Thief

Thief

AVERAGE FPS
121
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 121 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 66 69 91 120
1440p QHD 112 118 135 149
1080p Full HD 136 138 153 169

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 120
3840x2160 Medium 91
3840x2160 High 69
3840x2160 Ultra 66
2560x1440 Low 149
2560x1440 Medium 135
2560x1440 High 118
2560x1440 Ultra 112
1920x1080 Low 169
1920x1080 Medium 153
1920x1080 High 138
1920x1080 Ultra 136

Thief with Intel Core i3-12100F + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX, In-Depth Analysis

The Intel Core i3-12100F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX presents a striking asymmetry in Thief, a 2014 stealth title. This combination of a modern quad-core entry-level processor with a flagship-tier RDNA 3 graphics card yields frame rates that are heavily dictated by resolution, with the CPU demonstrating its capabilities as a bottleneck only at the lowest settings. The data indicates a system that is overwhelmingly GPU-bound at higher resolutions, yet shows clear signs of processor limitation when the graphical workload is reduced, making it an interesting case study in component balancing for this specific title.

Resolution Scaling

The measured frame rates reveal a classic pattern of GPU-bound scaling as resolution increases. At 1080p with High settings, the combo produces an average of 138 FPS. Moving to 1440p, the average drops to 118 FPS, a reduction of 20 FPS or approximately 14.5%. The scaling to 4K is more severe, with the average falling to 69 FPS, which is a 49 FPS drop from the 1440p figure and a 50% reduction from the 1080p result. This steep decline as pixel count quadruples indicates that the Radeon RX 7900 XTX is the primary limiting component at 4K, with its rendering workload increasing faster than the CPU can feed it.

The trend is consistent across other settings. With Medium settings, the 1080p average of 153 FPS falls to 135 FPS at 1440p, a 11.8% decrease, and then to 91 FPS at 4K, a 32.6% decrease from the 1440p result. This pattern confirms that the GPU is the bottleneck at higher resolutions, as the relative performance drop is significant when the pixel count increases. The data suggests that for a smooth 4K experience, the graphical settings must be carefully managed, as the GPU's workload dominates the frame time at this resolution.

However, the scaling behavior shifts when the settings are lowered to Low and the resolution is reduced. At 1080p Low, the average FPS reaches 169. At 1440p Low, it only drops to 149 FPS. The most telling data point is the jump from 1440p Low to 4K Low, where the average is 120 FPS. The difference between 1080p and 1440p at Low settings is just 20 FPS, but the jump to 4K sees a 29 FPS drop. This suggests that even at Low settings, the GPU is still the primary limiter at 4K, but at 1080p and 1440p, the CPU's performance ceiling is becoming more apparent, preventing the frame rate from scaling as high as the GPU alone could potentially deliver.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i3-12100F is a 4-core, 8-thread processor from the Alder Lake-S architecture, with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. Its benchmark results show a single-thread score of 893 in 3dMark and 1674 in Cinebench R23, indicating strong per-core performance that is crucial for older games like Thief, which often rely on a few heavily utilized threads. The processor's L3 cache is 12 MB shared, and its performance percentile of 68 versus all CPUs shows it is a capable mid-range part.

In the context of Thief, the CPU's role is most evident at lower resolutions and settings. The data shows that at 1080p Low, the average FPS is 169, which is only 20 FPS higher than at 1440p Low. This relatively small difference suggests that the CPU is beginning to limit performance at 1080p, as the GPU is not being fully utilized. If the GPU were the sole bottleneck, we would expect a larger drop in FPS from 1080p to 1440p, as the pixel count increases. The fact that the drop is modest indicates that the i3-12100F's 4 cores and 8 threads are reaching their limit in this scenario.

Despite its limited core count, the processor's high boost clock of 4.30 GHz helps it maintain playable frame rates. The 3dmark_8_threads score of 4026 is nearly identical to the max_threads score of 4023, which shows that the processor's performance scales well up to its full thread count and that there is no significant performance penalty for using all available threads. This explains why the game remains fluid even when the CPU is under load. The data implies that while the CPU is a limiting factor at 1080p Low, it is sufficient to keep average frame rates above 120 FPS across all tested settings at that resolution.

