Thief

Thief

AVERAGE FPS
98
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 98 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 46 44 58 79
1440p QHD 75 77 102 133
1080p Full HD 106 111 150 195

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 79
3840x2160 Medium 58
3840x2160 Ultra 46
3840x2160 High 44
2560x1440 Low 133
2560x1440 Medium 102
2560x1440 High 77
2560x1440 Ultra 75
1920x1080 Low 195
1920x1080 Medium 150
1920x1080 High 111
1920x1080 Ultra 106

Thief with AMD Ryzen 5 9600X + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X and Radeon RX 6750 XT combination delivers a solid 1080p experience in Thief, with frame rates that remain playable even at 4K. The data reveals a system where the GPU is the primary performance driver, but the CPU’s strong single-threaded capabilities ensure that the graphics card is fed efficiently across all settings and resolutions.

Resolution Scaling

The measured frame rates show a clear and predictable decline as resolution increases, which is the classic signature of a GPU-bound workload. At 1080p with High settings, the combo produces 110.9 FPS. Moving to 1440p drops this to 76.9 FPS, a 31% reduction, while 4K High sees a further drop to 44.4 FPS, which is 60% below the 1080p figure. This steep scaling curve indicates that the Radeon RX 6750 XT is the limiting factor at higher resolutions, as the rendering load increases exponentially with pixel count.

The pattern holds across other presets. With Low settings, 1080p yields 195.3 FPS, 1440p produces 133.4 FPS, and 4K manages 79.1 FPS. The Medium preset shows a similar trajectory: 149.8 FPS at 1080p, 101.7 FPS at 1440p, and 57.9 FPS at 4K. The Ultra preset follows suit with 105.5 FPS at 1080p, 74.7 FPS at 1440p, and 46 FPS at 4K. In every case, the scaling from 1080p to 1440p is less severe than from 1440p to 4K, confirming that the GPU’s memory bandwidth and compute resources are being saturated as pixel count rises.

The fact that the gap between Low and Ultra settings at 4K is relatively narrow (79.1 FPS vs 46 FPS) compared to the gap at 1080p (195.3 FPS vs 105.5 FPS) reinforces that the GPU is the bottleneck. At lower resolutions, the CPU has more headroom to push higher frame rates, but the GPU cannot keep pace with the demands of 4K rendering regardless of the quality preset. This suggests that players targeting 4K will need to accept lower settings, while those at 1080p can enjoy high refresh rates without worrying about CPU limitations.

Settings Recommendations

For the best balance of visual fidelity and performance, the High preset at 1440p emerges as the standout choice. It delivers 76.9 FPS, which is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, while offering noticeably better image quality than Medium. The jump from Medium to High at 1440p costs only 24.8 FPS (from 101.7 to 76.9), but the visual improvements in a stealth game like Thief, where shadows and lighting are crucial for immersion, are worth the trade-off.

At 1080p, the Ultra preset is viable, producing 105.5 FPS. This is the highest quality option that still maintains a triple-digit frame rate, making it ideal for players with high-refresh-rate monitors. The High preset at 1080p is also excellent at 110.9 FPS, but the incremental gain over Ultra is minimal, so maxing out the settings is recommended for this resolution.

For 4K, the situation is more constrained. The Low preset yields 79.1 FPS, which is playable but visually underwhelming. The Medium preset at 57.9 FPS is borderline, while High and Ultra fall below 50 FPS. Given that Thief is a stealth title where frame pacing and responsiveness matter more than absolute graphical fidelity, players on 4K displays should prioritize the Low or Medium presets to maintain a consistent experience. The data shows no reason to choose Ultra at any resolution other than 1080p, as the performance cost is steep and the visual gain is marginal.

GPU Role

The Radeon RX 6750 XT is the workhorse of this pairing, and its specifications explain the observed performance. It features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is sufficient for Thief’s textures and assets, even at 4K, as evidenced by the playable frame rates at lower presets. The GPU’s base clock of 2150 MHz and boost clock of 2600 MHz, with a game clock of 2495 MHz, allow it to sustain high throughput in demanding scenes.

