Undisputed

Undisputed is a sports title that stresses the GPU far more than the CPU, and the combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D with the Intel Arc B390 produces a playable but constrained experience. The measured data shows a clear hierarchy where performance drops sharply as resolution climbs, with the integrated-class Arc B390 acting as the primary bottleneck. This analysis breaks down the FPS results across three resolutions and four quality presets, interprets the CPU and GPU roles based on their specifications, and offers practical settings guidance.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS data reveals a steep and predictable performance curve as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. At High settings, the average frame rate falls from 76 FPS at 1080p to 55 FPS at 1440p, then down to 35 FPS at 4K. That represents a 28% drop when moving from 1080p to 1440p, and a further 36% drop from 1440p to 4K. The pattern is consistent across all presets, but the severity of the decline varies with the quality level.

At Low settings, the scaling is particularly revealing. The system delivers 127 FPS at 1080p, which drops to 92 FPS at 1440p and then to 58 FPS at 4K. The 1080p result is the only one in the entire measured set that exceeds 100 FPS, and the 4K result at Low is still playable. This indicates that even at the lowest quality settings, the Arc B390 cannot maintain high frame rates at higher resolutions, but it does not collapse entirely. Medium settings show a similar shape: 91 FPS at 1080p, 66 FPS at 1440p, and 42 FPS at 4K. Ultra settings are the most demanding, producing 49 FPS at 1080p, 35 FPS at 1440p, and just 22 FPS at 4K.

The scaling pattern strongly suggests that the GPU is the limiting component in this configuration. At 1080p, the CPU has enough headroom to push frame rates into triple digits at Low settings, but as resolution increases, the pixel throughput demands overwhelm the Arc B390’s capabilities. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is 36 FPS (58 vs 22), which is a 61% reduction in performance purely from raising quality settings. At 1080p, the same Low-to-Ultra gap is 78 FPS (127 vs 49), a 61% reduction as well, showing that the relative impact of settings is consistent regardless of resolution.

What this means for gameplay is that players targeting 4K will need to accept either Low settings for a playable 58 FPS or Medium for a slightly lower but still acceptable 42 FPS. Ultra at 4K is effectively unplayable. At 1440p, the situation improves marginally, with High giving 55 FPS and Low giving 92 FPS. The data shows that 1080p is the only resolution where this combo can deliver smooth, high-refresh-rate experiences, and even then only at Low or Medium settings.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B390 is an integrated graphics processor based on the Xe3-LPG architecture, built on a 3 nm process at Intel’s foundry. It features 1536 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster output units, along with 12 ray tracing cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 300 MHz and boosts up to 2500 MHz, with a power envelope of 80 W. Its memory is system shared, meaning it draws from the CPU’s DDR5 pool rather than having dedicated VRAM, and bandwidth is listed as system dependent.

In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark, the Arc B390 scores 1482 points, which places it in the 9th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are all older NVIDIA parts: the GeForce GT 520MX at 1463 points (1.3% slower), the GeForce 800M at 1460 points (1.5% slower), the GeForce GT 625 OEM at 1446 points (2.5% slower), and the GeForce GT 710 at 1443 points (2.7% slower). This places the Arc B390 in the entry-level segment, and the Undisputed results reflect that positioning.

The measured FPS data aligns with this low percentile ranking. At Ultra settings, the GPU cannot manage even 50 FPS at 1080p, and at 4K it falls to 22 FPS. The system shared memory is a notable factor here, as the GPU has no dedicated VRAM pool. This means texture storage and bandwidth are shared with the CPU, which can cause performance variability depending on what else the system is doing. The absence of a dedicated memory bus width or bandwidth figure in the specs reinforces that this is a fundamental limitation.

The boost clock of 2500 MHz is relatively high for an integrated part, but the small number of shading units and ROPs limits raw throughput. The pixel rate is listed at 60.00 GPixel/s and the texture rate at 120.0 GTexel/s, which are modest figures for handling modern game resolutions. The FP32 performance of 7.680 TFLOPS is the headline compute number, but in practice, the GPU’s rendering capabilities are constrained by its memory subsystem and low shader count. The 3DMark score of 1482, while only a single data point, corroborates the in-game results showing a GPU that is adequate for esports-level titles but struggles with a sports sim like Undisputed at higher settings.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 7000 series, based on the Zen 4 Raphael architecture and built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It has a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The CPU features a large 96 MB shared L3 cache, along with 1 MB L2 per core and 64 KB L1 per core. It supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and it includes integrated Radeon Graphics. The processor uses AMD Socket AM5 and has a launch MSRP of $269.

In benchmark terms, the 7500X3D scores 25047 in Passmark multithread and 3494 in single-thread tests. Its average benchmark score is 44573, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H at 44466 (0.2% faster), the Intel Core i9-13950HX at 44342 (0.5% faster), the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 at 44309 (0.6% faster), and the Intel Core i5-14600 at 44889 (0.7% slower). This shows the 7500X3D is competitive with high-end mobile and desktop parts from Intel, despite having fewer cores than some of them.

The CPU’s role in Undisputed is secondary to the GPU, as the FPS scaling demonstrates. At 1080p Low, the system hits 127 FPS, which indicates the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU well beyond the Arc B390’s limits. The high L3 cache and 4.50 GHz boost clock are well-suited for gaming workloads, and the 89th percentile ranking suggests there is ample headroom for most titles. The single-thread score of 3494 is particularly relevant for a sports game like Undisputed, which likely relies on a few primary threads for simulation and AI.

