The Technomancer

The Technomancer, a 2016 Action RPG, presents a demanding workload for modern hardware. This analysis examines the measured performance of the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, using only the provided benchmark data. The results show a pairing that is capable at 1080p and 1440p, but which falls short of smooth playability at 4K, with the GPU acting as the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data for this combo reveals a clear trade-off between visual fidelity and frame rate. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers an average of 146 FPS, while the Medium preset drops to 112 FPS, and High yields 96 FPS. The Ultra preset at this resolution produces an average of 75 FPS. For players prioritizing the highest refresh rates, the Low preset is the only option that clears the 144Hz threshold, but the Medium preset’s 112 FPS average remains well within the range of high-refresh monitors and offers a substantial visual upgrade over Low.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance picture changes. The Low preset averages 95 FPS, which is still very playable. Medium drops to 73 FPS, and High to 63 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1440p manages only 49 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target for many gamers. Based on this data, the Medium preset at 1440p appears to be the sweet spot, providing a 73 FPS average that balances smoothness with improved details over Low, while remaining well ahead of the High and Ultra presets in frame rate.

At 3840x2160, the situation becomes more constrained. The Low preset averages 52 FPS, which is technically playable but not ideal. Medium drops to 40 FPS, High to 34 FPS, and Ultra to just 27 FPS. None of the 4K presets achieve a consistent 60 FPS. The data suggests that for a playable experience at 4K, the Low preset is the only viable option, and even then, the average frame rate is below the 60 FPS standard. The benchmark results indicate that this combo is not suited for high-settings 4K gaming, as the frame rate penalty from Low to Ultra is substantial.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is the clear limiting factor in this configuration, particularly at higher resolutions. The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The core clocks are listed with a base of 2280 MHz and a boost of 2497 MHz. This memory configuration is modest by modern standards, and the 8 GB capacity is likely a constraint in a game like The Technomancer, which can be demanding on VRAM at higher settings and resolutions.

The GPU’s benchmark scores place it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26331. Its nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Radeon 860M and the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, both of which are within 0.3% of its average score. This suggests that while the RTX 5060 is a competent performer, it is not at the top of the performance stack. The measured FPS data supports this, as the frame rates drop sharply when moving from 1080p to 4K. For example, the High preset falls from 96 FPS at 1080p to 63 FPS at 1440p, and then to 34 FPS at 4K. This scaling pattern is a classic indicator of a GPU-bound scenario, where the graphics card’s rendering throughput becomes the primary bottleneck.

The GPU’s architecture is Blackwell 2.0, manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It has a TDP of 145 W, which is a moderate power draw for a mobile or desktop card. The data shows that the RTX 5060 contributes to a system that can handle 1080p and 1440p gaming with high frame rates on Medium or High settings, but the 4K results indicate that the GPU’s capabilities are exhausted at that resolution. The drop from 52 FPS on Low to 27 FPS on Ultra at 4K highlights the GPU’s sensitivity to settings, as the increased shading load and texture detail overwhelm its 8 GB frame buffer and 19.18 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX is a high-end mobile processor that provides ample compute resources for gaming. It features 24 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The CPU has 36 MB of shared L3 cache and supports DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. This processor is not likely to be the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios, including those measured here.

The CPU’s benchmark scores are strong, placing it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. Its average benchmark score is 67469, and it is within 0.7% of its nearest rivals, which include the Intel Xeon w5-3525 and the AMD EPYC 4484PX. In multi-threaded workloads, the CPU scores 35589 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, and 2204 in single-core. These numbers indicate a processor that can handle both heavily threaded tasks and the lighter single-threaded workloads typical of game logic.

