Undisputed

The Intel Core i5-14400F paired with the Intel Arc B370 is a combination that lands near the bottom of the tested leaderboard for Undisputed, ranking 2592 out of 2813 combos. This places it in the 8th percentile of all tested configurations, meaning roughly 92% of other pairings deliver higher average frame rates. The data shows a processor with strong multi-threaded potential paired with a graphics solution that is clearly the limiting factor, resulting in a system that is viable for lower resolutions and modest settings, but struggles to maintain smooth gameplay at higher demands.

FAQ

*Q: What is the overall ranking of this CPU and GPU combo in Undisputed?*

A: The combo ranks 2592 out of 2813 tested combinations. This places it in the bottom tier of results, indicating that most other hardware pairings will outperform it in this specific title.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14400F compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic CPU benchmarks?

A: The i5-14400F has an average benchmark score of 32279. This is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U (32233, 0.1% faster), the Intel Core i9-11900 (32226, 0.2% faster), and the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS (32354, 0.2% slower). The Intel Core i7-12800H scores 32121, making it 0.5% slower than the i5-14400F.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile, and which components are its closest rivals?

A: The Intel Arc B370 sits in the 5th percentile of all GPUs, with an average 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1184. Its nearest rivals are the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (1186, 0.2% faster), the ATI Radeon HD 5770 (1190, 0.5% faster), the AMD Radeon HD 7650M (1192, 0.7% faster), and the AMD FirePro M2000 (1168, 1.4% slower).

Q: What resolution and settings combination yields the highest average frame rate?

A: The highest average frame rate recorded is 115 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This is the only configuration in the measured data that breaks the 100 FPS mark.

Q: Is the 4K Ultra preset playable with this hardware?

A: No. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average frame rate drops to 20 FPS, which is well below the threshold for smooth, responsive gameplay. Even at 2560x1440 Ultra, the average is only 32 FPS.

*Q: Does the CPU's benchmark performance correlate with high frame rates in Undisputed?*

A: No. Despite the CPU scoring in the 83rd percentile of all processors, the measured FPS in Undisputed is heavily constrained by the GPU. The data shows that the Arc B370, in the 5th GPU percentile, is the bottleneck, preventing the i5-14400F from translating its strong synthetic performance into high frame rates in this game.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B370 is the primary determinant of this combo's performance in Undisputed. Its specifications place it firmly in the entry-level segment, and the measured frame rates reflect that. The GPU operates with a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. It features 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 20 render output units. The memory configuration is notable for being "System Shared," meaning it uses a portion of the system's main memory rather than dedicated VRAM. The memory bandwidth is listed as "System Dependent," which means performance can vary significantly based on the system's memory speed and configuration.

In practice, this shared memory setup translates to a hard ceiling on performance. The GPU's raw compute capabilities, listed at 6.144 TFLOPS for FP32, are modest. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1184 confirms its low-end status, placing it in the 5th percentile. This is the single most important data point for understanding the combo's behavior. The GPU's performance is so low that it is the limiting factor in every resolution and settings combination tested.

Looking at the measured data, the pattern is clear: the GPU struggles as resolution and graphical fidelity increase. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the average FPS is 115, which is acceptable for fast-paced gameplay. However, when settings are raised to High, the average drops to 68 FPS. At Medium, it is 83 FPS, and at Ultra, it falls to 44 FPS. This shows a steep performance cliff as the render load increases. The situation worsens at higher resolutions. At 2560x1440, the Low preset yields 83 FPS, but High drops to 49 FPS, and Ultra plunges to 32 FPS. The 4K data is even more severe: 52 FPS on Low, 38 FPS on Medium, 31 FPS on High, and a nearly unplayable 20 FPS on Ultra.

