Thief
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 79 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 33 | 37 | 47 | 63 |
| 1440p QHD | 57 | 60 | 82 | 109 |
| 1080p Full HD | 87 | 92 | 122 | 157 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Thief with AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + AMD Radeon RX 7600, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 secures the 1146th position out of 1642 tested combos for Thief, placing it in the lower-middle tier of the database. This is a result of the GPU’s performance profile in this title, as the CPU is largely uncontested in this workload. The combo’s standing reflects a system that can handle the game at mainstream resolutions but will require specific settings adjustments to achieve smooth frame rates at higher fidelity targets.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo rank of 1146 out of 1642 indicates the pairing is below the median performer in this specific game. Given that the data measures the complete system, this rank is heavily weighted by the RX 7600’s output. The CPU sits in the 82nd percentile against all processors, with an average benchmark score of 24993. Its nearest rivals—the Intel Core i7-11850H (24974, deltaPct 0.1), AMD Ryzen 7 2700X (25057, deltaPct -0.3), AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (25064, deltaPct -0.3), and AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (24897, deltaPct 0.4)—are all within a fraction of a percent in raw CPU compute. This shows the 7500F is not a limiting factor in this pairing; the processor’s compute headroom is effectively neutralized by the graphics card’s output.
By contrast, the RX 7600’s percentile rank against all GPUs is 63, with an average benchmark score of 20258. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT (20146, deltaPct 0.6), AMD Radeon RX 460 (20088, deltaPct 0.8), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534, deltaPct -1.3), and Intel Arc B570 (20556, deltaPct -1.5). The RX 7600 is essentially tied with these parts in aggregate GPU benchmarks, but the measured FPS in Thief shows that the game’s engine responds distinctly to this GPU’s architecture. The rank disparity between the CPU’s high percentile and the combo’s low rank confirms the GPU is the bottleneck; the data suggests that swapping to a faster GPU while keeping the same CPU would yield a substantial rank improvement, while a CPU upgrade alone would not move the needle in this title.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 7600 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, fabricated on a 6 nm process. Its memory configuration—8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s—is a defining factor for Thief’s performance at higher resolutions. The 8 GB capacity is sufficient for this 2014 title, but the memory bandwidth becomes a constraint as resolution scales, which the measured FPS data supports. The GPU’s base clock of 1720 MHz, game clock of 2250 MHz, and boost clock of 2655 MHz determine the raw compute throughput, while the 2048 shading units and 64 ROPs handle the pixel output.
The measured results show a clear pattern: the GPU’s clock speeds and memory bandwidth interact with Thief’s settings in a way that heavily favors lower presets. At 3840x2160, the drop from Low to Medium is 15.1 FPS, and from Medium to High is another 10 FPS, demonstrating that the GPU’s pixel rate of 169.9 GPixel/s is being taxed by the higher settings. The texture rate of 339.8 GTexel/s and FP32 performance of 21.75 TFLOPS are sufficient for 1080p but begin to show their limits at 4K. The GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is not a bottleneck for this engine, but the 8 GB memory size is the ceiling; the 4K Ultra result of 32.5 FPS indicates the frame buffer is not the issue—rather, the compute and memory bandwidth are saturated. The data indicates the RX 7600 is a capable 1080p card for this game, with diminishing returns as resolution climbs.
FAQ
*Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F holding back the RX 7600 in Thief?*
A: No. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 24993 places it in the 82nd percentile, and its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-11850H, is within 0.1% (deltaPct 0.1). The measured FPS are consistently limited by the GPU, as shown by the large FPS swings when changing graphics settings at the same resolution.
*Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Thief?*
A: The data shows 1920x1080 is the only resolution where all settings presets achieve playable frame rates. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset drops to 56.7 FPS, and at 3840x2160, the High preset falls to 37.4 FPS. For a consistent 60+ FPS experience, 1920x1080 with Medium (122.1 FPS) or High (92.1 FPS) is the practical target.
Q: How does the RX 7600 compare to its closest rival, the RX 7600 XT, in aggregate benchmarks?