FAQ

Q: Is the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX a good match for the Intel Core i3-12100F in Thief?

A: The data shows a functional pairing. At 4K, the GPU is the clear bottleneck, with the CPU rarely limiting performance. At 1080p Low, the CPU's limitations are exposed, but the frame rate remains high at 169 FPS, indicating the combo is well-balanced for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p.

Q: What is the best resolution to use with this combo?

A: For maximum frame rates, 1920x1080 is the best choice, with an average of 138 FPS on High settings. For a balance of visual fidelity and performance, 2560x1440 on High settings achieves 118 FPS, which is still very smooth. 4K is playable, but the average of 69 FPS on High settings is more demanding.

Q: How does the CPU affect performance at 4K?

A: The effect is minimal. The frame rate scaling from 1440p to 4K shows a significant drop (e.g., from 118 to 69 FPS on High), which indicates the workload is almost entirely on the GPU. The CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU at this resolution.

Q: Why is the frame rate difference between 1080p and 1440p smaller on Low settings?

A: At 1080p Low, the CPU becomes a limiting factor. The average FPS is 169, and at 1440p Low it is 149, a difference of only 20 FPS. This smaller gap, compared to the 4K drop, suggests the CPU is preventing the GPU from achieving its full potential at these lower resolutions.

Q: What are the minimum frame rates for the Medium settings?

A: The measured data shows a minimum FPS of 130 at 1920x1080, 114 at 2560x1440, and 77 at 3840x2160 on Medium settings. These are the only settings with recorded minimum frame rates, providing insight into the worst-case performance.

Q: Is the i3-12100F bottlenecking the RX 7900 XTX at 1080p?

A: The data suggests it does, but only at Low settings. The 1080p Low average of 169 FPS is only 20 FPS higher than the 1440p Low average of 149 FPS, which indicates a CPU limit. At High settings, the difference is 20 FPS as well, but the higher total frame rates (138 vs 118) suggest the CPU is less of a constraint.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a detailed look at the combo's performance across all settings and resolutions.

At 1920x1080, the frame rates are high across the board. The lowest average is 136 FPS on Ultra settings, while the highest is 169 FPS on Low settings. High settings yield 138 FPS, and Medium settings yield 153 FPS, with a minimum of 130 and a maximum of 175. The spread between Low and Ultra is 33 FPS, showing that the graphical settings have a significant impact on performance at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the averages are still impressive. Ultra settings produce 112 FPS, High produces 118 FPS, and Medium produces 135 FPS, with a minimum of 114 and a maximum of 155. Low settings lead with 149 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra is 37 FPS, which is a larger gap than at 1080p, indicating the GPU is becoming more of a factor.

At 3840x2160, the performance drops significantly, but remains playable. Low settings achieve an average of 120 FPS. Medium settings produce 91 FPS, with a minimum of 77 and a maximum of 104. High settings yield 69 FPS, and Ultra settings produce 66 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra is 54 FPS, which is the largest gap of any resolution, confirming that the GPU is the dominant bottleneck at 4K.

The data shows a consistent trend: as resolution increases, the frame rate drops, and the gap between Low and Ultra settings widens. This is the expected behavior for a system that is GPU-bound at higher resolutions, but the CPU's influence is still visible in the smaller differences at 1080p.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX is a high-end graphics card with 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 384-bit bus, providing a massive 960.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. Its boost clock is 2498 MHz, and its game clock is 2365 MHz, which are substantial figures for sustained performance. The card has 6144 shading units and 192 ROPs, and its FP32 performance is a staggering 61.39 TFLOPS. This hardware is designed for extreme resolutions and high-detail settings.