The 10 ray tracing cores and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate indicate the hardware is capable of advanced features, but the low fill rate and texture rate (48.00 GPixel/s and 96.00 GTexel/s, respectively) mean there is not enough horsepower to utilize them in a demanding title like Undisputed at playable frame rates. The GPU is fundamentally a low-power, integrated-style solution (TDP of 25 W) that is out of its depth when pushed beyond 1080p Low or Medium settings.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 2592 out of 2813 tested combinations is a stark indicator of its position. This places it in the bottom 8% of all configurations tested for Undisputed. This is not a case of a balanced system that is slightly behind; it is a pairing that is significantly outperformed by the vast majority of other hardware. The data indicates that this rank is almost entirely due to the GPU's 5th percentile performance. The CPU, by contrast, is in the 83rd percentile, showcasing a massive imbalance in capability.

To contextualize this rank, consider that the GPU's nearest rivals are legacy parts like the ATI Radeon HD 5770 and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M. These are components from a much older era, and the Arc B370's performance is comparable to them. This means the graphics solution is not just entry-level by today's standards; it is on par with hardware that is over a decade old. The CPU is also compared to mobile and lower-tier desktop parts, but the deltas are tiny (within 0.5%). This tells a story of a very capable CPU being held back by a severely underpowered GPU.

The ranking also suggests that any other combination with a discrete GPU from the last several generations would likely perform better, given that the Arc B370's performance is so low. The 2813 total combos represent a wide range of hardware, and finishing at 2592 is a clear signal that this pairing is not suitable for a game like Undisputed at higher quality settings. The data is measured, not estimated, which lends further weight to the finding that this specific combination delivers poor results in this sports title.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of the combo's capabilities across three resolutions and four settings presets. The pattern is consistent: performance scales inversely with resolution and settings, but the GPU bottleneck is so severe that even the lowest settings at higher resolutions fail to provide a consistently smooth experience.

At 1920x1080, the best-case scenario is the Low preset, which delivers an average of 115 FPS. This is the only configuration in the entire dataset that approaches high-refresh-rate territory. The Medium preset averages 83 FPS, with a minimum of 70 FPS and a maximum of 95 FPS. The High preset averages 68 FPS. The Ultra preset, however, drops to an average of 44 FPS, which makes it playable but not ideal for a fast-paced sports title where maintaining 60 FPS is often preferred. The data shows a clear diminishing return: moving from Low to Medium costs 32 FPS, from Medium to High costs 15 FPS, and from High to Ultra costs another 24 FPS.

At 2560x1440, performance takes a significant hit. The Low preset averages 83 FPS, which is still respectable. The Medium preset averages 60 FPS, with a minimum of 51 and a maximum of 69. This is a borderline playable experience. The High preset drops to 49 FPS, and the Ultra preset falls to 32 FPS. The data shows that 1440p is only viable on Low or Medium settings. The jump from Medium to High at this resolution costs 11 FPS, while the jump from High to Ultra costs 17 FPS, showing that the GPU's performance degrades non-linearly as the render load increases.

At 3840x2160, the combo is largely out of its depth. The Low preset averages 52 FPS, which is just about playable. The Medium preset averages 38 FPS, with a minimum of 32 and a maximum of 43. This is a poor experience. The High preset averages 31 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 20 FPS. These numbers are all below the threshold for smooth gameplay. The data indicates that 4K is not a realistic target for this hardware, and even the Low preset at this resolution is a marginal experience. The only configuration with recorded min/max values is 1440p Medium and 1080p Medium, showing some frame time variance, but the lack of min/max data for other rows suggests the averages are the primary metric for assessment.

The overall trend is that the GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU has the power to push higher frame rates, but the Arc B370 cannot keep up. For example, at 1080p Low, the 115 FPS average likely represents the GPU's absolute ceiling. When the resolution or settings are increased, the GPU's fill rate and compute capabilities are overwhelmed, leading to the sharp drops seen in the data.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-14400F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series. It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The CPU is built on Intel's 10 nm process (Raptor Lake architecture) and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. Its benchmark scores are solid for a desktop part: a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645 and a single-core score of 3055. In Geekbench, it scores 11268 multi-core and 2058 single-core. These numbers place it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, showing that it is a strong mid-range processor.

