The Technomancer
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 100 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 40 | 48 | 53 | 75 |
| 1440p QHD | 65 | 89 | 103 | 132 |
| 1080p Full HD | 105 | 134 | 157 | 199 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
The Technomancer with AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, In-Depth Analysis
Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component
The Technomancer presents a steep resolution scaling curve for this AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti pairing, with the data showing a clear transition from CPU-bound behavior at 1080p to GPU-bound behavior at 4K. At Ultra settings, the average frame rate falls from 105.2 FPS at 1920x1080 to 64.6 FPS at 2560x1440 — a 38.6% drop — and then to 39.5 FPS at 3840x2160, representing a 62.5% reduction from the 1080p baseline. This pattern indicates that the RTX 3070 Ti's rendering pipeline becomes the dominant constraint as pixel count rises, while the Ryzen 7 9800X3D's substantial thread resources have diminishing influence at higher resolutions.
The scaling behavior is even more pronounced at lower settings. At Low, the 1080p result of 198.9 FPS collapses to 131.7 FPS at 1440p and 74.6 FPS at 4K. The percentage drop from 1080p to 4K at Low is 62.5%, nearly identical to the Ultra drop of 62.5%. This consistency across settings strongly suggests that resolution scaling is governed by the GPU's fixed memory bandwidth and shading throughput rather than by settings-dependent workload characteristics. The RTX 3070 Ti's 608.3 GB/s memory bandwidth and 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 throughput are the physical limits being hit.
At 1080p, the story differs. The gap between Low (198.9 FPS) and Ultra (105.2 FPS) is 93.7 FPS, but the jump from Medium (156.6 FPS) to High (134.4 FPS) is only 22.2 FPS. This compression at the upper end of settings, combined with the extremely high Low-setting frame rate, indicates that the CPU can feed frames faster than the GPU can render them at lower settings. The Ryzen 7 9800X3D's 8 cores and 16 threads, boosting to 5.20 GHz, are sufficient to keep the RTX 3070 Ti saturated at 1080p Low, but the GPU becomes the bottleneck as settings increase.
GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture with 8 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding 608.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU's base clock of 1575 MHz and boost clock of 1770 MHz, combined with 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, produce a pixel rate of 169.9 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 339.8 GTexel/s. These specifications directly explain the measured frame rates: at 4K Ultra, the 39.5 FPS average corresponds to roughly 163 million pixels per second being shaded, which is near the practical limit of the GPU's 169.9 GPixel/s pixel rate when accounting for the game's shading complexity.
The 8 GB VRAM capacity is a notable factor at 4K. The measured data shows 47.8 FPS at 4K High versus 39.5 FPS at 4K Ultra — a 17.4% penalty for the Ultra preset. This gap likely reflects increased texture and geometry data exceeding comfortable VRAM headroom, forcing the memory controller to work harder. At 1080p, the VRAM pressure is minimal, as evidenced by the 105.2 FPS Ultra result, which is 166.3% higher than the 4K Ultra figure.
The GPU's 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores are present but appear irrelevant for this title's measured performance, as The Technomancer's rendering workload does not seem to leverage ray tracing or DLSS features. The PassMark G3D score of 23356 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3478 provide synthetic context: the GPU sits at the 74th percentile among all GPUs, with nearest rivals including the AMD Radeon RX 6700 (0.8% lower average score) and NVIDIA Quadro M5000 (0.9% lower). This mid-high tier positioning aligns with the measured 4K performance being playable but not exceptional.
How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos
This specific combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti ranks 658th out of 1656 tested combos in The Technomancer, placing it in the 60th percentile of all configurations. This rank reflects a meaningful imbalance: the CPU is a top-tier part (90th percentile among all CPUs), while the GPU is mid-high tier (74th percentile among all GPUs). The combo's overall position is dragged down by the GPU's relative weakness at 4K, where the measured 39.5 FPS at Ultra is below the 60 FPS threshold that many combos achieve.
The rank disparity becomes clearer when examining the CPU's nearest rivals. The Ryzen 7 9800X3D's average benchmark score of 37780 is nearly identical to the Intel Xeon 6353P (37811, -0.1% delta) and Intel Core Ultra 5 225 (37831, -0.1% delta). The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34004 and single-core score of 4800 demonstrate exceptional processing power that the RTX 3070 Ti cannot fully utilize at higher resolutions. At 1080p Low, the 198.9 FPS result shows the CPU's capability, but this is an outlier scenario; at 4K, the combo's rank is likely much lower than 658th.
The 1656-combo database includes configurations with both weaker CPUs paired with stronger GPUs and vice versa. The 658th rank suggests that this pairing is above average but not exceptional, with the GPU being the limiting factor in most scenarios. Users seeking higher 4K performance would need a more powerful GPU, while those targeting 1080p competitive play would find this combo overkill on the CPU side.
Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows
The data supports High settings at 1440p as the optimal balance for this combo. At 2560x1440 High, the average frame rate is 89.1 FPS, which is comfortably above the 60 FPS playability threshold while maintaining visual fidelity. The step from High to Ultra at 1440p costs 24.5 FPS (from 89.1 to 64.6 FPS), a 27.5% penalty that is difficult to justify for the marginal visual improvements Ultra typically provides. Conversely, dropping to Medium at 1440p yields 103.1 FPS, a 15.7% improvement over High, but the visual quality loss is likely more noticeable than the frame rate gain.
