The Technomancer

The Technomancer is not a new game, but it remains a demanding title for modern hardware, particularly at higher resolutions and settings. This analysis examines the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, using measured data to determine how this combination handles the game. The data indicates a powerful setup that delivers high frame rates across most configurations, with its primary challenge being 4K Ultra settings.

How This Combo Ranks

Out of 3,696 tested combinations for The Technomancer, this specific pairing of the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER holds the rank of 494. This places it within the top 13.4% of all recorded configurations, a strong showing that underscores the hardware's capability. The CPU itself achieves a 91st percentile ranking among all tested processors, while the GPU sits at the 76th percentile among all tested graphics cards. This suggests the platform is well-balanced, with the CPU providing a slight edge in relative performance compared to the GPU.

The ranking indicates that while this is not the absolute top-tier configuration for the game, it is firmly in the upper echelon. Users can expect this combo to outperform the vast majority of systems, but there is still headroom above it, likely occupied by more recent or more expensive hardware. The data shows that the combination is not bottlenecked in a way that would cause a low ranking; rather, it's a consistent high-performer that should handle the game with ease outside of the most extreme settings.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture and Vermeer codename. It has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, which allows it to handle both lightly-threaded tasks and heavily parallel workloads effectively. For a game like The Technomancer, which is an Action RPG from 2016, the multi-threaded performance is advantageous. The CPU’s benchmark scores reflect its strength, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,017 and a single-core score of 1,614, indicating it won't be a limiting factor in most gaming scenarios.

The processor's 64 MB of L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4 memory support with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth are also relevant. While The Technomancer may not be as cache-sensitive as some modern titles, the substantial cache helps ensure data is readily available for the cores. The benchmark results show that in a 16-thread 3DMark test, the CPU scores 10,810, and in a max-thread test, it scores 11,597. This indicates good scaling with thread count. Compared to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 9 5950X is essentially on par, with a 0.4% lead over the Intel Core i9-13900F and a 0.7% deficit against the Intel Core i7-14700. This shows that for this game, the CPU is more than sufficient, and any performance differences at lower resolutions are likely due to the GPU or game engine limitations rather than the processor.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the primary driver of frame rates in this configuration. It features 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 672.3 GB/s. This memory capacity is substantial and should prevent VRAM limitations even at 4K resolution with high-quality textures. The GPU has a base clock of 2340 MHz and a boost clock of 2610 MHz. Its compute power is rated at 44.10 TFLOPS for FP32 operations, and it includes 66 RT cores and 264 Tensor cores, making it a fully-featured Ada Lovelace architecture card.

The GPU's benchmark scores support its high-end positioning. It scores 31,811 in Passmark G3D and 199,267 in Geekbench OpenCL. Its 76th percentile among all GPUs is respectable, though its nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA TITAN RTX, which scores 31,676, a 1.9% difference. This suggests that for The Technomancer, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is performing as expected, with its strength lying in its high memory bandwidth and raw compute power. The data shows that the GPU's performance scales well with resolution, but the most demanding settings at 4K will test its limits.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured frame rates for this combo show a clear performance hierarchy across resolutions and settings.

1920x1080 (1080p): At this resolution, the CPU and GPU combo delivers exceptionally high frame rates. With Low settings, the average FPS is 250. Moving to Medium settings, the average drops to 211 FPS, with a minimum of 180 FPS and a maximum of 243 FPS. High settings yield an average of 180 FPS. At Ultra settings, the average is 141 FPS. These numbers are all far above the refresh rates of most standard monitors, making this resolution a non-issue for the hardware.

2560x1440 (1440p): This is often considered the sweet spot for high-refresh-rate gaming, and the data shows it is well-handled. At Low settings, the average FPS is 180. Medium settings bring the average down to 138 FPS, with a minimum of 117 FPS and a maximum of 159 FPS. High settings produce an average of 118 FPS. At Ultra settings, the average is 92 FPS. These results indicate that even with the most demanding settings, a 144Hz monitor will be sufficiently utilized.

3840x2160 (4K): This is where the hardware begins to show strain. At Low settings, the average FPS is a playable 99. Medium settings average 76 FPS, with a minimum of 64 FPS and a maximum of 87 FPS. High settings yield an average of 65 FPS. However, at Ultra settings, the average FPS drops to 51, which is the only configuration in the dataset that falls below the 60 FPS threshold typically desired for smooth gameplay. The data clearly shows that 4K Ultra is the only scenario where this combo struggles.

The progression of scores shows a consistent pattern: lowering the resolution or settings proportionally increases the average frame rate. The minimum FPS data available for Medium settings across all resolutions shows that frame pacing is stable, with the 1% lows being about 15-20% below the average, which is a healthy margin.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run The Technomancer at 4K with maximum graphics settings?

A: Yes, but with a caveat. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 51 FPS. This is playable, but it is below the 60 FPS target that many players prefer. For a locked 60 FPS experience, lowering the settings to High is recommended.

Q: What is the best resolution for this hardware to achieve a high refresh rate?

A: At 2560x1440, the combo achieves an average of 118 FPS on High and 92 FPS on Ultra. For the highest frame rates, 1920x1080 on Medium settings delivers an average of 211 FPS. If targeting 144Hz, 1440p with High settings is the most demanding configuration that still clears that bar.

Q: How much faster is the PC at 1080p compared to 4K?

A: The performance delta is significant. At 1080p Ultra, the average FPS is 141. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS is 51. This represents a 176% improvement in frame rate when dropping the resolution from 4K to 1080p at the same Ultra settings.

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X a bottleneck for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER in this game?

A: The data suggests it is not a significant bottleneck. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 51,947 is nearly identical to its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX, which scores 52,073. The high frame rates at 1080p, where CPU load is typically highest, indicate the processor is keeping up with the GPU.

Q: What is the performance difference between High and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the average FPS on High is 118, while on Ultra it is 92. This is a 28% decrease in performance when moving from High to Ultra. The visual fidelity difference may not justify the frame rate cost for all users.

Q: Does the 16 GB of VRAM on the GPU cause any issues in this game?

A: No. The measured data shows no signs of VRAM-related stuttering or performance drops, even at 4K with High settings. The 16 GB capacity is more than sufficient for The Technomancer's requirements.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal balance of visual quality and performance depends heavily on the target resolution and refresh rate.

For 1920x1080 displays, the hardware is so powerful that the choice is about preference. For competitive play or maximum smoothness, Medium settings at 211 FPS are excellent. However, for the best visual experience without sacrificing much performance, Ultra settings at 141 FPS are highly recommended. There is no reason to use Low or High settings at this resolution, as the frame rates are already extremely high.

For 2560x1440 displays, the High preset offers the best balance. An average of 118 FPS is ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors (120Hz or 144Hz). The Ultra preset drops the average to 92 FPS, which is still smooth, but the 28% performance hit is a significant trade-off for marginal visual gains. For users with a 60Hz monitor, Ultra is entirely viable, but for those with faster panels, High is the recommended setting.

For 3840x2160 displays, the analysis is straightforward. The Ultra preset is not recommended for a consistent experience, as the 51 FPS average can dip below 60. The High preset, with an average of 65 FPS, is the better choice. It provides a playable and stable frame rate that is close to the 60 FPS target. If you prefer maximizing visuals over frame rate, Ultra is playable, but High is the more practical recommendation for a smooth experience.