Undisputed

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and AMD Radeon RX 9070 pairing delivers a high-refresh-rate experience in Undisputed, with the data showing a significant performance ceiling at lower settings. The measured results place this combo in the 71st percentile among all tested configurations, indicating that while it is not the absolute top-tier, it provides a robust platform for competitive play.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, built on a 5 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, with a 65W TDP. This CPU uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform and supports DDR5 memory, with a dual-channel memory bus providing 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The processor features 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache.

For a sports game like Undisputed, the CPU’s role is primarily to maintain a consistent frame delivery, especially in scenarios with many on-screen characters. The 6-core/12-thread configuration is more than sufficient for the game's physics and AI calculations, and the high boost clock of 4.70 GHz helps ensure that single-threaded tasks—which are often the bottleneck in sports titles—are handled with minimal latency. The benchmark data supports this; the CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3689 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3072 indicate strong per-core performance that aligns well with the high average FPS numbers observed at 1080p.

Comparing to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 5 7400F sits at an average benchmark score of 32750, which is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14600T (32707) and 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32697). It trails the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H by 0.2% (32812) but leads the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 by 0.3% (32662). These are marginal differences, suggesting that the 7400F is well-positioned in its performance tier, and its 83rd percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms it is a capable gaming processor.

The data shows that at 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 353 FPS average. This high frame rate is likely less reliant on the GPU and more dependent on the CPU's ability to process the game logic quickly. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 25645 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21765 provide ample headroom for background tasks without impacting gaming performance. The processor’s PCIe Gen 5 support with 24 lanes also ensures it can communicate with the GPU without bottlenecking data transfer, which is crucial for maintaining those high frame rates.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 is the driving force behind the visual output, featuring the Navi 48 chip based on RDNA 4.0 architecture. It is built on a 4 nm process and comes with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s. The GPU has a base clock of 1330 MHz and a boost clock of 2520 MHz, with a game clock of 2070 MHz. It also houses 3584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operations pipelines.

For Undisputed, the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is a significant asset, especially at higher resolutions. The benchmark data shows a clear scaling pattern across settings. At 4K (3840x2160), the average FPS drops from 161 at Low settings to 62 at Ultra settings. This demonstrates that the GPU is the primary constraint at this resolution and high settings, as the VRAM and compute units are taxed by the increased detail and effects. The 16 GB VRAM buffer ensures that there is no memory spillover, but the raw processing power is tested at 4K Ultra.

The GPU's performance in synthetic benchmarks, such as a PassMark G3D score of 25381, places it in the 69th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals show close competition: the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z (23736) is 0.6% behind, the AMD Radeon RX 6800S (24063) is 0.8% ahead, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile (23628) is 1.1% behind, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER (24170) is 1.2% ahead. This indicates that the RX 9070 is a solid mid-to-high-tier performer, consistent with the FPS results in the game.

At 1440p, the GPU handles the load more comfortably. The average FPS at High settings is 152, and at Medium it is 184, showing that the GPU can maintain high refresh rates at this resolution. The RX 9070’s boost clock of 2520 MHz is likely a key factor in these results, as it allows the GPU to scale its performance dynamically. The card’s pixel rate of 322.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 564.5 GTexel/s provide sufficient fill rate for the game's visuals at these settings. The 220W TDP and dual-slot design indicate it is a power-hungry card, but the benchmark data confirms it delivers performance commensurate with its power draw.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Analyzing the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend heavily on the target resolution and refresh rate. For competitive play where high frame rates are paramount, the Low preset offers the highest performance, but it comes with a visual compromise. At 1080p, the Low preset achieves 353 FPS, which is far beyond any standard monitor's refresh rate, making it a viable option for esports-level responsiveness, though the visual quality may be lacking.

For most users, the Medium preset appears to be the sweet spot. At 1080p, it delivers 254 FPS average with a minimum of 216 FPS, which is excellent for a 240Hz monitor. The max FPS of 292 indicates good stability. At 1440p, the Medium preset yields 184 FPS average, with a minimum of 156 FPS, which is still very high and suitable for high-refresh-rate 1440p displays. The data shows that Medium provides a significant visual upgrade over Low while maintaining frame rates well above 150 FPS at both resolutions.

The High preset is also strong, but it introduces a more noticeable frame rate drop. At 1080p, High averages 210 FPS, which is still smooth, but at 1440p it drops to 152 FPS. At 4K, High averages 96 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors. The Ultra preset, while visually the richest, shows a drastic performance hit. At 1440p, Ultra averages 98 FPS, and at 4K it drops to 62 FPS. These numbers suggest that Ultra is best reserved for 1080p gaming, where it still achieves 135 FPS.

