Undisputed

The data for Undisputed with an AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 shows a system that delivers extremely high frame rates even at 4K, with a noticeable performance gradient across preset levels. This particular CPU–GPU combination ranked 895th out of 3,718 tested combinations in this game, positioning it in the top quarter of all measured combos, and the measured results here—taken across three resolutions and four quality presets—illustrate how the pairing behaves under varying load.

Resolution Scaling

Undisputed exhibits a clear and predictable scaling pattern as resolution rises from 1080p to 1440p to 4K, but the magnitude of the drop depends strongly on the preset selected. At the High preset, average FPS falls from 223 at 1920x1080, to 161 at 2560x1440, and finally to 102 at 3840x2160. That means the frame rate at 4K is roughly 45% of the 1080p value. The Low preset shows a steeper absolute decline—from 374 at 1080p, to 271 at 1440p, to 171 at 4K—yet the 4K score still remains well above the refresh rates of most monitors. At the Medium preset, figures are 269 (1080p), 195 (1440p), and 123 (4K), showing a similar ratio. The Ultra preset is the most demanding: it starts at 143 FPS in 1080p, drops to 104 in 1440p, and bottoms out at 66 in 4K.

These numbers suggest the RTX 4070 is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions. At 1080p Low, the 374 FPS ceiling is far beyond the pixel throughput of most GPUs, implying the CPU is capable of delivering a very high instruction rate, but the GPU limits how many pixels can be processed per frame. The measureable difference between Low and Ultra at the same resolution points to a GPU-side load: at 1080p, Low is 374 FPS while Ultra is 143 FPS, a 2.6× gap. This gap shrinks at 1440p (271 vs 104) and narrows further at 4K (171 vs 66), reinforcing that the RTX 4070's shading, ROP, and texture processing throughput becomes the limiting factor as pixel output increases.

The CPU appears to have ample headroom even at 1080p Low, as the FPS does not plateau until it reaches a very high rate. The GPU's memory bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s and 12 GB of GDDR6X also come into play. At 4K Ultra with 66 FPS, the system is clearly hitting a memory bandwidth or fill-rate bottleneck that the 8-core CPU cannot overcome.

CPU Role

The CPU component of this combination is the AMD Ryzen 7 7700, a 7000-series desktop processor with 8 cores and 16 threads, base clock 3.80 GHz, boost 5.30 GHz, and a 65 W TDP. Its architecture is Zen 4 (Raphael) on a 5 nm process from TSMC, with 32 MB of shared L3 cache and a dual-channel DDR5 memory interface offering 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU's single-thread and multi-thread scores from the benchmark suite reflect its position. In Cinebench R23 it posts 1,930 in single-core and 18,760 in multicore. Passmark single-thread is 4,063, while multithread reaches 34,470. The Geekbench scores are 2,525 single and 15,371 for many.

The processor's percentile rank among all CPUs is 87 – meaning it performs better than 87% of all tested CPUs in synthetic tests. When compared to its nearest rivals, the data shows a tight grouping. The Ryzen 7 7700's average benchmark score is 40,081; it is 0.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 and 0.2% lower than the Intel Core 5 221E. The Intel Core i9-13905H sits just ahead (0.6% faster), while the AMD Ryzen 9 270 is behind by 0.4%. That cluster indicates the CPU's raw compute performance is balanced across several modern parts.

For Undisputed, the game's CPU utilization appears high in single-threaded tasks, but the multi-thread scores matter as boxing sims often simulate many physics interactions and animation states. The 16 threads can handle alternating frame work and background tasks. In practice, as seen in the resolution scaling, the CPU is never the primary limiter in this test at typical resolutions. Even in the highest frame-rate scenario (1080p Low, 374 FPS), it still delivers above what the GPU can drive. The strong single-thread performance (boost 5.30 GHz, Passmark 4063) ensures that the render thread is not a bottleneck at those low graphics loads.

The RAM size is unmentioned, but the CPU supports ECC and DDR5 with dual-channel memory, which suits the high 83.2 GB/s bandwidth needed for high FPS and 1920×1080.

GPU Role

The graphics card in this setup is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070, based on the AD104 chip under the Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process with 35,800 million transistors and a die size of 294 mm². It has a base clock of 1,920 MHz and a boost of 2,475 MHz, with a 16-pin connector and a 200 W TDP. The memory configuration is 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, giving 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth, which is a key enabler for 4K gaming.

The RTX 4070 has 5,888 shading units, 184 TMUs, 64 ROPs, 46 RT cores, and 184 tensor cores. It delivers 29.15 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 158.4 GPixel/s pixel rate, plus 455.4 GTexel/s texture rate. In the raw benchmark measurements, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 3,854, Geekbench OpenCL is 154,858, Vulkan is 174,152, and the Passmark G3D is 26,927. These scores give the GPU a 81 percentile ranking among all GPUs.

