Thief
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 125 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 56 | 59 | 77 | 102 |
| 1440p QHD | 95 | 100 | 132 | 173 |
| 1080p Full HD | 139 | 146 | 192 | 231 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Thief with AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti delivers a strong 1080p and 1440p experience in Thief, with 4K Ultra remaining playable but demanding compromises. The measured data shows a combo ranking at 401 out of 2851 tested configurations, placing it in the top 15 percent of all tested systems for this title. This pairing leverages an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 5 processor with a 5.50 GHz boost clock alongside a 12 GB GDDR6X GPU from the Ampere generation, producing frame rates that range from 56 FPS at 4K Ultra to 231 FPS at 1080p Low.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS rows provide a clear picture of how this combo behaves across four quality presets at three resolutions. For the best experience, the data suggests that Medium settings offer the most balanced trade-off between visual fidelity and performance headroom. At 1080p Medium, the combo produces 192 FPS average, with a minimum of 163 FPS and a maximum of 221 FPS. That minimum frame rate is well above the refresh rate of most standard monitors, meaning stutter and dips will be rare even in busy scenes. High settings at 1080p drop the average to 146 FPS, which remains smooth, but the jump from Medium to High costs roughly 46 FPS on average—a significant penalty for modest visual gains in a game from 2014.
At 1440p, Medium again stands out. The average FPS sits at 132, with a minimum of 112 and a maximum of 151. Those numbers indicate that even the lowest recorded frames stay comfortably above 100 FPS, which is ideal for high-refresh-rate 1440p displays. High at 1440p delivers 100 FPS average, which is still playable but leaves less margin for demanding scenes. Ultra at 1440p drops to 95 FPS average, and while that is technically smooth, the gap between Medium and Ultra is 37 FPS—again, a large cost for settings that may not be visually distinct in a stealth title where shadows and lighting matter more than texture density.
For 4K, the recommendation changes. Medium at 4K produces 77 FPS average, with a minimum of 66 and a maximum of 89. That is playable on a 60 Hz display, and the minimum frame rate of 66 FPS means you will not drop below the refresh rate of a standard 4K monitor. High at 4K yields 59 FPS average, which is borderline for 60 Hz—dips below 60 are likely in action sequences. Ultra at 4K drops to 56 FPS average, making it the least desirable preset for this resolution. Low at 4K hits 102 FPS, but the visual degradation is severe and unnecessary given the GPU’s capability. The best experience at 4K is Medium, as it keeps frame rates above 60 FPS on average while preserving enough graphical detail.
If you prioritize smoothness above all else, Low settings at 1440p deliver 173 FPS average, and at 1080p Low reaches 231 FPS. These numbers are useful for competitive players or those with very high refresh rate monitors, but the visual quality loss is substantial. The data strongly suggests that Medium is the sweet spot for this combo across all resolutions, providing the highest average FPS that still maintains a minimum above the common 60 FPS threshold for 4K and far above that for 1080p and 1440p.
How This Combo Ranks
The comboRankInGame field places this specific CPU-GPU pairing at rank 401 out of 2851 tested combinations in Thief. That puts it in roughly the 86th percentile of all tested systems. In practical terms, this means the Ryzen 7 9700F and RTX 3080 Ti combination outperforms the vast majority of other configurations tested for this game, but it is not at the absolute top tier. The ranking reflects a system that can handle high refresh rates at 1440p and maintain playable 4K, but it is not the fastest possible setup for Thief.
Looking at the individual components, the CPU’s percentileVsAllCpus is 94, meaning it scores better than 94 percent of all processors in the benchmark database. Its nearest rivals in CPU average benchmark score include the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX, which scores 69875 with a deltaPct of 0.2 percent, and the Intel Core i7-14700KF, which scores 70163 with a deltaPct of -0.2 percent. The Ryzen 7 9700F’s avgBenchmarkScore is 69996, placing it right between those two. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X scores 69515 (deltaPct 0.7 percent), and the Intel Core i7-14700K scores 69355 (deltaPct 0.9 percent). This indicates that the 9700F is essentially performance-equivalent to the previous generation’s high-end desktop parts, with differences of less than one percent. For a game like Thief, which is not heavily multithreaded, this level of CPU performance is more than sufficient.