Given the data, the Medium preset is recommended for the best balance of visual fidelity and performance. It provides a comfortable margin above 60 FPS even at 4K (116 FPS) and offers high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p. For users with 144Hz or 165Hz monitors, the High preset at 1440p (152 FPS) is also a strong choice, offering better visual details without dropping below the refresh rate threshold.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

This specific combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and AMD Radeon RX 9070 ranks 812th out of 2813 tested combos in Undisputed. This places it in the top 29% of all configurations, which is a respectable position. The ranking suggests that while this combo is not in the top tier of performance, it is a strong mid-to-high-range setup that outperforms the majority of systems.

The combo's rank is influenced by both the CPU and GPU. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking and the GPU's 69th percentile ranking combine to produce a balanced system. The data shows that the combo performs particularly well at lower resolutions, where the CPU can keep up with the GPU's output. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 353 FPS, which is a very high number, and even at 1080p Ultra, it manages 135 FPS.

Compared to other combos in the database, this pairing sits in a competitive zone. The nearest GPU rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER, is only 1.2% behind in average score, suggesting that this combo would perform similarly to a system pairing the 7400F with that older GPU. However, the RX 9070’s 16 GB VRAM gives it an advantage in memory-heavy scenarios, which is reflected in the 4K results. The combo's rank of 812 indicates that it is a better-performing setup than roughly 71% of all tested combos, making it a solid choice for a high-refresh-rate gaming PC without reaching the absolute top tier.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to achieve high refresh rates?

A: The data shows that at 1920x1080 with Medium settings, the combo achieves 254 FPS average, and at 2560x1440 with Medium settings, it achieves 184 FPS average. For 4K gaming, the Medium preset at 3840x2160 yields 116 FPS, which is playable but not as high as the lower resolutions.

Q: How does this CPU compare to its nearest rivals in terms of benchmark scores?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F has an average benchmark score of 32750. It is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14600T (32707) and 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32697). It is 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (32812) and 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (32662).

Q: Is 16 GB of VRAM necessary for this game?

A: The GPU features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory. The measured data shows that at 4K Ultra settings, the average FPS drops to 62, indicating that the GPU's compute capability, rather than VRAM capacity, is the limiting factor. The 16 GB buffer ensures no memory-related stutters, even at the highest settings.

Q: What is the performance impact of switching from High to Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the High preset averages 152 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 98 FPS. This represents a significant performance drop of 54 FPS, or roughly 35%, when moving to the highest visual quality preset.

Q: How does the combo rank among all tested configurations?

A: This combo ranks 812th out of 2813 tested combos in Undisputed. This places it in the 71st percentile, meaning it outperforms the majority of tested systems.

Q: What is the average FPS at 1080p on the Low preset?

A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves an average FPS of 353. This is the highest average FPS recorded in the measured data across all resolutions and settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured data provides a clear picture of performance across all settings and resolutions. The following breakdown details the exact average FPS figures, with minimum and maximum values where available.

3840x2160 (4K)

• Low: Average FPS is 161. Minimum and maximum FPS were not recorded.
• Medium: Average FPS is 116, with a minimum of 99 and a maximum of 134.
• High: Average FPS is 96. Minimum and maximum FPS were not recorded.
• Ultra: Average FPS is 62. Minimum and maximum FPS were not recorded.

2560x1440 (1440p)

• Low: Average FPS is 255. Minimum and maximum FPS were not recorded.
• Medium: Average FPS is 184, with a minimum of 156 and a maximum of 211.
• High: Average FPS is 152. Minimum and maximum FPS were not recorded.
• Ultra: Average FPS is 98. Minimum and maximum FPS were not recorded.

1920x1080 (1080p)

• Low: Average FPS is 353. Minimum and maximum FPS were not recorded.
• Medium: Average FPS is 254, with a minimum of 216 and a maximum of 292.
• High: Average FPS is 210. Minimum and maximum FPS were not recorded.
• Ultra: Average FPS is 135. Minimum and maximum FPS were not recorded.

The data reveals a consistent scaling pattern. At 1080p, the Medium preset provides a 44 FPS advantage over High (254 vs 210) and a 99 FPS advantage over Ultra (254 vs 135). The gap between Low and Medium is 99 FPS (353 vs 254). At 1440p, the Medium preset is 32 FPS ahead of High (184 vs 152) and 86 FPS ahead of Ultra (184 vs 98). The jump from Low to Medium at 1440p is 71 FPS (255 vs 184). At 4K, the Medium preset is 20 FPS ahead of High (116 vs 96) and 54 FPS ahead of Ultra (116 vs 62). The difference between Low and Medium at 4K is 45 FPS (161 vs 116).

The minimum FPS values recorded for the Medium preset at all resolutions indicate good frame time stability. At 4K, the minimum is 99 FPS, at 1440p it is 156 FPS, and at 1080p it is 216 FPS. These minimums are close to the averages, suggesting that the combo maintains a consistent performance level without severe drops. The maximum FPS values also show headroom, with the 1080p Medium setting reaching 292 FPS, indicating the system can push beyond the average when the scene allows.