Undisputed

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D paired with the Intel Arc B390 lands near the bottom of the performance hierarchy for Undisputed, ranking 2491 out of 2813 tested combinations. This places the combo in the 12th percentile of tested systems, indicating that while it is playable at lower settings, it is not competitive with the vast majority of hardware configurations for this title. The data shows a system that is heavily constrained by its graphics component, with the CPU’s substantial processing power largely untapped at higher resolutions. The following analysis breaks down the measured performance, the roles of each component, and the practical settings for playability.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s rank of 2491 out of 2813 tested combinations is a clear signal that this configuration is underpowered for Undisputed relative to the broader hardware ecosystem. With a percentile ranking that puts it in the bottom 12% of all combos, the data indicates that users would experience significant performance limitations, particularly at higher graphical presets and resolutions. The ranking is not a reflection of the CPU, which is a top-tier performer, but rather a direct consequence of the Intel Arc B390’s position as an entry-level integrated graphics solution.

Benchmark results show the GPU sits in the 9th percentile of all graphics cards, with an average benchmark score of 1482. Its nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX (score 1463, 1.3% slower), the NVIDIA GeForce 800M (score 1460, 1.5% slower), and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM (score 1446, 2.5% slower). This places the Arc B390 in the company of legacy and low-power mobile GPUs, firmly establishing it as a component not designed for modern gaming workloads. Consequently, the overall combo rank is dragged down by the GPU, even though the CPU alone would rank in the 91st percentile of all processors.

In practical terms, the data suggests that this combo would struggle to maintain smooth frame rates in Undisputed at any setting above Low, and even at Low, the experience is only acceptable at 1920x1080. The gap between this combo and higher-performing alternatives is vast; the measured FPS values confirm that the GPU is the definitive bottleneck. The system’s overall standing is a direct result of this imbalance, making it a configuration for basic functionality rather than a competitive gaming experience.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B390 is the primary performance limiter in this configuration. Its specifications are those of an integrated graphics processor (IGP) rather than a discrete solution, which explains its low standing. The GPU features a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2500 MHz, with 1536 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster output units. It also includes 12 ray tracing cores, though its raw compute power is limited to 7.680 TFLOPS FP32. The memory subsystem is described as "System Shared," meaning it relies on the host system’s DDR5 memory, with bandwidth that is "System Dependent" rather than dedicated.

This memory configuration has a direct impact on Undisputed’s performance. The lack of dedicated VRAM means the GPU must compete with the CPU for memory bandwidth, which is a significant handicap in a game that requires consistent data throughput. The measured results reflect this: at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the combo manages only 22 FPS, while dropping to Low settings at the same resolution yields 58 FPS. The boost clock of 2500 MHz is high for an IGP, but the limited shading units and memory bandwidth prevent it from translating that clock speed into playable frame rates at higher resolutions.

The GPU’s performance profile is consistently weak across all measured scenarios. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX, scores 1.3% lower in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, highlighting just how dated the Arc B390’s performance level is. The data indicates that this GPU is suitable for 1080p gaming only at Low settings, where it achieves 127 FPS in Undisputed. At any other setting or resolution, the frame rates drop below the threshold for a smooth experience, with 2560x1440 High producing 55 FPS and 3840x2160 Medium producing 42 FPS. The GPU’s role is clear: it is the bottleneck, and its limitations define the entire combo’s capabilities.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance ranking of this CPU and GPU combo in Undisputed?

A: The combo ranks 2491 out of 2813 tested combinations, placing it in the bottom 12% of all tested systems for this game.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The CPU has an average benchmark score of 54762, which is 0.6% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF (score 55093), 1.3% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K (score 54053), and 2.1% higher than the Intel Core i7-14700F (score 53620).

Q: What is the best resolution and settings for achieving 60 FPS with this combo?

A: The data shows that 60 FPS is only achievable at 1920x1080 with Low settings, where the combo produces 127 FPS. At 2560x1440 Low, the frame rate drops to 92 FPS, and at 3840x2160 Low, it falls to 58 FPS.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B390’s performance compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The GPU scores 1482 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which is 1.3% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX (1463), 1.5% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce 800M (1460), and 2.7% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 (1443).

Q: Does the CPU’s performance have a significant impact on the frame rates in this game?

A: No, the data indicates the CPU is not the limiting factor. The Ryzen 9 9900X3D ranks in the 91st percentile of all CPUs with a multi-threaded PassMark score of 56154, but the GPU’s low performance prevents the CPU from being fully utilized.

Q: What are the minimum and maximum frame rates recorded for the 2560x1440 Medium setting?