In Thief, the GPU's role is dominant at all resolutions, but especially at 4K. The 4K Ultra average of 66 FPS shows that even a top-tier card like the RX 7900 XTX is challenged by this game at maximum settings and resolution. The 24 GB of VRAM is far more than the game requires, but it ensures there are no memory-related stutters. The high memory bandwidth is also crucial for maintaining high frame rates at 4K, where the data throughput requirements are immense.

The GPU's performance percentile of 64 versus all GPUs is interesting, given its high average benchmark score of 19410. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB, which has a similar average score, but this is likely due to the benchmark's weighting. In Thief, the RX 7900 XTX demonstrates its capability by delivering 120 FPS at 4K Low, a feat that would be impossible for lower-tier cards. The data confirms that the GPU is the component that determines the upper limit of performance, especially when the resolution is increased.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the user's resolution and performance target. For a 60 FPS experience at 4K, the Ultra preset is the best choice, as it delivers an average of 66 FPS, which is just above the target. High settings also work well, with an average of 69 FPS, but Ultra provides the maximum visual fidelity with only a minor performance cost.

For high-refresh-rate monitors at 1440p, the High preset is the recommended choice, achieving an average of 118 FPS. This provides a smooth experience that can take advantage of 120Hz displays. The Low preset at 149 FPS is only necessary for the most competitive players seeking maximum frame rates, but the visual quality trade-off is significant. The Medium preset at 135 FPS is a good middle ground for those who want a solid frame rate with better visuals than Low.

At 1080p, the Ultra preset is the best option, delivering 136 FPS. This allows for a fully maxed-out visual experience while still maintaining frame rates high enough for any monitor. The High preset at 138 FPS is nearly identical in performance, but Ultra offers more graphical features. The Low preset at 169 FPS is excessive for most users, but it could be useful for players with 165Hz or 240Hz monitors who want to maximize their refresh rate. The data suggests that the Ultra preset is the best experience at this resolution, as the performance cost is minimal compared to High.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo of the Intel Core i3-12100F and the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX ranks 695 out of 3720 tested combos in Thief. This places it in the top 18.7% of all tested configurations, indicating that it is a high-performing combination overall. The rank is impressive, but it is likely held back by the CPU's performance. The i3-12100F has an average benchmark score of 13494 and is ranked in the 68th percentile of all CPUs, while the RX 7900 XTX has an average score of 19410 and is in the 64th percentile of all GPUs.

The GPU's performance is the primary driver of this high rank. Its nearest rivals in the benchmark database include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB and the NVIDIA TITAN Xp, which shows a wide range of performance in its class. However, the CPU's position in the rankings is more modest. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core 3 N355 and the Intel Core i5-9500, which have similar average benchmark scores. This suggests that the CPU is a mid-range part, but its high boost clock allows it to keep up with the GPU in most scenarios.

The rank of 695 indicates that there are 694 combos that perform better in Thief. These likely include systems with higher-end CPUs, such as Core i5 or i7 processors, paired with similar or better GPUs. The data shows that while the RX 7900 XTX is a top-tier GPU, the i3-12100F can be a limiting factor in some scenarios, preventing the combo from reaching even higher ranks. Despite this, the overall performance is strong, and the combo is well-suited for high-resolution gaming in this title.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i3-12100F

Cores / Threads 4 / 8
Base Clock 3300 MHz
Boost Clock 4300 MHz
TDP 58W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

VRAM 24 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2498 MHz MHz
TDP 355 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i3-12100F + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX in Thief

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 120.0
3840x2160 Medium 91.0
3840x2160 High 69.0
3840x2160 Ultra 66.0
2560x1440 Low 149.0
2560x1440 Medium 135.0
2560x1440 High 118.0
2560x1440 Ultra 112.0
1920x1080 Low 169.0
1920x1080 Medium 153.0
1920x1080 High 138.0
1920x1080 Ultra 136.0

Thief with ii3-12100F + Other GPUs

See how Thief performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Thief with RX 7900 XTX + Other CPUs

See how Thief performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii3-12100F + RX 7900 XTX

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.