The Technomancer

The Technomancer, a 2016 action RPG, presents a demanding workload that scales significantly with resolution and graphical presets. This analysis examines the measured performance of the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, using only the provided benchmark data. The findings illustrate a system that is well-balanced at 1440p, capable at 1080p, but which struggles to maintain high frame rates at 4K with maximum settings. The data reveals clear trends in how this specific hardware combination handles the game's engine, offering insights into the limiting factors at each setting level.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a clear and expected pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. At the High preset, the average frame rate drops from 116.7 FPS at 1080p to 74.9 FPS at 2560x1440, a reduction of 41.8 FPS, and then further down to 44.9 FPS at 4K. This scaling indicates that the GPU becomes an increasingly dominant bottleneck as pixel count rises, which is typical for a demanding title like The Technomancer.

The scaling factor from 1080p to 1440p is roughly 1.56x (116.7 / 74.9), which is close to the pixel count difference between the two resolutions. This near-linear drop suggests that at these settings, the system is almost entirely GPU-limited. However, the scaling from 1440p to 4K is less steep (74.9 / 44.9 ≈ 1.67x), which is slightly better than the raw pixel difference would imply. This subtle deviation could point to other bottlenecks, such as memory bandwidth or driver overhead, beginning to have a more noticeable impact at the higher resolution.

When examining the Low preset, the trend is amplified. The average FPS at 1080p is 177.3, which drops to 118.5 at 1440p and 63.3 at 4K. The relative drop from 1440p to 4K is significant, representing a 46.7% decrease in performance. This large reduction at 4K on the Low preset suggests that while the GPU is still the primary limiter, the sheer pixel throughput required at 4K overwhelms the RX 6750 XT's capabilities, regardless of the graphical load. The data implies that for a consistently smooth experience at 4K, compromises in settings will yield diminishing returns.

FAQ

Q: What is the average frame rate at 2560x1440 with High settings?

A: The measured average FPS is 74.9. This suggests that the combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is well-suited for a high-refresh-rate 1440p experience in The Technomancer.

Q: How does the 4K Ultra preset performance compare to the 1080p Ultra preset?

A: At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 90.4. In contrast, at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average FPS drops to 31.1. This represents a 65.6% decrease in performance, indicating that 4K Ultra is not a viable option for smooth gameplay with this hardware.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the primary bottleneck at 1080p with Low settings?

A: The data shows an average of 177.3 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This high frame rate, combined with the fact that the Ryzen 5 7600X has a high boost clock of 5.30 GHz, suggests that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU effectively at this resolution, and the frame rate is likely still limited by the GPU's raw rendering speed.

Q: What is the performance difference between the Low and Ultra presets at 2560x1440?

A: The measured average FPS for the Low preset is 118.5, while the Ultra preset yields an average of 61.7. This is a difference of 56.8 FPS, showing that the Ultra preset demands nearly twice the GPU resources as the Low preset at this resolution.

Q: Where does this CPU+GPU combo rank among all tested combinations in this game?

A: The combo is ranked 818 out of 1656 total tested combinations. This places it in the upper-middle tier of all systems, indicating a balanced mid-range to high-end performance level for The Technomancer.

Q: Does the game utilize the CPU's multi-threading capabilities effectively?

A: While direct in-game CPU utilization is not measured, the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance, evidenced by a Passmark multithread score of 28390 and a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24128, provides ample headroom. The frame rate scaling with resolution suggests that the game is more dependent on the GPU, so the CPU's 12 threads are likely sufficient to avoid becoming a limiting factor.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested hardware combinations for The Technomancer, the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT pairing achieves a rank of 818 out of 1656 combos. This places it almost exactly in the middle of the pack, at the 49.4th percentile. This is a noteworthy result, as it indicates that while this setup is by no means at the top of the performance charts, it provides a solid, mid-tier experience that outperforms a majority of the tested configurations.

The ranking is a composite measure that reflects the system's ability to handle the game's demands. The CPU, which sits in the 83rd percentile compared to all other CPUs, is a strong performer. The GPU, in the 79th percentile compared to all other GPUs, is also a capable component. However, the game's engine likely does not scale perfectly with all hardware, and the mid-pack ranking suggests that the overall experience is more representative of a balanced, mainstream build rather than a high-end enthusiast setup. It is a pairing that would be expected to handle the game well at standard gaming resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The data provides a clear performance matrix across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the system shows its strongest performance. The Low preset achieves an average of 177.3 FPS, Medium hits 137.1 FPS, High reaches 116.7 FPS, and Ultra still manages a playable 90.4 FPS. All presets at this resolution are well above the 60 FPS threshold, indicating that the system can deliver a smooth experience even with the highest graphical fidelity.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains robust. The Low preset averages 118.5 FPS, which is very high for this resolution. Medium settings provide 93.1 FPS, and High settings deliver 74.9 FPS, which is still comfortable for most monitors. The Ultra preset drops to 61.7 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS baseline for a playable experience, but it shows the first signs of strain on the system.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly overburdened. The Low preset is the only one to achieve a comfortable average frame rate, at 63.3 FPS. The Medium preset falls to 51.2 FPS, which may be acceptable for some, but High settings drop to 44.9 FPS. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, yielding an average of only 31.1 FPS, which would result in a noticeably stuttery and less responsive experience. The data shows a clear performance ceiling at 4K for this hardware combination.

Settings Recommendations

For a 1920x1080 display, the data indicates that the Ultra preset is the best option. With an average FPS of 90.4, it provides a fully smooth and visually rich experience without sacrificing performance. The frame rate is high enough that there is no need to compromise on visual quality, making Ultra the clear choice for this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the High preset offers the best balance of visual fidelity and performance, with an average of 74.9 FPS. While the Ultra preset is still playable at 61.7 FPS, the High preset provides a more consistent margin above the 60 FPS mark, ensuring a steadier frame pacing. For players who prioritize maximum frame rates, the Medium preset is also an excellent choice, as it averages 93.1 FPS, well above what most 1440p monitors can display.

For 4K gaming at 3840x2160, the options are limited. The Low preset, with an average of 63.3 FPS, is the only configuration that provides a consistently smooth experience. The Medium preset, at 51.2 FPS, is a viable alternative for those who can tolerate a lower frame rate for better visual quality, but it may not be suitable for fast-paced action. The High and Ultra presets are not recommended, as their average frame rates fall into a range that would be considered sub-optimal for a smooth gaming experience.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, with a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. In this game, the CPU's role appears to be secondary to the GPU, as the performance scaling with resolution is a hallmark of a GPU-bound workload. The high clock speeds, particularly the 5.30 GHz boost, are beneficial for maintaining high frame rates, as they ensure that the CPU can quickly process game logic and feed the GPU with data.

The CPU's benchmark scores, such as a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24128 and a single-core score of 3406, indicate a very capable processor. However, the game's performance at 4K shows that even a strong CPU cannot compensate for the GPU's limitations at that resolution. The data suggests that the Ryzen 5 7600X provides more than enough processing power for this title, and its 12 threads are unlikely to be a bottleneck in any of the tested scenarios. The primary constraint on performance is entirely the Radeon RX 6750 XT's rendering capabilities.