The Technomancer
This combination offers playable performance with an average of 37 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 14 | 17 | 22 | 28 |
| 1440p QHD | 23 | 32 | 35 | 51 |
| 1080p Full HD | 39 | 53 | 58 | 79 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
The Technomancer with AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT + AMD Radeon RX 580, In-Depth Analysis
The Technomancer presents a demanding workload for the AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT and AMD Radeon RX 580 pairing. The data shows this combination is positioned in the lower tier of tested configurations, ranking 1548 out of 1656 combos, placing it in the 6th percentile. This is a system that can deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with adjusted settings, but it is severely constrained at higher resolutions, indicating the GPU is the primary bottleneck in almost every scenario.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate drop from 1080p to 4K is steep and clearly illustrates where the performance ceiling lies. At Low settings, the average FPS falls from 79.2 at 1920x1080 to 50.6 at 2560x1440, a reduction of 36%. Pushing further to 3840x2160 yields just 27.6 FPS, a 65% drop from the 1080p baseline. This steep decline is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario, where the RX 580's pixel throughput and memory bandwidth are overwhelmed by the increasing resolution.
The trend is consistent across all settings. At High settings, the average FPS drops from 52.5 at 1080p to 31.7 at 1440p, and finally to 17.2 at 4K. The scaling pattern shows that the RX 580's compute resources, rated at 6.175 TFLOPS FP32, are insufficient to maintain playable frame rates when the pixel count quadruples. The data suggests that the CPU, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, is not the limiting factor at 4K; the GPU's 32 ROPs and 256-bit memory interface are simply saturated.
The most telling comparison is the 4K Ultra result of 14.4 FPS versus the 1080p Low result of 79.2 FPS. This 5.5x difference in performance for a 4x increase in pixel count indicates significant overhead from the Ultra preset, further confirming that the graphics card is the sole bottleneck at high resolutions. The benchmark results indicate that for a smooth experience, users must prioritize resolution scaling downwards before tweaking quality settings.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU and GPU combo in The Technomancer?
A: The data shows that 1920x1080 is the only resolution where average frame rates exceed 60 FPS, and only with Low settings (79.2 FPS). For a more balanced visual experience, 2560x1440 with Low settings provides a playable 50.6 FPS, but the GPU's performance drops significantly at 4K.
Q: How does the RX 580's performance compare to its closest rivals?
A: The RX 580's average benchmark score is 13559. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570, scores 13564, a 0% delta. The data shows it is essentially tied with the GTX 570 and GTX 950 (13549, +0.1% delta), while being 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 455 (13416). This indicates it is a mid-range performer in this specific benchmark database.
Q: Will lowering graphics settings from Ultra to Low improve performance at 1440p?
A: Yes, significantly. At 2560x1440, the average FPS jumps from 22.7 on Ultra to 50.6 on Low. This 27.9 FPS increase represents a 123% performance uplift, demonstrating that the Ultra preset demands far more from the GPU than the hardware can deliver.
Q: Is the Ryzen 5 5600GT a strong CPU for gaming?
A: The CPU's benchmark scores are solid, with an average benchmark score of 20740, placing it in the 78th percentile of all CPUs. Its multicore performance in Cinebench R23 is 17272, and it scores 2438 in single-core. It is a capable processor, but in this game, the GPU limits the overall experience.
Q: What is the expected frame rate at 1080p with Medium settings?
A: The measured average FPS for this combination at 1920x1080 with Medium settings is 57.5 FPS. This is close to the 60 FPS target but may not be perfectly smooth in all scenes, suggesting that High settings (52.5 FPS) or a slight reduction in resolution may be necessary for a consistent experience.
Q: Does the CPU's integrated graphics affect performance?
A: No. The Ryzen 5 5600GT includes Radeon Vega 7 integrated graphics, but the system uses the discrete Radeon RX 580. The measured FPS data is for the dedicated GPU, and the iGPU does not contribute to the frame rates in these benchmarks.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 580 is the definitive performance limiter in this configuration. The data shows that its 8 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. However, the benchmarks reveal that this is insufficient for The Technomancer at high resolutions. The GPU's base clock is 1257 MHz, boosting to 1340 MHz, and its performance in the Passmark G3D test is 8813, placing it in the 53rd percentile of all GPUs.
The GPU's memory configuration is critical. At 4K Ultra, the frame rate collapses to 14.4 FPS, a clear sign that the 8 GB frame buffer and 256-bit memory interface are saturated. Even at 1440p High, the 31.7 FPS average indicates that the card is struggling to maintain fluid motion. The GPU's compute capabilities, rated at 6.175 TFLOPS, are simply not enough to handle the game's effects at higher presets.
