Control

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER combination delivers a top-tier experience in Control, securing a rank of 443 out of 3720 tested combos. This places the pairing in the top 12% of all configurations tested for this title, a strong result driven by a balanced high-end CPU and GPU pairing. The data indicates that this system is exceptionally well-suited for high-refresh-rate 1440p gaming and remains highly capable at 4K, with the primary performance ceiling dictated by the graphics card rather than the processor.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 443 out of 3720 tested combinations places it firmly in the upper echelon of systems benchmarked for Control. This is a clear indication that the pairing of the Ryzen 9 5950X and the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER provides a level of performance that will satisfy the vast majority of players, handling the game's most demanding scenarios with ease. The data suggests this is not a combination where one component significantly bottlenecks the other; instead, they work in concert to deliver consistently high frame rates.

To contextualize this rank, the CPU and GPU each have their own individual standings. The Ryzen 9 5950X sits in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, indicating that its processing power is among the top 9% of all processors evaluated. Its average benchmark score of 51947 places it in close competition with a tightly-bunched group of rivals. For instance, it is a mere 0.2% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX, which scores 52073, and 0.3% behind the AMD EPYC 8124P, which scores 52121. Conversely, it is 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13900F and 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core i7-14700. This shows that in raw compute performance, the 5950X is essentially neck-and-neck with some of the most powerful modern processors.

On the graphics side, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER holds the 76th percentile among all GPUs, a strong showing that places it in the top quarter of all graphics cards. Its average benchmark score of 31087 is similarly competitive with its immediate rivals. The data shows it is 0.4% ahead of the NVIDIA Quadro M5000, which scores 31206, and 0.4% ahead of the NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q, which scores 31220. It also leads the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell by 1.4% and the NVIDIA TITAN RTX by 1.9%. While the GPU's percentile is lower than the CPU's, the measured in-game FPS reveals that this does not translate to a poor experience; rather, it highlights that the GPU is the more likely limiting factor at higher resolutions.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer. It operates on the AMD Socket AM4 platform and features a base clock of 3.40 GHz, which can boost up to 4.90 GHz. This high core and thread count, combined with a substantial 64 MB of L3 cache, makes it a formidable processor for both multi-threaded workloads and gaming. The benchmark data supports this, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26017 and a single-core score of 1614, indicating excellent performance in both heavily-threaded and lightly-threaded tasks.

In the context of Control, a game that is typically more demanding on the GPU, the 5950X's role is to ensure that frame times remain consistent and that the graphics card is fed with data as quickly as possible. The 3DMark scores illustrate its threading capabilities: a 2-thread score of 1856, a 4-thread score of 3595, an 8-thread score of 6598, and a 16-thread score of 10810. These incremental gains show excellent scaling, meaning the CPU can efficiently distribute work across its many cores. The max-thread score of 11597 further confirms that even when all 32 threads are engaged, the processor maintains high performance.

This processing headroom is crucial for a title like Control, which features complex physics and destruction systems. The 5950X's robust single-thread performance, evidenced by a Geekbench single-core score of 2083 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3470, ensures that the game's primary simulation thread is not a bottleneck. The data strongly suggests that at 1080p and 1440p, the CPU is more than capable of keeping up with the GPU, allowing the graphics card to operate at its full potential. It is only at 4K, where the GPU workload increases dramatically, that the system's frame rates become more dependent on the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture and features 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 672.3 GB/s. Its base clock is 2340 MHz, with a boost clock of 2610 MHz. The 16 GB VRAM capacity is a significant asset for Control, a game that can be demanding on memory at higher resolutions and with high-quality textures. This generous memory allocation ensures that the game does not run into VRAM limitations at 4K, allowing for smoother performance with fewer hitches.

The GPU's raw compute power is substantial, with an FP32 performance of 44.10 TFLOPS. Its 8448 shading units and 264 texture mapping units are tasked with rendering the game's detailed environments and effects. The benchmark results show the card's capabilities in various APIs, with a strong Passmark G3D score of 31811 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 199267. The card is also well-equipped for the future, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6.

