Thief
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 94 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 42 | 42 | 58 | 72 |
| 1440p QHD | 72 | 72 | 100 | 131 |
| 1080p Full HD | 102 | 106 | 143 | 187 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Thief with AMD Ryzen 7 7700 + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT delivers a solid 1080p and 1440p experience in Thief, but the data shows a sharp performance cliff at 4K. This combination ranks in the 50th percentile of all tested combos, and the measured frame rates reveal a system where the GPU becomes the dominant constraint as resolution climbs.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data shows a predictable but steep decline as resolution increases. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo produces 186.5 FPS, which drops to 131.1 FPS at 1440p and further to 72.3 FPS at 4K. This represents a 61% reduction from 1080p Low to 4K Low, indicating that the rendering load scales heavily with pixel count.
Looking at High settings, the pattern is similar but with lower absolute numbers: 106.3 FPS at 1080p, 72.4 FPS at 1440p, and 41.7 FPS at 4K. The 1440p High result is nearly identical to the 4K Low result (72.4 vs 72.3 FPS), which suggests that the GPU is hitting a similar throughput ceiling regardless of whether the workload comes from higher resolution or higher visual fidelity.
The most telling comparison is between 1080p Ultra and 4K Ultra. At 1080p Ultra, the combo manages 101.7 FPS, while at 4K Ultra it falls to 42.2 FPS. That is a 58.5% drop, which is consistent with the 4x pixel count increase from 1080p to 4K. The fact that the drop is not the full 75% (which would be expected if the GPU were purely pixel-bound) indicates that the CPU is still contributing to frame pacing at 1080p, but by 4K the GPU is almost certainly the limiting factor.
The scaling from Medium to Ultra at each resolution is also revealing. At 1080p, Medium produces 142.9 FPS while Ultra produces 101.7 FPS, a 29% penalty for the highest preset. At 4K, Medium yields 57.8 FPS and Ultra yields 42.2 FPS, a 27% penalty. The consistency of this penalty across resolutions suggests that the Ultra preset’s additional effects scale uniformly with resolution, rather than introducing a disproportionate cost at higher pixel counts.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT is the primary driver of the scaling behavior observed in this data. Its 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus provides 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p workloads but becomes strained at 4K with high-quality textures. The GPU’s boost clock of 2581 MHz and game clock of 2424 MHz are respectable for the RDNA 2.0 architecture, and the 2560 shading units deliver 13.21 TFLOPS of FP32 performance.
The benchmark results position this GPU at the 77th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 33721. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6800 (0.7% higher score), the AMD Radeon HD 7950 (1% lower), the AMD Radeon RX 480 (1% lower), and the NVIDIA RTX A5000 (1.3% higher). This clustering shows that the RX 6700 XT sits in a competitive performance band, but it is not a high-end part.
In Thief, the GPU’s role is clearly dominant at higher resolutions. The 4K Ultra result of 42.2 FPS is below the 60 FPS threshold that most users consider playable, and even 4K Medium at 57.8 FPS is borderline. The fact that 1440p High (72.4 FPS) and 4K Low (72.3 FPS) produce nearly identical results strongly suggests that the GPU is saturated in both cases, and that the CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU at these settings.
The CPU’s contribution should not be dismissed. The Ryzen 7 7700 has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, and it ranks at the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 40468 is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H (0.1% higher) and the Intel Core i9-13905H (0.6% lower). However, in this game, the GPU bottleneck at 4K means that CPU performance differences are unlikely to manifest in the measured FPS.
FAQ
*Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Thief?*
A: 1440p provides the best balance. At 1440p High, the combo achieves 72.4 FPS, which is playable, while 1080p High reaches 106.3 FPS. The 4K results at 41.7 FPS (High) and 42.2 FPS (Ultra) are below smooth-playable thresholds.
Q: How does the combo rank against all tested systems?
A: The combo ranks 822nd out of 1642 tested combinations, placing it at the 50th percentile. This is a mid-pack result, reflecting the GPU’s 77th percentile standing and the CPU’s 91st percentile standing, with the GPU likely capping overall performance.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck at 4K?
