Undisputed

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 lands at rank 246 out of 3718 tested combos for Undisputed. That places this setup in the top 7% of all configurations in the database, a strong result for a sports title that rewards high frame rates. The percentile positioning is more about the GPU than the CPU, as the RTX 4080 sits at the 86th percentile among all GPUs, while the Ryzen 7 5700X holds the 79th percentile among all CPUs. The ranking is not a fluke of a single resolution; the data shows consistently high performance across all measured settings. For context, this combo outperforms the vast majority of systems, but it is not at the absolute top, leaving headroom for even higher-end parts. The gap between this rank and the top-tier configurations is unlikely to be visible in practice, because the frame rates already exceed the refresh rates of most displays. The combo's position in the rankings reflects a balanced pairing where the GPU carries the load in this particular title, but the CPU is sufficient to avoid becoming a bottleneck. In terms of the overall database, a rank of 246 means this system is in the upper echelon, suitable for high-refresh-rate play at any resolution tested.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is the primary driver of performance in Undisputed, and the data makes this clear. The GPU features 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 1400 MHz with 22.4 Gbps effective speed, which is ample for the textures and geometry in a sports title. The core clocks are listed at a base of 2205 MHz and a boost of 2505 MHz, built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with a 5 nm process. The GPU's compute capabilities are substantial, with 9728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 ROPs. The FP32 performance is rated at 48.74 TFLOPS, which is more than enough for a game like Undisputed that does not rely on extreme compute workloads. In the measured results, the RTX 4080 shows its strength by pushing average FPS above 200 in most configurations, even at 4K. At 2560x1440 with High settings, the average FPS is 206, and at 1920x1080 with High settings, it reaches 285. These numbers indicate that the GPU is not struggling at all; the limiting factor is elsewhere. The GPU's benchmark scores corroborate this, with a Passmark G3D score of 34457 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 214739. The GPU's nearest rival is the RTX 4080 SUPER, which is only 0.1% ahead in average score, making the performance difference negligible. The RTX 4080 is end-of-life in production status, but that does not diminish its capability in this game. The 320 W TDP and triple-slot cooler are worth noting for system planning, but the performance data speaks for itself.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS shows a clear and expected scaling pattern as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. At 1920x1080 with High settings, the average FPS is 285. Moving to 2560x1440 at the same settings drops the average to 206, a reduction of 79 FPS or about 28%. At 3840x2160 with High settings, the average FPS falls to 130, which is a further drop of 76 FPS from 1440p, or about 37% lower. The pattern is consistent across all settings presets. For Low settings, the FPS goes from 479 at 1080p to 346 at 1440p to 219 at 4K. Medium settings show 345 FPS at 1080p, 249 FPS at 1440p, and 158 FPS at 4K. Ultra settings are the most demanding, with 184 FPS at 1080p, 133 FPS at 1440p, and 84 FPS at 4K. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p is steeper than from 1440p to 4K in percentage terms, which suggests the CPU is starting to become a factor at lower resolutions. At 1080p, the Ryzen 7 5700X's single-thread performance is more likely to limit frame rates, while at 4K, the GPU is the dominant constraint. The data shows that the drop from 1080p to 1440p is roughly 28-30% across settings, while the drop from 1440p to 4K is roughly 37-40%. This indicates that the RTX 4080 has enough headroom to handle 1440p easily, but 4K is where the GPU's limits begin to show, especially at Ultra settings where the average FPS falls below 100. The minimum FPS values are only provided for Medium settings, showing 293 at 1080p, 212 at 1440p, and 134 at 4K, which suggests that even the lows are playable. Overall, the scaling behavior indicates a system that is well-balanced for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1440p and capable of smooth 4K play at lower presets.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data provides a clear picture of which settings preset offers the best experience for this combo. At 1920x1080, all presets deliver high average FPS, but the Medium preset stands out with an average of 345 FPS and a minimum of 293 FPS. This is a better balance than High, which averages 285 FPS, or Ultra, which averages 184 FPS. The Medium preset at 1080p is the sweet spot for competitive play, offering frame rates that exceed most high-refresh monitors' capabilities while maintaining visual quality. At 2560x1440, the Medium preset again provides the best experience, with an average of 249 FPS and a minimum of 212 FPS. High at 1440p averages 206 FPS, which is still excellent, but Medium offers a higher minimum frame rate, which is important for consistency. Ultra at 1440p drops to 133 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for fast-paced action. At 3840x2160, the Medium preset is the recommended choice, averaging 158 FPS with a minimum of 134 FPS. This is the only 4K preset that stays above 100 FPS on average, making it the most practical for smooth play. High at 4K averages 130 FPS, but the lack of a reported minimum makes it harder to recommend over Medium, which has a solid floor. Low presets are unnecessary at any resolution, as the frame rates are excessively high and visual quality suffers. The data suggests that Medium settings provide the best overall experience, balancing frame rate and visual fidelity across all three resolutions. For users with 144Hz or 165Hz monitors, Medium at 1440p is the clear winner, while those with 4K displays should stick to Medium to stay above 100 FPS. Ultra settings are only advisable for users who prioritize image quality over frame rate, as the averages at 4K Ultra drop to 84 FPS.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance ranking of this combo in Undisputed?

