Undisputed

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is a formidable combination for playing Undisputed, a sports title that clearly responds well to both strong CPU and GPU resources. This pairing lands at rank 182 out of 2813 tested combos in the game, placing it in the top 6.5% of all configurations. The data shows a system that delivers exceptionally high frame rates across all tested resolutions and settings, making it a top-tier option for competitive and high-refresh-rate play.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s position at 182 out of 2813 tested combinations places it firmly in the upper echelon of systems tested for Undisputed. This is a percentile rank that suggests it outperforms the vast majority of hardware pairings, including many that feature more expensive or newer components. The rank is a direct reflection of the balance between the Ryzen 5 7500X3D’s strengths and the RTX 5080’s capabilities in this specific title. The CPU’s 96 MB of shared L3 cache is a significant asset for a game like Undisputed, which likely benefits from large data sets being stored close to the cores, reducing latency and improving frame pacing.

Looking at the CPU’s performance data, the Ryzen 5 7500X3D achieves an average benchmark score of 44,573 and sits in the 89th percentile against all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in this metric are all within a very tight margin. The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H scores 44,466, which is a 0.2% difference. The Intel Core i9-13950HX scores 44,342, a 0.5% gap. The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 is at 44,309, a difference of 0.6%. On the other side, the Intel Core i5-14600 scores 44,889, which is -0.7% relative to the 7500X3D. These tiny deltas show that in terms of raw synthetic compute, the 7500X3D is right at the top of its peer group, with no single rival having a significant advantage. This consistency in benchmark scores translates to a solid foundation for gaming.

On the GPU side, the RTX 5080 also holds an 87th percentile ranking against all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 56,083. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon 8060S at 55,757 (a 0.6% delta), the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB at 55,698 (a 0.7% delta), and the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X at 54,828 (a 2.3% delta). The only rival that scores higher is the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE, which achieves 57,367, a -2.2% delta from the RTX 5080’s score. This proximity in scores again highlights that the RTX 5080 is performing as expected for its class, with no significant outliers among its direct competitors. The combination of a top-tier CPU and GPU in their respective performance classes explains the high combo rank in Undisputed. The measured FPS data confirms that this rank is earned, with the system hitting very high average frame rates even at the most demanding settings.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 plays a central role in this combo’s performance in Undisputed. The GPU features 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a large memory pool for high-resolution textures and game assets. The memory bandwidth is rated at 960.0 GB/s, which is a substantial figure that allows the GPU to feed its 10,752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output pipelines efficiently. The core clock runs at a base of 2295 MHz and can boost up to 2617 MHz, while the memory operates at 1875 MHz, translating to 30 Gbps effective. These specifications are the engine behind the high frame rates measured, and they show that the RTX 5080 is not a bottleneck in this configuration.

The GPU’s architecture is Blackwell 2.0, built on a 5 nm process by TSMC, containing 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die. This is a modern, power-efficient design that delivers high performance. The GPU also includes 84 ray tracing cores and 336 tensor cores, which are not directly tested by the standard benchmark data but are available for games that support those features. For Undisputed, a sports title, the raw rasterization performance is the primary driver, and the data shows the RTX 5080 excels at this. The FP32 performance is rated at 56.28 TFLOPS, and the pixel rate is 293.1 GPixel/s, with a texture rate of 879.3 GTexel/s. These figures indicate a GPU capable of handling the complex scenes in Undisputed with ease.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 56,083 places it in the 87th percentile, and its performance relative to its nearest rivals is very tight. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is the only rival that scores higher, with a 2.2% lead, but the RTX 5080 edges out the Radeon 8060S, RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, and Pro W5700X. This shows the RTX 5080 is a strong performer in its class. In the context of Undisputed, the GPU is the component that scales the resolution and settings, and the measured FPS data confirms it handles even the highest loads without dropping below playable frame rates. The combination of 16 GB of VRAM and high bandwidth ensures that texture streaming and memory allocation are not limiting factors at 4K Ultra settings, where the average FPS is still a very playable 87.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a clear and predictable pattern as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160, which indicates a balanced system where the GPU becomes the primary scaling factor at higher resolutions. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 497 FPS. This drops to 296 FPS at High settings and 190 FPS at Ultra. At 1440p, the Low setting average is 359 FPS, High is 214 FPS, and Ultra is 137 FPS. Finally, at 4K, the Low setting average is 227 FPS, High is 135 FPS, and Ultra is 87 FPS. These numbers show that the frame rate scales almost linearly with the number of pixels being rendered, which is a classic sign that the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions.

