Undisputed

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 ranks 477th out of 1,580 tested combos in Undisputed. This places the combination in the 70th percentile of all tested systems, a strong showing that reflects a well-balanced pairing for this sports title. The ranking suggests that while this combo is not at the absolute top tier for Undisputed, it sits comfortably ahead of the majority of configurations, offering a high level of performance that will satisfy most players.

The CPU's overall standing reinforces this position. With an average benchmark score of 27,220, the Ryzen 7 5700 sits at the 84th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in the broader benchmark suite are the Intel Core i9-9900K, which scores 27,043 and is just 0.7% behind, and the Intel Core i7-12700H at 27,006, trailing by 0.8%. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 is also close at 26,909, a 1.2% deficit. This tight cluster of scores indicates that the Ryzen 7 5700 delivers compute performance that is essentially on par with several high-end chips from previous generations, making it a solid foundation for gaming workloads.

The GPU side tells a similar story. The RTX 3080 achieves an average benchmark score of 35,787, placing it at the 80th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon Pro Duo with a score of 35,860, a negligible 0.2% difference. The AMD Radeon 880M is 0.4% behind at 35,646, while the AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE is 0.9% ahead at 36,101. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile trails by 1.0% with a score of 35,435. These margins are razor-thin, demonstrating that the RTX 3080's rasterization performance remains highly competitive even against newer architectures, which directly benefits frame rates in a game like Undisputed.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is the dominant component in this pairing for Undisputed, and its memory configuration is a key factor. The card is equipped with 10 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 320-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s. This high-bandwidth setup is well-suited for a sports title that demands consistent texture streaming and high-resolution rendering. The large memory pool ensures that even at 4K resolution with high-detail assets, the GPU does not become a bottleneck due to capacity limits.

Clock speeds for this GPU are set to a base of 1440 MHz and a boost of 1710 MHz. The memory operates at an effective speed of 19 Gbps. These frequencies, combined with the Ampere architecture's 8,704 shading units, 272 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units, allow the card to sustain high fill rates. The pixel rate is 164.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 465.1 GTexel/s, which are substantial figures that translate directly to the ability to process complex scenes in Undisputed without frame drops.

Benchmark results show that the GPU is a powerhouse in both compute and graphics tasks. It scores 167,014 in Geekbench OpenCL and 145,176 in Geekbench Vulkan. In Passmark's G3D test, it scores 25,086, and its GPU compute score is 14,397. These numbers indicate that the card's raw throughput is more than sufficient to handle the physics and rendering calculations required by the game. The data suggests that in most scenarios, the CPU will be waiting on the GPU to finish its work, particularly at higher settings where the load on the graphics card increases exponentially.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Undisputed at 4K with high settings?

A: Yes. The measured average frame rate at 3840x2160 with High settings is 98.9 FPS, which is well above the threshold for smooth, playable performance.

Q: How does the combo perform at 1080p with Ultra settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the average frame rate is 140.1 FPS. This shows that even at the highest settings, the system delivers a high-refresh-rate experience.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this configuration?

A: Benchmark results indicate the GPU is the primary bottleneck. At 1080p Low, the average FPS is 357.7, which is incredibly high. The performance scales down as resolution increases, which is a classic sign of GPU limitation rather than CPU constraint.

Q: What is the difference in performance between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the average FPS drops from 259.9 on Low settings to 99.2 on Ultra settings. This represents a significant performance cost for the visual fidelity gains of Ultra.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested systems?

A: It ranks 477th out of 1,580 tested combos, placing it in the upper echelon of configurations for Undisputed.

Q: Is the RTX 3080's 10 GB VRAM sufficient for this game?

A: Yes. The data shows that at 4K Ultra, the average FPS is 63.2, which is still playable. The VRAM capacity has not caused a performance cliff, indicating the 10 GB is adequate for this title.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers exceptional performance across all settings. The lowest average is 140.1 FPS at Ultra, which is still very smooth. Medium settings produce 260.8 FPS, while High settings yield 215.2 FPS. The Low setting pushes the system to its limit, achieving an average of 357.7 FPS. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the system is consistently operating far above the refresh rates of most monitors, providing a highly responsive experience.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance remains strong. The Ultra setting produces an average of 99.2 FPS, which is just shy of the 100 FPS mark. High settings reach 154.2 FPS, Medium settings hit 190.2 FPS, and Low settings achieve 259.9 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a predictable reduction in frame rates, but the system still delivers playable and often high-refresh-rate results at every preset.

At 3840x2160, the performance impact becomes more pronounced. The Ultra setting yields an average of 63.2 FPS, which is borderline for high-refresh gaming but still playable on standard 60 Hz displays. High settings produce 98.9 FPS, Medium settings achieve 120.2 FPS, and Low settings reach 164 FPS. The 4K results demonstrate that the RTX 3080 is capable of handling the resolution, though users seeking maximum frame rates will need to adjust settings down from Ultra.

Resolution Scaling

The data reveals a clear pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 357.7 at 1080p to 259.9 at 1440p, a decrease of 97.8 FPS. Moving from 1440p to 4K at Low settings further reduces the average to 164 FPS, which is a 95.9 FPS drop. This linear decline suggests that the GPU is the limiting factor, as the workload scales directly with the number of pixels being rendered.

At High settings, the scaling is similar. The average FPS at 1080p is 215.2, which falls to 154.2 at 1440p and then to 98.9 at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is 61 FPS, and the drop from 1440p to 4K is 55.3 FPS. This consistent reduction indicates that the system is not experiencing any sudden bottlenecks or thermal throttling, but rather a steady increase in GPU load.

The Ultra settings show the most dramatic scaling. At 1080p, the average is 140.1 FPS. At 1440p, it drops to 99.2 FPS, a loss of 40.9 FPS. At 4K, it falls to 63.2 FPS, another 36 FPS loss. The percentage reduction from 1080p to 4K at Ultra is roughly 55%. This steep decline highlights that 4K Ultra is the most demanding scenario for this combo, and it pushes the GPU to its limits. The data confirms that while the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU at lower resolutions, the RTX 3080 becomes the definitive bottleneck as the resolution climbs.