Undisputed

The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 pairing delivers exceptional performance in Undisputed, consistently producing frame rates well above the thresholds required for smooth competitive play. Across all tested resolutions and settings, the combo never drops below an average of 140 FPS, making it a top-tier option for this sports title. The data places this combination at rank 3 out of 3,718 tested combos, indicating that it outperforms the vast majority of systems in the database.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best resolution to play Undisputed with this hardware?*

A: The data shows that at 2560x1440 with High settings, the system achieves an average of 337 FPS. At 1920x1080 with High settings, it reaches 436 FPS. While 3840x2160 at Ultra still delivers a playable 140 FPS average, the higher refresh rate potential at lower resolutions makes 2560x1440 the sweet spot for competitive play.

Q: How much faster is the Low preset compared to Ultra at 4K?

A: At 3840x2160, the Low preset produces an average of 257 FPS, which is 117 FPS higher than the Ultra preset's 140 FPS average. This represents a significant 83.6% performance increase, though the Ultra preset remains fully playable.

Q: Does the RTX 4080's 16 GB of VRAM cause any issues in this game?

A: The benchmark data shows no VRAM-related performance drops. The system maintains high frame rates across all settings, including 386 FPS at 1920x1080 Ultra and 253 FPS at 2560x1440 Ultra, indicating that the 16 GB GDDR6X memory is more than sufficient for Undisputed's requirements.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested systems?

A: This configuration ranks 3rd out of 3,718 tested combos in the database. This places it in the top 0.1% of all systems tested, indicating that it outperforms nearly every other combination for this game.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The lowest minimum FPS recorded across all tests is 186 FPS, which occurs at 3840x2160 with Medium settings. This represents the worst-case frame drop in the dataset, yet it still exceeds the refresh rate of most high-end monitors.

Q: Is there a significant difference between Medium and High settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, Medium settings yield an average of 397 FPS, while High settings produce 337 FPS. The 60 FPS difference (15.1% slower) is noticeable but both settings provide far more frames than necessary for smooth gameplay, allowing users to prioritize visual quality without concern.

Settings Recommendations

The benchmark data reveals a clear hierarchy of performance across presets, with the optimal choice depending on the user's display capabilities. At 3840x2160, the High preset delivers 186 FPS average, which is the best balance of visual fidelity and speed for 4K displays. The Ultra preset drops to 140 FPS, still playable but 24.7% slower, while the Medium preset at 219 FPS and Low at 257 FPS offer diminishing visual returns for the additional speed. For 4K users, High is the recommended setting, as it maintains a comfortable margin above 144 Hz while preserving substantial graphical detail.

At 2560x1440, the High preset's 337 FPS average is the recommended choice for users with high-refresh-rate displays. The Medium preset reaches 397 FPS, which could benefit those with 360 Hz monitors, but the visual trade-off is significant. The Low preset at 425 FPS and Ultra at 253 FPS represent the extremes, with Ultra still exceeding 240 Hz. For 1440p, High provides the best overall experience, as most displays in this resolution class cap at 240 Hz or below, and the added visual quality justifies the 60 FPS reduction from Medium.

At 1920x1080, the High preset at 436 FPS is the optimal choice, as it exceeds the capabilities of virtually all monitors in this resolution class. The Medium preset at 462 FPS and Low at 489 FPS offer negligible practical benefits, while Ultra at 386 FPS still provides an excellent experience. Given that 1080p displays rarely exceed 360 Hz, the High preset at 436 FPS leaves ample headroom while delivering the best visual quality per frame. Users seeking maximum competitive advantage could choose Low, but the 53 FPS difference between Low and High is unlikely to be perceptible in actual gameplay.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 serves as the primary driver of Undisputed's exceptional frame rates, with its 16 GB of GDDR6X memory and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth ensuring no memory bottleneck at any tested setting. The GPU's Ada Lovelace architecture, built on a 5 nm process with 45,900 million transistors, provides the raw compute power necessary to maintain high averages even at 4K Ultra. The boost clock of 2505 MHz, combined with 9,728 shading units, allows the card to process the game's graphics workload efficiently across all resolutions.

The memory configuration proves critical in the 3840x2160 tests, where the 256-bit bus width and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth support the higher data throughput required at 4K. The 16 GB capacity is never stressed, as indicated by the consistent performance scaling from Low to Ultra settings. The RTX 4080's 48.74 TFLOPS of FP32 performance directly correlates with the frame rate differences observed: at 4K, the GPU delivers 257 FPS at Low but drops to 140 FPS at Ultra, a 45.5% reduction that reflects the increased shading and texture work demanded by higher presets.

The GPU's percentile ranking of 86 places it above 86% of all GPUs in the database, and its average benchmark score of 54,247 nearly matches the RTX 4080 SUPER's 54,209 (0.1% difference). This proximity to the SUPER variant suggests that Undisputed is not heavily optimized for the specific architectural differences between these cards, allowing the standard 4080 to perform almost identically. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,567 further validates its capability, though the game's actual performance benefits more from the card's raw rasterization throughput than from ray tracing or tensor core features.

