Undisputed

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 combination delivers a highly playable experience in Undisputed, with performance scaling predictably from 1080p to 4K. The data shows that this pairing is well-balanced for the game, though the GPU becomes the primary constraint at higher resolutions and settings. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS, the role of each component, and provides actionable settings recommendations based solely on the benchmark data.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS reveals a clear and consistent pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases. At 1080p with High settings, the combo produces 140 FPS. Moving to 1440p High drops the average to 101 FPS, a reduction of roughly 28%. Pushing further to 4K High yields 64 FPS, which is a 54% decrease from the 1080p result and a 37% drop from 1440p. This scaling curve is typical for a system where the graphics card is doing progressively heavier lifting.

The Low settings preset provides the clearest view of the CPU’s headroom. At 1080p Low, the system hits 235 FPS, which then scales down to 170 FPS at 1440p and 107 FPS at 4K. The fact that 4K Low (107 FPS) is still faster than 1080p Ultra (90 FPS) strongly indicates that the rendering load, not the processor, is the limiting factor at high detail levels. When the GPU is unburdened by low graphics settings, the frame rates are extraordinarily high, even at 4K, suggesting the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has ample compute power to feed the RTX 5060.

The scaling between Medium and High settings is also informative. At 1440p, the gap between Medium (122 FPS) and High (101 FPS) is 21 FPS, while at 4K, the gap is 13 FPS (77 FPS vs 64 FPS). This shows that the cost of moving from Medium to High is significant but not prohibitive. However, the jump from High to Ultra is the most punishing. At 1080p, Ultra (90 FPS) is 50 FPS slower than High (140 FPS). At 1440p, Ultra (65 FPS) is 36 FPS slower than High (101 FPS). At 4K, Ultra (41 FPS) is 23 FPS slower than High (64 FPS). This suggests that the Ultra preset introduces rendering effects that disproportionately tax the GPU.

The minimum FPS data, available only for the Medium preset, shows the frame pacing. At 1080p Medium, the system reports a min of 144 FPS and a max of 194 FPS, against an average of 169 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the range is 104 to 140 FPS, with an average of 122 FPS. The 4K Medium numbers show a min of 66 FPS and a max of 89 FPS, with an average of 77 FPS. These figures indicate that the game maintains reasonably consistent frame times, with the minimums staying within a comfortable margin of the averages, suggesting a stable experience without severe hitches.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to maintain a 60+ FPS average?

A: The data shows that 4K High (64 FPS) is the highest resolution and settings combination that still averages above 60 FPS. For a more comfortable margin, 1440p High (101 FPS) or 1440p Ultra (65 FPS) are also viable options.

Q: Is the RTX 5060's 8GB VRAM a bottleneck at 4K in this game?

A: Based on the measured FPS, the 8GB VRAM does not appear to cause a hard failure, as 4K Medium (77 FPS) and 4K High (64 FPS) are playable. The significant drop to 41 FPS at 4K Ultra suggests that the combination of high resolution and the Ultra preset's demands likely saturate the memory bus or capacity, heavily impacting performance.

Q: How does the Ultra preset compare to High in terms of performance cost?

A: The cost is steep. At 1080p, enabling Ultra drops the average FPS from 140 to 90, a 50 FPS loss. At 1440p, the loss is 36 FPS (from 101 to 65). At 4K, the loss is 23 FPS (from 64 to 41). The Ultra preset is significantly more demanding than High.

Q: Does the CPU limit the system at any point in this game?

A: The data indicates the CPU is not a limiting factor. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 235 FPS, and even at 4K Low, it manages 107 FPS. These high frame rates at low settings, even at high resolutions, suggest the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 provides sufficient processing power to avoid bottlenecking the GPU.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Medium settings?

A: The scaling is moderate. At 1080p, Low (235 FPS) is 66 FPS faster than Medium (169 FPS). At 1440p, Low (170 FPS) is 48 FPS faster than Medium (122 FPS). At 4K, Low (107 FPS) is 30 FPS faster than Medium (77 FPS). The visual quality gain from Low to Medium appears to come with a manageable performance penalty.

*Q: How does this combo rank among all tested systems for Undisputed?*

A: This specific combination ranks 2470 out of 3718 tested combos. While this places it in the lower-middle portion of the database, the measured FPS shows it is still capable of delivering high frame rates at mainstream resolutions and settings.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is the central component for determining visual fidelity in Undisputed. Its 8GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus provides a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The data shows that this memory configuration is sufficient for smooth gameplay up to High settings at 4K, but the Ultra preset at 4K (41 FPS) reveals a clear breaking point. The RTX 5060’s 48 ROPs and 120 TMUs handle the game's rasterization workload effectively at lower presets, but the sheer fill rate required at 4K Ultra likely overwhelms the 8GB frame buffer.

