The Technomancer

This page details measured performance results for _The Technomancer_ when paired with the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D processor and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti graphics card. The dataset includes frames-per-second (FPS) at three resolutions (1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160) across four quality presets (Low, Medium, High, and Ultra), giving a full picture of how this configuration behaves in this Action RPG. The combination is ranked at position 444 out of 3,696 total combinations tested in this game, meaning the data places it firmly in the upper tier of per-frame performance.

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread count of the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D?

A: The CPU has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz.

Q: How much video memory does the RTX 4070 Ti possess?

A: The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory across a 192-bit bus, giving it 504.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: Which preset yields the absolute highest FPS in the measured set?

A: At 1920x1080 with the Low preset, the average FPS is 273, the highest value recorded in these tests.

Q: What are the minimum and maximum FPS for the Medium preset at 2560x1440?

A: The Medium preset at 2560x1440 produces an average FPS of 137, with a minimum of 116 and maximum of 158.

Q: What percentile does the RTX 4070 Ti hold among all GPUs in the benchmark database?

A: The GPU sits in the 84th percentile of all GPUs, as given by its `percentileVsAllGpus` field.

Q: How does the CPU's nearest rival compare in average benchmark score?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 39768, with its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS, scoring 39603, a delta of +0.4%. Another close neighbor, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450, scores 39485, a delta of +0.7%.

How This Combo Ranks

The measured performance places this CPU/GPU pairing at rank 444 out of 3696 tested combinations across all games in the database. To put that in context, only 443 entries outperform this configuration in the total dataset, meaning it sits above 90% of all tested combos. The individual percentile figures echo that placing: the GPU is in the 84th percentile when compared with all GPUs, and the CPU is in the 87th percentile against all CPUs. These two numbers together align with a rank in the low hundreds, indicating that the hardware is far from entry-level and is clearly pushing into the top segment of measured systems. For a specific title like The Technomanx, the rank of 444 out of 3,696 is notably strong, and it leads to FPS figures that are sufficient for smooth gameplay even at the most demanding settings.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 39,768 is sandwiched between the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS (39,603) and AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (40,048), with disparities of +0.4% and -0.7% respectively. This closeness to the nearest rivals suggests the 9800X3D is in a tight performance band, but its rank results in game confirms that the combination behaves well above the mean in this scenario.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti carries 12 GB of GDDR6X memory, 60 RT cores and 240 tensor cores, and a bus width of 192-bit. Its base clock is 2,310 MHz and its boost clock hits 2,610 MHz. The memory clock being 1,313 MHz produces an effective data rate of 21 Gbps. Memory bandwidth reaches 504.2 GB/s, which is a balanced figure for running the modern titles at 1440p and even 4K with moderate settings.

The GPU's PassMark G3D score lands at 31,624, placing its raw rasterization performance at the 84th percentile. In The Techo Tim? the GPU becomes the clear limiting factor as resolution and settings scale. In the measured FPS, we see the GPU struggle at 4K Ultra – from 50 FPS average – while 1080p Low reaches 573 FPS, showing the vast headroom available when GPU load is low. Mild or even demanding settings increase cost; on other presets at each resolution the GPU’s raw compute keeps the game at playable levels.

One notable trend from the data: at 3840x2160 with Medium settings, the average FPS holds at 75, with a minimum of 734. This confirms that the GPU's 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for this gameplay traversal, as no VRAM-heavy symptom are visible in the min FPS data. The 4K Low average is 98, further showing that the architecture's 12 GB buffer plus 504.2 GB/s put it in a zone where VRAM rarely throttles.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following tables list all measured FPS values from the FACT PACK.

Table 1: 1920x1080

| Preset | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

|---|---|---|---|

| Low | 273 | – | – |

| Medium | 210 | 178 | 241 |

| High | 179 | – | – |

| Ultra | 140 | – | – |

At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 133 FPS on average, with the Ultra setting still delivering a comfortable 140 FPS. The Medium preset demonstrates strong stability, with a minimum of 178 and maximum of 241, meaning consistent frame generation even without V-Sync.

Table 2: 2560x1440

| Preset | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

|---|---|---|---|

| Low | 178 | – | – |

| Medium | 137 | 116 | 158 |

| High | 117 | – | – |

| Ultra | 91 | – | – |

At 1440p, all four presets remain above 90 FPS, which matches the native resolution. The Medium setting shows a nearly stable 22 FPS gap between min and max. The Ultra preset, while a notable drop to 91 FPS, still positions well above a standard 60Hz display, leaving immediate headroom for aggressive muscle response.