However, the CPU’s potential is largely untapped in this configuration because the GPU becomes the bottleneck at higher resolutions. The measured data shows that at 4K Ultra, the FPS drops to 22, which is far below what the CPU could theoretically support. The 6 cores and 12 threads are more than sufficient for modern games, and the 96 MB L3 cache helps with data locality, but none of that matters when the GPU cannot render frames fast enough. The CPU’s memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s is also irrelevant in practice, since the GPU shares the same memory pool.

The nearest rival data reinforces that the 7500X3D is not the weak link here. Being within 1% of the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H and Core i9-13950HX in average score means it performs at a high level. For Undisputed specifically, the CPU is unlikely to cause frame drops or stuttering, as its compute capabilities far exceed the GPU’s rendering throughput. Players upgrading the GPU in this system would likely see substantial FPS gains, while upgrading the CPU alone would yield little improvement in this title.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU/GPU combo in Undisputed?

A: The data shows 1920x1080 is the only resolution where the system can exceed 90 FPS, with Low settings hitting 127 FPS and Medium hitting 91 FPS. At 2560x1440, the best result is 92 FPS at Low, while 3840x2160 peaks at 58 FPS at Low.

Q: How does the Arc B390 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The Arc B390 scores 1482 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which is 1.3% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX, 1.5% higher than the GeForce 800M, 2.5% higher than the GeForce GT 625 OEM, and 2.7% higher than the GeForce GT 710.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 7500X3D a strong CPU for gaming?

A: Yes, the data indicates it is. It ranks in the 89th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 44573. Its single-thread score is 3494 and multithread is 25047, placing it within 0.7% of the Intel Core i5-14600.

Q: Why does performance drop so much from 1080p to 4K?

A: The resolution scaling shows a consistent pattern where average FPS falls by roughly 28-36% at each step up. At High settings, the drop from 1080p to 1440p is 21 FPS, and from 1440p to 4K is 20 FPS. This is due to the Arc B390’s limited pixel throughput, as its low percentile ranking suggests.

Q: Can this system run Undisputed at Ultra settings?

A: Technically yes, but not well. The measured data shows Ultra settings produce 49 FPS at 1080p, 35 FPS at 1440p, and 22 FPS at 4K. These are all below 60 FPS, making Ultra playable only on lower resolutions with frame rate drops.

Q: What is the FPS range at Medium settings?

A: The measured data includes min and max FPS only for Medium settings. At 1920x1080, the range is 78 to 105 FPS with an average of 91. At 2560x1440, the range is 56 to 76 FPS with an average of 66. At 3840x2160, the range is 36 to 48 FPS with an average of 42.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The complete measured FPS results for Undisputed with the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D and Intel Arc B390 are as follows. At 1920x1080, Low settings deliver an average of 127 FPS, Medium delivers 91 FPS with a range of 78 to 105, High delivers 76 FPS, and Ultra delivers 49 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 78 FPS, showing the significant impact of quality settings on this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the averages drop across the board. Low settings produce 92 FPS, Medium produces 66 FPS with a range of 56 to 76, High produces 55 FPS, and Ultra produces 35 FPS. The Low-to-Ultra spread narrows to 57 FPS, but the relative performance hit is similar to 1080p. The 1440p results are the middle ground, offering playable frame rates at Low and Medium, but dipping below 60 FPS at High.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles. Low settings average 58 FPS, Medium averages 42 FPS with a range of 36 to 48, High averages 35 FPS, and Ultra averages 22 FPS. The 4K results show that only Low settings stay above 60 FPS, and even then barely. The Medium range of 36 to 48 FPS indicates occasional dips below 40, which could be noticeable in fast-paced gameplay. Ultra at 4K is the worst result, with an average of 22 FPS that is effectively unplayable.

Across all resolutions, the pattern is clear: Low settings provide the only path to high frame rates, while Ultra is reserved for players who prioritize visual fidelity over smoothness. The Medium preset offers a balanced middle ground, but its min FPS values at 1440p (56) and 4K (36) show that it can drop below the averages, especially during intense scenes. The data lacks min and max values for Low, High, and Ultra, so the Medium results provide the only insight into frame time consistency, and they suggest the GPU is working hard to maintain those averages.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this configuration depend heavily on the target resolution and acceptable frame rate. At 1920x1080, Medium settings provide the best balance, with an average of 91 FPS and a range of 78 to 105. This keeps the experience above 60 FPS at all times while delivering better visual quality than Low. High settings at 76 FPS are also viable for players who want improved visuals, but the 15 FPS drop from Medium is notable. Ultra at 49 FPS should be avoided if smoothness is a priority, as it falls below the 60 FPS threshold.

At 2560x1440, Low settings are the safest choice, delivering 92 FPS. Medium settings average 66 FPS, but the min of 56 FPS means occasional dips below 60 are possible, which could be jarring. High settings at 55 FPS and Ultra at 35 FPS are both below 60, making them less suitable for competitive play. For a mostly consistent experience at 1440p, Low is recommended, with Medium as an option for those willing to accept occasional frame drops.

At 3840x2160, only Low settings are viable, averaging 58 FPS. Medium at 42 FPS and High at 35 FPS are playable but not ideal, and Ultra at 22 FPS is not recommended. Given the data, 4K gaming with this combo requires sacrificing visual quality to maintain playable frame rates. The Medium preset at 4K has a min of 36 FPS, which suggests it will feel stuttery in action sequences.

The overall recommendation is to use Medium settings at 1080p for the best combination of visual fidelity and performance, as it stays well above 60 FPS. At 1440p, Low is the most reliable preset, while at 4K, Low is the only preset that approaches 60 FPS. Players prioritizing frame rate over visuals should stick to Low across all resolutions, as it offers the highest averages in every case. The Arc B390’s 9th percentile ranking means it cannot handle high-quality presets at higher resolutions, so the data supports a conservative approach to settings for a smooth experience.