Nearest rivals to the RTX 4070 in synthetic benchmarks: NVIDIA Tesla P4 (deltaPct 0.1), AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 ( +0.4%), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile (−1.3%), and AMD Radeon PRO W6400 ( +1.3%). So the RTX 4070 sits in a close pack, separated by only a few percent.

In this game, the GPU's impact is clear on the Ultra preset at 4K. We observe the highest resolution Ultra frame rate at 66 FPS, while the 1080p Ultra hits 143 FPS. This is consistent with the GPU's pixel output capacity. The 12 GB VRAM is likely sufficient for Undisputed at 4K Ultra, as no signs of VRAM limit-induced crash are present, but the fill-rate and texture power limit the performance.

How This Combo Ranks

In Undisputed, the combination of the Ryzen 7 7700 and RTX 4070 achieves a rank of 895 out of 3,718 tested combinations. This places it roughly in the ~76th percentile of all combos—meaning it outperforms about 76% of other CPU+GPU pairs tested for this game. The measured data was collected directly (dataIsMeasured true), so the ranking is based on actual performance, not simulation.

The CPU's high percentile (87) and the GPU's 81 percentile suggest that each component is individually ahead of most hardware, but the combination rank is still very high, which is a positive sign. The 895 rank indicates that the two cooperate efficiently; both have enough headroom for the game's demands. The critical factor is that the CPU never becomes the weak link in the tested scenarios; the GPU is the one responding to resolution changes. The CPU's strong multi-core performance (Cinebench R23 Multi 18,760) ensures it can feed the GPU with data even at lower resolutions where the GPU is under less load, leading to very high frame rates like 374 FPS.

In comparison to other combos, the ranking is consistent with what the component scores suggest: this hardware is overkill for 1080p play, solid at 1440p, and still playable at 4K on the High preset.

FAQ

Q: What is the best average FPS at 4K in this test?

A: The highest average FPS in 2160p is 171 FPS with the Low preset; the second best is 123 on Medium, then 102 on High, and the lowest is 66 on Ultra.

Q: At which resolution is the CPU bottleneck less likely to appear?

A: The data shows that at 1080p Low, the FPS reaches 374, which is higher than the GPU can push at any higher resolution. That suggests the CPU is not a limitation at 1080p. At 4K, the GPU's pixel fill becomes the first limitation, so the CPU role is dim.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 7 7700 averages 40,081. It is 0.1% faster than the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, 0.2% slower than the Intel Core 5 221E, and 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13905H, and 0.4% above the AMD Ryzen 9 270.

Q: Does the RTX 4070 beat its nearest rival in raw bench score?

A: Its average benchmark score is 37,648, which is 0.1% higher than the Tesla P4, 0.4% higher than the Radeon RX Vega 56, 1.3% lower than the RTX 4080 Mobile, and 1.3% higher than the Radeon PRO W6400.

Q: Which preset yields the most balanced FPS at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Medium states offer 195 FPS while the High preset1080p. If smoothness is priority, Medium has a reported min of 165 and max of 224 FPS, while High and Ultra have no min/max given in the data.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured rows, the Medium preset appears to offer the best balance between visual load and minimum frame rate stability. At 1920×1080, Medium averages 269 FPS with a minimum of 229 and maximum of 310 – a stable spread. At 2560×1440, Medium is 195 FPS (min 165, max 224), still above the refresh rate of most monitors. At 3840×2160, it provides 123 FPS (min 105, max 142). This preset gives a consistent pixel average.

The High preset also delivers even higher frame rates (161 at 1440p, 102 at 4K), but without min/max in the data, no guarantee of 1% low. However, since High retains the same 12GB VRAM, it is worth using if the monitor is 1440p 144Hz, as it stays far above 144 FPS at that resolution.

The Ultra preset should be avoided for 4K play. It provides only 66 FPS at 2160p with no record of temporal stability, and 104 at 1440p, which is still high but below the 1440p 144Hz target. For a 120Hz 4K display, High is a better option as it reaches 102.

Given these, the recommendation is to set Medium for most players, especially at 1080p or 1440p, where the difference between Medium and High is no longer the issue. For those who must have the sharpest shadows, High is the second choice.

Measured FPS Breakdown

This table breaks down every measured average frame rate, with the min and max details where available.

• 3840x2160, High: 102 FPS
• 3840x2160, Low: 171 FPS
• 3840x2160, Medium: 123 FPS (min 105, max 142)
• 3840x2160, Ultra: 66 FPS
• 2560x1440, High: 161 FPS
• 2560x1440, Low: 271 FPS
• 2560x1440, Medium: 195 FPS (min 165, max 224)
• 2560x1440, Ultra: 104 FPS
• 1920x1080, High: 223 FPS
• 1920x1080, Low: 374 FPS
• 1920x1080, Medium: 269 FPS (min 229, max 310)
• 1920x1080, Ultra: 143 FPS

All data is measured and only the rows appear exactly as collected. The Medium preset is the one where both min and max are recorded in the dataset, giving the clearest picture of frame pacing. For all other presets, only the average is provided. This existing pattern makes the Medium preset the one with the most complete range data.