The GPU’s percentileVsAllGpus is 83, which is lower than the CPU’s 94. The RTX 3080 Ti has an avgBenchmarkScore of 41187, with nearest rivals including the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 (score 40870, deltaPct 0.8 percent), the NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB (score 41707, deltaPct -1.2 percent), and the NVIDIA Tesla M40 (score 41897, deltaPct -1.7 percent). Interestingly, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 scores 40377 with a deltaPct of 2 percent, meaning the older 3080 Ti outperforms it by two percent in average benchmark score. The GPU’s lower percentile compared to the CPU suggests that in this combo, the graphics card is the more likely bottleneck at higher resolutions, which aligns with the measured FPS data showing larger drops from 1440p to 4K than from 1080p to 1440p.
The rank of 401 out of 2851 combos is respectable but not elite. It reflects a system where the CPU is near the top of its class, while the GPU, though capable, is not the fastest available. For Thief specifically, this combination is well above average, and the measured FPS numbers confirm that it can deliver smooth gameplay at most settings and resolutions.
FAQ
*Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Thief?*
A: Based on the measured data, 1440p offers the best combination of image quality and performance. At 1440p Medium, the average FPS is 132 with a minimum of 112, while at 1080p Medium the average is 192. 4K Medium drops to 77 FPS average, which is still playable but with less headroom.
*Q: Can this system run Thief at 4K Ultra?*
A: Yes, but with a caveat. The measured 4K Ultra average FPS is 56, which is below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay on a 60 Hz monitor. For a consistent experience, 4K Medium (77 FPS average) or 4K High (59 FPS average) are better choices.
Q: How does the Ryzen 7 9700F compare to its nearest CPU rivals?
A: The Ryzen 7 9700F has an avgBenchmarkScore of 69996. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX, scores 69875 with a deltaPct of 0.2 percent, meaning the 9700F is 0.2 percent faster. The Intel Core i7-14700KF scores 70163 with a deltaPct of -0.2 percent, making it 0.2 percent faster than the 9700F. Differences are negligible.
Q: What is the GPU’s performance relative to other cards?
A: The RTX 3080 Ti has an avgBenchmarkScore of 41187 and ranks in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs. It is 2 percent faster than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 (score 40377, deltaPct 2 percent) and 1.2 percent slower than the NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB (score 41707, deltaPct -1.2 percent).
*Q: Does the CPU or GPU limit performance in Thief?*
A: The data indicates the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. From 1080p to 1440p, the average FPS drops by roughly 30 percent across settings, but from 1440p to 4K, the drop is around 40-50 percent. The CPU’s 94th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 83rd percentile also suggests the GPU is the weaker link.
Q: Is the minimum FPS data available for all settings?
A: No, the measured data only includes minFps and maxFps for Medium settings at each resolution. For 1080p Medium, minFps is 163 and maxFps is 221; for 1440p Medium, minFps is 112 and maxFps is 151; for 4K Medium, minFps is 66 and maxFps is 89. Other settings only have avgFps values.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1080p, the combo delivers its highest frame rates. Low settings produce 231 FPS average, which is the fastest measured result in the entire dataset. Medium settings drop to 192 FPS average, with a minimum of 163 and a maximum of 221. High settings average 146 FPS, and Ultra averages 139 FPS. The spread between Low and Ultra is 92 FPS, showing that the RTX 3080 Ti has substantial headroom at this resolution. Even at Ultra, the average of 139 FPS is far above the typical 60-144 Hz refresh rates, meaning this system will not be GPU-limited at 1080p in most scenarios.
At 1440p, the numbers scale down but remain strong. Low settings average 173 FPS, Medium averages 132 FPS (minimum 112, maximum 151), High averages 100 FPS, and Ultra averages 95 FPS. The difference between Medium and High is 32 FPS, and between High and Ultra is only 5 FPS. This suggests that the jump from High to Ultra is relatively cheap in performance terms, while the jump from Medium to High is more costly. For players with 144 Hz 1440p monitors, Medium is the only setting that guarantees frame rates above 120 FPS on average, though High at 100 FPS is still smooth on 100 Hz displays.
At 4K, the performance drops significantly. Low settings average 102 FPS, which is playable but visually poor. Medium averages 77 FPS (minimum 66, maximum 89), High averages 59 FPS, and Ultra averages 56 FPS. The gap between Medium and High is 18 FPS, and between High and Ultra is only 3 FPS. The minimum FPS for Medium at 4K is 66, which is above the 60 Hz refresh rate of most 4K monitors, making Medium the only preset that guarantees a stutter-free experience on a standard display. High and Ultra both dip below 60 FPS on average, which can cause visible judder in fast-moving scenes.
