The Technomancer
This combination offers playable performance with an average of 38 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 16 | 17 | 24 | 29 |
| 1440p QHD | 27 | 33 | 36 | 49 |
| 1080p Full HD | 38 | 48 | 57 | 77 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
The Technomancer with AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT + AMD Radeon RX 580, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT paired with the AMD Radeon RX 580 produces a highly variable experience in The Technomancer, depending entirely on the resolution and quality preset selected. The measured data shows a clear pattern: this combination is capable of smooth gameplay only at 1080p, with the GPU becoming the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions. The most balanced experience is found at 1920x1080 with Medium settings, which delivers a playable 57.2 FPS average while maintaining a reasonable level of visual fidelity. Dropping to Low settings at the same resolution pushes the frame rate to 77.1 FPS, which is ideal for players prioritizing responsiveness, but the jump to High settings at 48.3 FPS begins to show the GPU's limitations. At 2560x1440, even the Low preset only manages 49.2 FPS, indicating that this resolution is not recommended for consistent performance. The 3840x2160 results are uniformly below playable thresholds, with the best case being 28.7 FPS on Low settings, so 4K should be avoided entirely for this title.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combination are 1920x1080 with the Medium preset. This configuration yields an average of 57.2 FPS, which sits comfortably above the 30 FPS minimum for playability and provides a smooth experience for most action RPG gameplay. The High preset at the same resolution drops to 48.3 FPS, which is still playable but shows a 15.6% performance penalty compared to Medium. For players who value frame rate above all else, the Low preset at 1080p delivers 77.1 FPS, a 34.8% improvement over Medium, making it the best choice for high-refresh-rate displays or for those sensitive to input lag. Ultra settings at 1080p should be avoided, as the 37.9 FPS average is borderline and likely to feel stuttery during intense combat sequences.
At 2560x1440, the data suggests that only the Low preset is viable, with a 49.2 FPS average. The Medium preset at this resolution falls to 35.6 FPS, which may be tolerable for slower-paced exploration but will struggle during action-heavy moments. High and Ultra at 1440p produce 33.0 FPS and 27.2 FPS respectively, making them unsuitable for consistent gameplay. For 3840x2160, none of the presets achieve playable frame rates; the highest measured value is 28.7 FPS on Low, which is below the 30 FPS threshold. Users with 4K displays should either lower the resolution to 1080p or accept a slideshow-like experience. The recommendation is to prioritize 1080p Medium for the best balance of visual quality and performance, or 1080p Low for maximum smoothness.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution to use with this CPU and GPU combination in The Technomancer?
A: The measured data shows that 1920x1080 is the only resolution where all presets produce playable frame rates, ranging from 37.9 FPS on Ultra to 77.1 FPS on Low. At 2560x1440, only the Low preset achieves a playable 49.2 FPS, while 3840x2160 results are all below 30 FPS.
Q: How does the Low preset compare to Ultra at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves 77.1 FPS, which is more than double the Ultra preset's 37.9 FPS. This represents a 103.4% performance increase, making Low the clear choice for players who prioritize frame rate over graphical fidelity.
Q: Is this GPU capable of handling 1440p gaming in this title?
A: Marginally, but only at the lowest settings. The 2560x1440 Low preset delivers 49.2 FPS, which is playable, but the Medium preset drops to 35.6 FPS and High falls to 33.0 FPS. Ultra at 1440p is not recommended at 27.2 FPS.
Q: What happens to performance when moving from 1080p to 4K?
A: The performance drop is severe. At Medium settings, the frame rate falls from 57.2 FPS at 1080p to 24.2 FPS at 4K, a 57.7% reduction. At Low settings, the drop is from 77.1 FPS to 28.7 FPS, a 62.8% reduction, indicating the GPU is heavily taxed at 4K.
Q: How does the RX 580 compare to its nearest rival, the GTX 570?
A: The RX 580 has an average benchmark score of 13559, while the GTX 570 scores 13564, resulting in a negligible 0% deltaPct. The two GPUs are effectively tied in overall compute performance, though the RX 580's 8 GB of GDDR5 memory provides an advantage in texture-heavy scenes.
Q: Does the Ryzen 7 5800XT bottleneck the RX 580 in this game?