The GPU’s 2560 shading units and 160 TMUs, paired with 64 ROPs, deliver a pixel rate of 166.4 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 416.0 GTexel/s. These figures translate to strong rasterization performance, which is the primary workload in Thief, a game that does not heavily utilize ray tracing. The FP32 performance of 13.31 TFLOPS is solid for a mid-range card, and the data confirms that it is the decisive factor in frame rate scaling. The GPU’s percentile ranking of 79 among all GPUs places it in the upper tier, and its average benchmark score of 35327 is competitive with the nearest rivals.

The closest competitor, the AMD Radeon RX 5600M, scores 35264, a mere 0.2% difference, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 scores 35787, putting it 1.3% ahead. In practice, this means the RX 6750 XT trades blows with these cards in synthetic tests, but in Thief, its performance is dictated by the resolution and settings as shown in the measured FPS data. The 12 GB VRAM buffer is a key advantage, ensuring that the card does not run out of memory at 4K, which would cause severe stuttering or texture pop-in.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Ryzen 5 9600X and RX 6750 XT ranks 716 out of 1642 tested combos in Thief, placing it in the upper 44th percentile. This is a respectable position, indicating that the pairing performs better than the majority of systems tested. The rank reflects the balanced nature of the components: the GPU provides strong rasterization, while the CPU avoids bottlenecking it.

Looking at the CPU’s nearest rivals, the Ryzen 5 9600X scores 28246 on average, which is nearly identical to the Intel Core i5-13490F at 28173 (0.3% ahead) and the AMD Ryzen 5 230 at 28164 (0.3% ahead). The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS scores 28369, putting it 0.4% ahead, and the Intel Core i5-14500T scores 28377, 0.5% ahead. These deltas are negligible, meaning the CPU is not a significant differentiating factor in the overall combo rank. The GPU, however, has a wider spread among its rivals: the RX 5600M is 0.2% behind, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is 0.3% ahead, and the RTX 3080 is 1.3% ahead. This suggests that the GPU choice has a greater impact on the final ranking than the CPU.

The combo rank of 716 is achieved despite the GPU being end-of-life, which speaks to its enduring capability in older titles like Thief. The game’s release date of 2014-02-24 means it was designed for hardware of that era, and modern components like the RX 6750 XT have ample headroom. The ranking indicates that this system is well-suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K being a stretch but still feasible at lower settings.

CPU Role

The Ryzen 5 9600X plays a supporting role in this configuration, but its specifications ensure that it does not become a bottleneck. With 6 cores and 12 threads, based on the Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm process, it offers a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. This high boost clock is critical for gaming, as Thief’s engine is primarily single-threaded, and the CPU’s single-core performance is excellent.

The CPU’s benchmark results confirm its strength: a 3DMark single-thread score of 1253 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3603. These numbers place it well above average, and its percentile ranking of 85 among all CPUs underscores its capability. The L3 cache of 32 MB shared across the 6 cores provides ample capacity for game data, and the dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth ensures fast data transfer to the GPU.

In Thief, the CPU’s role is to feed the GPU with draw calls and physics calculations. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 195.3 FPS, which suggests that the CPU is capable of generating very high frame rates when the GPU is not stressed. The fact that frame rates drop significantly at 4K, even at Low settings, confirms that the GPU is the limiting factor, not the CPU. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 28246 is only 0.5% lower than its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14500T, indicating that it is on par with other mid-range processors.

The Ryzen 5 9600X’s 65 W TDP is modest, making it an efficient choice for a gaming rig. The boost clock of 5.40 GHz is particularly valuable in Thief, where frame times can spike in complex scenes with many AI characters and dynamic lighting. The data shows that the CPU provides a stable foundation, allowing the GPU to operate at its full potential without being starved for data. For players considering upgrades, the CPU is unlikely to be the source of any performance complaints, as its capabilities exceed the demands of this game.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 9600X

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 3900 MHz
Boost Clock 5400 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

VRAM 12 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2600 MHz MHz
TDP 250 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 9600X + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT in Thief

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 79.1
3840x2160 Medium 57.9
3840x2160 Ultra 46.0
3840x2160 High 44.4
2560x1440 Low 133.4
2560x1440 Medium 101.7
2560x1440 High 76.9
2560x1440 Ultra 74.7
1920x1080 Low 195.3
1920x1080 Medium 149.8
1920x1080 High 110.9
1920x1080 Ultra 105.5

Thief with Ryzen 5 9600X + Other GPUs

See how Thief performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Thief with RX 6750 XT + Other CPUs

See how Thief performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 5 9600X + RX 6750 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.