A: This combo ranks 246th out of 3718 tested combinations, placing it in the top 7% of all systems in the database for this game.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 compare to its closest rival in benchmark scores?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 has an average benchmark score of 54247, while the RTX 4080 SUPER scores 54209, a delta of 0.1% in favor of the SUPER, which is a negligible difference.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 4K gaming with this combo?

A: At 3840x2160, the Medium preset offers an average FPS of 158 with a minimum of 134 FPS, making it the best choice for keeping frame rates above 100 FPS. Ultra at 4K drops to 84 FPS average.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 1080p?

A: The data suggests the CPU becomes more of a factor at 1080p, as the FPS drop from 1080p to 1440p is about 28%, while the drop from 1440p to 4K is larger, indicating the GPU is more stressed at higher resolutions.

Q: What are the average FPS numbers at 1440p with High settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with High settings, the average FPS is 206, with no minimum or maximum reported for that preset. The Medium preset at 1440p averages 249 FPS with a minimum of 212 FPS.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 5700X compare to the Intel Core i5-12600K in average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X has an average benchmark score of 27578, which is identical to the Intel Core i5-12600K's score of 27578, showing a delta of 0% between them.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X plays a supporting role in this combo, but its specifications and benchmark results are worth examining. This CPU has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. It is built on the Zen 3 architecture with a 7 nm process, featuring 32 MB of shared L3 cache and 512 KB of L2 cache per core. The TDP is rated at 65 W, which is low for a desktop processor, but the performance is not compromised. In the measured FPS data, the CPU's influence is visible at lower resolutions. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the average FPS reaches 479, which is extraordinarily high and suggests the CPU is able to feed the GPU fast enough to avoid a bottleneck. At 1080p Ultra, the average FPS is 184, which is still high but shows that the CPU is working harder to process game logic and physics. The CPU's benchmark scores include a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13184 and a single-core score of 1499. The Passmark multi-thread score is 26612, and the single-thread score is 3385. These scores place the 5700X at the 79th percentile among all CPUs, which is respectable but not top-tier. The nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-12600K, has an identical average benchmark score of 27578, showing that the 5700X is competitive with a solid mid-range offering. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 is 0.2% ahead, and the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X is 0.2% behind, meaning the 5700X sits in a tight performance cluster. In Undisputed, a sports title that likely does not use more than 8 cores effectively, the 5700X's 8-core, 16-thread configuration is more than sufficient. The boost clock of 4.60 GHz is adequate for single-threaded tasks, and the 3dmark single-thread score of 921 reflects this. The data indicates that the CPU is not the primary constraint in this game, as the GPU is the dominant factor at higher resolutions. However, at 1080p, the CPU's performance does influence the maximum achievable frame rates, as evidenced by the scaling differences. The Ryzen 7 5700X's memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s and dual-channel DDR4 support are adequate for this workload. Overall, the CPU provides a solid foundation for the RTX 4080, ensuring that the GPU can operate at its full potential without being held back. The 100 MHz difference in boost clock compared to some rivals is unlikely to produce noticeable differences in this game, as the GPU is the limiting factor in most scenarios.