The Technomancer

The Technomancer

AVERAGE FPS
86
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 86 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 32 41 48 63
1440p QHD 59 75 88 115
1080p Full HD 90 115 135 175

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 63
3840x2160 Medium 48
3840x2160 High 41
3840x2160 Ultra 32
2560x1440 Low 115
2560x1440 Medium 88
2560x1440 High 75
2560x1440 Ultra 59
1920x1080 Low 175
1920x1080 Medium 135
1920x1080 High 115
1920x1080 Ultra 90

The Technomancer with AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, In-Depth Analysis

The Technomancer, a 2016 Action RPG, presents a demanding workload for modern hardware. The pairing of the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti produces a measurable performance profile across resolutions, with the data indicating a system that is firmly GPU-limited at higher settings. The benchmark results show that this combination ranks in the 48.6th percentile of all tested combos for this game, placing it near the middle of the pack. The following analysis breaks down the measured FPS data, component roles, and overall standing of this specific configuration.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data for The Technomancer reveals a classic pattern of resolution-dependent scaling, with the RTX 3060 Ti becoming the primary bottleneck as pixel count increases. At 1920x1080 with High settings, the combo achieves an average of 115 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 at the same High settings, the average drops to 75 FPS, a reduction of 40 FPS. At 3840x2160, the average falls further to 41 FPS. This scaling from 1080p to 4K represents a 64% decrease in average FPS at High settings, which strongly indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU, with its 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 5 architecture, is not the constraint here; the workload is clearly overwhelming the graphics card's capabilities at higher resolutions.

The scaling pattern is even more pronounced when comparing the Low settings across resolutions. At 1080p Low, the system produces an average of 175 FPS, which is a high enough frame rate to suggest the CPU is still capable of feeding the GPU. However, at 1440p Low, the average is 115 FPS, and at 4K Low, it drops to 63 FPS. The 112 FPS difference between 1080p Low and 4K Low is substantial and confirms that the rendering load is the dominant factor. This is a clear indicator that for users targeting high refresh rates at 1080p, the CPU can keep pace, but the GPU will limit performance at higher resolutions, regardless of the graphics settings.

The data also shows that the gap between settings narrows as resolution increases. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 85 FPS (175 vs 90). At 1440p, this gap shrinks to 56 FPS (115 vs 59). At 4K, the difference is only 31 FPS (63 vs 32). This convergence of performance at 4K is a classic symptom of a GPU-bound scenario. When the GPU is fully saturated at 4K, the specific graphics settings have a relatively smaller impact on the final frame rate because the pixel fill rate and memory bandwidth become the limiting factors. The RTX 3060 Ti’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are being taxed heavily at this resolution, making the difference between Low and Ultra settings less impactful than at lower resolutions where the CPU can more easily feed the GPU.

Looking at the 4K data specifically, the average FPS at High is 41, at Medium it is 48, and at Low it is 63. The jump from Medium to Low is 15 FPS, which is more significant than the 7 FPS jump from High to Medium. This suggests that certain graphics options, likely those related to shadow quality or post-processing, have a disproportionate impact on performance at high resolutions. The game’s engine shows a non-linear scaling of cost with these settings, which is important for users who want to optimize for playability at 4K. The Ultra setting, with an average of 32 FPS, is the only truly unplayable option, but even High at 41 FPS is not ideal for a smooth experience.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database for The Technomancer, this specific combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti holds a combo rank of 1375 out of 2825 tested combos. This puts the pairing in the 48.6th percentile, meaning it performs better than just under half of all other tested configurations in this game. This is a middling result, and it reflects the fact that the GPU is a significant limiting factor. While the CPU is a top-tier part, the RTX 3060 Ti, which sits at the 59th percentile for all GPUs, holds the overall combo back in this specific title.

The rank suggests that while this is not a bottom-tier setup, it is also far from the top of the performance charts. Many other combinations, likely those pairing the same or similar CPUs with faster GPUs, will achieve higher frame rates. The data shows that the CPU’s potential is not fully realized in this game due to the GPU bottleneck. For a title like The Technomancer, which is not known for being particularly CPU-intensive, the GPU’s performance is the primary driver of the combo’s overall rank. The fact that the combo is ranked slightly below the 50th percentile indicates that a majority of other tested systems have a better balance of components for this specific workload.

