Undisputed

The Intel Core i5-11400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Rocket Lake architecture, built on Intel's 14 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The processor's cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a shared 12 MB L3 cache. Memory support is limited to DDR4, running on a dual-channel bus with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. In synthetic benchmarks, the 3DMark single-thread score is 868, while the max-thread score reaches 5652. Cinebench R23 results show a single-core score of 2029 and a multi-core score of 14372. The processor sits at the 75th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17181. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 5700U with a nearly identical average score of 17189 (deltaPct 0), and the Intel Core i7-1260P at 17212 (deltaPct -0.2). In the context of Undisputed, a sports title that often relies on consistent frame pacing, the i5-11400F's 6 cores and 12 threads provide a solid foundation for physics and AI calculations, though the game's engine appears to favor higher single-thread performance given the 868 single-thread 3DMark score. The data indicates this CPU is not a bottleneck at lower resolutions, where the GPU takes over, but at 4K Ultra settings, the combined load may expose CPU limits.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Core i5-11400F brings a balance of core count and clock speed that directly influences Undisputed's performance. With 6 physical cores and 12 threads, the processor can handle the game's background tasks, such as crowd simulation and ring-side physics, without stuttering. The boost clock of 4.40 GHz is crucial for the main game loop, where frame time consistency matters more than raw throughput. Benchmark results show a 3DMark 2-thread score of 1691 and a 4-thread score of 3171, indicating that the processor scales well with the moderate thread usage typical of sports titles. In contrast, the 8-thread score of 4691 and max-thread score of 5652 suggest diminishing returns beyond 4 threads, which aligns with Undisputed's likely reliance on a few primary threads. The Cinebench R20 single-core score of 852 and multi-core score of 6036 further illustrate that this CPU is not a top-tier performer but is adequate for the game's demands. Compared to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, the i5-11400F matches its average score of 17189 with a deltaPct of 0, meaning the two are statistically tied in general processing power. However, the Intel chip's higher boost clock may give it an edge in single-threaded scenarios, which could translate to better minimum FPS in Undisputed, though the measured data does not include min FPS values. The processor's 65 W TDP and 12 MB shared L3 cache are modest, but they ensure stable power delivery during long gaming sessions. The data suggests that the CPU's role becomes more pronounced at 1080p, where frame rates exceed 200 FPS on Low settings, potentially pushing the CPU to its limits before the GPU becomes the bottleneck.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

In the database of tested configurations, the combination of the Intel Core i5-11400F and AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT ranks 1053 out of 1580 combos for Undisputed. This places the duo in the lower third of all tested systems, which is surprising given the GPU's capabilities. The combo rank reflects not just raw performance but also how well the CPU and GPU work together for this specific game. The i5-11400F's average benchmark score of 17181 places it in the 75th percentile of all CPUs, yet when paired with the RX 7600 XT, the combo's rank suggests that other pairings with stronger processors achieve better frame rates. The GPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 7600 with an average score of 20258 (deltaPct -0.6) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER at 19774 (deltaPct 1.9), indicating the RX 7600 XT is competitive but not dominant. The combo's rank of 1053 implies that while the GPU is strong, the CPU may hold back performance in CPU-bound scenarios, particularly at 1080p where the measured FPS on Low settings reaches 236.5. This high frame rate suggests the CPU is working hard to feed the GPU, and any faster processor could push the combo higher in the rankings. The data shows that the combo outperforms many lower-tier CPUs but falls short of those with higher single-thread scores. The deltaPct values for the CPU's rivals are minimal (0 to -0.2), so the processor itself is not the sole reason for the rank; rather, the overall system balance matters. The rank of 1053 out of 1580 means roughly 33% of tested combos perform better, which is a notable finding for a GPU that sits in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs. This discrepancy suggests that the bottleneck is the CPU, especially when considering that the RX 7600 XT's passmark G3D score of 17132 is robust.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data reveals a clear scaling pattern across resolutions, which points directly to the limiting component. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 236.5 FPS, but this drops to 170 FPS at 1440p and further to 109.1 FPS at 4K. This represents a 54% drop from 1080p to 4K on Low settings, indicating that the GPU is increasingly the bottleneck as resolution rises. However, the picture changes with higher settings. At Ultra settings, the 1080p FPS is 92, which drops to 66.5 FPS at 1440p (a 27.7% reduction) and to 39.9 FPS at 4K (a 56.6% reduction from 1080p). The relatively smaller drop from 1080p to 1440p at Ultra (from 92 to 66.5) suggests that the CPU is still keeping up, but the massive drop to 4K Ultra (39.9 FPS) indicates the GPU is overwhelmed. The data implies that at 1080p, the CPU is often the limiting factor, especially on Low and Medium settings where frame rates exceed 170 FPS. At 4K, the GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are stressed, but the 128-bit bus width limits throughput. The scaling between Medium and High settings at 1440p (124.6 FPS vs 102.9 FPS) shows a 17.4% drop, which is consistent with GPU-bound behavior. The most telling comparison is at 4K, where the gap between Low (109.1 FPS) and Ultra (39.9 FPS) is a 63.4% reduction, confirming that the GPU is the primary limiter at high resolutions. This analysis suggests that for competitive play at 1080p, the CPU may cause frame pacing issues, while at 4K, the GPU's raw compute power (22.57 TFLOPS) is insufficient for Ultra settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS values provide a detailed picture of performance across all settings. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers 236.5 FPS on Low, 172.8 FPS on Medium, 140.3 FPS on High, and 92 FPS on Ultra. The transition from Low to Ultra represents a 61.1% performance drop, highlighting the GPU's limitations at higher graphical fidelity. At 2560x1440, the scores are 170 FPS on Low, 124.6 FPS on Medium, 102.9 FPS on High, and 66.5 FPS on Ultra. The drop from Low to Ultra here is 60.9%, nearly identical to 1080p, which suggests a consistent GPU-bound scaling. At 3840x2160, the results are 109.1 FPS on Low, 79.8 FPS on Medium, 62.8 FPS on High, and 39.9 FPS on Ultra. The Low to Ultra drop is 63.4%, slightly higher than at lower resolutions. These numbers indicate that the RX 7600 XT can handle 4K only on Low settings with a playable 109.1 FPS, but Ultra settings at 4K are not viable. The 1440p Ultra result of 66.5 FPS is borderline playable, while 1080p Ultra at 92 FPS offers a smooth experience. The data shows that Medium settings at 1440p (124.6 FPS) and High settings at 1080p (140.3 FPS) are the sweet spots for high refresh rate monitors. The lack of min FPS data means we cannot assess frame consistency, but the average FPS values suggest that the combo is capable of smooth gameplay at 1080p and 1440p with adjusted settings. The 4K Low result of 109.1 FPS is particularly interesting, as it indicates that the GPU can push high frame rates at 4K if the graphical load is reduced, but the CPU's performance at this resolution is likely sufficient given the 6-core design.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with a Navi 33 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. It features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. The GPU's base clock is 1980 MHz, with a boost clock of 2755 MHz and a game clock of 2470 MHz. The memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, along with 32 ray tracing cores. Its compute capabilities include 22.57 TFLOPS for FP32 and 45.14 TFLOPS for FP16. The GPU sits in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20146. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 7600, scores 20258 (deltaPct -0.6), meaning the XT variant is slightly slower in average benchmarks, which is unexpected given the extra VRAM. In Undisputed, the GPU's 16 GB VRAM is more than sufficient, as the game likely does not exceed 8 GB even at 4K Ultra. The data shows that the GPU's performance is the primary factor in the FPS drops at higher resolutions. The 4K Ultra result of 39.9 FPS is a clear indication that the GPU's 22.57 TFLOPS is not enough for the game's most demanding settings. However, the 4K Low result of 109.1 FPS shows that the GPU can handle the resolution when the load is light. The 128-bit memory bus is a potential bottleneck, as the 288.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit texture streaming in a game with detailed ring environments. The GPU's boost clock of 2755 MHz is high, but the 190 W TDP and 1x 8-pin power connector suggest it is a mid-range part. The passmark G3D score of 17132 places it well above the RX 460's 20088 (deltaPct 0.3), but the RX 7600 XT's overall performance is only 0.6% slower than the RX 7600 in average benchmarks, which is a minimal difference.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for achieving 60 FPS or higher in Undisputed with this combo?

