Undisputed

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and Intel Arc B570 combination lands in the lower-middle tier of the tested hardware pool for Undisputed, with a combo rank of 2256 out of 2813 tested combos. This places it in the 80th percentile of performance rankings, meaning roughly 80% of the tested system configurations deliver higher frame rates in this boxing title. The pairing of a 6-core Zen 4 desktop processor with Intel's Battlemage-generation graphics card produces a playable but not dominant experience, with the data showing that the system's ranking is pulled down primarily by the GPU's position in the overall graphics hierarchy rather than by any CPU limitation.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 2256 out of 2813 tested configurations puts it in the bottom fifth of the database for Undisputed. This is a significant indicator that while the system is fully capable of running the game, it does so at frame rates that many other hardware pairings surpass. The rank reflects the combined performance ceiling of both components working together in this specific title, and the numbers suggest that the Arc B570 is the limiting factor in most scenarios.

Looking at the individual component standings, the CPU sits in the 83rd percentile against all processors tested across the database, while the GPU sits in the 65th percentile against all graphics cards. The gap between these two percentile positions is telling: the processor is a relatively strong performer in the broader context of all CPUs, but the graphics card is more mid-pack. In a game like Undisputed, where visual rendering demands can scale heavily with settings and resolution, the GPU's lower relative standing drags the overall combo ranking down.

The measured frame rates confirm this dynamic. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo produces 195 FPS on average, which is a strong result. But at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average drops to 34 FPS, which is below the threshold most players would consider smooth. The spread between these two extremes shows a system that has a wide performance envelope but struggles at the high end of graphical demands.

When compared to other combos in the database, this pairing's rank indicates that it is better suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming rather than 4K. The data shows that at 4K Ultra, the system falls to 34 FPS average, which is a marginal experience for a sports title that benefits from fluid motion. The 2256th position out of 2813 total combinations suggests that while this is not a bottom-tier system, it is firmly in the territory where compromises must be made on visual quality to achieve acceptable frame rates.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F provides six cores and twelve threads, operating with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. This is a Zen 4 architecture processor built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with a 65 W TDP. The CPU's cache configuration includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is DDR5 with dual-channel configuration and 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth.

In synthetic benchmarks, this processor demonstrates solid multi-threaded capability. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 21765, while the single-core score is 3072. The Passmark multi-thread score is 25645, and the single-thread score is 3689. These numbers put the CPU in the 83rd percentile against all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 32750.

The nearest rivals in the CPU database are closely clustered. The Intel Core i5-14600T has an average score of 32707, which is 0.1% different from the 7400F. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H scores 32697, a 0.2% difference. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32812, which is -0.2% difference. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 32662, a 0.3% difference. This clustering indicates that the 7400F's raw compute performance is essentially on par with several other mid-range and mobile processors, making it a balanced choice for gaming workloads.

For Undisputed, the CPU's role is to handle game logic, physics calculations, and frame pacing. With six cores and twelve threads, the processor has enough headroom to avoid becoming a bottleneck in most scenarios. The boost clock of 4.70 GHz provides strong single-thread performance, which is often more important for sports games that rely on simulation and AI. The Passmark physics score of 1660 further indicates adequate processing power for the game's simulation elements.

The data shows that at 1080p Low settings, the combo reaches 195 FPS, which suggests the CPU is not limiting performance at that level. Even at 1440p Low, the system produces 141 FPS, again indicating that the processor can feed frames to the GPU without issue. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking versus all CPUs means it sits above the majority of processors in the database, providing a solid foundation for this gaming build.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B570 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, codenamed Battlemage, and uses the BMG-G21 chip. It features 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operations pipelines. The GPU has 18 ray tracing cores. Clock speeds are set at 2500 MHz for both base and boost. The memory subsystem consists of 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, providing 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The card has a TDP of 150 W and uses a dual-slot design with a single 8-pin power connector.

In synthetic benchmarks, the Arc B570 produces a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2649, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 83514, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 96844. The Passmark G3D score is 14195, with a GPU compute score of 7281. These results place the GPU in the 65th percentile against all graphics cards, with an average benchmark score of 20556.

The nearest GPU rivals are tightly grouped. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile has an average score of 20534, a 0.1% difference. The Intel Arc A750 scores 20582, which is -0.1% difference. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20480, a 0.4% difference. The AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20662, a -0.5% difference. This shows the Arc B570 performs at a level comparable to those cards, though it is notably two of these rivals are mobile parts and two are much older desktop GPUs.

For Undisputed, the GPU's 10 GB of VRAM is sufficient for the game's texture requirements at 1080p and 1440p. The 380.0 GB/s memory bandwidth helps with high-resolution rendering, though the 160-bit bus width does place some constraints. The GPU's FP32 performance of 11.52 TFLOPS provides the raw compute needed for modern rendering techniques, and the 18 ray tracing cores offer some future-proofing for titles that use ray-traced effects.

The measured frame rates show that the GPU's performance scales predictably with resolution and settings. At 1920x1080 Low, the system averages 195 FPS. At 2560x1440 Low, it averages 141 FPS. At 3840x2160 Low, it drops to 89 FPS. These numbers indicate that the GPU has enough headroom for esports-level frame rates at lower settings, but struggles at 4K with higher quality presets.

