The Technomancer
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 124 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 44 | 58 | 72 | 90 |
| 1440p QHD | 86 | 108 | 127 | 166 |
| 1080p Full HD | 127 | 165 | 196 | 253 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
The Technomancer with AMD Ryzen 5 8400F + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, In-Depth Analysis
The Technomancer, a 2016 action RPG, presents an interesting stress test for the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT combination. The benchmark data reveals a system that is overwhelmingly GPU-bound at higher resolutions, yet shows the CPU’s capability to push extreme frame rates at 1080p. This analysis breaks down the measured performance, offering a clear picture of what this pairing delivers for this specific title.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K is a clear indicator of where the performance bottleneck lies. At 1920x1080 with High settings, the combo delivers an average of 165.1 FPS. Moving up to 2560x1440, the average drops to 108.1 FPS, a reduction of approximately 34.5%. The jump to 3840x2160 yields a 57.9 FPS average, which is a further 46.4% decrease from the 1440p figure. This steep, consistent drop as resolution increases is the classic signature of a GPU-limited scenario.
The data suggests the Ryzen 5 8400F has ample headroom to feed the Radeon RX 7900 XT at lower resolutions. The 165.1 FPS at 1080p High is a strong indicator that the CPU is not the limiting factor in this configuration for this game. The scaling curve is aggressive; the performance cost of doubling the pixel count from 1440p to 4K is substantial, resulting in a 50.2 FPS loss. This demonstrates that the RX 7900 XT’s compute resources are being fully utilized as the pixel workload increases, while the CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient to maintain high frame delivery.
The 4K results, with a 57.9 FPS average on High, place the system in a playable but not optimal zone for a title of this era. The transition from 1080p to 1440p shows a performance hit that is more than proportional to the pixel count increase, indicating that the GPU is the primary driver of performance. The CPU, with its 82nd percentile ranking against all CPUs, is clearly not the constraint; the data points to the graphics card as the definitive limiting component at all resolutions above 1080p.
Settings Recommendations
The measured results provide a clear hierarchy for settings optimization. At 3840x2160, the jump from Low to Ultra has a dramatic impact on performance, with the average frame rate falling from 89.6 FPS to 44.2 FPS. For a smooth 4K experience, the High preset, at 57.9 FPS, is the most balanced choice, offering a significant visual upgrade over Medium (71.8 FPS) while staying above the 60 FPS threshold is not achieved, but it is the closest playable option. The Low preset at 4K, while achieving 89.6 FPS, sacrifices too much visual fidelity for the performance gain.
At 2560x1440, the options are more flexible. The High preset delivers a stellar 108.1 FPS, making it the ideal target for high-refresh-rate monitors. The Ultra preset, at 85.9 FPS, is also viable if visual fidelity is the top priority. The Medium preset at 127.2 FPS is an option for those seeking maximum frame rates, but the jump to High is a better value in terms of performance-per-visual-cost. The data shows that Ultra at 1440p provides a comfortable margin over the 60 FPS standard, so users can push the settings without concern.
For 1920x1080, the system is severely GPU-bound, allowing for maximum settings. The Ultra preset achieves a 127.4 FPS average, which is more than sufficient. However, the High preset at 165.1 FPS offers a significant frame rate advantage for competitive play or high-refresh displays. The benchmark results indicate that High at 1080p is the sweet spot, providing a fluid experience with a substantial frame rate buffer. The Low preset at 252.8 FPS is only relevant for extreme esports scenarios, which this game does not represent. Ultimately, the best experience per the data is High at 1440p, balancing visuals and performance.
FAQ
Q: What is the average frame rate for the High preset at 2560x1440?
A: The measured average FPS for the High preset at 2560x1440 is 108.1, which indicates a very smooth experience for this action RPG.
Q: How does the system perform at 4K with the Ultra preset?
A: At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average frame rate drops to 44.2 FPS. This is below the 60 FPS target and suggests that the Ultra preset is too demanding for a consistent 4K experience on this hardware.
Q: At which resolution and settings combo does the system achieve the highest frame rate?
