Doom

The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti combination delivers a robust 1080p and 1440p experience in Doom, though it struggles to maintain high refresh rates at 4K with maxed-out settings. The data shows a clear performance hierarchy across resolutions, with the CPU’s strong single-threaded score and the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM capacity playing distinct roles.

FAQ

Q: What is the combo’s overall rank in Doom?

A: This pairing ranks 662nd out of 1,681 tested combos, placing it in the upper-middle tier of the database for this specific title.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 9800X3D sits within 0.7% of the Intel Core i5-13600KF’s average score, and it also trails the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 and Intel Xeon 6353P by just 0.1% each. It is effectively tied with those processors in synthetic benchmarks.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The RTX 3070 Ti comes with 8 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 608.3 GB/s. The memory clock is listed at 1188 MHz with 19 Gbps effective speed.

Q: What is the best 4K result in the measured data?

A: At 3840x2160, the highest average frame rate is 93.6 FPS on Low settings. The Ultra preset drops to 56.4 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU at lower resolutions?

A: The data does not indicate a bottleneck. At 1920x1080, the combo reaches 274.8 FPS on Low, which suggests the CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 1212 is sufficient to feed the GPU in this older title.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU?

A: The Ryzen 7 9800X3D had a launch MSRP of $479.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s 662nd place out of 1,681 tested combinations in Doom reflects a solid, if unspectacular, pairing. The CPU’s percentile rank of 90 against all CPUs indicates strong processing power, but the GPU’s 74th percentile against all GPUs tempers the overall result. In practical terms, this combo is positioned to handle the game’s demanding scenes without issue at mainstream resolutions, but it is not among the elite performers for this title.

The CPU’s nearest rivals in synthetic tests include the Intel Core i9-13900HK and Intel Core i5-13600KF, with the AMD chip scoring 0.6% and 0.7% lower, respectively. This negligible difference suggests that in a game like Doom, which is not heavily threaded, the 9800X3D’s 8-core, 16-thread configuration is more than adequate. The GPU’s nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6700, which scores 0.8% higher, and the NVIDIA Quadro M5000, which is 0.9% higher. These margins are minor, positioning the RTX 3070 Ti as a mid-range performer in this context.

GPU Role

The RTX 3070 Ti’s role in this combo is defined by its 8 GB GDDR6X frame buffer. In Doom, a title from 2016, this capacity is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the Ultra preset at 4K pushes the card to its limits. The GPU’s base clock is 1575 MHz with a boost clock of 1770 MHz, and its 6144 shading units deliver a FP32 performance of 21.75 TFLOPS. These specifications allow for high frame rates when the resolution or settings are moderated.

The memory bandwidth of 608.3 GB/s is a strong asset, helping to maintain consistent frame pacing even when texture loads are high. However, the 8 GB VRAM becomes a limiting factor at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, where the average FPS drops to 56.4. The data shows that reducing settings to High at 4K raises the average to 71.6 FPS, indicating that the GPU’s compute power is not the sole constraint; the memory capacity and bandwidth are also at play.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers exceptional performance across all settings. Low settings produce an average of 274.8 FPS, Medium yields 235.7 FPS, and High reaches 200.9 FPS. Even the Ultra preset maintains a high 165.4 FPS, making this resolution ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but shows a clear scaling pattern. Low settings achieve 174.9 FPS, Medium drops to 153.2 FPS, and High hits 131.2 FPS. The Ultra preset falls to 104.7 FPS, which is still well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, but it represents a 40% reduction from the Low setting’s result.

At 3840x2160, the GPU’s limitations become apparent. Low settings yield 93.6 FPS, Medium manages 83.1 FPS, and High drops to 71.6 FPS. The Ultra preset is the only configuration that falls below 60 FPS, averaging 56.4 FPS. This is a 39.7% decrease from the Low setting at the same resolution, highlighting the significant cost of the Ultra preset’s visual enhancements.

Settings Recommendations

For players targeting a 60 FPS minimum, the Ultra preset is only viable at 1080p, where it averages 165.4 FPS. At 1440p, Ultra’s 104.7 FPS is still comfortable, but at 4K, the 56.4 FPS average is borderline. The data suggests that High settings provide the best balance of visual fidelity and performance across resolutions. At 4K, High’s 71.6 FPS is a substantial improvement over Ultra’s 56.4 FPS, with only a modest reduction in graphical quality.

For the highest frame rates, the Low preset is the clear choice, delivering 274.8 FPS at 1080p and 174.9 FPS at 1440p. However, for most users, Medium at 1440p (153.2 FPS) or High at 1080p (200.9 FPS) offers a superior experience without sacrificing visual detail. At 4K, High is the recommended preset, as it remains above 70 FPS, whereas Medium’s 83.1 FPS and Low’s 93.6 FPS are less visually appealing but still playable. The data indicates that the Ultra preset’s performance penalty is steepest at higher resolutions, making it a poor choice for 4K gaming with this combo.