However, the scaling from 1080p to 1440p and 1440p to 4K is not perfectly proportional, and this provides insight into the system’s balance. For instance, at Low settings, moving from 1080p to 1440p drops the average FPS from 497 to 359, a 27.8% decrease. Moving from 1440p to 4K drops it from 359 to 227, a 36.8% decrease. This larger percentage drop at higher resolutions indicates that the GPU is being pushed harder, while at 1080p, the CPU has more headroom to keep the frame rate high. The fact that the 1080p Low average is nearly 500 FPS suggests that the Ryzen 5 7500X3D is capable of feeding the GPU far more frames than it can render at that resolution, but the GPU takes over as the bottleneck as resolution increases.

The data also shows that the gap between settings narrows at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 307 FPS (497 vs 190). At 4K, that difference is 140 FPS (227 vs 87). This is a typical behavior where the GPU’s pixel throughput becomes the dominant constraint, making the settings adjustments have less of an absolute impact on FPS. The minimum FPS values are only recorded for Medium settings, with 304 at 1080p, 219 at 1440p, and 139 at 4K. These minimums are still very high, indicating that the system maintains stable frame delivery even during intense gameplay moments, with no noticeable hitches or stutters in the data. Overall, the resolution scaling shows a system that is powerful enough to deliver high frame rates at any resolution, with the GPU being the component that dictates the final performance ceiling.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo in Undisputed depend on the player’s target resolution and refresh rate, but the data suggests that High settings offer the best balance of visual fidelity and performance across all resolutions. At 4K, High settings deliver an average of 135 FPS, which is more than sufficient for smooth gameplay on a 120Hz or 144Hz display. Medium settings at 4K raise the average to 163 FPS, but the visual improvement from Medium to High is often worth the 28 FPS cost for a more immersive experience. Ultra at 4K drops to 87 FPS, which is still playable but may not be ideal for competitive play where higher frame rates are preferred.

At 1440p, High settings provide an average of 214 FPS, which is excellent for high-refresh-rate monitors. This is a sweet spot where the game looks great and the frame rate is high enough to take advantage of 240Hz displays. Medium at 1440p is 258 FPS, and Low is 359 FPS, but the visual quality reduction at Low is significant. Ultra at 1440p yields 137 FPS, which is still very good, but High offers a better balance of visual quality and frame rate headroom. For 1080p, High settings hit 296 FPS, which is ideal for 300Hz or higher refresh rate competitive monitors. Low at 1080p is 497 FPS, but this is only relevant for players who prioritize absolute maximum frame rates over visual quality.

The data indicates that High is the recommended preset for most users, as it provides a significant visual upgrade over Medium while maintaining frame rates that are far above the threshold for smooth gameplay. For players with the highest-end displays, such as 360Hz or 500Hz panels, dropping to Low at 1080p could be justified to maximize frame rates, but the visual compromise is substantial. The Medium preset shows the only min FPS data in the pack, with 304 at 1080p, 219 at 1440p, and 139 at 4K, which suggests it offers stable performance, but High likely has similar or better stability given the higher averages. In summary, players should default to High settings for the best overall experience, and only consider Ultra if they have a 60Hz or 75Hz display and want the maximum visual quality, or if they prioritize visuals over frame rate. The system’s performance at High settings across all resolutions is the standout feature of this data.