A: The highest measured average frame rate is 252.8 FPS, which occurs at 1920x1080 with the Low preset. This indicates the CPU is capable of very high frame generation when the GPU load is minimal.
Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F a bottleneck for the RX 7900 XT in this game?
A: The data suggests it is not a significant bottleneck. The frame rate scales consistently with resolution, which is a sign of a GPU limitation. The CPU's performance is sufficient to deliver 165.1 FPS at 1080p High, showing it can keep up with the GPU's output at lower resolutions.
Q: What is the frame rate difference between the Medium and High presets at 4K?
A: At 3840x2160, the Medium preset yields an average of 71.8 FPS, while the High preset yields 57.9 FPS. This represents a difference of 13.9 FPS, showing a notable performance cost for the visual upgrade.
Q: What is the combo's rank among all tested hardware combinations for this game?
A: The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT ranks 304th out of 1656 tested combos for The Technomancer, placing it in the top 18.4% of all systems.
How This Combo Ranks
The data places this specific combination in a strong position. With a combo rank of 304 out of 1656 tested configurations, this pairing sits comfortably in the top 18.4% of all systems benchmarked for The Technomancer. This is a robust result, demonstrating that the Ryzen 5 8400F and RX 7900 XT form a cohesive unit for this title, outperforming the vast majority of other hardware pairings.
This high ranking is supported by the measured frame rates. The system achieves over 100 FPS at 1440p High and maintains a playable 57.9 FPS at 4K High. These figures are not just marginal; they represent a significant performance tier. The CPU itself is ranked in the 82nd percentile against all CPUs, and the GPU also holds an 82nd percentile ranking against all GPUs, indicating that both components are high-performing parts in their respective categories. The combination of two above-average components results in a synergistic effect that pushes the system to this impressive overall rank.
While the rank is strong, it is not at the absolute top, which is expected given the hardware. The 4K Ultra preset, at 44.2 FPS, shows the limits of the GPU when pushed to its maximum, a common trait for even high-end cards in demanding titles. The system’s rank reflects its capability to handle the game exceptionally well at high refresh rates on 1440p and provide a solid 4K experience, but it does not conquer the most demanding settings at the highest resolution. The overall ranking reflects the balance of the components, with neither part holding the other back in a significant way.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is the primary driver of performance in this configuration. Its role is defined by its substantial memory subsystem and high compute throughput. The GPU features 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 800.0 GB/s. This large memory pool and high bandwidth are critical for handling the texture data and geometry at higher resolutions, which is supported by the significant frame rate drops observed as resolution increases.
The clocks and compute specs further explain the performance. With a boost clock of 2394 MHz and a game clock of 2025 MHz, the GPU is able to sustain high throughput. This is complemented by 5376 shading units and 192 ROPs, which handle the pixel processing workload. The pixel rate of 459.6 GPixel/s is a key metric for understanding its 4K performance; while it is capable, the demands of the Ultra preset at 4K still prove to be too much, resulting in the 44.2 FPS average. The GPU's 82nd percentile ranking against all other GPUs confirms its high-end status.
The GPU's compute performance, as measured by its 51.48 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, is what allows for the high frame rates at lower resolutions. At 1080p, the GPU is not the bottleneck, and the 165.1 FPS average shows it can easily handle the workload. However, the scaling to 4K reveals its limitations. The 20 GB VRAM buffer is not the limiting factor here, as the game is from 2016; instead, the raw shader and ROP throughput are what dictate the performance. The data confirms that the RX 7900 XT is a high-performance part that provides a strong experience, but its limits are clearly visible when resolution and settings are maxed out.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 8400F + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT in The Technomancer
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 89.6 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 71.8 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 57.9 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 44.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 165.7 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 127.2 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 108.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 85.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 252.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 195.8 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 165.1 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 127.4 |
The Technomancer with Ryzen 5 8400F + Other GPUs
See how The Technomancer performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
The Technomancer with RX 7900 XT + Other CPUs
See how The Technomancer performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 8400F + RX 7900 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.