Undisputed

The Intel Core i5-14400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 combination ranks 2014th out of 3718 tested combos in Undisputed, placing it in the 54th percentile of all configurations. This mid-pack standing reflects a pairing where the GPU’s 61st percentile ranking among all GPUs is partially offset by the CPU’s stronger 83rd percentile position, resulting in a system that sits slightly above the median for this boxing title. The data indicates that while this combo is not at the top tier for competitive play, it remains a competent choice for the vast majority of scenarios, with the measured frames per second (FPS) showing it can handle most settings without falling into unplayable territory.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s rank of 2014 out of 3718 places it squarely in the middle of the distribution, which is a meaningful data point when interpreting its performance envelope. In percentile terms, this means roughly 54% of tested combos outperform it, while 46% deliver lower average FPS in Undisputed. This positioning is largely consistent with the RTX 4060’s own percentileVsAllGpus score of 61, suggesting the GPU is the primary limiter in most scenarios. However, the CPU’s percentileVsAllCpus of 83 indicates that the i5-14400F has headroom to spare, meaning the bottleneck is clearly on the graphics side.

When comparing the RTX 4060 to its nearest rivals in the database, the deltaPct values are remarkably tight. The AMD Radeon HD 7790 sits just 0.2% higher in average benchmark score, while the AMD Radeon 780M is 0.3% lower. The AMD Radeon Pro 560 and Pro 460 are 0.5% and 0.7% lower, respectively. These sub-1% differences suggest that the RTX 4060’s raw compute performance is essentially interchangeable with these older or integrated-class parts in synthetic tests, but the measured FPS in Undisputed tells a different story, as the game’s specific demands favor the 4060’s architecture.

On the CPU side, the i5-14400F’s nearest rivals show similarly small deltas. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U is 0.1% higher, the Intel Core i9-11900 is 0.2% higher, and the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS is 0.2% lower. The Intel Core i7-12800H is 0.5% higher. These tiny margins mean that from a pure processing standpoint, swapping the i5-14400F for any of these alternatives would produce nearly identical CPU-bound performance, reinforcing that the choice of graphics card matters far more for Undisputed.

The combo’s overall rank is not a verdict on playability, however. As the measured FPS breakdown will show, this system achieves playable frame rates at nearly every resolution and settings combination tested, with only the 4K Ultra preset dipping below 50 FPS. The rank of 2014 should therefore be read as a statement about relative headroom and future-proofing rather than an absolute quality measure, as the data indicates this pairing can deliver a smooth experience for most users.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best resolution to run Undisputed with this combo?*

A: Based on the measured FPS, 1920x1080 at High settings delivers 162 FPS, while 2560x1440 at High drops to 117 FPS. For a balance of visual fidelity and performance, 2560x1440 at High is the sweet spot, as it remains well above the 60 FPS threshold.

*Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Undisputed?*

A: Yes, but with caveats. At 4K High settings, the average FPS is 74, which is playable. However, 4K Ultra drops to 48 FPS, which falls below the ideal smoothness threshold for fast-paced action. The data suggests sticking to High or Medium at 4K.

Q: How does the RTX 4060 compare to its closest rivals in this game?

A: The measured FPS for the RTX 4060 shows it delivers strong results, but the nearest rival data indicates synthetic scores are within 0.7% of parts like the Radeon Pro 560. In practice, the 4060’s 8 GB VRAM and modern architecture likely provide better real-world scaling, but the database does not list rival FPS values for Undisputed.

Q: Is the Intel Core i5-14400F a bottleneck for the RTX 4060?

A: The data suggests no. The CPU’s percentileVsAllCpus of 83 is significantly higher than the GPU’s 61, and its multi-core benchmark score of 21645 in Cinebench R23 indicates ample processing power. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 271 FPS, showing the CPU is not limiting even at lower settings.

Q: What settings preset gives the highest FPS at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset yields 196 FPS, Medium yields 141 FPS, High yields 117 FPS, and Ultra yields 75 FPS. If raw frame rate is the goal, Low is the clear winner, but High offers a better visual experience with still-excellent performance.