The data shows a consistent pattern: the RTX 3080 Ti is most comfortable at 1080p and 1440p, where it delivers frame rates well above playable thresholds. At 4K, the GPU starts to struggle with the higher settings, and users must choose between visual fidelity and smoothness. The Medium preset at 4K is the only one that maintains an average above 60 FPS, and its minimum of 66 FPS provides a safety margin.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals how this combo scales across resolutions. From 1080p to 1440p, the average FPS drops by roughly 30 percent for most settings. For example, Medium goes from 192 FPS at 1080p to 132 FPS at 1440p, a decrease of 60 FPS (31 percent). High goes from 146 to 100 FPS, a decrease of 46 FPS (32 percent). Low goes from 231 to 173 FPS, a decrease of 58 FPS (25 percent). Ultra goes from 139 to 95 FPS, a decrease of 44 FPS (32 percent). This consistent 25-32 percent drop indicates that the GPU is handling the increased pixel count in a predictable manner, with no sudden bottlenecks.
From 1440p to 4K, the drop becomes more severe. Medium goes from 132 FPS at 1440p to 77 FPS at 4K, a decrease of 55 FPS (42 percent). High goes from 100 to 59 FPS, a decrease of 41 FPS (41 percent). Low goes from 173 to 102 FPS, a decrease of 71 FPS (41 percent). Ultra goes from 95 to 56 FPS, a decrease of 39 FPS (41 percent). The uniform 41-42 percent drop across all settings from 1440p to 4K is a strong indicator that the GPU is the limiting component at these resolutions. The pixel count from 1440p to 4K roughly doubles, and the frame rate drops by roughly 40 percent, which is consistent with a GPU-bound scenario where memory bandwidth and fill rate become the primary constraints.
The RTX 3080 Ti has a memory bandwidth of 912.4 GB/s and a pixel rate of 186.5 GPixel/s. At 4K, the GPU must move significantly more data per frame, and the 12 GB GDDR6X memory buffer is likely near its capacity with Ultra settings. The fact that the FPS drop from 1440p to 4K is steeper than from 1080p to 1440p suggests that the GPU’s rendering pipeline, not the CPU, is the bottleneck. The Ryzen 7 9700F’s high single-thread performance (Passmark single-thread score of 4691) ensures that it can feed the GPU at all resolutions, but at 4K the GPU simply cannot render frames fast enough to match lower resolution performance.
This scaling behavior tells a clear story: the CPU is not a limiting factor at any resolution in Thief. The consistent percentage drops across settings and resolutions are characteristic of a GPU-bound workload. Players looking to improve 4K performance would need a more powerful GPU, as the 9700F has ample headroom.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture (codenamed Granite Ridge). It has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The processor is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with 8,315 million transistors on a 70.6 mm² die. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.
In Thief, a game released in 2014, the CPU’s role is primarily to handle game logic, AI, and draw calls. The measured data shows that at 1080p, where GPU load is lower, the CPU must work harder to keep up. The fact that 1080p Low produces 231 FPS average indicates that the 9700F can feed the RTX 3080 Ti effectively even at very high frame rates. The Passmark multithread score is 36470, and the single-thread score is 4691. The single-thread performance is particularly important for older games like Thief, which often rely on one or two heavily loaded threads.
The CPU’s nearest rivals in average benchmark score include the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (69875, deltaPct 0.2 percent) and the Intel Core i7-14700KF (70163, deltaPct -0.2 percent). These differences of less than one percent mean that swapping between these CPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in Thief. The Ryzen 7 9700F’s 94th percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms that it is a high-end part, but the game’s performance is not CPU-bound at any measured resolution.
The CPU’s 32 MB of L3 cache is ample for a 2014 title, and the 5.50 GHz boost clock ensures that single-threaded tasks are handled swiftly. The data shows that the CPU does not bottleneck the GPU at any point: from 1080p Low (231 FPS) to 4K Ultra (56 FPS), the frame rate is always dictated by the GPU’s rendering capabilities. The 8 cores and 16 threads are more than sufficient for Thief, and even a lower-end CPU would likely produce similar results at higher resolutions. However, at 1080p with Low settings, the 9700F’s strong single-thread performance helps achieve that 231 FPS average, which confirms its efficiency. In summary, the CPU provides a solid foundation for this combo, but it is not the star of the show—the RTX 3080 Ti’s performance at 1440p and below is the defining feature of this pairing.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 9700F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti in Thief
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 102.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 77.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 59.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 56.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 173.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 132.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 100.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 95.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 231.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 192.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 146.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 139.0 |
Thief with Ryzen 7 9700F + Other GPUs
See how Thief performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Thief with RTX 3080 Ti + Other CPUs
See how Thief performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 9700F + RTX 3080 Ti
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.