The GPU’s clock speeds are listed with a base of 2280 MHz and a boost of 2497 MHz. These clocks, combined with the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, contribute to the card's overall throughput. The measured frame rates show a direct correlation between the graphics load and performance. For instance, the transition from 1440p High (101 FPS) to 4K High (64 FPS) shows a 37% reduction in FPS, which is directly attributable to the increased pixel count and shading work. The card's 19.18 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is clearly taxed more heavily as resolution scales, a pattern visible in the benchmark results.

The RTX 5060's position in the GPU hierarchy is modest, sitting at the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 26331 places it in close competition with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, which is 1.2% ahead, and the AMD Radeon 860M, which is 0.3% ahead. This context suggests that the RTX 5060 is a capable mid-range performer. In Undisputed, it is the component that dictates the boundary between playable and unplayable settings, particularly at 4K. The data strongly suggests that users should prioritize the High preset over Ultra to maintain a fluid experience, as the performance cost of the latter is severe.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The benchmark data provides a complete matrix of results across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the system performs exceptionally well across the board. The Low preset delivers an average of 235 FPS, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate displays. Medium settings yield 169 FPS, with a minimum of 144 FPS and a maximum of 194 FPS. High settings produce 140 FPS, which is still exceptionally smooth. The Ultra preset, however, drops to 90 FPS, which, while playable, is a significant step down from the other presets.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but begins to show the GPU's workload. Low settings still achieve a very high 170 FPS. Medium settings average 122 FPS, with a range of 104 to 140 FPS. High settings provide 101 FPS, which is excellent for a 1440p experience. The Ultra preset falls to 65 FPS, which is on the edge of the ideal range for smooth gameplay.

At 3840x2160, the scaling becomes more pronounced. Low settings remain playable at 107 FPS. Medium settings average 77 FPS, with a minimum of 66 FPS and a maximum of 89 FPS. High settings drop to 64 FPS, which is still above the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset is the only combination that falls below the playable threshold, averaging just 41 FPS. This is the only measured configuration where the system struggles to maintain a smooth frame rate, indicating a hard limit for this hardware in this game.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS, the optimal settings depend heavily on the target resolution and refresh rate. For 1080p, the High preset (140 FPS) is the best choice for most users, as it offers a substantial visual upgrade over Medium (169 FPS) while still delivering frame rates well above 100. Users with a 144Hz or higher refresh rate monitor could even consider the Medium preset for the extra headroom, but High is the sweet spot for visual quality and performance.

For 1440p, the High preset (101 FPS) is the clear recommendation. It provides a smooth, high-refresh experience that is well-suited for competitive play. The Medium preset (122 FPS) is also an option for users who prefer maximum smoothness, but the visual fidelity gains from High are worth the 21 FPS loss. The Ultra preset at 1440p (65 FPS) is playable but offers diminishing returns; the data suggests that the extra visual effects are not worth the significant performance hit compared to High.

At 4K, the High preset (64 FPS) is the only viable option for a 60 FPS experience. The Medium preset (77 FPS) is also excellent, providing a more comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset is not recommended, as the 41 FPS average falls below the standard for smooth gameplay. The data clearly shows that 4K Ultra is beyond the capabilities of the RTX 5060 in this title. For the best balance of visual quality and performance, the High preset at 1080p or 1440p is the most sensible choice, with 1440p High being the standout combination for a premium experience.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture. It has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The benchmark data for Undisputed suggests that this processor is more than capable of keeping up with the RTX 5060, as the frame rates at low settings are exceptionally high. The 1080p Low result of 235 FPS is a strong indicator that the CPU is not a bottleneck in this scenario, as the GPU is likely the limiting factor even at this low resolution.

The processor's cache hierarchy includes 64 MB of shared L3 cache, which is likely beneficial for game logic and physics calculations. Its multi-threaded performance is strong, as evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35314. This raw compute power ensures that the game's simulation and AI routines are handled without issue, allowing the GPU to focus on rendering. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking among all CPUs further confirms its high-end status, sitting close to the Intel Core i9-14900K, which is only 1.7% ahead in average benchmark score.

In the context of Undisputed, the CPU's role is to maintain a stable frame pipeline. The data shows that even at 4K Low (107 FPS), the system is still producing high frame rates, which would not be possible if the processor were struggling. The Ryzen AI Max+ 395's 32 threads provide ample headroom for background tasks and future game updates. While the nearestRivals data shows it is comparable to the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX (1.6% higher score) and the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX (2% higher score), its performance in this game is clearly sufficient to avoid being the primary constraint. The measured FPS across all resolutions and settings points to the GPU as the definitive performance limiter, with the CPU consistently delivering frames without becoming a bottleneck.