A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the combo achieves an average of 66 FPS, with a minimum of 56 FPS and a maximum of 76 FPS.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern: performance scales predictably with resolution and settings, but the combo never reaches a comfortable level for high-end play. At 1920x1080, the lowest resolution tested, the combo delivers its best results. With Low settings, it achieves an average of 127 FPS, which is the only scenario where the frame rate is exceptionally high. Medium settings at this resolution produce 91 FPS (min 78, max 105), High settings produce 76 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to 49 FPS. This shows that 1080p is the only viable resolution for this combo, and even then, only Low and Medium settings provide a consistently smooth experience.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance drops significantly. Low settings yield an average of 92 FPS, which is playable but not as fluid as 1080p. Medium settings produce 66 FPS (min 56, max 76), which is borderline for a sports game, while High settings reduce the average to 55 FPS. Ultra settings at this resolution fall to 35 FPS, which is not smooth enough for gameplay. The trend continues at 3840x2160, where Low settings produce 58 FPS, Medium produces 42 FPS (min 36, max 48), High produces 35 FPS, and Ultra produces a barely interactive 22 FPS.

The data shows that the gap between Low and Ultra settings is substantial. At 1920x1080, the difference is 78 FPS (127 vs 49), which represents a 61% drop in performance. At 2560x1440, the drop is 57 FPS (92 vs 35), and at 3840x2160, it is 36 FPS (58 vs 22). These numbers indicate that the GPU is heavily taxed by the higher settings, and the "System Shared" memory architecture likely contributes to the steep performance cliffs. The only configuration that provides both high frame rates and visual fidelity is 1920x1080 Medium, which maintains a 91 FPS average with a minimum of 78 FPS.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D is an exceptionally powerful processor that is largely wasted in this combo. It features 12 cores and 24 threads, based on the Zen 5 architecture (Granite Ridge), with a base clock of 4.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. It has 128 MB of L3 cache, which is substantial for gaming, and supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus. The CPU’s benchmark scores are impressive: it achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 47737 and a single-core score of 6739, alongside a Geekbench multi-core score of 22884 and single-core score of 3041. Its average benchmark score of 54762 places it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs.

Given these specifications, one might expect the CPU to drive high frame rates in Undisputed, but the data shows otherwise. The CPU is not the bottleneck in any of the measured scenarios. For instance, at 1920x1080 Low, the combo produces 127 FPS, but this is limited by the GPU, not the CPU. The CPU’s nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF (avgScore 55093, 0.6% faster) and the Intel Core i7-14700F (avgScore 53620, 2.1% slower), all have similar performance levels, yet none of them would be paired with such a weak GPU in a gaming build.

The CPU’s role in this combo is to ensure that the system does not suffer from any CPU-bound frame drops. In Undisputed, a game that is not heavily multi-threaded, the CPU’s high single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread score of 4646) ensures that it can handle the game’s logic and AI without issue. However, the measured FPS values show that the GPU is the sole determinant of performance. The CPU’s 12 cores and 24 threads provide headroom for other tasks, but in this gaming context, they are underutilized. The data indicates that this CPU would be better served by a discrete GPU, but in this configuration, its capabilities are masked by the Arc B390’s limitations.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend entirely on the user’s resolution and tolerance for frame rate drops. For a smooth 60 FPS experience, the only viable option is 1920x1080 with Low settings, which delivers 127 FPS. This is the only configuration that provides a significant margin above the 60 FPS threshold. For users who prefer a balance between visual quality and performance, 1920x1080 Medium is the best choice, offering 91 FPS with a minimum of 78 FPS, ensuring minimal stutter during gameplay.

At 2560x1440, the data shows that Low settings (92 FPS) are the only way to maintain a high frame rate, but even this is a compromise. Medium settings at this resolution produce 66 FPS, which is playable but may dip in demanding scenes, as indicated by the 56 FPS minimum. High settings at 2560x1440 drop to 55 FPS, which is below the ideal threshold for a sports game, and Ultra settings are not recommended due to the 35 FPS average. For 3840x2160, the data is clear: no setting provides a playable experience. Low settings at 58 FPS are borderline, but Medium (42 FPS), High (35 FPS), and Ultra (22 FPS) are all too slow for competitive play.

The recommendation is to prioritize resolution over settings. The data shows that 1920x1080 Medium is the sweet spot, providing a 91 FPS average with a minimum of 78 FPS, which is smooth and visually acceptable. If the user insists on a higher resolution, 2560x1440 Low (92 FPS) is the only reasonable option. Avoid Ultra settings entirely, as the 22-49 FPS range across all resolutions is not suitable for a game that requires responsive controls. The measured results indicate that this combo is best suited for 1080p gaming at Medium or Low settings, and any attempt to push higher resolutions will result in a subpar experience.