The RX 580's nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570, has an identical average benchmark score (13564 vs 13559), suggesting similar raw performance. However, the RX 580's 8 GB of VRAM is a significant advantage over the older card's memory capacity, which is not listed in the provided data. The performance at 1080p Low (79.2 FPS) shows that the card can handle the game when the workload is light, but any increase in settings or resolution leads to a rapid decline in frame rates.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of the system's capabilities across three resolutions and four quality presets.
At 1920x1080, the results are as follows:
- Low: 79.2 FPS average.
- Medium: 57.5 FPS average.
- High: 52.5 FPS average.
- Ultra: 38.9 FPS average.
This resolution is the only one where the system approaches a consistently smooth experience. The jump from Low to Medium is a 21.7 FPS drop, indicating that the Medium preset adds a significant load. The difference between High and Ultra is 13.6 FPS, showing that the Ultra preset is particularly demanding.
At 2560x1440, performance drops notably:
- Low: 50.6 FPS average.
- Medium: 35.4 FPS average.
- High: 31.7 FPS average.
- Ultra: 22.7 FPS average.
Only the Low preset maintains an average above 50 FPS at this resolution. The gap between Low and Medium is 15.2 FPS, and the Ultra preset is less than half the speed of Low. This resolution is only playable with the lowest settings.
At 3840x2160, the system is not playable:
- Low: 27.6 FPS average.
- Medium: 21.6 FPS average.
- High: 17.2 FPS average.
- Ultra: 14.4 FPS average.
All results are below 30 FPS, confirming that 4K is beyond the capabilities of this GPU. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a 13.2 FPS drop, highlighting the severe performance penalty at this resolution.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured rows, the best experience for this hardware is at 1920x1080 with Medium settings, yielding an average of 57.5 FPS. This preset offers a balance between visual fidelity and performance, avoiding the significant frame rate penalty of the High and Ultra presets. The data shows that the drop from Medium to High is only 5 FPS, which might tempt some users, but the Medium preset provides a more stable foundation.
For users prioritizing smoothness, 1920x1080 with Low settings at 79.2 FPS is the clear choice. This configuration provides a high refresh rate experience and easily clears the 60 FPS threshold. The visual quality will be reduced, but the frame rate is sufficient for fast-paced action.
At 2560x1440, the only viable option is the Low preset at 50.6 FPS. The Medium preset at 35.4 FPS is too choppy for a responsive experience. The data suggests that users should not attempt High or Ultra settings at this resolution, as the frame rates fall below 32 FPS. The 4K resolution is not recommended for any settings, as even the Low preset fails to reach 30 FPS.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT provides a solid foundation for this gaming system, but its role is secondary to the GPU in The Technomancer. The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads, based on the Zen 3 architecture, are more than adequate for this game. Its benchmark scores are respectable; the Cinebench R23 multicore score is 17272, and the single-core score is 2438. The CPU's average benchmark score of 20740 places it in the 78th percentile of all CPUs, showing it is a strong performer.
The CPU's performance relative to its rivals is notable. It is essentially tied with the Intel Core i7-10700 (20746 vs 20740, 0% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X (20680, +0.3% delta). It is 0.3% behind the Intel Core i5-12490F (20794). This shows that the 5600GT is competitive with other mid-range and high-end processors from its generation.
In this game, the CPU does not appear to be the limiting factor. The frame rate differences between resolutions are consistent with a GPU bottleneck. The CPU's 16 MB of L3 cache and 3.60 GHz base clock (4.60 GHz boost) are sufficient to feed the RX 580. The data indicates that the CPU is a capable partner, but its performance is masked by the GPU's inability to keep up at higher settings.
How This Combo Ranks
This specific combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT and AMD Radeon RX 580 ranks 1548 out of 1656 tested combos for The Technomancer. This places it in the bottom 6% of all configurations, indicating that it is a low-performance pairing for this particular game. The ranking reflects the GPU's limitations more than the CPU's capabilities.
The GPU's benchmark percentile of 53% (vs. all GPUs) and the CPU's 78th percentile (vs. all CPUs) show a significant imbalance. The CPU is a stronger component relative to its peers than the GPU. This explains why the combo ranks so low; the weak GPU drags down the overall performance of a relatively strong CPU.
The data suggests that users with this combo would see significant gains from upgrading the GPU. The CPU has headroom to support a more powerful graphics card. The measured FPS results confirm that the RX 580 is the primary constraint, and any upgrade path should focus on the GPU to improve the experience in The Technomancer. The system is functional for 1080p gaming, but it is far from the top of the performance charts.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT
AMD Radeon RX 580
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT + AMD Radeon RX 580 in The Technomancer
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 27.6 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 21.6 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 17.2 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 14.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 50.6 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 35.4 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 31.7 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 22.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 79.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 57.5 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 52.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 38.9 |
The Technomancer with Ryzen 5 5600GT + Other GPUs
See how The Technomancer performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
The Technomancer with RX 580 + Other CPUs
See how The Technomancer performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 5600GT + RX 580
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.