A: The data suggests the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The CPU's strong multi-threaded performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23794, is not the bottleneck; instead, the RX 580's 6.175 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is insufficient for smooth 1440p or 4K gameplay.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and AMD Radeon RX 580 ranks 1543 out of 1656 tested combos in The Technomancer, placing it in the bottom 6.8% of all configurations. This rank reflects the significant imbalance between the CPU and GPU in this pairing; the 5800XT is a high-end processor that sits in the 86th percentile against all CPUs, while the RX 580 only reaches the 53rd percentile against all GPUs. The benchmark data confirms this mismatch: the CPU's 3DMark max threads score of 7680 vastly outstrips the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 8813, meaning the processor is left waiting for the graphics card to finish rendering frames. Compared to other combos, this pairing is held back almost entirely by the GPU. The nearest rival GPUs, such as the GTX 570 with a deltaPct of 0% and the GTX 950 with a deltaPct of 0.1%, show that the RX 580 is in a performance tier that struggles with modern titles at high resolutions. For The Technomancer specifically, the rank of 1543 indicates that users would need to significantly lower settings or resolution to achieve a playable experience, as evidenced by the measured FPS data. This combo is best suited for 1080p gaming where the CPU's headroom can be leveraged for higher frame rates rather than for pushing resolution.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the results show a wide spread: Low settings produce 77.1 FPS, Medium achieves 57.2 FPS, High reaches 48.3 FPS, and Ultra drops to 37.9 FPS. This 39.2 FPS difference between Low and Ultra represents a 103.4% performance swing, highlighting how much headroom the GPU has at this resolution. The 1080p Medium result of 57.2 FPS is the sweet spot, offering 18.4% more performance than High while maintaining decent visual quality. At 2560x1440, the performance curve flattens considerably: Low achieves 49.2 FPS, Medium drops to 35.6 FPS, High falls to 33.0 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 27.2 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra narrows to 22.0 FPS, a 80.9% difference, showing that the GPU is becoming the limiting factor. The 1440p results indicate that only Low is reliably playable, with Medium being marginal and High/Ultra unsuitable for action gameplay. At 3840x2160, all presets fail to reach 30 FPS: Low manages 28.7 FPS, Medium 24.2 FPS, High 16.8 FPS, and Ultra 15.7 FPS. The 4K results are consistently below playable thresholds, with even the lowest preset struggling to maintain a stable frame rate. This data reveals that the RX 580 is simply not powerful enough for 4K gaming in this title, regardless of settings.
Resolution Scaling
The resolution scaling analysis shows how severely performance degrades as pixel count increases. Moving from 1080p to 1440p at Medium settings, the frame rate drops from 57.2 FPS to 35.6 FPS, a 38.0% reduction. From 1080p to 4K at the same settings, the drop is more dramatic, falling to 24.2 FPS, a 57.7% reduction. At Low settings, the scaling is even steeper: 77.1 FPS at 1080p drops to 49.2 FPS at 1440p (36.2% reduction) and then to 28.7 FPS at 4K (62.8% reduction). This pattern indicates that the RX 580's memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s and its 6.175 TFLOPS of compute are insufficient to handle the increased pixel workload at higher resolutions. The fact that the frame rate drops by more than half from 1080p to 4K at Low settings suggests the GPU is fully saturated, with no headroom for additional resolution. The 8 GB of GDDR5 memory is not the constraint, as even at 4K the VRAM capacity is sufficient; instead, the raw shading power of 2304 shading units is overwhelmed. The scaling behavior points directly to the GPU as the limiting component. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see smaller frame rate differences between resolutions, but the data shows a nearly linear relationship between pixel count and frame rate loss, which is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario. The Ryzen 7 5800XT's capabilities, including its 3.80 GHz base clock and 4.80 GHz boost clock, are not the constraint here; the processor has ample headroom to feed the GPU at any resolution.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT plays a supporting role in this combination, as its substantial processing power is largely underutilized in The Technomancer. The CPU features 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. Its benchmark results demonstrate considerable capability: a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23794 and a single-core score of 3359, placing it in the 86th percentile against all CPUs. In comparison, the RX 580's Passmark G3D score of 8813 and its 53rd percentile ranking show a clear mismatch in performance tiers. The game's engine appears to be GPU-limited, as evidenced by the frame rate scaling across resolutions. At 1080p Low, the 77.1 FPS result suggests the CPU is capable of driving the GPU to its maximum output, but the GPU's ceiling is reached quickly. The CPU's 32 MB of L3 cache and 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth provide ample data throughput for the game's assets, and the 16 threads ensure that any multi-threaded game logic is handled without hitches. However, the measured data shows that even with this powerful CPU, the frame rates at 1440p and 4K are unplayable, confirming that the GPU is the sole bottleneck. The CPU's 3DMark max threads score of 7680 indicates that it can handle far more demanding workloads than this title presents, meaning users upgrading from a weaker CPU would see no benefit in this game without also upgrading the GPU. The 5800XT's role here is to ensure that the GPU is always fed with data, which it does admirably, but it cannot compensate for the RX 580's limited processing power in this GPU-intensive title.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT
AMD Radeon RX 580
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT + AMD Radeon RX 580 in The Technomancer
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 28.7 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 24.2 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 16.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 15.7 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 49.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 35.6 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 33.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 27.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 77.1 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 57.2 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 48.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 37.9 |
The Technomancer with Ryzen 7 5800XT + Other GPUs
See how The Technomancer performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
The Technomancer with RX 580 + Other CPUs
See how The Technomancer performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 5800XT + RX 580
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.