Q: Does the combo’s 2014th rank mean it is a poor choice?

A: No. The rank is relative to all 3718 combos, which includes far more powerful (and expensive) configurations. The measured FPS shows the combo is capable of 60+ FPS at 4K High, which is a solid achievement for any mid-range system.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-14400F brings 10 cores and 16 threads to the table, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. This configuration is part of the Raptor Lake-R architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process, and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. For Undisputed, a sports title that relies on physics calculations and AI opponent behavior, these specifications are more than sufficient, as the game is not known for being CPU-intensive in the same way as strategy or simulation titles.

The CPU’s benchmark results reinforce its capability. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645 and single-core score of 3055 indicate strong all-around performance, while its Geekbench multi-core score of 11268 and single-core score of 2058 show similar strength. The Passmark multithread score of 25470 and single-thread score of 3701 further confirm that the i5-14400F can handle both heavily threaded workloads and the single-threaded tasks that often dominate game logic. The data shows that in Undisputed, the CPU’s role is to feed the GPU with consistent frame data, and its 83rd percentile ranking among all CPUs means it will rarely be the limiting factor.

The fact that the CPU has a 20 MB shared L3 cache and 1.25 MB L2 per core helps with game asset streaming and reducing memory latency, which can be beneficial in fast-paced sports games where quick reaction times matter. The 65 W TDP and Intel Socket 1700 compatibility make it a straightforward choice for mainstream builds, and its release date of January 2024 places it as a current-generation part. The launch MSRP of $196 positions it as a mid-tier processor, but the measured FPS shows it punches above its weight when paired with a capable GPU.

In practical terms, the CPU’s performance headroom is evident when examining the FPS at lower settings. At 1080p Low, the combo reaches 271 FPS, which is far beyond the refresh rate of most monitors. This indicates that even in scenarios where the GPU has less work to do, the CPU can keep up without causing frame drops. The i5-14400F’s boost clock of 4.70 GHz provides the single-thread speed needed for game physics, while its 16 threads ensure that background tasks do not interfere with gameplay.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combo covers three resolutions (1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160) and four settings presets (Low, Medium, High, and Ultra), providing a comprehensive view of performance scaling. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers exceptional results across the board. The Low preset achieves 271 FPS, which is nearly twice the refresh rate of most gaming monitors. Medium drops to 195 FPS, still extremely high, while High comes in at 162 FPS. Even the most demanding Ultra preset maintains 104 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but shows the expected decline. Low settings yield 196 FPS, Medium produces 141 FPS, and High manages 117 FPS. The Ultra preset falls to 75 FPS, which still provides a smooth experience for most users, though those with high-refresh-rate 1440p monitors may need to adjust settings. The Medium preset at 1440p shows a minimum FPS of 120 and a maximum of 162, indicating stable frame times with no significant dips.

At 3840x2160, the data reveals the GPU’s limitations more clearly. The Low preset achieves 124 FPS, which is surprisingly high for 4K and suggests that Undisputed is not particularly demanding at lower visual quality. Medium drops to 89 FPS with a minimum of 76 and maximum of 103, still playable. High settings yield 74 FPS, which is acceptable for most users, but the Ultra preset falls to 48 FPS, which may feel choppy during intense boxing exchanges. This pattern indicates that the RTX 4060’s 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus become limiting factors at 4K with maximum settings.

The data also shows that the combo is well-suited for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p, as even the Ultra preset exceeds 100 FPS. For 1440p users, the High preset at 117 FPS offers an excellent balance of visual quality and performance, while 4K users should stick to High or Medium to maintain playable frame rates. The absence of min/max FPS data for most presets limits the analysis of frame time consistency, but the available data for Medium presets shows tight ranges, suggesting stable performance.

Resolution Scaling

The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is steep but predictable, and the data allows for a clear analysis of where the bottleneck lies. At Low settings, the combo delivers 271 FPS at 1080p, 196 FPS at 1440p, and 124 FPS at 4K. This represents a 28% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a 54% drop from 1080p to 4K. The scaling is roughly in line with the increase in pixel count, suggesting that the GPU is the primary constraint even at Low settings, as the CPU has ample headroom.

