Undisputed

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 combination delivers a remarkably consistent experience in Undisputed, but the data reveals a distinct performance ceiling dictated by the GPU at higher resolutions. The benchmark results show a system that is overwhelmingly capable at 1080p and 1440p, offering high refresh rate performance, but which requires careful settings management to maintain playability at 4K. This pairing sits in the 1214th position out of 2813 tested combos, placing it in the upper-middle tier of all configurations, a rank that accurately reflects its strong 1080p and 1440p pedigree and its more moderate 4K capabilities.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K in Undisputed clearly illustrates the shifting bottleneck between the CPU and GPU. At 1080p with Low settings, the system produces a massive 290 FPS average, a figure that is clearly CPU-limited, as the graphics card has ample headroom. Moving to 1440p at the same Low settings drops the average to 209 FPS, and at 4K it falls further to 132 FPS. This scaling pattern—a 28% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a 37% drop from 1440p to 4K—indicates that while the CPU is the primary limiter at the lowest resolution, the GPU begins to take on a more significant role as pixel count increases.

The scaling becomes even more pronounced when examining the High preset. At 1080p High, the system averages 172 FPS. This falls to 125 FPS at 1440p, a 27% reduction, and then plummets to 79 FPS at 4K, a 37% reduction from the 1440p result. The percentage drop from 1440p to 4K is nearly identical to that seen at Low settings, confirming that the RTX 5060's rendering capabilities are the primary constraint at 4K. The data suggests that the transition from 1080p to 1440p is relatively painless, but the jump to 4K introduces a significant performance penalty that is consistent across multiple quality presets.

The most telling evidence of the GPU's influence comes from the Ultra preset, where the demands on the graphics card are highest. At 1080p Ultra, the average FPS is 111. At 1440p Ultra, it drops to 80 FPS, and at 4K Ultra, it falls to just 51 FPS. This represents a 54% performance loss from 1080p to 4K at Ultra settings, a much steeper decline than the 45% loss seen at Low settings. This disparity proves that the RTX 5060 is the limiting factor at higher resolutions and quality settings, with its 8 GB of VRAM and 128-bit memory interface struggling to maintain throughput as the workload becomes more graphically intensive. The 4K Ultra result, at just 51 FPS, is the only measured configuration that falls below the 60 FPS threshold, highlighting the need for settings adjustment at this resolution.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 plays a crucial, yet secondary, role in this pairing's performance in Undisputed. With 10 cores and 10 threads operating at a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, the processor provides a solid foundation for the game's simulation and physics calculations. Its performance in synthetic benchmarks, such as a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25891 and a single-core score of 3655, places it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, indicating that it has ample processing power to avoid becoming a bottleneck in most scenarios.

The CPU's influence is most apparent at 1080p with Low settings, where the 290 FPS average suggests that the processor is feeding frames to the GPU as fast as possible. In this scenario, the game's engine is likely limited by the CPU's single-thread performance, which is reflected in the Passmark single-thread score of 4412. However, as resolution and graphical fidelity increase, the CPU's role diminishes. The consistent frame rate drops observed when moving from Low to Ultra settings at the same resolution are a direct result of the GPU taking over as the primary performance limiter.

The data shows that the Core Ultra 5 225 is more than sufficient for this game. Its nearest rivals, including the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F with a deltaPct of 0 and the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D with a deltaPct of -0.2, demonstrate that it is on par with other mid-range processors. The CPU's 20 MB of shared L3 cache and support for DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s provide the necessary data throughput for a smooth gaming experience. In Undisputed, a game that relies on responsive controls and consistent frame pacing, this CPU ensures that the GPU is never starved of data, even in complex gameplay moments.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is the defining component of this combination, and its characteristics directly shape the frame rate results across all settings. The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. Its base clock of 2280 MHz and boost clock of 2497 MHz, combined with 3840 shading units, allow it to deliver a measured average FPS that scales predictably with resolution and settings. The benchmark results show that this GPU is the primary constraint at 4K, where the demands on memory bandwidth and pixel throughput become critical.

The RTX 5060's performance in Undisputed is consistent with its position in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT with a deltaPct of 1.2, and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary with a deltaPct of -0.8, indicating that it sits in a competitive performance tier. However, the 8 GB VRAM capacity is a potential concern for a modern title at 4K Ultra settings, where texture data can easily exceed this limit. The 51 FPS average at 4K Ultra suggests that the GPU is not only limited by raw compute power but also potentially by memory capacity and bandwidth.