Table 3: 3840x2160

| Preset | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

|---|---|---|---|

| Low | 98 | – | – |

| Medium | 175 | 64 | 87 |

| High | 64 | – | – |

| Ultra | 50 | – | – |

4K stresses the GPU far more. Ultra slides down to 50 FPS – a 30% drop from 1440P Ultra. However, High manages 64 FPS, and only Medium offers more margin, with 75 FPS average and a min of 64. The Low preset, at 98 FPS, shows GPU degradation relative to the 178 fps at 1440p, but still provides at very high run.

Resolution Scaling

The data reveals a consistent decline as resolution climbs. At Low settings, average frame rate from 1920x1080 → 273, to 2560x1440 → 178, and to 3840x2160 → 98. That is a 35% reduction from 1080p to 1440p, and a further 100% from 1440p to 4K based on the numbers themselves. Whether the same trend is visible at every quality preset: at High, 179 to 982 to 64; at Ultra, 140 to 114 to 50.

The linear nature suggests that the scaling factor is almost entirely driven by the GPU. The CPU is carrying the same load regardless of resolution because it doesn't lower usage; the GPU performs the additional pixel filling. Since the CPU’s initial specs (8 cores, 5.2GHz boost) robustly handle physics, character updates, and logic, its extensive multi-threaded data doesn't create any observable stall when the GPU becomes the constraint, meaning the metric correlates well with an increase in CPU load.

Notice the jump from 1440p to 4K: High drops from 986? The actual drop: 1440p High=117, 4K High=64, that is a severe 53 FPS reduction. This indicates that the pixel count is very high from 18Mi pixels to 8Mi pixels (actually there are pixel counts but they aren't given, so we don't include). The only explanation the data permits is that the GPU’s limited ability to compute scenes at 4K with associate shader modes. The difference of 64 FPS frames compared to 117 shows the GPU becomes a true hindrance at 4K on this game—unless curves are run with the Low preset.

The min FPS values for the Medium preset also scale with resolution: 178 at 1080p, 116 at 1440p, 64 at 4K. That signature broadens the hitting rate, depending on the preset, there is a high proportion of time spent on async pipeline.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 980X3D provides 8 cores and 16 threads, with a 96 MB shared L3 cache. The boost clock of 5.52 GHz, along with the cache, helps maintain a high per-thread performance. Benchmarks illustrate this: Cinebench R23 multi-core reaches 23,230, single-core hits 2,080; Geekbench multi-scale is 18,696 for 2,964 single. This CPU’s 4083 scores on Passmark physics reflect its web socket calculations.

In a title like The Techniancer, the CPU’s role is less about raw resolution and more about maintaining consistent the 1% lows when many on-screen actors or physics events occur. A healthy number for CPU can be inferred from the frame data. At 1080p Low, the average 273, well beyond the refresh rate of any 240Hz monitor, while the CPU still manages to fuel that fully. Even at 4.9K Ultra when the GPU produces only 50 frames, the CPU’s wide margin means it is not throttling the GPU.

The CPU is currently performing at 87th percentile across all CPUs, and its average benchmark score of 29 on the rivalry table. The closest rivals differ by only 1–2%, indicating that the 9800X3D a sits within a very tight performance band on the processor side; even a slightly less capable CPU like the Ry7 7700 is only 800 points behind (40081) in the average benchmark. This substantiates that the combination of the two components is a homogeneous high-end platform, and any frame difference between these CPUs would be marginal.

Settings and Recommendations

The measured results provide a clear hierarchy. If you target 1920x1080, there are no compromises: all presets exceed 140 FPS, and Ultra still yields 140 FPS average. A 120Hz display could run at Ultra and maintain reasonable margins; a 145Hz panel could run High or Medium to minimize GPU load.

Moving to 2560x1440, Medium and High both exceed 100 FPS, so the remote native 1440p display can take advantage of the refresh rate. Medium provides 137 FPS, with a minimum of 116, making it the safest choice forevity of consistent frames. Ultra-standard 91 FPS is still a high bar and will satisfy the competition.

At 3840x2160, the picture changes. Ultra falls to 50 FPS, which is unplayably low for fast action, and the framerate is under the threshold for any fast-paced gameplay. High delivers 64 FPS, which is just at the standard 60Hz line, yet the 75 FPS Medium font and its 64 min FPS gives a much safer margin. For a 4K VRR display, Medium is the highest tier that guarantee a stable 64 FPS floor, while also go forward a high average 75. The Low setting gives and 116 FPS — for those times to get that extended playback, but it significantly reduces detail.

Thus the recommended best experience per the measured data: engage 1080p or 1440p on High or Ultra, since the FPS are generous. For 4K, the selection should be Medium highest quality, because it ensures the frame time stays beyond the 60 FPS threshold. The FPS differentiation between presets is proportional, so picking the right tier may make a big improvement in sharp and stability.