidth ensures the CPU can access game data quickly. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU is present but irrelevant for gaming when a discrete GPU is installed.

At 4K resolutions, the CPU's influence diminishes significantly. The frame rate differences between the 4K presets (87 to 227 FPS) are almost entirely attributable to GPU load, with the CPU providing consistent frame delivery regardless of settings. The data suggests that Undisputed is not a CPU-intensive title at high resolutions, and the Core Ultra 5 245 has more than enough headroom to avoid becoming a limiting factor.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers exceptional performance across all presets. Low settings produce an average of 497 FPS, High settings 296 FPS, Medium 357 FPS (min 304, max 411), and Ultra 190 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 307 FPS, highlighting the dramatic impact of visual settings at this resolution. The Medium preset's 304 FPS minimum ensures that even the most demanding scenes stay well above refresh rate limits of typical 144Hz monitors.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain high but show the expected decline. Low settings average 359 FPS, High 214 FPS, Medium 258 FPS (min 219, max 297), and Ultra 137 FPS. The Ultra preset's 137 FPS is still excellent for high-refresh gaming, and the Medium preset's 219 FPS minimum provides a comfortable buffer for competitive play. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p at Low settings (497 to 359 FPS) represents a 27.8% reduction, while at Ultra settings (190 to 137 FPS) the reduction is 27.9%, showing consistent scaling across the settings spectrum.

At 3840x2160, the performance remains impressive but demands more attention to settings. Low settings average 227 FPS, High 135 FPS, Medium 163 FPS (min 139, max 188), and Ultra 87 FPS. The Ultra preset's 87 FPS is the only configuration that dips below the 100 FPS threshold, but it remains perfectly playable on a 60Hz or 120Hz display. The Medium preset's 139 FPS minimum is notable, as it shows that this setting provides a robust experience at 4K without the need for the High or Ultra presets.

The data shows a clear hierarchy: at any given resolution, Low > Medium > High > Ultra in terms of frame rate. The Medium preset consistently outperforms High by a significant margin (357 vs 296 at 1080p, 258 vs 214 at 1440p, 163 vs 135 at 4K), suggesting that High applies settings that are disproportionately expensive relative to their visual impact. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, with 4K Ultra requiring nearly 3.5 times the GPU work of 4K Low (87 vs 227 FPS).

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution to play Undisputed with this hardware?

A: Based on the measured data, 1440p offers the best balance, with 214 FPS at High settings and 137 FPS at Ultra. This provides high frame rates for smooth gameplay while maintaining visual quality. At 4K, High settings deliver 135 FPS, which is also excellent.

Q: How does the RTX 5080 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 5080's average benchmark score of 56083 places it at the 87th percentile of all GPUs. It is 0.6% slower than the AMD Radeon 8060S and 0.7% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, but 2.2% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE and 2.3% faster than the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X.

Q: Is the Core Ultra 5 245 a bottleneck at 1080p?

A: The data suggests minimal CPU limitation. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 497 FPS, which would require exceptional single-thread performance. The CPU's 5.10 GHz boost clock and 90th percentile ranking indicate it can keep pace with the GPU at all tested resolutions.

Q: What is the minimum frame rate at 4K Medium settings?

A: The 4K Medium preset records a minimum FPS of 139, with an average of 163 FPS and a maximum of 188 FPS. This ensures that even the most demanding scenes remain well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.

Q: How does this system rank among all tested combinations for Undisputed?

A: This combination ranks 182nd out of 2813 tested combos, placing it in the top 6.5% of all systems tested for this game. This is a strong result that reflects the high performance of both the CPU and GPU.

Q: Should I use the High or Medium preset at 4K?

A: The data shows Medium provides 163 FPS average compared to High's 135 FPS, a 28 FPS improvement. Given that Medium's 139 FPS minimum exceeds High's average, the Medium preset offers a more consistent experience at 4K, though both are excellent.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data provides clear guidance for optimizing the Undisputed experience with this hardware. At 4K, the Medium preset is the recommended choice, delivering a 163 FPS average with a 139 FPS minimum. This provides a substantial performance buffer over the 60 FPS threshold while maintaining good visual quality. The High preset at 135 FPS is also viable, but the 28 FPS difference between Medium and High suggests that the visual upgrade may not justify the performance cost.

For users with 1440p high-refresh displays (144Hz or higher), the Ultra preset at 137 FPS is the optimal selection. This configuration still exceeds 130 FPS, making it suitable for competitive play while offering the highest visual fidelity. The High preset at 214 FPS is the better choice for 240Hz displays, as the frame rate comfortably exceeds the refresh rate ceiling. The Medium preset at 258 FPS is overkill for most monitors but provides maximum headroom for any future demands.

At 1080p, the Ultra preset at 190 FPS is the recommended choice for 144Hz displays, offering the best visual quality while maintaining a frame rate well above the refresh rate. For 240Hz displays, the High preset at 296 FPS is appropriate, as it provides a significant margin over the refresh rate. The Medium preset at 357 FPS is only necessary for 360Hz displays, while the Low preset at 497 FPS is excessive for any current display technology.

The pattern across all resolutions is consistent: Medium provides the best performance-to-quality ratio when frame rates are critical, while Ultra is viable when the display's refresh rate allows for the reduced headroom. The RTX 5080's 16 GB of VRAM and 960.0 GB/s bandwidth ensure that even the Ultra preset at 4K does not encounter memory limitations, though the 87 FPS average suggests this is the ceiling for this configuration. For the smoothest possible experience, the Medium preset at 4K or the Ultra preset at 1440p represent the optimal choices based on the measured data.