Undisputed

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER delivers a playable experience in Undisputed, with performance that scales predictably across resolutions and settings. The data shows a combination that can hit 60+ FPS at 4K with High settings, while offering exceptionally high frame rates at 1080p, placing it in the 71st percentile of tested combos for this game.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Undisputed?*

A: Based on the measured FPS, 2560x1440 on High settings provides an excellent balance, achieving an average of 99 FPS. This is significantly smoother than the 62 FPS average at 3840x2160 on High, while still offering a substantial visual upgrade over 1920x1080.

Q: How does the combo's performance rank compared to other tested configurations?

A: The combo ranks 2008 out of 2813 tested combinations, meaning it outperforms roughly 71% of all tested setups in this specific game. This places it in a solid mid-to-upper tier for Undisputed performance.

*Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Undisputed?*

A: Yes, it can. At 3840x2160, the combo achieves 62 FPS on High settings and 75 FPS on Medium settings. However, Ultra settings at 4K drop to 40 FPS, which is below the ideal smoothness threshold for most players.

Q: What is the difference in performance between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: The difference is substantial. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers an average of 229 FPS, while the Ultra preset delivers 88 FPS. This represents a 141 FPS drop, showing that the Ultra preset is significantly more demanding.

Q: Which component is more likely to be the bottleneck at 4K?

A: The data suggests the GPU is the primary limiting factor at 4K. The RTX 2060 SUPER's 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for High settings (62 FPS), but the 40 FPS at Ultra indicates the GPU's compute resources are being overwhelmed.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 7400F processor sufficient for this game?

A: The CPU's benchmark scores indicate it is a capable performer. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 and single-core score of 3072 suggest it provides ample headroom for the GPU to reach its limits, especially at lower resolutions where frame rates are highest.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER achieves a rank of 2008 out of 2813 tested combos in Undisputed. This places the setup in the 71st percentile, indicating that it delivers better performance than the majority of other hardware pairings tested for this title. The rank reflects the balanced nature of the components, where the CPU's strong multi-core capabilities can feed the GPU effectively.

Looking at the CPU data, the Ryzen 5 7400F sits in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32750. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-14600T (32707, 0.1% faster), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (32662, 0.3% faster), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (32812, 0.2% slower). These marginal differences indicate the 7400F is competitive with a wide range of modern processors.

The GPU, meanwhile, holds the 62nd percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 18093. Its nearest rivals show very close scores: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile (18159, 0.4% faster), the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 (18189, 0.5% faster), and the AMD Radeon RX 460 (18373, 1.5% faster). This suggests the RTX 2060 SUPER is positioned in a dense performance tier where minor architectural differences can shift rankings.

The 71st percentile combo rank is higher than the GPU's individual 62nd percentile, which indicates the CPU is helping to boost the overall gaming experience. This synergy is particularly evident at lower resolutions where the GPU is less stressed, allowing the CPU's capabilities to come to the forefront.

Settings Recommendations

The optimal settings depend on the user's priority for frame rate versus visual fidelity. For players targeting the standard 60 FPS threshold, the 3840x2160 High preset delivers 62 FPS, making it a viable option for 4K displays. However, for those with high refresh rate monitors, the 2560x1440 High preset at 99 FPS offers a much smoother experience without a significant visual compromise.

The Medium preset at various resolutions provides a compelling middle ground. At 1920x1080, Medium achieves 165 FPS with a minimum of 140 FPS and a maximum of 190 FPS, offering a wide margin above the 144 Hz refresh rate common on many gaming monitors. At 2560x1440, Medium still delivers 119 FPS, which is excellent for most competitive play.

The Low preset is best reserved for maximizing frame rates, particularly at 1080p where it hits 229 FPS. At 4K, Low yields 105 FPS, which is surprisingly high and could be used for very high refresh rate 4K monitors, though the visual sacrifices are substantial. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, and the data shows it is best used at 1080p where it still manages 88 FPS.

For the best overall experience, the High preset at 2560x1440 appears to be the sweet spot. It provides 99 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS standard and close to the 120 FPS target for smoother motion, while maintaining a high level of visual detail. Users with 4K displays can still use High settings at 3840x2160 for a playable 62 FPS, but should avoid Ultra at that resolution.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets.

At 1920x1080, the combo shows strong performance across the board. The Low preset achieves an average of 229 FPS, representing the highest frame rate in the entire dataset. The Medium preset delivers 165 FPS on average, with a minimum of 140 FPS and a maximum of 190 FPS. The High preset produces 136 FPS, and the Ultra preset drops to 88 FPS. The scaling from High to Ultra represents a 35% performance decrease, indicating the Ultra preset's additional effects are significant.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains solid. The Low preset achieves 166 FPS, which is remarkably close to the 1080p Medium result. The Medium preset delivers 119 FPS (minimum 101, maximum 137), while High produces 99 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1440p yields 63 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS threshold but noticeably lower than the 99 FPS of High settings.