A: The RX 7600’s average benchmark score is 20258, while the RX 7600 XT scores 20146, a deltaPct of 0.6. This puts the RX 7600 slightly ahead of its XT counterpart in the database’s aggregated tests, though the difference is marginal.
*Q: Can this combo handle 4K Ultra settings in Thief?*
A: No. The measured 3840x2160 Ultra preset yields an average of 32.5 FPS, which is below the typical 60 FPS target. The 3840x2160 Medium preset (47.4 FPS) and High preset (37.4 FPS) also fail to reach 60 FPS, indicating the GPU lacks the memory bandwidth and compute power for 4K in this game.
Q: What is the difference between the Low and Ultra presets at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 109 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 56.7 FPS. This 52.3 FPS gap highlights the significant cost of the Ultra settings on the GPU’s ROPs and shading units, making Low the only preset that comfortably exceeds 100 FPS at this resolution.
Q: Does the CPU’s single-thread performance influence the FPS results?
A: The CPU’s 3dmark_single_thread score of 974 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3218 are strong, but the data shows no evidence of CPU bottlenecking. The FPS scales inversely with GPU load (e.g., 1920x1080 Low at 157 FPS versus Ultra at 87 FPS), which confirms the GPU is the primary driver of frame rate changes.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the RX 7600 delivers its strongest results. The Low preset averages 157 FPS, which is the highest measured value in the entire dataset. Medium follows at 122.1 FPS, High at 92.1 FPS, and Ultra at 87 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 34.9 FPS, while the gap between High and Ultra is only 5.1 FPS, indicating that the Ultra preset is not proportionally more demanding than High at this resolution. All four presets exceed the 60 FPS threshold, making 1080p the only resolution where every setting is viable.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance drops are significant. Low averages 109 FPS, Medium drops to 82.2 FPS, and High falls to 60.1 FPS—just above the 60 FPS line. Ultra drops to 56.7 FPS, which is the first preset in the dataset to fall below 60 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1440p shows a 52.3 FPS reduction, a steeper curve than 1080p, which suggests the GPU’s memory bandwidth (288.0 GB/s) becomes a limiting factor as pixel count increases.
At 3840x2160, the RX 7600 struggles. Low averages 62.5 FPS, which is the only 4K preset to clear 60 FPS. Medium drops to 47.4 FPS, High falls to 37.4 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 32.5 FPS. The delta between Low and Ultra at 4K is 30 FPS, and the progression from Low to Medium (-15.1 FPS) is nearly identical to the Medium-to-High drop (-10 FPS), indicating a linear scaling of GPU load. The 4K results confirm that the GPU is compute-bound at this resolution, with the 169.9 GPixel/s pixel rate being the primary constraint.
Settings Recommendations
The optimal experience for this combo is 1920x1080 with the High preset, which delivers 92.1 FPS. This strikes the best balance between visual fidelity and performance, as the Ultra preset only provides a marginal 5.1 FPS improvement at 1080p over High. For users prioritizing maximum frame rates, the Low preset at 1920x1080 (157 FPS) is the only setting that approaches the CPU’s potential, but it sacrifices the game’s visual detail.
At 2560x1440, the Medium preset (82.2 FPS) is the recommended choice, as it maintains a comfortable margin above 60 FPS while offering better visuals than Low. The High preset (60.1 FPS) is playable but leaves no headroom for frame time spikes, and Ultra (56.7 FPS) falls below the 60 FPS target. For 4K users, the Low preset (62.5 FPS) is the only playable option; Medium (47.4 FPS) and higher are not recommended due to the sub-60 FPS results. The data shows that the RX 7600’s 8 GB memory and 128-bit bus are best utilized at 1080p, where the GPU’s 21.75 TFLOPS of FP32 compute can be fully leveraged without the memory bandwidth bottleneck that appears at higher resolutions.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
AMD Radeon RX 7600
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + AMD Radeon RX 7600 in Thief
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 62.5 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 47.4 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 37.4 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 32.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 109.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 82.2 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 60.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 56.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 157.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 122.1 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 92.1 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 87.0 |
Thief with Ryzen 5 7500F + Other GPUs
See how Thief performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Thief with RX 7600 + Other CPUs
See how Thief performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 7500F + RX 7600
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.