This ranking is a direct consequence of the RTX 3060 Ti’s performance class. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 16129 places it in the 59th percentile of all GPUs, and its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 9060 and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT. These are all mid-range to upper-mid-range cards, and their performance in a modern game at high resolutions will naturally limit a high-end CPU. The combo rank of 1375 out of 2825 is a quantitative measure of this limitation. It shows that for The Technomancer, users with this setup should expect performance that is representative of the GPU’s tier, not the CPU’s.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the defining component in this configuration for The Technomancer. Its performance characteristics, including its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, 256-bit memory bus, and 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth, are directly reflected in the measured FPS. The GPU’s 4864 shading units and 80 ROPs, running at a base clock of 1410 MHz and a boost clock of 1665 MHz, provide a specific level of raw compute power that is being fully utilized in this game. The data shows that the GPU is the bottleneck at every resolution above 1080p, and even at 1080p with higher settings, it is likely the limiting factor.

The 8 GB of VRAM is a critical detail for this game. At 4K resolution, the high texture and geometry loads can easily consume a significant portion of this memory. The measured averages of 41 FPS at 4K High and 32 FPS at 4K Ultra suggest that the card is struggling not just with compute but potentially with memory capacity and bandwidth. While the data does not provide direct VRAM usage numbers, the steep drop in performance at 4K is consistent with a card that is being pushed to its limits in both processing and memory throughput. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is a substantial figure, but The Technomancer at 4K with high-detail assets will still stress it.

The GPU’s architecture, Ampere, and its process node of 8 nm from Samsung, define its efficiency and thermal characteristics. With a TDP of 200 W, it is not a particularly power-hungry card, but its performance in this game is what it is. The benchmark results for the GPU itself, such as a Geekbench OpenCL score of 78927 and a Passmark G3D score of 20349, provide a general picture of its capabilities, but the in-game FPS data is the most relevant. The performance relative to its nearest rivals, such as the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT, which has a similar average score, shows that the RTX 3060 Ti is a solid but not exceptional performer, and this is exactly what the The Technomancer data shows. The GPU’s role is to be the primary performance limiter, a fact that is evident in the resolution scaling.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of this combo’s performance across three resolutions and four settings levels. At 1920x1080, the system is capable of high frame rates. With Low settings, the average FPS is 175, which is exceptionally high. Medium settings yield an average of 135 FPS, with a minimum of 114 and a maximum of 155. High settings produce an average of 115 FPS. Ultra settings drop the average to 90 FPS. This data shows that at 1080p, the system is well-suited for high-refresh-rate monitors, even with the most demanding settings, as the average never falls below 90 FPS. The minimum FPS of 114 at Medium settings also indicates good frame time consistency.

At 2560x1440, performance is still solid but noticeably lower. Low settings average 115 FPS, which is still very playable. Medium settings average 88 FPS, with a minimum of 75 and a maximum of 101. High settings average 75 FPS. Ultra settings bring the average down to 59 FPS. This resolution is the sweet spot for this combo if a high refresh rate is the goal, as High settings can still push past 70 FPS. The minimum FPS of 75 at Medium settings suggests that even in demanding scenes, the system will not drop below a comfortable threshold. The Ultra setting at 59 FPS is playable but not optimal for competitive play.

At 3840x2160, the RTX 3060 Ti is clearly overburdened. Low settings average 63 FPS, which is the only setting that provides a consistently smooth experience. Medium settings average 48 FPS, with a minimum of 41 and a maximum of 56. High settings average 41 FPS. Ultra settings average 32 FPS. This data indicates that 4K gaming with this GPU is only feasible with Low settings, and even then, the average FPS is not high. The minimum FPS of 41 at Medium settings shows that the game can experience significant dips, potentially making it feel stuttery. For a smooth 4K experience, a more powerful GPU would be required.

The full breakdown of the data is as follows:

  • 1920x1080: Low 175 FPS, Medium 135 FPS (min 114, max 155), High 115 FPS, Ultra 90 FPS.
  • 2560x1440: Low 115 FPS, Medium 88 FPS (min 75, max 101), High 75 FPS, Ultra 59 FPS.
  • 3840x2160: Low 63 FPS, Medium 48 FPS (min 41, max 56), High 41 FPS, Ultra 32 FPS.