In the context of Undisputed, the CPU's role is secondary. The game is a sports title, which typically relies more on GPU performance for rendering the arena, fighters, and effects. However, the CPU must still handle physics, AI, and game logic. The data shows that the i5-14400F is more than capable of handling these tasks. Its nearest rivals in the synthetic benchmark database are all lower-tier or mobile parts, and the deltas are negligible (within 0.5%). This suggests that the CPU is not the source of any performance bottleneck in this pairing.

The CPU's 20 MB of shared L3 cache and 1.25 MB per-core L2 cache provide ample headroom for game data. The 10 cores and 16 threads are sufficient for modern games, including those that can utilize more than 8 threads. The high single-core performance, evidenced by the 3055 Cinebench R23 score, is beneficial for games that rely on a single primary thread for game logic. The data from the measured FPS confirms this: the frame rates drop dramatically when the GPU is stressed, not when the CPU is stressed. For instance, at 1080p Low, the CPU is able to feed the GPU enough frames to reach 115 FPS. However, when the GPU is pushed at 4K Ultra, the CPU is still waiting for the GPU to finish rendering, resulting in the 20 FPS average.

The launch MSRP for this CPU is $196, which reflects its mid-range positioning. Its performance is a clear step above the i7-12800H (0.5% faster) and is nearly identical to the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U and i9-11900. This shows that the i5-14400F is a competent processor that will not hold back a system in most gaming scenarios. In this specific combo, the CPU is effectively idle waiting on the GPU. The 65W TDP and unlocked multiplier (though it is locked, so overclocking is not possible) are non-factors in the game's performance. The CPU is simply not the weak link.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend entirely on the target resolution and the user's tolerance for frame rate dips. The clear takeaway is that this system is best suited for 1080p gaming, with a few options at 1440p for less demanding scenarios.

For 1920x1080, the Low preset is the strongest recommendation. The 115 FPS average is smooth and responsive, providing the best competitive advantage in a boxing game where timing is critical. This setting ensures the frame rate stays well above 60 FPS, eliminating any perceived stutter. The Medium preset, at 83 FPS, is also a good choice if visual fidelity is preferred, as the minimum of 70 FPS is still solid. The High preset at 68 FPS is playable but not ideal, as it leaves less headroom for demanding scenes. The Ultra preset at 44 FPS should be avoided, as it falls below the 60 FPS threshold and can feel sluggish.

For 2560x1440, the Low preset is the only clear recommendation, averaging 83 FPS. This provides a playable experience with a decent frame rate. The Medium preset averages 60 FPS, which is borderline. The minimum of 51 FPS indicates that there will be noticeable dips below 60 FPS during intense gameplay, which can be problematic. High and Ultra settings at 1440p are not recommended, with averages of 49 FPS and 32 FPS, respectively. These are too low for a responsive sports game.

For 3840x2160, no settings are recommended for a good experience. The Low preset averages 52 FPS, which is playable but not smooth. The Medium preset at 38 FPS and High at 31 FPS are poor. The Ultra preset at 20 FPS is effectively a slideshow. Users with a 4K display should either lower the resolution to 1440p or accept that this hardware cannot deliver a quality experience at 4K.

The best overall experience, balancing visual quality and performance, is the 1920x1080 Medium preset. It offers a 83 FPS average with a minimum of 70 FPS, which is well within the playable range. It provides a meaningful visual upgrade over Low while retaining a frame rate that is smooth enough for the game's fast, reflex-based combat. For those who prioritize maximum smoothness, 1080p Low is the safest bet. For those who must play at 1440p, the Low preset is the only acceptable option. The data is unambiguous: this combo is not designed for high-fidelity or high-resolution gaming, and users should adjust their expectations accordingly.