A: The data strongly indicates GPU bottleneck at 4K. The near-identical FPS between 1440p High (72.4) and 4K Low (72.3) suggests the GPU is saturated, while the CPU’s high benchmark scores (91st percentile) indicate it has ample headroom.
Q: What is the FPS difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p?
A: At 1080p, Low settings produce 186.5 FPS, while Ultra produces 101.7 FPS. This is an 84.8 FPS difference, or approximately 45% lower performance at Ultra compared to Low.
Q: Does the combo maintain 60 FPS at 1440p with all presets?
A: Yes. At 1440p, the lowest measured result is 71.6 FPS on Ultra, which is above 60 FPS. All other 1440p presets (Low, Medium, High) exceed 70 FPS, with Low reaching 131.1 FPS.
Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rival in benchmarks?
A: The RX 6700 XT’s average benchmark score of 33721 is 0.7% lower than the RX 6800, and 1.3% lower than the RTX A5000. It outperforms the HD 7950 and RX 480 by 1% each.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo rank of 822 out of 1642 places this system squarely in the middle of the database. This is a notable discrepancy when considering the individual component rankings: the CPU is at the 91st percentile, while the GPU is at the 77th percentile. The combination’s 50th percentile rank suggests that the GPU’s performance ceiling is the primary limiter in this pairing.
In practical terms, this means the Ryzen 7 7700 is capable of driving a more powerful GPU, but the RX 6700 XT restricts the system to mid-range performance territory. The CPU’s nearest rivals in benchmark scores (Ryzen 9 7940H, Ryzen AI 9 365, Core i9-13905H) all fall within a 1.2% range, showing that the CPU is competitive with modern mobile and desktop parts. However, the GPU’s rivals (RX 6800, HD 7950, RX 480, RTX A5000) are a mix of older and newer parts, indicating that the GPU is in a crowded performance band.
The measured FPS data confirms this ranking. At 1080p, the combo delivers high frame rates across all presets, with even Ultra exceeding 100 FPS. At 1440p, it remains playable at all presets, with Ultra at 71.6 FPS. The 4K results are the weakest, with no preset reaching 60 FPS. This pattern is consistent with a mid-range GPU that excels at mainstream resolutions but lacks the raw throughput for 4K gaming.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS rows, the optimal settings depend on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For 1080p gaming, the Ultra preset at 101.7 FPS provides the best visual quality without sacrificing smoothness, as it remains well above 60 FPS. Users with high-refresh-rate monitors can drop to Medium (142.9 FPS) or Low (186.5 FPS) to maximize frame rates.
At 1440p, the High preset at 72.4 FPS is the recommended choice. It offers a good balance of visual fidelity and performance, staying above the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset at 71.6 FPS is nearly identical in performance, so users can choose either based on personal preference for specific visual effects. The Medium preset at 99.6 FPS is a viable option for those prioritizing higher frame rates over maximum quality.
For 4K, the data suggests that this combo is not well-suited for high-quality gaming. The Low preset at 72.3 FPS is the only setting that reaches playable levels, while Medium (57.8 FPS) and High (41.7 FPS) fall short. The Ultra preset at 42.2 FPS is the worst performer. Given these results, 4K users should either stick to Low settings or consider lowering the resolution to 1440p for a better experience.
The 12 GB VRAM on the RX 6700 XT is sufficient for all presets at 1080p and 1440p in this game, but the GPU’s raw compute limits its 4K capabilities. The data shows that the jump from 1440p to 4K incurs a roughly 40% performance penalty at most settings, which is a significant cost for the increased resolution. Users should prioritize 1440p as the sweet spot for this hardware combination in Thief.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 7700
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 7700 + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT in Thief
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 72.3 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 57.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 42.2 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 41.7 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 131.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 99.6 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 72.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 71.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 186.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 142.9 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 106.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 101.7 |
Thief with Ryzen 7 7700 + Other GPUs
See how Thief performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Thief with RX 6700 XT + Other CPUs
See how Thief performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 7700 + RX 6700 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.