Undisputed

The Intel Core i5-14400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 ranks 730th out of 1580 tested combos in Undisputed. This places the configuration in the upper-middle tier of the database, meaning it outperforms a majority of tested systems while still leaving headroom above it. The combo’s standing is reinforced by the individual component percentiles: the CPU sits at the 88th percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands at the 72nd percentile among all graphics cards. These figures suggest a balanced pairing where the processor carries slightly more relative weight than the graphics card. The measured frame rates across all settings and resolutions confirm that this is not a marginal setup; it consistently delivers playable performance, and at lower settings it pushes well beyond typical display refresh rates.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s rank of 730 out of 1580 tested combinations places it in the 46th percentile of all pairings, slightly below the median but far from the bottom tier. This positioning is largely driven by the RTX 3070, which, while capable, sits at the 72nd percentile among GPUs and trails its nearest rivals by narrow margins. According to the data, the RTX 3070’s average benchmark score of 28238 is within 1% of the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (27985) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti (27956), and it is only 0.6% behind the AMD FirePro S7150 (28409). This clustering indicates that the GPU is competitive with a specific performance bracket, but it does not dominate its peers. The CPU, by contrast, is a stronger asset: the i5-14400F’s average benchmark score of 32508 places it nearly identical to the Intel Core i7-12800H (32513), AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 (32446), and AMD Ryzen 7 250 (32584), with deltas of 0% to 0.2%. This means the processor is well-matched against mobile and desktop chips from recent generations, giving the combo a solid foundation for gaming workloads.

In practical terms, the rank reflects a system that can handle Undisputed smoothly at most settings, but it is not optimized for the highest visual fidelity at 4K. The measured FPS data shows that the combo’s performance scales predictably with resolution and settings, and the rank captures this mid-tier positioning. For a sports title like Undisputed, where frame rate consistency matters more than absolute graphical extremes, this rank suggests the combo is a reasonable but not exceptional choice.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data provides clear guidance on which preset delivers the best experience. At 1080p, the Ultra preset yields an average of 116.8 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, but High (183.7 FPS) and Medium (223.9 FPS) offer substantially higher headroom. The Low preset reaches 310.6 FPS, but this comes at the cost of visual quality that may not be necessary for a sports game. At 1440p, the Ultra preset drops to 87.1 FPS, still playable, but High (131.4 FPS) and Medium (159.5 FPS) provide a more comfortable margin above refresh rate targets. At 4K, the situation changes: Ultra falls to 54.3 FPS, which is below the ideal for fast-paced action, while High (81.8 FPS) and Medium (105.2 FPS) maintain playable rates.

The best experience per the data is the High preset at 1440p, delivering 131.4 FPS. This choice balances visual fidelity with performance, staying well above 60 FPS and avoiding the steep drop seen at Ultra. At 1080p, High is also excellent, but the resolution scaling section shows diminishing returns beyond that. For users with 4K displays, Medium at 105.2 FPS is the recommended compromise, as it keeps frame rates fluid without sacrificing too much detail. The Ultra preset is only advisable at 1080p, where the 116.8 FPS average remains acceptable, but it is the weakest option at higher resolutions.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K reveals the limiting component in this combo. At High settings, the average FPS falls from 183.7 at 1080p to 131.4 at 1440p, then to 81.8 at 4K. This represents a 55% reduction from 1080p to 4K, which is a typical pattern for a GPU-bound scenario. The RTX 3070’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p, but at 4K the workload increases sharply, and the frame rate drops accordingly. The Low preset shows a similar trend: 310.6 FPS at 1080p, 223.7 FPS at 1440p, and 140.9 FPS at 4K. The percentage drop from 1080p to 4K is 55% at Low, matching the High preset’s scaling.

This consistent scaling indicates the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions. The CPU, with its 10 cores and 16 threads, has ample headroom to feed the GPU at 1080p, as evidenced by the very high frame rates at Low settings (310.6 FPS). At 4K, the GPU’s raw compute limits the output, not the processor. The data supports this: the RTX 3070’s FP32 performance of 20.31 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 165.6 GPixel/s are moderate by current standards, and the 4K Ultra result of 54.3 FPS shows the card struggling under maximum load. The i5-14400F’s boost clock of 4.70 GHz and single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3093) are strong, but they are not the limiting factor here.

FAQ

Q: What is the combo’s overall rank in Undisputed?

A: The combo ranks 730th out of 1580 tested combinations, placing it in the upper-middle tier of the database.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gameplay?

A: The High preset at 1440p delivers 131.4 FPS average, which is the best balance of visual quality and performance for that resolution.

Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming?

A: Yes, but only at lower presets. At 4K High, it averages 81.8 FPS, while Ultra drops to 54.3 FPS, so Medium (105.2 FPS) is the recommended setting for 4K.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i5-14400F’s average benchmark score of 32508 is within 0.2% of the Intel Core i7-12800H (32513), AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 (32446), and AMD Ryzen 7 250 (32584).

Q: How does the GPU compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT?

A: The RTX 3070’s average benchmark score of 28238 is 0.9% higher than the RX 6600 XT’s 27985, indicating nearly identical performance.

Q: What is the limiting factor at 4K resolution?

A: The GPU is the bottleneck at 4K, as the FPS drops from 183.7 at 1080p High to 81.8 at 4K High, while the CPU has sufficient headroom.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is the primary driver of frame rates in this combo, and its specifications explain the measured results. The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is adequate for 1080p and 1440p but becomes a constraint at 4K, where the frame rate drops significantly. The boost clock of 1725 MHz and base clock of 1500 MHz are standard for the Ampere architecture, and the 5888 shading units provide the compute power for modern titles. The FP32 performance of 20.31 TFLOPS is competitive within its class, as shown by the passmark G3D score of 22214, which places the GPU at the 72nd percentile among all graphics cards.

The GPU’s nearest rivals illustrate its position: the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT scores 27985, just 0.9% lower, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti scores 27956, 1% lower. This tight grouping means the RTX 3070 is not a standout performer, but it holds its own. The measured FPS data reflects this: at 1080p High, the GPU delivers 183.7 FPS, which is excellent, but at 4K Ultra, it drops to 54.3 FPS, showing the card’s limits under maximum load. The 220 W TDP and suggested 550 W PSU indicate a power-hungry component, but the data does not include power draw metrics, so no further claims can be made. The RTX 3070’s end-of-life status and release date of 2020-08-31 suggest it is a previous-generation part, but its performance remains relevant for this game.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-14400F provides the computational foundation for this combo, and its specifications align with the measured frame rates. The CPU has 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. This configuration is well-suited for gaming, as the high boost clock supports single-threaded performance, while the multi-core design handles background tasks. The Cinebench R23 scores of 21914 (multi-core) and 3093 (single-core) place the CPU at the 88th percentile among all processors, which is a strong showing. The Geekbench single-core score of 2333 and multi-core score of 11209 further confirm its capability.

The CPU’s nearest rivals are all within 0.2% of its average benchmark score of 32508, indicating that the i5-14400F is a well-balanced mid-range processor. The 20 MB shared L3 cache and dual-channel memory support for DDR4 and DDR5 contribute to its efficiency, though the data does not specify memory bandwidth. In Undisputed, the CPU’s role is less prominent than the GPU’s, as evidenced by the resolution scaling: at 1080p Low, the combo hits 310.6 FPS, which suggests the CPU can feed the GPU at very high rates. The 4.70 GHz boost clock is key here, as it ensures that the processor does not bottleneck the GPU at lower resolutions. The launch MSRP of $196 positions it as a mainstream option, and its 65 W TDP indicates moderate power consumption, but the data does not include power draw measurements.