The Technomancer

The benchmark data for The Technomancer with the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and AMD Radeon RX 7700 reveals a system that is clearly capable of high refresh rate gaming at 1080p, but which begins to show its limitations as resolution climbs. The measured FPS values across three resolutions and four quality presets paint a picture of a balanced pairing where the GPU becomes the primary scaling factor, while the CPU provides ample headroom. This analysis will break down the measured performance, contextualize it against other tested combos, and explore the specific roles of the processor and graphics card in this Action RPG.

Resolution Scaling

The most striking trend in the measured data is the dramatic drop in average FPS as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. At 1080p with High settings, the combo delivers 117 FPS average. Moving to 1440p at the same High preset drops that figure to 77 FPS, a reduction of 40 FPS. At 4K, the average falls further to 42 FPS. This scaling pattern strongly suggests that the AMD Radeon RX 7700 is the limiting factor at higher resolutions, as the pixel count increases demand on the GPU’s shading units, ROPs, and memory bandwidth.

To illustrate the full extent of this scaling, consider the Low preset figures. At 1080p Low, the system achieves a very high 179 FPS average, which is indicative of a CPU-bound scenario where the processor is feeding frames as fast as possible. At 1440p Low, the average drops to 117 FPS, and at 4K Low it falls to 64 FPS. The relative drop from 1080p to 4K on Low is about 64%, while on High the drop from 1080p to 4K is about 64% as well (117 to 42 FPS). This consistency across presets indicates that the resolution scaling is relatively uniform, driven by the raw pixel throughput capabilities of the RX 7700 rather than any specific setting.

The data suggests that at 1080p, the CPU (AMD Ryzen 5 8400F) is able to keep up with the GPU’s output, as evidenced by the very high frame counts on Low and Medium presets. However, the gap between 1080p and 1440p performance is substantial, with a 40 FPS difference on High. This indicates that the GPU’s fill rate and memory bandwidth, which are fixed hardware characteristics, become the bottleneck as resolution increases. The RX 7700’s 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for the game’s textures, but the sheer number of pixels at 4K overwhelms the compute units.

For Ultra settings, the scaling is even more pronounced. At 1080p Ultra, the average is 92 FPS. At 1440p Ultra, it drops to 60 FPS, and at 4K Ultra, it collapses to 33 FPS. The 4K Ultra result shows a sub-30 FPS minimum would likely be common in demanding scenes, though the measured minimum for that specific row is not provided. The data implies that 4K Ultra is not a viable configuration for smooth gameplay, while 1440p Ultra sits right at the edge of playability, and 1080p Ultra offers a solid experience.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and AMD Radeon RX 7700 is ranked 1275 out of 2825 tested combos for The Technomancer. This places it in the 45th percentile of all tested systems, meaning it outperforms roughly 45% of the combinations in the database. While this rank is not near the top, it is important to consider the context. The benchmark database includes a wide range of hardware, from older entry-level parts to the latest flagship CPUs and GPUs. A mid-pack ranking for this combo indicates that it is a competent but not exceptional performer for this specific game.

The combo’s rank is influenced by both the CPU and GPU. The Ryzen 5 8400F has a percentile rank of 77 against all CPUs, meaning it is better than 77% of all processors in the database. In contrast, the RX 7700 has a percentile rank of 58 against all GPUs, better than 58% of all graphics cards. The combo’s overall rank of 1275 out of 2825 (which is about the 45th percentile) is lower than what either component’s individual percentile would suggest. This discrepancy likely arises because The Technomancer is a demanding title that heavily taxes the GPU, and the RX 7700’s mid-tier performance holds the combo back relative to other systems with stronger graphics cards.

Looking at the CPU’s nearest rivals, the Ryzen 5 8400F is closely matched with several other processors. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F has an average benchmark score of 24964, which is just 0.2% lower than the 8400F’s 25005. The Intel Core i7-11850H is 0.3% behind, and the Intel Core i7-13620H is 0.4% behind. On the higher side, the AMD EPYC 9474F is 0.4% ahead. These very small deltaPct values indicate that the 8400F’s CPU performance is nearly identical to these rivals, meaning the combo’s ranking is almost entirely determined by the GPU choice.

