Undisputed

# How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti sits at rank 989 out of 3718 tested combos in Undisputed. That places this configuration in the top 27% of all tested systems, a strong result for a sports title that typically favors high refresh rates over extreme GPU compute loads. The combo outperforms roughly 73% of all other CPU-GPU pairings tested in this game, indicating that the hardware pairing is well-balanced for the title's demands.

What makes this ranking particularly notable is the delta between the component classes. The RTX 3080 Ti holds an 83rd percentile ranking among all GPUs, while the Ryzen 7 7700 sits at an 87th percentile among all CPUs. The proximity of these percentiles suggests the two components complement each other effectively, with neither creating a dramatic bottleneck that would drag the combo rank far below either component's individual standing. The measured data confirms this balance: at 1080p High settings, the combo delivers 222 FPS average, while at 4K High it drops to 101 FPS — a scaling pattern that shows the GPU beginning to assert its limits at higher resolutions, but not collapsing in a way that would indicate a severe pairing mismatch.

# GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti brings 12 GB of GDDR6X memory across a 384-bit bus, yielding 912.4 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1188 MHz with 19 Gbps effective transfer rate. For Undisputed, a boxing simulation with detailed character models and arena environments, this memory configuration proves more than adequate. The base clock of 1365 MHz and boost clock of 1665 MHz drive the GA102 chip's 10,240 shading units, 320 TMUs, and 112 ROPs to produce the frame rates observed in the measured data.

The GPU's 34.10 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, combined with 80 RT cores and 320 tensor cores, gives the card substantial headroom even at 4K resolution. The measured results show this clearly: at 4K Medium settings, the combo averages 122 FPS with a minimum of 104 FPS and maximum of 141 FPS. The 4K Ultra preset drops to 65 FPS average, which remains playable but shows the GPU being pushed harder as texture quality and shadow complexity increase. The 4K Low preset hits 170 FPS average, demonstrating that even at the highest resolution this GPU has enough raw throughput to maintain high frame rates when visual effects are reduced.

The RTX 3080 Ti's 83rd percentile ranking among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 41187, places it slightly above the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 in the nearest rival comparison, with a delta of 0.8%. It also edges out the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 by 2% in average benchmark score, suggesting that while newer architectures exist, this Ampere-generation card remains competitive in raw performance metrics relevant to Undisputed's rendering workload.

# Settings Recommendations

For 1080p displays, the High preset at 222 FPS average represents the best balance of visual quality and performance, though the Ultra preset at 143 FPS still provides a smooth experience for the vast majority of displays. The Low preset at 1080p reaches 372 FPS average, which exceeds the refresh rate capabilities of nearly all consumer monitors, making it useful only for competitive play where every frame matters.

At 1440p, the High preset delivers 160 FPS average, which is the recommended choice for high-refresh-rate monitors. The Medium preset at 194 FPS offers a significant FPS boost over High while the visual quality difference in a sports title like Undisputed is often less noticeable during fast-paced boxing action. The Ultra preset at 103 FPS remains viable for those prioritizing visual fidelity, but the 57 FPS gap between High and Ultra at this resolution suggests diminishing returns on the extra GPU load.

For 4K displays, the Medium preset at 122 FPS average is the clear recommendation, providing a smooth experience above the 120 FPS threshold. The High preset at 101 FPS is also acceptable for 60 Hz displays, but the Ultra preset at 65 FPS, while technically playable, sits close to the lower boundary of what most users would consider comfortable for a sports title. The 4K Low preset at 170 FPS demonstrates that the GPU can handle the resolution easily when graphical effects are minimized, but the Medium preset offers a better visual experience for only a 48 FPS penalty.

# FAQ

Q: How does this combo rank against other tested configurations in Undisputed?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti combination ranks 989th out of 3718 tested combos, placing it in the top 27% of all systems tested in this game.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Undisputed?

A: Based on the measured data, 1440p High settings at 160 FPS average provides the best combination of resolution and frame rate. At 4K, the Medium preset at 122 FPS average is the highest resolution option that maintains performance above the 120 FPS threshold.

Q: How does the RTX 3080 Ti compare to its nearest rivals in benchmark scores?

A: The RTX 3080 Ti has an average benchmark score of 41187, which is 0.8% higher than the AMD Radeon Pro 5300's 40870, 1.2% higher than the NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB's 41707, and 2% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070's 40377.

Q: What is the FPS difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: At 1080p, the Low preset averages 372 FPS while the Ultra preset averages 143 FPS, representing a 229 FPS difference between the lowest and highest quality presets.

Q: Does the 4K Medium preset maintain consistent frame times?

A: Yes, the 4K Medium preset shows an average of 122 FPS with a minimum of 104 FPS and maximum of 141 FPS, indicating a frame time variance of 37 FPS between minimum and maximum.