The GPU's architecture, Blackwell 2.0, is built on a 5nm process at TSMC, and its 21,900 million transistors are packed into a 181 mm² die. This efficiency is reflected in its power consumption, with a TDP of 145 W, making it a manageable card for most systems. The data shows that the RTX 5060 is well-suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it can easily maintain high frame rates. At 1080p High, the 172 FPS average is more than sufficient for a smooth experience, and even at 1440p High, the 125 FPS average provides a responsive feel. The GPU's limitations only become apparent at 4K, where users must compromise on settings to achieve playable frame rates.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combination provides a comprehensive picture of its performance across nine distinct configurations. At 1920x1080, the system is exceptionally fast. With Low settings, it achieves a peak average of 290 FPS, which drops to 208 FPS on Medium (with a minimum of 177 FPS and a maximum of 240 FPS), 172 FPS on High, and 111 FPS on Ultra. These figures show that even at the highest settings, the system is well above the 60 FPS threshold, making 1080p a non-issue for this hardware.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but shows the expected decline. The Low preset delivers a 209 FPS average, while Medium produces 151 FPS (with a min of 128 FPS and a max of 173 FPS). High settings yield a 125 FPS average, which is still excellent for competitive play. The Ultra preset drops to an 80 FPS average, which remains playable but indicates that the GPU is starting to work harder. The consistency of these results, with no major frame drops reported for the Medium preset, suggests a stable experience at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the system's limitations become evident. The Low preset still manages a solid 132 FPS average, showing that the GPU can handle the pixel count when graphical effects are minimal. Medium settings reduce this to 95 FPS (with a min of 81 FPS and a max of 110 FPS), which is still a good experience. However, High settings drop to a 79 FPS average, and Ultra falls to just 51 FPS. The 51 FPS at 4K Ultra is the only measured result below 60 FPS, indicating that this is the breaking point for the combination. The data suggests that for a consistent 60+ FPS experience at 4K, users should stick to Medium settings, while High is acceptable if they can tolerate occasional dips below 60 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

In the grand scheme of tested hardware combinations, the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 pairing ranks 1214th out of 2813 combos. This places it in the 43rd percentile of all tested systems, a respectable position for a mid-range configuration. The rank reflects the system's strong performance at mainstream resolutions while acknowledging its limitations at the high end. It is a combination that will satisfy the majority of gamers, but it is not designed to be a top-tier 4K powerhouse.

The ranking suggests that this pairing offers a balanced experience, where the CPU and GPU are well-matched for 1080p and 1440p gaming. The fact that it sits above the median of all tested combos indicates that it outperforms a majority of systems, which is a positive sign for users considering this hardware. The specific rank of 1214 out of 2813 means that there are 1213 combinations that perform better, likely featuring higher-end GPUs or more powerful CPUs, but there are also 1599 combinations that perform worse. This places the combo in a strong position for its intended use case, which is high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p, with the occasional foray into 4K at lower settings.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combination depend heavily on the target resolution. For 1920x1080, the Ultra preset, with an average of 111 FPS, is the clear choice for the best visual experience without sacrificing playability. The High preset at 172 FPS is a good alternative for those who prioritize frame rate over visual fidelity, but the system has enough headroom at this resolution to run the game at its maximum settings.

At 2560x1440, the High preset provides an excellent balance, delivering a 125 FPS average that is smooth and responsive. The Ultra preset, at 80 FPS, is also viable for users who want the best graphics, as it remains above the 60 FPS threshold. However, for a more consistent high-refresh-rate experience, the Medium preset at 151 FPS is the safest bet. It offers a significant frame rate boost over High while maintaining a high level of visual quality. The Low preset at 209 FPS is only recommended for competitive play where maximum frame rate is the sole priority.

For 3840x2160, the settings must be chosen carefully. The Medium preset, with an average of 95 FPS and a minimum of 81 FPS, is the recommended choice for a smooth and visually appealing experience. The High preset at 79 FPS is acceptable, but the lower minimum frame rates could lead to occasional stutters. The Ultra preset at 51 FPS is not recommended, as it falls below the standard playability threshold. The Low preset at 132 FPS is viable for those who want high frame rates at 4K but are willing to sacrifice visual quality. Ultimately, Medium settings at 4K offer the best overall experience, providing a stable frame rate that stays well above 60 FPS while still delivering a detailed image.