At 3840x2160, the GPU's limits become apparent. The Low preset achieves 105 FPS, which is still very playable. The Medium preset delivers 75 FPS (minimum 64, maximum 87), and High drops to 62 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K produces just 40 FPS, which is below the standard playable threshold and indicates the GPU is heavily taxed at this configuration.

The data reveals a consistent pattern: the gap between Low and Medium is smaller than the gap between High and Ultra. For example, at 1440p, the jump from Low (166 FPS) to Medium (119 FPS) is a 47 FPS drop, while the jump from High (99 FPS) to Ultra (63 FPS) is a 36 FPS drop. This suggests that the Ultra preset introduces rendering features that disproportionately impact performance.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER is the primary driver of graphical performance in this combo. Its specifications include 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1470 MHz and a boost clock of 1650 MHz, with a TDP of 175 W.

In the context of Undisputed, the 8 GB VRAM appears sufficient for the tested settings, as the game does not show signs of memory-related stuttering in the measured data. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for the texture and geometry data required at 4K resolution, as evidenced by the playable 62 FPS on High settings.

The GPU's compute capabilities, rated at 7.181 TFLOPS FP32, are the limiting factor at higher settings. The 40 FPS result at 4K Ultra demonstrates that the rasterization and shading workload exceeds what the GPU can handle in real-time. The 2176 shading units and 64 ROPs provide a baseline for pixel throughput, but the demanding Ultra preset requires more processing power than this Turing-based card can provide.

The RTX 2060 SUPER's position relative to its rivals is tight. It scores 16462 in the Passmark G3D benchmark, placing it just 0.4% behind the RTX 3060 Mobile and 1.5% behind the AMD Radeon RX 460. These small margins suggest that in Undisputed, the RTX 2060 SUPER performs as expected for its class, with no significant outliers in the measured FPS data.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F provides the processing foundation for this combo. It features 6 cores and 12 threads based on the Zen 4 architecture, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The CPU has 32 MB of shared L3 cache and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s.

For Undisputed, a sports game, the CPU's role is to handle game logic, physics, and AI, while the GPU manages rendering. The Ryzen 5 7400F's multi-core performance, as indicated by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765, provides ample headroom for these tasks. The single-core score of 3072 ensures that the main game thread can execute efficiently, which is crucial for maintaining consistent frame pacing.

The CPU's Passmark multi-thread score of 25645 and single-thread score of 3689 further confirm its capability. In the measured data, the CPU does not appear to be a bottleneck at any resolution. At 1080p Low, the 229 FPS result is likely near the game's engine limit, as the CPU must process frames faster than the GPU can render them. However, the smooth scaling from Low to Ultra at all resolutions suggests the CPU is never holding back the GPU.

The 7400F's 65 W TDP and 5 nm process node indicate it operates efficiently, which is beneficial for maintaining sustained performance during long gaming sessions. Its 83rd percentile ranking among all CPUs shows it is a strong performer, and its nearest rivals in the benchmarks are all within 0.3% of its average score, confirming it is a well-rounded processor.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS scaling from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 reveals important insights about the system's limiting components. At High settings, the frame rate drops from 136 FPS at 1080p to 99 FPS at 1440p (a 27% decrease) and then to 62 FPS at 4K (a 37% decrease from 1440p). This pattern indicates the GPU is becoming progressively more stressed as resolution increases.

The scaling behavior changes across settings. At Medium settings, the drop from 1080p (165 FPS) to 1440p (119 FPS) is 28%, and from 1440p to 4K (75 FPS) is 37%. At Low settings, the drop is less pronounced: 229 FPS at 1080p to 166 FPS at 1440p (27% decrease) and then to 105 FPS at 4K (37% decrease). The consistent percentage drops suggest the GPU is the limiting factor across all settings.

At Ultra settings, the scaling is more dramatic. The drop from 1080p (88 FPS) to 1440p (63 FPS) is 28%, and from 1440p to 4K (40 FPS) is 37%. This indicates that the Ultra preset's additional rendering features, such as higher quality shadows and reflections, place a proportionally heavier load on the GPU as resolution increases.

The data suggests that the CPU is not a limiting factor at any resolution. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see frame rates plateau at lower resolutions, particularly at 1080p where the GPU has less work to do. However, the fact that 1080p Low achieves 229 FPS while 4K Low achieves 105 FPS indicates that the GPU is responsible for the performance differential. The RTX 2060 SUPER's fill rate and shading capabilities are the primary constraints, particularly at 4K where the pixel count quadruples compared to 1080p.