In Control, the GPU is the primary driver of visual fidelity. The measured frame rates show a clear correlation between graphical settings and performance. At 1080p, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is able to push very high frame rates, reaching 228 FPS on Low settings and 144 FPS on High. This indicates that the GPU is so powerful at this resolution that it can easily handle the game's demands, and the CPU is keeping pace. The transition to 1440p shows a predictable performance scaling, with the High preset delivering 109 FPS. The GPU's strength is most evident at 4K, where it still manages a very playable 73 FPS on High settings, demonstrating that this card is a capable 4K solution for this title without requiring significant compromises.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance rank of this CPU and GPU combination in Control?

A: The combination ranks 443rd out of 3720 tested combos, placing it in the top 12% of all configurations benchmarked for this game.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals in terms of average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen 9 5950X has an average score of 51947. It is 0.2% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX and 0.3% behind the AMD EPYC 8124P, while being 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13900F and 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core i7-14700.

Q: What is the maximum amount of VRAM available on the GPU, and what type of memory is it?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is equipped with 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: What is the average frame rate at 1440p with High settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with High settings, the combination achieves an average frame rate of 109 FPS.

Q: Is the 4K performance at High settings playable according to the data?

A: Yes, at 3840x2160 with High settings, the system delivers an average of 73 FPS, which is above the standard 60 FPS threshold for smooth playability.

Q: What are the boost clocks for the CPU and GPU in this combo?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, while the GPU has a boost clock of 2610 MHz.

Resolution Scaling

The performance scaling across resolutions reveals a classic pattern where the GPU becomes increasingly dominant as the resolution increases. At 1080p, the system is heavily CPU-bound at lower settings, with the GPU having significant headroom. This is evident in the High preset, which yields 144 FPS at 1080p. Moving to 1440p, the frame rate drops to 109 FPS on High settings, a 24.3% decrease. This is a substantial drop, but the resulting frame rate is still exceptionally high for a 1440p experience, indicating the combination is ideal for high-refresh-rate 1440p monitors.

The jump to 4K presents a more significant challenge for the GPU. At 3840x2160 with High settings, the average frame rate falls to 73 FPS. This represents a 33.0% drop from the 1440p result and a 49.3% drop from the 1080p result. This sharp decline is a clear indicator that the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the limiting component at this resolution. The CPU's role becomes less critical as the resolution increases, as the GPU's rendering workload grows exponentially. The 16-core processor has more than enough power to handle the game's logic at any resolution, but the GPU's raw pixel-pushing capabilities are what ultimately define the performance ceiling at 4K.

The data for the Low preset further illustrates this point. At 1080p Low, the system hits 228 FPS, but at 4K Low, it drops to 116 FPS. While this is still a very playable frame rate, the 49.1% reduction from 1080p to 4K is nearly identical to the drop seen on the High preset. This consistency across settings confirms that the performance scaling is primarily driven by the resolution's pixel count and the GPU's ability to process it, rather than the complexity of the scene. The system is clearly optimized for 1440p gaming, where it offers an extraordinary balance of speed and visual quality, but it also remains a very strong 4K performer, especially on High settings where it maintains an average of 73 FPS.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combination depend on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For players with a 1080p or 1440p monitor with a high refresh rate, the High preset is the clear recommendation. At 1080p, it delivers 144 FPS, and at 1440p, it delivers 109 FPS. These frame rates are high enough to take full advantage of 144Hz or even 165Hz displays, and the High preset offers a significant visual upgrade over Medium without a massive performance cost. The Medium preset, which yields 162 FPS at 1080p and 122 FPS at 1440p, could be chosen to push frame rates even higher, but the visual fidelity compromise is generally not worth it when the High preset already provides such excellent performance.

For 4K gaming, the High preset is also the best choice, delivering a very solid 73 FPS average. This is comfortably above the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay. While the Ultra preset is playable at 64 FPS, the 12.3% performance drop from High to Ultra may not justify the marginal increase in visual quality for many users. The data suggests that High is the "sweet spot" for this game and this hardware, providing a near-optimal blend of visual fidelity and performance. The Low preset, while achieving higher frame rates, is not recommended as it would significantly detract from the game's atmospheric visuals, which are a core part of the Control experience. The Medium preset, with its 83 FPS at 4K, is a viable alternative if a player wants a buffer above 60 FPS, but High offers a better visual experience for the minor frame rate cost. In summary, the High preset is the definitive recommendation for all resolutions, as it provides the best overall experience by maintaining high and consistent frame rates while showcasing the game's impressive graphics.