At 1080p, High settings at 134.4 FPS provide an excellent experience for high-refresh-rate monitors, with Ultra at 105.2 FPS still being viable. The Low preset at 1080p produces 198.9 FPS, which exceeds the refresh rate of most displays, making it relevant only for competitive scenarios where maximum frame rates matter. The Medium preset at 156.6 FPS is a strong middle ground, but the jump from Medium to High is only 22.2 FPS, making High the better visual choice for a modest frame rate cost.
At 4K, no preset achieves 60 FPS. The best 4K result is Low at 74.6 FPS, which is playable but visually compromised. High at 47.8 FPS is borderline playable for slower-paced Action RPG gameplay, but Ultra at 39.5 FPS is not recommended. Users with 4K displays should accept 1440p rendering or lower settings; the data shows that 4K gaming with this combo requires significant graphical compromises.
Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers
At 1920x1080, the measured average FPS values are: Low 198.9, Medium 156.6, High 134.4, and Ultra 105.2. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a 47.1% total reduction, with the largest single step being from Low to Medium at 42.3 FPS (21.3% drop). The Medium-to-High step costs 22.2 FPS (14.2% drop), and the High-to-Ultra step costs 29.2 FPS (21.7% drop).
At 2560x1440, the results are: Low 131.7, Medium 103.1, High 89.1, and Ultra 64.6. The Low-to-Medium drop is 28.6 FPS (21.7%), Medium-to-High is 14.0 FPS (13.6%), and High-to-Ultra is 24.5 FPS (27.5%). Notably, the Ultra penalty is proportionally larger at 1440p than at 1080p, suggesting that Ultra settings at 1440p begin to strain the GPU's resources more severely.
At 3840x2160, the values are: Low 74.6, Medium 53.0, High 47.8, and Ultra 39.5. The Low-to-Medium drop is 21.6 FPS (29.0%), Medium-to-High is 5.2 FPS (9.8%), and High-to-Ultra is 8.3 FPS (17.4%). The 4K scaling shows that even the Low preset struggles to maintain high frame rates, and the Medium-to-High gap narrows significantly compared to lower resolutions, indicating that the GPU is becoming saturated across all settings.
CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results
The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D is a Zen 5 architecture processor codenamed Granite Ridge, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process with 8,315 million transistors on a 70.6 mm² die. It features 8 cores and 16 threads with a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The L3 cache is a substantial 96 MB shared, which is critical for gaming workloads that benefit from large cache pools. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, along with PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes.
The CPU's benchmark results demonstrate its exceptional single-threaded and multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34004 and single-core score of 4800 place it in the 90th percentile among all CPUs. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 10081 and 2-thread score of 2394 show strong scaling across thread counts. PassMark multi-thread score of 40009 and single-thread score of 4430 reinforce this picture. The nearest rivals in CPU benchmarks include the Intel Core i9-13900HK (0.6% lower average score) and Intel Core i5-13600KF (0.7% lower), indicating the Ryzen 7 9800X3D is competitive with leading desktop and mobile processors.
In The Technomancer, the CPU's role is most evident at 1080p Low settings, where the 198.9 FPS result indicates the CPU can produce frames faster than the GPU can render them. The 5.20 GHz boost clock and 96 MB L3 cache are likely key contributors to this headroom. However, at 4K, the CPU's influence diminishes significantly, as the GPU becomes the bottleneck. The 120 W TDP and 4 nm process node allow for high sustained clocks without thermal throttling, but this does not translate to higher frame rates when the GPU is saturated. The CPU's 16 threads are more than sufficient for The Technomancer's workload, and the data suggests that even a less powerful CPU would achieve similar results at 4K with this GPU.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in The Technomancer?
A: The data supports 2560x1440 with High settings, achieving 89.1 FPS, as the optimal balance. At 1080p High, the frame rate is 134.4 FPS, while 4K High drops to 47.8 FPS.
Q: Can this combo run The Technomancer at 4K smoothly?
A: No preset at 3840x2160 reaches 60 FPS. The best 4K result is Low at 74.6 FPS, followed by Medium at 53.0 FPS, High at 47.8 FPS, and Ultra at 39.5 FPS.
Q: How does the Ryzen 7 9800X3D compare to its nearest CPU rivals?
A: The Ryzen 7 9800X3D has an average benchmark score of 37780, which is 0.1% lower than the Intel Xeon 6353P (37811) and 0.1% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 (37831). It is 0.6% higher than the Intel Core i9-13900HK (38020).
Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile and how does it rank?
A: The RTX 3070 Ti is at the 74th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 590 GME, which has a 0.3% higher average score, while the AMD Radeon RX 6700 is 0.8% lower.
Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 3070 Ti have and does it matter?
A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus. The measured 4K Ultra result of 39.5 FPS versus 4K High at 47.8 FPS suggests VRAM pressure at the highest settings and resolution.
Q: What is the combo's rank among all tested configurations?
A: This combo ranks 658th out of 1656 tested combos in The Technomancer, placing it in the 60th percentile. The CPU is at the 90th percentile while the GPU is at the 74th percentile, indicating the GPU is the limiting component.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti in The Technomancer
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 74.6 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 53.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 47.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 39.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 131.7 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 103.1 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 89.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 64.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 198.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 156.6 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 134.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 105.2 |
The Technomancer with Ryzen 7 9800X3D + Other GPUs
See how The Technomancer performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
The Technomancer with RTX 3070 Ti + Other CPUs
See how The Technomancer performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 9800X3D + RTX 3070 Ti
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.