To The Core
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 170 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 73 | 88 | 101 | 123 |
| 1440p QHD | 122 | 152 | 179 | 208 |
| 1080p Full HD | 185 | 229 | 266 | 315 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
To The Core with Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 delivers a remarkably fluid experience in To The Core, an Idle genre title that clearly favors high refresh rates. The benchmark data shows this combo never drops below 72.8 FPS even at 4K Ultra, making it a strong candidate for high-refresh-rate displays at lower resolutions. This analysis examines the specific FPS measurements, the role of each component, and how this pairing ranks against other tested configurations.
FAQ
*Q: What is the best average FPS this combo achieves in To The Core?*
A: The highest measured average is 314.6 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings. Even at the most demanding preset (4K Ultra), the combo maintains a solid 72.8 FPS average.
Q: How much performance does the combo lose when moving from 1080p to 4K?
A: At High settings, the average FPS drops from 228.8 at 1080p to 88.4 at 4K, a reduction of roughly 61%. At Low settings, the drop is from 314.6 to 122.8, approximately 61% as well, indicating a consistent scaling pattern.
Q: Which settings preset offers the highest FPS at 1440p?
A: The Low preset yields the highest average at 2560x1440 with 208.2 FPS. The Medium preset follows at 179.2 FPS, while Ultra drops to 122.2 FPS.
Q: How does the CPU's multi-core performance compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Core Ultra 7 265K scores 50,009 in Cinebench R23 multi-core. Its closest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF, has an average benchmark score only 0.2% higher, while the Intel Core i9-14900K is 0.9% higher. The AMD EPYC 7413 leads by 1.2%.
Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and how does it affect the game?
A: The RTX 4060 features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 272.0 GB/s bandwidth. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2302, placing it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs.
Q: Does this combo rank high among all tested configurations for this game?
A: The combo ranks 1011 out of 1756 tested combos, placing it in the upper-middle tier. This position reflects strong performance but not top-tier status, as 745 other combinations deliver higher average FPS.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with a 5 nm process from TSMC, featuring 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die. Its boost clock of 2460 MHz and base clock of 1830 MHz drive 3072 shading units, 96 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. The GPU's 8 GB GDDR6 memory operates at 17 Gbps effective, delivering 272.0 GB/s across a 128-bit bus, which proves sufficient for To The Core's demands at all tested settings.
The GPU's FP32 compute rating is 15.11 TFLOPS, with texture rate at 236.2 GTexel/s and pixel rate at 118.1 GPixel/s. These specifications translate into the measured FPS figures, where the GPU shows clear headroom at lower resolutions. At 1080p Low, the combo reaches 314.6 FPS, indicating the RTX 4060 is far from saturated. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2302 and Passmark G3D score of 19545 place it in the 66th percentile, confirming mid-range positioning.
The GPU's nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6600M, scores 0.6% higher on average, while the Intel Arc B580 trails by 0.7%. This tight competition suggests the RTX 4060's performance in To The Core is representative of its class. The GPU's 115 W TDP and dual-slot design with a 12-pin connector make it a compact, efficient choice, though the benchmark results show that at 4K Ultra, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, dropping to 72.8 FPS.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS data reveals a clear pattern of diminishing returns as resolution increases. At High settings, the transition from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 reduces average FPS from 228.8 to 151.7, a 33.7% drop. Moving from 1440p to 3840x2160 further reduces it to 88.4, another 41.7% decline. This steep scaling indicates the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions, with the CPU's capabilities becoming less relevant as pixel count rises.
The scaling is consistent across all presets. At Low settings, 1080p yields 314.6 FPS, dropping to 208.2 at 1440p (-33.8%) and then 122.8 at 4K (-41.0%). At Ultra, the figures are 185.2, 122.2, and 72.8 respectively, with percentage drops of 34.0% and 40.4%. This uniformity suggests the game's rendering pipeline scales predictably with resolution, and the RTX 4060's 8 GB memory buffer and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 4K but not over-provisioned.
The 1080p numbers, exceeding 300 FPS at Low, point to CPU-side limits becoming relevant only at very high frame rates. The Core Ultra 7 265K's 5.50 GHz boost clock and 20 cores ensure it can feed the GPU efficiently at these rates. However, at 4K Ultra with 72.8 FPS, the GPU's compute throughput is the clear constraint, as the CPU has ample headroom with a 97th percentile ranking among all CPUs.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers exceptional performance. Low settings produce 314.6 FPS average, Medium 265.8 FPS, High 228.8 FPS, and Ultra 185.2 FPS. These figures show a smooth progression, with each preset tier costing roughly 13-19% performance versus the previous one. The gap from Low to Ultra is 41.1%, indicating that Ultra settings impose a significant but manageable load.
Moving to 2560x1440, the averages are 208.2 FPS (Low), 179.2 FPS (Medium), 151.7 FPS (High), and 122.2 FPS (Ultra). The percentage drops from 1080p are consistent: 33.8% for Low, 32.6% for Medium, 33.7% for High, and 34.0% for Ultra. This uniformity across presets suggests resolution scaling is independent of quality level, a sign of a well-optimized renderer.