Q: How does the CPU's benchmark performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 7700 has an average benchmark score of 40081, which is 0.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365's 40048, 0.2% lower than the Intel Core 5 221E's 40144, 0.4% lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 270's 40246, and 0.6% lower than the Intel Core i9-13905H's 40313.

# Resolution Scaling

The measured data reveals a clear and predictable scaling pattern across resolutions. At 1080p High settings, the combo produces 222 FPS average. Moving to 1440p High drops this to 160 FPS, a 28% reduction. At 4K High, the average falls to 101 FPS, representing another 37% reduction from 1440p. This scaling pattern indicates that the GPU becomes increasingly load-bound as resolution increases, while the CPU's contribution to frame rate diminishes.

The Low preset shows even more dramatic scaling: 372 FPS at 1080p, 269 FPS at 1440p (a 28% drop), and 170 FPS at 4K (a 37% drop from 1440p). The consistency of these percentage drops across presets suggests that the resolution scaling behavior is largely independent of graphical settings, pointing to the GPU's pixel throughput as the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions.

The 4K to 1080p ratio for High settings is 101/222 = 0.455, meaning 4K delivers roughly 45% of the 1080p frame rate. For Low settings, the ratio is 170/372 = 0.457, nearly identical. This consistency strongly indicates that the GPU is the limiting component at higher resolutions, as the CPU's workload does not scale with resolution. The RTX 3080 Ti's 186.5 GPixel/s pixel rate and 532.8 GTexel/s texture rate provide the theoretical ceiling that explains these scaling patterns.

# CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 contributes 8 cores and 16 threads running at a base clock of 3.80 GHz and boost clock of 5.30 GHz. This Zen 4 architecture chip, built on TSMC's 5 nm process, features 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. For Undisputed, a sports title that primarily relies on physics calculations for character interactions and AI for opponent behavior, the CPU's single-thread performance is particularly relevant.

The 3DMark single-thread score of 1049 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1930 indicate strong per-core performance. The passmark single-thread score of 4063 places this chip well above average for gaming workloads. In Undisputed, where the game logic and physics simulation typically run on fewer threads, this single-thread strength ensures that the CPU does not become a bottleneck even at high frame rates. The measured data supports this: at 1080p Low, the combo achieves 372 FPS average, which would be impossible if the CPU were severely limiting frame production.

The CPU's multi-threaded capabilities, demonstrated by a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18760 and 3DMark max-threads score of 8479, provide headroom for background tasks and future game updates that might utilize additional threads. The 87th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 40081, shows that this chip sits just above the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 in the nearest rival comparison, with a delta of 0.1%. The Ryzen 7 7700's 65 W TDP and dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth further contribute to its efficiency in gaming workloads.

# Measured FPS Breakdown

1920x1080 (1080p):

• Low: 372 FPS average
• Medium: 268 FPS average, 228 FPS minimum, 308 FPS maximum
• High: 222 FPS average
• Ultra: 143 FPS average

2560x1440 (1440p):

• Low: 269 FPS average
• Medium: 194 FPS average, 165 FPS minimum, 223 FPS maximum
• High: 160 FPS average
• Ultra: 103 FPS average

3840x2160 (4K):

• Low: 170 FPS average
• Medium: 122 FPS average, 104 FPS minimum, 141 FPS maximum
• High: 101 FPS average
• Ultra: 65 FPS average

The Medium preset at each resolution is the only setting with complete minimum and maximum FPS data, providing insight into frame time consistency. At 1080p Medium, the 228-308 FPS range shows a variance of 80 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the 165-223 FPS range narrows to 58 FPS. At 4K Medium, the 104-141 FPS range tightens further to 37 FPS. This trend indicates that frame time consistency actually improves as resolution increases, likely because the GPU becomes more uniformly load-bound rather than experiencing intermittent CPU-driven spikes.

The scaling from 1080p Low to 1080p Ultra shows a 229 FPS drop, representing a 61% reduction in frame rate from lowest to highest settings. At 1440p, the same comparison yields a 166 FPS drop (62% reduction), and at 4K, a 105 FPS drop (62% reduction). This consistent percentage reduction across resolutions demonstrates that the graphical settings have a multiplicative effect on GPU workload, independent of resolution scaling.

For users targeting specific refresh rates, the data provides clear guidance: 144 Hz displays can be driven at 1440p Ultra (103 FPS is below this target, so High at 160 FPS is appropriate), 165 Hz displays work best at 1440p High or 1080p Ultra, and 240 Hz displays require 1080p High or Medium settings. The 4K 120 Hz market is served by the Medium preset at 122 FPS average, though the 104 FPS minimum means occasional dips below the 120 FPS threshold.