For the GPU, the RX 7700’s nearest rivals show a more varied picture. The AMD Radeon R9 370X has an average score of 15862, just 0.1% higher than the RX 7700’s 15852. The AMD Radeon Pro W5500 is 1.1% lower, while the AMD Radeon RX 9060 is 1% higher and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is 1.7% higher. These deltas are small, but they suggest that the RX 7700 sits in a tight performance cluster. The fact that the RTX 3060 Ti is slightly ahead in average benchmark scores may translate to slightly better frame rates in The Technomancer, though the measured FPS data for this specific combo shows the RX 7700 delivering the numbers above.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix. It has a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. For a game like The Technomancer, which is an Action RPG from 2016, the CPU’s role is to handle game logic, physics, and draw calls. The 12 threads provide ample parallel processing capability for modern game engines, and the high boost clock ensures strong single-threaded performance when needed.

Benchmark results for the 8400F show a single-thread score of 951 in 3dMark and 2943 in Cinebench R23 single-core. These scores indicate strong per-core performance, which is crucial for games that rely on a few primary threads. The multi-threaded scores are equally impressive, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20851 and a Passmark multithread score of 24389. These numbers suggest that the CPU can handle both lightly-threaded and heavily-threaded workloads without becoming a bottleneck in most gaming scenarios.

In the measured FPS data for The Technomancer, the CPU’s capability is evident at 1080p with Low settings, where the combo achieves 179 FPS. This high frame rate is likely near the CPU’s maximum output for this game, as the GPU is not heavily taxed at such low settings and resolution. However, as resolution increases, the CPU’s role diminishes, and the GPU takes over as the primary bottleneck. The fact that the 1080p Ultra setting yields 92 FPS, while the 1080p Low setting yields 179 FPS, shows that the CPU can push well over 100 FPS, but the GPU’s workload at Ultra settings limits the final output.

The 8400F’s 16 MB of shared L3 cache and 1 MB per-core L2 cache are sufficient for gaming workloads. The processor’s memory support for DDR5 and dual-channel configuration, with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, ensures that data can be fed to the CPU quickly. This is important for maintaining high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, as seen at 1080p Low. The data indicates that the CPU is not the limiting factor in this combo for The Technomancer at any resolution tested, as the FPS drops are consistently tied to resolution increases, which primarily affect GPU load.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of performance across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the system delivers an average of 179 FPS on Low, 137 FPS on Medium, 117 FPS on High, and 92 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset shows a minimum FPS of 117 and a maximum of 158, indicating some frame time variance but generally smooth gameplay. The High and Ultra presets do not have minimum or maximum values listed, but the averages suggest that 1080p is well within the comfort zone for high refresh rate monitors.

At 2560x1440, the averages drop to 117 FPS on Low, 90 FPS on Medium, 77 FPS on High, and 60 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset at this resolution records a minimum of 76 FPS and a maximum of 103 FPS. The 1440p High result of 77 FPS is still playable for most gamers, while 1440p Ultra at 60 FPS is exactly at the threshold for smooth 60 Hz displays. The 1440p Low result of 117 FPS shows that the system can push high refresh rates even at this resolution if settings are lowered.

At 3840x2160, the performance becomes more constrained. The Low preset averages 64 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for fast-paced action. The Medium preset averages 49 FPS, with a minimum of 42 and maximum of 57, indicating noticeable frame dips. The High preset drops to 42 FPS average, and the Ultra preset falls to 33 FPS average. These numbers clearly show that 4K gaming with this combo requires significant compromises in settings to achieve playable frame rates. The jump from 1440p to 4K on High settings represents a 35 FPS drop, which is the largest single-resolution gap in the data, further confirming the GPU’s struggle with the increased pixel count.

The data also reveals the scaling of settings within each resolution. At 1080p, moving from Low to Ultra reduces the average FPS by 87 FPS (179 to 92), a 49% reduction. At 1440p, the same settings change reduces FPS by 57 FPS (117 to 60), a 49% reduction. At 4K, the reduction is 31 FPS (64 to 33), also a 48% reduction. This consistent percentage drop across resolutions suggests that the Ultra preset imposes a similar relative performance cost regardless of resolution, which is typical for settings like shadows, textures, and post-processing effects.

FAQ

*Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo achieves in The Technomancer?*

A: The highest measured average FPS is 179, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming at playable frame rates?