In the context of The Technomancer, the CPU’s role appears to be secondary to the GPU. The measured FPS data shows that the frame rate scales primarily with resolution and settings, which are GPU-dependent variables. At 1080p, the CPU is able to feed the GPU sufficiently, as evidenced by the high frame rates on Low (146 FPS) and Medium (112 FPS). Even at the Ultra preset, the 75 FPS average suggests that the CPU is not bottlenecking the system; rather, the GPU is struggling to render the higher detail settings. If the CPU were the limiting factor, we would expect to see similar frame rates across different resolutions, but the data shows a clear decline from 1080p to 4K, which is a hallmark of a GPU-limited system.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations for The Technomancer, this specific pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 ranks 1863rd out of 2825 combos. This places it in the lower-middle portion of the performance spectrum, which is consistent with the GPU’s 72nd percentile ranking. The combo’s rank suggests that while the CPU is a top-tier performer, the GPU holds the system back from achieving higher overall scores in this game.

The rank of 1863 out of 2825 means that roughly two-thirds of the tested combinations perform better in this specific game. This is not surprising given the RTX 5060’s position relative to its rivals. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 26331 is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon 860M (26401) and the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (26421), which are both lower-end parts. The data indicates that this combo is better suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming than for high-end 4K or high-refresh-rate 1440p Ultra settings, as the rank reflects an aggregate performance that is dragged down by the GPU’s limitations.

Resolution Scaling

The resolution scaling data provides a clear picture of the system’s bottlenecks. When moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440, the average FPS drops by roughly one-third across all presets. For instance, the High preset falls from 96 FPS to 63 FPS, a 34% reduction. The Low preset drops from 146 FPS to 95 FPS, a 35% reduction. This consistent percentage drop suggests that the GPU is the primary limiting factor, as resolution scaling directly affects the pixel fill rate and shading workload.

The scaling from 2560x1440 to 3840x2160 is even more severe. The High preset drops from 63 FPS to 34 FPS, a 46% reduction. The Low preset falls from 95 FPS to 52 FPS, a 45% reduction. This steeper decline at 4K indicates that the GPU is becoming increasingly saturated, and the 8 GB VRAM may also be a contributing factor as texture data exceeds its capacity. The frame rate at 4K Ultra is just 27 FPS, which is below the threshold for acceptable playability. This scaling pattern confirms that the CPU is not the limiting component; if it were, the frame rates would remain relatively flat as resolution increases, but the data shows a steep downward slope that is characteristic of a GPU-bound system.

FAQ

Q: What is the best preset for 1080p gaming with this combo?

A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers the highest average FPS at 146, but the Medium preset’s 112 FPS average offers a better balance of visual quality and performance. The Ultra preset drops to 75 FPS.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in The Technomancer?

A: The measured data shows that at 3840x2160, the maximum average FPS is 52 on the Low preset. The Medium preset averages 40 FPS, High averages 34 FPS, and Ultra averages 27 FPS. None of these reach a consistent 60 FPS.

Q: Which component is the bottleneck in this configuration?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the limiting factor. Frame rates drop significantly with resolution increases, from 96 FPS at 1080p High to 34 FPS at 4K High, which is a classic sign of GPU saturation. The CPU’s strong benchmark scores (94th percentile) suggest it is not the primary constraint.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested systems?

A: This combo ranks 1863rd out of 2825 tested combinations for The Technomancer. This places it in the lower-middle tier, consistent with the RTX 5060’s 72nd percentile GPU ranking.

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The highest average FPS is 146, achieved at 1920x1080 with the Low preset. The next highest is 112 FPS at the same resolution with Medium settings.

Q: Is the Ultra preset viable at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset averages 49 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay. The Medium preset at 73 FPS is a more viable option for 1440p.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following table details the exact average FPS measurements for each resolution and settings preset combination.

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |

|------------|----------|---------|

| 3840x2160 | High | 34 |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 52 |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 40 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 27 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 63 |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 95 |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 73 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 49 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 96 |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 146 |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 112 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 75 |

The data also includes minimum and maximum FPS for the Medium preset at each resolution. At 4K Medium, the range is 34 to 46 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the range is 62 to 84 FPS. At 1080p Medium, the range is 95 to 129 FPS. These ranges indicate that frame pacing is relatively stable, with no extreme dips or spikes. The lack of min/max data for other presets means the Medium preset’s variance is the only available indicator of frame time consistency, which appears acceptable.