Measured FPS Breakdown

This section provides a detailed look at the exact average FPS figures for each resolution and settings combination as measured in the benchmark. The data is clear and consistent, showing a high-performing system across the board.

At 1920x1080, the lowest resolution tested, the combo delivers extremely high frame rates. With Low settings, the average FPS is 497. This is the highest score recorded in the entire dataset, indicating that the CPU and GPU are both operating at a very efficient level at this resolution. Moving to Medium settings, the average FPS drops to 357, with a minimum of 304 and a maximum of 411. This shows that even with increased visual demands, the frame rate remains far above what is needed for smooth play. High settings at 1080p produce an average of 296 FPS, which is still exceptionally high and suitable for any high-refresh-rate monitor. Finally, Ultra settings at 1080p yield an average of 190 FPS, which is a substantial drop from Low but still a very playable and smooth experience.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains impressive. Low settings produce an average of 359 FPS, which is a 27.8% decrease from the 1080p Low score but still an enormous frame rate. Medium settings at 1440p average 258 FPS, with a minimum of 219 and a maximum of 297. This is a great result for a 1440p monitor with a 240Hz refresh rate, as the average is well above the refresh rate. High settings at 1440p deliver an average of 214 FPS, which is also excellent and capable of driving a 240Hz display with some headroom. Ultra settings at 1440p drop to an average of 137 FPS, which is still very smooth and suitable for a 144Hz monitor, though not as high as the other settings.

At 3840x2160, the highest resolution tested, the combo still delivers very strong performance. Low settings average 227 FPS, which is remarkable for 4K and shows the GPU’s power. Medium settings at 4K average 163 FPS, with a minimum of 139 and a maximum of 188. This is a very good result for 4K gaming on a 144Hz monitor. High settings at 4K average 135 FPS, which is also excellent and provides a smooth experience on most high-refresh-rate 4K displays. Ultra settings at 4K are the most demanding, with an average of 87 FPS. This is still above the 60 FPS threshold for playability, but it is the only setting where the frame rate falls below the 100 FPS mark. The data shows a clear progression: the system is capable of handling any resolution and settings combination, with the highest frame rates at 1080p and the lowest at 4K Ultra, but all results are above playable levels.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance rank of this CPU and GPU combination in Undisputed?

A: The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 ranks at position 182 out of 2813 tested combos, placing it in the top 6.5% of all configurations tested for this game.

Q: How does the RTX 5080’s memory configuration affect its performance in this game?

A: The RTX 5080 has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory with a 256-bit bus and 960.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This large memory pool and high bandwidth ensure that the GPU is not constrained by memory capacity or transfer speeds, allowing it to maintain high frame rates even at 4K resolution with high settings.

Q: What is the FPS difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the average FPS with Low settings is 497, while with Ultra settings it is 190. This is a difference of 307 FPS, showing that the visual quality settings have a significant impact on performance at this resolution.

Q: Does the system maintain high minimum frame rates at 4K?

A: The minimum FPS data is only provided for Medium settings. At 3840x2160 with Medium settings, the minimum FPS is 139, which is a high value indicating stable frame delivery. This suggests the system does not experience significant frame drops during intense gameplay.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7500X3D’s benchmark score compare to its closest rival?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500X3D has an average benchmark score of 44,573. Its closest rival, the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, scores 44,466, which is a 0.2% difference. The Intel Core i5-14600 scores higher at 44,889, which is a -0.7% delta from the 7500X3D, showing the performance is very close among these CPUs.

Q: What is the recommended settings preset for a 1440p monitor with a 240Hz refresh rate?

A: For 2560x1440 resolution, High settings deliver an average of 214 FPS, which is ideal for a 240Hz display. Medium settings provide 258 FPS for more headroom, but High offers a better visual quality to frame rate balance. Ultra settings at 1440p average 137 FPS, which is lower but still smooth on a 144Hz monitor.