This data is measured and provides a clear performance hierarchy for users to reference.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best resolution and settings combination for this system in The Technomancer?*

A: For a balance of visual quality and performance, 2560x1440 with High settings yields an average of 75 FPS. For a higher frame rate, 1920x1080 with High settings provides 115 FPS, while 1920x1080 with Medium settings offers 135 FPS. At 4K, only Low settings, with an average of 63 FPS, is recommended for a playable experience.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the main bottleneck for this game?

A: The data indicates the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the primary limiting factor. The average FPS drops significantly from 175 at 1080p Low to 63 at 4K Low, showing a heavy reliance on GPU performance. The CPU, with its high multi-threaded score of 22807 in Cinebench R23, is not the constraint.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to others tested for this game?

A: This combination ranks 1375 out of 2825 tested combos, placing it in the 48.6th percentile. This means it performs better than roughly half of all other tested systems, but it is not a top-tier setup due to the GPU’s mid-range performance class.

Q: Can this system achieve a stable 60 FPS at 4K resolution?

A: No. At 4K with Low settings, the average FPS is 63, but Medium settings drop the average to 48 FPS with a minimum of 41. High and Ultra settings average 41 and 32 FPS, respectively. A stable 60 FPS at 4K is not achievable with this GPU.

Q: What are the performance characteristics of the RTX 3060 Ti in this game?

A: The RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 448.0 GB/s bandwidth. Its average benchmark score is 16129, placing it in the 59th percentile of all GPUs. In The Technomancer, its performance is the primary bottleneck, especially at resolutions above 1080p.

Q: Does the Ryzen 7 9850X3D's performance have a significant impact on this game's frame rates?

A: The CPU’s impact is minimal at higher resolutions. The Ryzen 7 9850X3D has a high single-thread score of 2228 in Cinebench R23, but the game’s frame rates are largely determined by the GPU. The CPU is more than capable of handling the game’s logic, but it cannot compensate for the GPU’s limitations.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D plays a supporting role in this configuration for The Technomancer, as the game is clearly GPU-limited. The CPU features 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 5 architecture, with a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. Its large 96 MB of shared L3 cache is a key feature for gaming, but in this specific title, the data suggests that the graphics card is the primary determinant of performance. The CPU’s high benchmark scores, such as a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22807 and a single-core score of 2228, indicate it is a top-tier processor, but these strengths are not fully utilized when the GPU is saturated.

The CPU’s role is to feed the GPU with data and handle game logic. At 1080p, the data shows that the CPU is capable of delivering high frame rates, as evidenced by the 175 FPS average at Low settings. This indicates that the CPU is not a limiting factor at this resolution. However, as the resolution increases to 1440p and 4K, the GPU’s workload increases, and the frame rates drop, showing that the CPU’s potential is being held back. The CPU’s performance relative to its nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core i9-14900, which has an average score only 0.5% higher, shows that it is a very competitive part, but its advantage does not translate to higher FPS in this game due to the GPU bottleneck.

The 8 cores and 16 threads are more than sufficient for The Technomancer, which is not a heavily threaded title. The CPU’s 4 nm process node and 120 W TDP also contribute to its efficiency, but again, this is not a factor in the game’s performance. The data shows that the CPU is a capable and powerful component that is not the reason for any performance shortfalls. The benchmark results, such as a Passmark multi-thread score of 41318, further confirm its strength. In this context, the CPU’s role is to provide a stable and powerful foundation, but the measured FPS is a direct result of the RTX 3060 Ti’s capabilities. Users with this CPU can be assured that it will not be the weak link, but they must also recognize that the GPU will define their experience in this game.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D

Cores / Threads 8 / 16
Base Clock 4700 MHz
Boost Clock 5600 MHz
TDP 120W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

VRAM 8 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 1665 MHz MHz
TDP 200 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti in The Technomancer

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 63.0
3840x2160 Medium 48.0
3840x2160 High 41.0
3840x2160 Ultra 32.0
2560x1440 Low 115.0
2560x1440 Medium 88.0
2560x1440 High 75.0
2560x1440 Ultra 59.0
1920x1080 Low 175.0
1920x1080 Medium 135.0
1920x1080 High 115.0
1920x1080 Ultra 90.0

The Technomancer with Ryzen 7 9850X3D + Other GPUs

See how The Technomancer performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

The Technomancer with RTX 3060 Ti + Other CPUs

See how The Technomancer performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 7 9850X3D + RTX 3060 Ti

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.