A: At 4K, the combo averages 64 FPS on Low, 49 FPS on Medium, 42 FPS on High, and 33 FPS on Ultra. Only the Low preset provides consistently playable frame rates above 60 FPS.

Q: How does the average FPS at 1440p High compare to 1080p High?

A: At 1440p High, the average FPS is 77, while at 1080p High it is 117. The 1440p result is 40 FPS lower, representing a 34% reduction in performance.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded for the Medium preset across all resolutions?

A: The Medium preset has minimum FPS values of 117 at 1080p, 76 at 1440p, and 42 at 4K.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to be the bottleneck in this game?

A: Based on the resolution scaling, the GPU is the primary bottleneck. The CPU can deliver 179 FPS at 1080p Low, but frame rates drop significantly with resolution increases, which primarily stress the GPU.

Q: How does the combo rank compared to other tested systems?

A: The combo ranks 1275 out of 2825 tested combos for The Technomancer, placing it in the mid-range of all systems in the database.

Settings Recommendations

For the best experience, the data suggests that 1920x1080 is the sweet spot for this combo. At 1080p, even the Ultra preset delivers 92 FPS average, which is smooth for most monitors. For players with high refresh rate displays (144Hz or higher), the High preset at 1080p offers 117 FPS average, which is close to the refresh ceiling and provides a responsive experience. The Low preset at 1080p pushes to 179 FPS, but the visual quality trade-off may not be worth it for most players, as the High preset still offers excellent frame rates with significantly better visuals.

At 2560x1440, the High preset at 77 FPS is the recommended choice for a balance of visual fidelity and performance. This is suitable for 60 Hz monitors and is also playable on 75 Hz displays. The Medium preset at 90 FPS is a better option for those seeking higher refresh rates at 1440p, as it provides a 13 FPS improvement over High while still maintaining acceptable visual quality. The Ultra preset at 60 FPS is only recommended for players who prioritize visual quality over frame rate stability, as the average sits right at the 60 FPS threshold.

For 3840x2160, the data indicates that only the Low preset (64 FPS) provides a consistently playable experience. The Medium preset at 49 FPS may be acceptable for slower-paced gameplay, but the minimum of 42 FPS could cause noticeable stuttering in action sequences. The High and Ultra presets at 42 and 33 FPS respectively are not recommended for this game, as they fall below the threshold for smooth gameplay. Players with 4K monitors should consider lowering the resolution to 1440p for a better experience, or accept the visual compromises of the Low preset.

Overall, the best experience per the measured rows is achieved at 1080p with the High preset, which provides a high average FPS of 117 with no recorded minimums below 60 FPS. This configuration balances visual quality with performance, making it the most versatile recommendation for this combo in The Technomancer.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is the dominant component in this combo’s gaming performance, and its specifications directly explain the measured FPS results. The GPU is based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 32 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process. It features 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units. These compute resources determine the pixel and texture throughput, which are critical for rendering The Technomancer’s environments at high resolutions.

The RX 7700’s clock speeds include a base of 1900 MHz, a game clock of 2041 MHz, and a boost clock of 2459 MHz. The boost clock is the maximum speed the GPU can reach under load, and it directly influences frame rates. The GPU’s 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s. This memory bandwidth is sufficient for the game’s textures and assets, even at 4K, but the compute capability of the shading units becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions.

The GPU’s benchmark scores provide context for its performance. Its Passmark G3D score is 20974, which is a measure of its overall 3D rendering capability. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 106028, indicating strong compute performance. In the database, the RX 7700 has an average benchmark score of 15852 and ranks in the 58th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon R9 370X, has a score of 15862, which is just 0.1% higher, showing that the RX 7700 is positioned in a competitive mid-range segment.

The measured FPS data shows that the GPU’s performance scales predictably with settings and resolution. At 1080p, the GPU is not fully utilized, allowing the CPU to drive frame rates up to 179 FPS on Low. However, as resolution increases, the GPU’s shading units and ROPs become saturated, causing the significant drops seen at 1440p and 4K. The 4K Ultra result of 33 FPS average indicates that the GPU’s compute resources are overwhelmed by the combination of high resolution and intensive settings. The RX 7700’s 96 ROPs and 236.1 GPixel/s pixel rate determine its fill rate, which is a key factor in 4K performance. The data suggests that this GPU is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K requiring significant settings reductions to maintain playable frame rates.