A: The data shows playable frame rates at all resolutions, but the GPU is the limiter at 4K Ultra. At 4K High, the average FPS is 62.8, which is just above 60. For higher refresh rates, 1440p High offers 102.9 FPS, and 1080p High delivers 140.3 FPS.

Q: How does the RX 7600 XT compare to its closest rival in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The RX 7600 XT has an average benchmark score of 20146, while its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 7600, scores 20258, resulting in a deltaPct of -0.6. This means the XT is 0.6% slower in average benchmarks, despite having double the VRAM.

Q: Is the Intel Core i5-11400F a bottleneck for this GPU in Undisputed?

A: At 1080p with Low settings, the combo reaches 236.5 FPS, which is near the CPU's limit. The CPU's max-thread 3DMark score of 5652 suggests it can handle the game, but the combo rank of 1053 out of 1580 indicates that other CPUs may yield higher frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios.

Q: What is the FPS difference between 1080p and 4K on Ultra settings?

A: At 1080p Ultra, the average FPS is 92, while at 4K Ultra, it drops to 39.9. This represents a 56.6% reduction in performance, highlighting the GPU's struggle with high resolutions and demanding settings.

Q: Does the CPU's single-thread performance affect frame rates in Undisputed?

A: The 3DMark single-thread score of 868 indicates moderate single-thread capability. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2029 suggests it can handle the game's main loop, but the measured FPS at 1080p Low (236.5) implies the CPU is working near its maximum.

Q: Which settings provide a balance between visual quality and frame rate at 1440p?

A: The data shows 1440p Medium at 124.6 FPS and 1440p High at 102.9 FPS. Both are above 100 FPS, offering a good balance. The 1440p Ultra result of 66.5 FPS is also playable but requires a high refresh rate monitor to be fully utilized.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the best experience depends on the target resolution and frame rate. For 1080p, High settings at 140.3 FPS provide a smooth and visually detailed experience, while Ultra at 92 FPS is also viable for players with 120 Hz monitors. Medium at 172.8 FPS is the best choice for competitive play, as it maximizes frame rates without sacrificing too much visual quality. For 1440p, High settings at 102.9 FPS offer a strong balance, but Medium at 124.6 FPS provides higher headroom for demanding scenes. The 1440p Ultra result of 66.5 FPS is borderline, so it is recommended only for players with G-Sync or FreeSync displays. For 4K, the data shows that only Low settings at 109.1 FPS are truly playable, while Medium at 79.8 FPS is acceptable for slower-paced gameplay. The 4K High result of 62.8 FPS is just above 60, but the 4K Ultra result of 39.9 FPS is not recommended for a smooth experience. The data indicates that the GPU's 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for all settings, so the main trade-off is between the 22.57 TFLOPS compute power and the game's graphical demands. For the best overall experience, 1440p High settings at 102.9 FPS offer the most balanced combination of visual fidelity and performance, as the CPU is less likely to bottleneck at this resolution compared to 1080p.