At 3840x2160, the performance remains playable but drops significantly. Low settings average 122.8 FPS, Medium 100.8 FPS, High 88.4 FPS, and Ultra 72.8 FPS. The 4K Ultra figure is 60.6% lower than the 1080p Low result, demonstrating the GPU's workload quadruples with pixel count. For a 60 Hz 4K display, even Ultra settings exceed the refresh rate, but for 120 Hz or higher panels, users must consider lower presets.
The delta between Low and Ultra at each resolution is informative. At 1080p, the spread is 129.4 FPS (314.6 vs 185.2). At 1440p, it narrows to 86.0 FPS (208.2 vs 122.2). At 4K, it compresses further to 50.0 FPS (122.8 vs 72.8). This narrowing indicates that at higher resolutions, the GPU's fixed resources become the dominant factor, reducing the relative impact of settings changes.
Settings Recommendations
For users with 1080p displays, the Ultra preset at 185.2 FPS is the clear recommendation. This preset provides the best visual quality while still delivering frame rates well above 144 Hz, making it suitable for high-refresh monitors. The High preset at 228.8 FPS offers a 23.5% FPS increase for those prioritizing speed over visuals, but Ultra's 185.2 FPS is already sufficient for competitive play.
At 1440p, the High preset at 151.7 FPS strikes the optimal balance. It delivers smooth performance for 144 Hz displays while retaining significant visual fidelity. The Ultra preset at 122.2 FPS remains viable for 120 Hz panels, but the 24.1% performance gain from dropping to High (151.7 vs 122.2) outweighs the visual upgrade for most users. Medium at 179.2 FPS is excessive for 144 Hz but useful for 165 Hz or 240 Hz displays.
For 4K users, the Medium preset at 100.8 FPS is the best choice for 100 Hz panels, while High at 88.4 FPS suits 90 Hz displays. Ultra at 72.8 FPS is playable but falls below 75 Hz refresh rates, introducing potential judder. Low at 122.8 FPS enables 120 Hz operation but sacrifices visual quality. Given the idle genre's less demanding visuals, Medium or High provide the best experience, balancing smoothness and fidelity without exceeding the GPU's capabilities.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K, part of the Core Ultra Series 2 with Arrow Lake architecture, brings 20 cores and 20 threads to the pairing. Its base clock of 3.90 GHz boosts to 5.50 GHz, supported by 30 MB of shared L3 cache and 3 MB L2 per core. The CPU's 17,800 million transistors on a 3 nm TSMC process enable a 97th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 79,102.
In Cinebench R23, the chip scores 50,009 multi-core and 7,060 single-core. These results place it within 0.9% of the Intel Core i9-14900K, which scores 79,824 on average, and 1.2% behind the AMD EPYC 7413 at 80,041. The 265K's Passmark multi-thread score of 58,838 and single-thread score of 4,904 reinforce its strength, though the game's idle nature means the CPU's role is primarily ensuring consistent frame delivery at high FPS.
The benchmark data suggests the CPU is not a bottleneck in To The Core. At 1080p Low, the combo reaches 314.6 FPS, and the CPU's 20 threads and 5.50 GHz boost provide ample headroom. The 125 W TDP and DDR5 dual-channel memory support with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth ensure data flows efficiently. However, at 4K Ultra with 72.8 FPS, the CPU utilization likely drops well below 50%, as the GPU's 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 throughput becomes the limiting factor. The CPU's integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU is irrelevant for this discrete GPU configuration.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 ranks 1011 out of 1756 tested combos in To The Core. This places it in the upper-middle tier of all configurations, with 745 combos performing better and 1010 performing worse. The rank reflects the GPU's mid-range positioning (66th percentile) tempered by the CPU's high-end performance (97th percentile).
The CPU's strength boosts the combo's standing. With a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 50,009, the 265K outperforms its nearest rivals by narrow margins: the 265KF is 0.2% higher, the i9-14900KF is 0.2% higher, and the i9-14900K is 0.9% higher. This top-tier CPU performance ensures the combo maximizes the RTX 4060's potential, particularly at lower resolutions where frame rates exceed 300 FPS.
However, the GPU's 66th percentile ranking limits overall placement. The RTX 4060's nearest rivals are closely matched, with the RX 6600M 0.6% higher, GTX 780 Ti 0.7% higher, and Arc B580 0.7% lower. This tight grouping means the combo's rank is sensitive to GPU selection. A faster GPU would dramatically improve the ranking, as the CPU has headroom to support higher frame rates, evidenced by the 314.6 FPS at 1080p Low not yet hitting CPU limits. The 1011st rank out of 1756 is respectable, placing this combo in the 42.4th percentile of all tested configurations, a solid result for a mid-range GPU paired with a high-end CPU.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 in To The Core
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 122.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 100.8 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 88.4 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 72.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 208.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 179.2 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 151.7 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 122.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 314.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 265.8 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 228.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 185.2 |
To The Core with iUltra 7 265K + Other GPUs
See how To The Core performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
To The Core with RTX 4060 + Other CPUs
See how To The Core performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 7 265K + RTX 4060
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.