How This Combo Ranks

This configuration achieves rank 3 out of 3,718 tested combinations in Undisputed, placing it in the 99.9th percentile of all systems evaluated. This exceptional ranking indicates that the Ryzen 7 3700X and RTX 4080 pairing is among the fastest configurations available for this title, outperforming the overwhelming majority of alternatives. The high rank is particularly notable given that the CPU is from the 3000 series, suggesting that Undisputed is not heavily CPU-bound at the tested settings.

The rank of 3 means that only 2 other combinations in the database produce higher frame rates, which likely consist of newer flagship CPUs paired with the RTX 4090 or similar top-end hardware. The margin between this combo and the top 2 is not quantified in the data, but the performance levels achieved—such as 489 FPS at 1080p Low and 337 FPS at 1440p High—indicate that the system is operating near the practical limits of the game engine. The 3,718 tested combos span a wide range of hardware, from entry-level systems to extreme enthusiast builds, making the 3rd place finish a clear statement of this combo's elite status.

The combination of an 84th percentile CPU and 86th percentile GPU produces a synergistic result that exceeds the sum of its parts. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 22,458 and the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 34,457 both contribute to the system's overall capability, but the rank 3 placement suggests that Undisputed scales particularly well with the RTX 4080's architecture. The data shows that the combo maintains high frame rates even at 4K Ultra (140 FPS), a feat that many higher-ranked combos might not achieve, indicating that this specific pairing is exceptionally well-suited to this game's demands.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, provides sufficient processing power to feed the RTX 4080 without creating a bottleneck in Undisputed. The CPU's base clock of 3.60 GHz and boost clock of 4.40 GHz, combined with 32 MB of L3 cache, ensure that game logic and physics calculations are handled efficiently. The Zen 2 architecture, built on a 7 nm process, delivers a PassMark single-thread score of 2,656 and a multithread score of 22,458, which are adequate for maintaining high frame rates across all tested settings.

The CPU's role becomes more apparent at lower resolutions, where the GPU has more headroom and the CPU must work harder to keep up. At 1920x1080, the frame rates range from 386 FPS at Ultra to 489 FPS at Low, and the CPU must process game state updates and draw calls at these high rates. The Ryzen 7 3700X's 16 threads allow it to handle the multi-threaded workload of Undisputed efficiently, as evidenced by the lack of significant frame drops in the 1080p tests. The data shows that the CPU's performance is sufficient even at the highest frame rates, with no indications of CPU-related stuttering or frame pacing issues.

The CPU's nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, has an average benchmark score of 34,222, which is 0.1% lower than the 3700X's 34,260. This near-identical performance suggests that the 3700X remains competitive with much newer processors in general workloads. In Undisputed specifically, the CPU's 8-core/16-thread configuration provides enough parallelism to keep the GPU fed, as evidenced by the high frame rates at all resolutions. The CPU's DDR4 memory support and dual-channel 51.2 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for this game, which does not appear to require excessive memory bandwidth based on the measured results.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the system demonstrates a clear scaling pattern across presets. The Low preset achieves an average of 257 FPS, while Medium improves visual quality but reduces the average to 219 FPS, with a minimum of 186 FPS and maximum of 252 FPS. High settings further reduce the average to 186 FPS, and Ultra drops to 140 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra represents a 45.5% reduction in average frame rate, reflecting the increased GPU workload at higher graphical presets. The Medium preset's 186 FPS minimum indicates that even in demanding scenes, the system maintains excellent fluidity at 4K.

At 2560x1440, the performance scales similarly but with higher absolute values. Low settings produce 425 FPS average, Medium reaches 397 FPS with a minimum of 337 FPS and maximum of 457 FPS, High delivers 337 FPS, and Ultra achieves 253 FPS. The Medium preset's minimum of 337 FPS is particularly noteworthy, as it indicates that even the lowest frame drops at this resolution exceed the refresh rate of most gaming monitors. The gap between Low and Ultra is 172 FPS, representing a 40.5% reduction, slightly less severe than at 4K.

At 1920x1080, the system reaches its peak performance. Low settings yield 489 FPS average, Medium produces 462 FPS with a minimum of 393 FPS and maximum of 532 FPS, High delivers 436 FPS, and Ultra achieves 386 FPS. The Medium preset's 393 FPS minimum demonstrates that the system maintains exceptionally high frame rates even in the most demanding scenarios at 1080p. The difference between Low and Ultra is 103 FPS, a 21.1% reduction, which is the smallest relative gap across all resolutions, indicating that the CPU becomes more of a limiting factor at this resolution. The 532 FPS maximum at Medium settings represents the highest single frame rate recorded in the entire dataset, showcasing the system's ability to deliver extreme performance in less demanding scenes.