At High settings, the pattern is similar: 162 FPS at 1080p, 117 FPS at 1440p, and 74 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is 28%, and from 1080p to 4K it is 54%. This consistency across settings indicates that the resolution scaling is driven by the GPU’s rendering capabilities rather than any CPU limitation. The RTX 4060’s 272.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM are likely the limiting factors at higher resolutions, as the game’s textures and effects require more memory and bandwidth.

The Ultra preset shows the most dramatic scaling: 104 FPS at 1080p, 75 FPS at 1440p, and 48 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is 28%, but from 1440p to 4K it is 36%, indicating that the GPU is increasingly strained as resolution climbs. This suggests that the 4K Ultra preset is beyond the RTX 4060’s comfort zone, and users should expect sub-60 FPS performance. The data shows that the limiting component is overwhelmingly the GPU, as the CPU’s performance headroom is not fully utilized even at 1080p Low.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS, the optimal settings preset depends on the user’s resolution and refresh rate priorities. For 1920x1080 users, the Ultra preset at 104 FPS is the clear recommendation, as it provides the best visual quality while still exceeding 60 FPS comfortably. For those with 144Hz or 165Hz monitors, the High preset at 162 FPS is the better choice, as it delivers a significant frame rate boost with only a modest reduction in visual fidelity.

At 2560x1440, the High preset at 117 FPS offers the best balance, providing smooth gameplay and good visual detail. The Ultra preset at 75 FPS is also viable for users who prioritize image quality over raw frame rate, but the Medium preset at 141 FPS is a strong alternative for competitive play. The data shows that the Medium preset at 1440p has a minimum FPS of 120, ensuring no drops below the 60 FPS threshold.

For 3840x2160 users, the High preset at 74 FPS is the recommended choice, as it maintains playable frame rates while delivering acceptable visual quality. The Medium preset at 89 FPS is even better for smoothness, but the visual difference between Medium and High may be noticeable. The Ultra preset at 48 FPS should be avoided, as it falls below the 60 FPS threshold and may result in a less responsive experience. The Low preset at 124 FPS is viable for users who prioritize frame rate above all else, but the reduced visual detail may detract from the game’s presentation.

Overall, the data indicates that the combo is best utilized at 1080p or 1440p with High or Ultra settings, where it delivers excellent performance. At 4K, users should stick to High or Medium to maintain playability.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with a 5 nm process from TSMC, featuring 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die. Its base clock is 1830 MHz with a boost clock of 2460 MHz, and it comes with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 272.0 GB/s of bandwidth. These specifications are modest by modern standards, and the GPU’s percentileVsAllGpus of 61 reflects its mid-range positioning.

The GPU’s benchmark results show a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2302, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 95057, and a Vulkan score of 48643. Its Passmark G3D score of 19545 is notable, but its DirectX 12 score of 76 and DirectX 11 score of 175 suggest that raw compute performance does not always translate directly to gaming FPS. The RTX 4060’s nearest rivals, including the AMD Radeon HD 7790 and Radeon 780M, have nearly identical average scores, but the measured FPS in Undisputed shows the 4060 pulling ahead in real-world scenarios.

In Undisputed, the GPU’s role is to handle the rendering of boxers, arenas, and crowd effects, all of which require significant shader and texture work. The 3072 shading units, 96 TMUs, and 48 ROPs provide adequate throughput for most settings, but the 128-bit memory bus becomes a bottleneck at higher resolutions. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but at 4K with Ultra settings, the game may exceed this capacity, leading to the observed 48 FPS average.

The GPU’s boost clock of 2460 MHz helps maintain high frame rates at lower resolutions, as evidenced by the 271 FPS at 1080p Low. However, the 115 W TDP and dual-slot design indicate that this is not a high-power part, and its performance ceiling is limited by thermal and power constraints. The 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 performance is respectable for the price point, but the data shows that the GPU is the primary limiting factor in this combo, particularly at 4K.