The GPU's 65th percentile ranking means it outperforms about 65% of all graphics cards in the database. However, the nearest rivals in its performance class include both mobile and older desktop parts, which contextualizes its position. The Arc B570 is a capable mid-range card, but it is not a high-end performer, and this is reflected in the Undisputed frame rates at higher settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers a wide range of performance depending on settings. With Low settings, the average frame rate is 195 FPS, which is exceptionally smooth and well above the refresh rate of most monitors. Medium settings produce an average of 141 FPS, with minimum and maximum readings of 120 and 162 FPS respectively. High settings yield 116 FPS average, while Ultra settings drop to 75 FPS average. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the system can handle the game comfortably at any preset, with Ultra still providing a playable experience.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scales down as expected. Low settings produce an average of 141 FPS, which is still very smooth. Medium settings average 102 FPS, with minimum and maximum of 86 and 117 FPS. High settings average 84 FPS, which remains playable for most users. Ultra settings drop to 54 FPS average, which is on the edge of what most players would consider acceptable for a fast-paced sports game. The 1440p numbers show that the system can handle this resolution well at medium and high settings, but Ultra requires compromises.

At 3840x2160, the system begins to struggle. Low settings produce an average of 89 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for a competitive title. Medium settings average 64 FPS, with minimum and maximum of 55 and 74 FPS respectively. High settings drop to 53 FPS average, which is below the 60 FPS threshold many players prefer. Ultra settings produce an average of 34 FPS, which is a poor experience for a game that benefits from smooth animations. The 4K data clearly shows that this combo is not suited for high-fidelity gaming at that resolution.

The pattern across all three resolutions is consistent: Low settings always provide a high frame rate, Medium provides a playable middle ground, High is acceptable at 1080p and 1440p but marginal at 4K, and Ultra is only viable at 1080p. The measured data includes minimum and maximum values only for Medium settings at each resolution, showing a tighter frame time distribution at that preset. At 1080p Medium, the range is 120 to 162 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the range is 86 to 117 FPS. At 4K Medium, the range is 55 to 74 FPS. These ranges indicate that Medium settings provide a stable experience without major frame time spikes.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best resolution to play Undisputed with this combo?*

A: Based on the measured data, 1920x1080 provides the most consistent experience across all settings. At 1080p, even Ultra settings average 75 FPS, while Low settings reach 195 FPS. At 1440p, Ultra drops to 54 FPS average, and at 4K, Ultra falls to 34 FPS. The data suggests 1080p is the sweet spot for this hardware combination.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F has an average benchmark score of 32750. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14600T, scores 32707, which is a 0.1% difference. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H scores 32697, a 0.2% difference. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32812, a -0.2% difference. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 32662, a 0.3% difference. The CPU is effectively on par with these processors.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The Intel Arc B570 has an average benchmark score of 20556. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534, a 0.1% difference. The Intel Arc A750 scores 20582, a -0.1% difference. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20480, a 0.4% difference. The AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20662, a -0.5% difference. The GPU performs within a tight band of these competitors.

*Q: Is this combo capable of 4K gaming in Undisputed?*

A: The measured data shows that at 3840x2160, the system averages 89 FPS on Low settings, 64 FPS on Medium, 53 FPS on High, and 34 FPS on Ultra. Low and Medium settings are playable at 4K, but High and Ultra do not meet the 60 FPS threshold. Players seeking 4K would need to use Low or Medium settings for a smooth experience.

Q: What is the highest settings preset that maintains 60 FPS at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, High settings average 84 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold. Ultra settings average 54 FPS, which is below it. Medium settings average 102 FPS. Therefore, High is the highest preset that maintains 60 FPS at 1440p based on the measured data.

Q: How does the system's combo rank compare to other tested configurations?

A: The combo ranks 2256 out of 2813 tested combinations for Undisputed. This places it in the lower portion of the database, roughly in the bottom 20% of tested systems. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking and GPU's 65th percentile ranking indicate that the GPU is the limiting factor for overall performance in this title.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend on the target resolution and desired frame rate. At 1920x1080, all settings presets provide playable frame rates. Ultra settings average 75 FPS, which is acceptable for most players. High settings average 116 FPS, providing a smoother experience. Medium settings average 141 FPS, and Low settings reach 195 FPS. For competitive play or high-refresh-rate monitors, Low or Medium settings at 1080p are the best choices, as they deliver frame rates well above 144 FPS. For a balance of visual quality and performance, High settings at 1080p offer a strong experience with 116 FPS average.

At 2560x1440, the recommendation shifts. High settings average 84 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold and provides a good visual experience. Medium settings average 102 FPS, giving more headroom for frame time consistency. Ultra settings average 54 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target and may result in noticeable stutter during gameplay. Low settings average 141 FPS, which is excellent but sacrifices visual fidelity. For most players, High settings at 1440p provide the best balance, with Medium as a viable alternative for those who prioritize frame rate over graphics.

At 3840x2160, the options are more limited. Low settings average 89 FPS, which is playable but visually sparse. Medium settings average 64 FPS, with a minimum of 55 FPS and maximum of 74 FPS. This is borderline for smooth gameplay, as the minimum dips below 60 FPS. High settings average 53 FPS, which is below the threshold for a smooth experience. Ultra settings average 34 FPS, which is not recommended. For 4K gaming, Medium settings are the highest preset that remains near playable, though Low settings provide a more consistent frame rate.

The measured data indicates that Medium settings provide the most stable frame time distribution, as evidenced by the minimum and maximum values recorded at each resolution. At 1080p Medium, the range is 120 to 162 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the range is 86 to 117 FPS. At 4K Medium, the range is 55 to 74 FPS. This consistency makes Medium a reliable choice for players who want to avoid frame rate dips.

For the best overall experience, the data suggests using High settings at 1080p or 1440p. At 1080p, High yields 116 FPS, which is smooth and visually appealing. At 1440p, High yields 84 FPS, which is still above 60 FPS and offers a good balance. Players with 4K displays should use Medium settings, which provide the highest quality preset that maintains an average frame rate above 60 FPS. The system is not suited for Ultra settings at any resolution above 1080p, as the measured frame rates fall below acceptable thresholds.