The Medium
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 76 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 38 | 46 | 64 | 97 |
| 1440p QHD | 47 | 55 | 76 | 126 |
| 1080p Full HD | 53 | 66 | 93 | 151 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
The Medium with AMD Ryzen 5 7600 + AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT produces a distinct performance profile in The Medium, where resolution scaling reveals a system heavily influenced by graphical load rather than CPU limitations. At 1080p, the combo achieves a 65.5 FPS average on High settings, which drops to 55.3 FPS at 1440p and further to 46.2 FPS at 4K. This represents a 16% reduction from 1080p to 1440p and a 29% reduction from 1440p to 4K, indicating that the GPU is the primary bottleneck as pixel count rises. The scaling pattern is consistent with a horror title that relies on fixed camera angles and layered rendering, where higher resolutions disproportionately increase shading and texture work.
The low preset tells a different story. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 150.8 FPS, which declines to 126 FPS at 1440p and 97.3 FPS at 4K. The percentage drops here are smaller in absolute terms but similar in relative magnitude, confirming that even at the lowest settings, the RX 9070 XT remains the limiting factor. The gap between Low and Ultra at any given resolution is substantial: at 1080p, the difference is 98.2 FPS, while at 4K it narrows to 59.3 FPS. This suggests that the game’s more demanding presets scale with resolution in a way that compresses framerate headroom, making the 4K Ultra experience particularly taxing.
Resolution Scaling
The measured data shows a consistent decline in average FPS as resolution increases, but the shape of that decline is instructive. From 1080p to 1440p at High settings, the framerate falls from 65.5 to 55.3 FPS, a 15.6% drop. Moving from 1440p to 4K High, the framerate falls from 55.3 to 46.2 FPS, a 16.5% drop. These near-identical percentages indicate that the GPU is operating in a linear scaling regime, where each doubling of pixel count (approximately 2.25x from 1080p to 1440p, and 2.25x from 1440p to 4K) produces a proportional reduction in throughput. The Ryzen 5 7600, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, is not introducing a CPU-side ceiling at these settings.
At Ultra settings, the pattern shifts slightly. The 1080p Ultra average of 52.6 FPS drops to 46.8 FPS at 1440p, an 11% reduction, and then to 38 FPS at 4K, a 19% reduction. The larger drop at 4K Ultra suggests that the combination of maximum graphical features and high pixel count pushes the RX 9070 XT into a region where its 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth are being fully utilized, leaving less headroom for the 256-bit bus to maintain efficiency. Conversely, the Low preset shows a more gradual decline: 150.8 FPS at 1080p, 126 FPS at 1440p (a 16.5% drop), and 97.3 FPS at 4K (a 22.8% drop). The larger relative loss at 4K Low indicates that even with reduced shading and effects, the raw pixel throughput demands of 3840x2160 exceed what the GPU can deliver at high framerates.
The data suggests that the limiting component is unequivocally the graphics card. The CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 999 and multi-thread score of 6503 place it in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, and its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D (0.2% higher average score) and Intel Core i9-12900HK (0.2% lower). None of these competitors show CPU-bound behavior in this title, and the measured FPS scaling follows GPU workload patterns precisely. For users targeting 60 FPS, the High preset at 1440p (55.3 FPS) is marginally below target, while Medium at 1440p (75.8 FPS) provides comfortable headroom. At 4K, only the Low preset (97.3 FPS) exceeds 60 FPS.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT, built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture with a Navi 48 chip on a 4 nm process, operates with a base clock of 1660 MHz and a boost clock of 2970 MHz. The memory subsystem consists of 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s. These specifications directly influence the measured results in The Medium, where the game’s reliance on high-resolution textures and volumetric effects creates a strong correlation between memory bandwidth and framerate. The gap between the Low preset at 4K (97.3 FPS) and the Ultra preset at 4K (38 FPS) — a 59.3 FPS difference — can be attributed to the increased memory pressure and shading complexity at Ultra, which forces the GPU to operate closer to its 304 W TDP limit.
The GPU’s 48.66 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 760.3 GTexel/s texture rate provide ample compute for the game’s fixed-camera scenes, but the 4K Ultra results (38 FPS) indicate that the 128 ROPs are not sufficient to maintain high fill rates at maximum settings. The pixel rate of 380.2 GPixel/s becomes a bottleneck when combined with the game’s post-processing effects, which are likely more aggressive at Ultra. The GPU’s benchmark scores reinforce this: a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 7260 and a PassMark G3D score of 26795 place it in the 82nd percentile among all GPUs, but its nearest rivals in the database are professional and mobile parts like the AMD Radeon Pro 575 (0.1% lower) and NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile (0.2% higher), which are not gaming-oriented.
The 16 GB memory capacity is not exhausted at any measured setting, as the highest resolution (4K) and highest preset (Ultra) still produce playable framerates, but the bandwidth becomes the limiting factor. The measured data shows that at 4K, the difference between Medium (64 FPS) and High (46.2 FPS) is 17.8 FPS, while the difference between Low (97.3 FPS) and Medium (64 FPS) is 33.3 FPS. This larger jump suggests that the Medium preset introduces memory-intensive features that reduce throughput disproportionately, likely related to the game’s dual-reality rendering mechanic. The GPU’s 64 RT cores are not directly tested in these rows, but the absence of ray tracing options in the measured presets means the focus is on traditional rasterization performance.
Settings Recommendations
The measured rows provide clear guidance for optimizing the experience. At 1080p, the Medium preset delivers 93.4 FPS, which is 27.9 FPS higher than High (65.5 FPS) and 40.8 FPS higher than Ultra (52.6 FPS). The jump from Low (150.8 FPS) to Medium (93.4 FPS) costs 57.4 FPS, but the visual improvement likely justifies this for most users, given that Medium still exceeds 90 FPS. For users with 144 Hz displays, the Low preset at 1080p is the only option that approaches that refresh rate, hitting 150.8 FPS, while Medium at 93.4 FPS is suitable for 90 Hz panels.
At 1440p, the Medium preset produces 75.8 FPS, which is the best balance of visual fidelity and framerate stability. High (55.3 FPS) is below the 60 FPS target, and Ultra (46.8 FPS) is only suitable for users who prioritize image quality over smoothness. The Low preset at 126 FPS is a viable option for competitive play, though the game’s horror genre typically benefits from higher settings for atmosphere. At 4K, the situation is more constrained: Medium (64 FPS) is the only preset that meets the 60 FPS threshold, while High (46.2 FPS) and Ultra (38 FPS) require a tolerance for sub-60 framerates. The Low preset at 97.3 FPS offers the smoothest 4K experience but sacrifices the game’s visual identity.
The data indicates that the Medium preset is the sweet spot across all resolutions. At 1080p, it provides 93.4 FPS; at 1440p, 75.8 FPS; and at 4K, 64 FPS. The consistency of this preset’s performance — never falling below 60 FPS — makes it the recommended choice for a balanced experience. The Ultra preset, which produces 52.6 FPS at 1080p, 46.8 FPS at 1440p, and 38 FPS at 4K, is best reserved for screenshot purposes or users with variable refresh rate displays who can tolerate framerates in the 40-55 range. The High preset occupies a middle ground but fails to maintain 60 FPS at both 1440p and 4K, making it less attractive than Medium given the modest visual gains.
FAQ
*Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 bottleneck the RX 9070 XT in The Medium?*
A: No. The CPU’s benchmark scores, including a 3DMark single-thread score of 999 and a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22992, place it in the 83rd percentile. The measured FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K follows GPU workload patterns, with no plateau at any resolution that would indicate CPU limitation.
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to maintain 60 FPS?
A: At 1440p, the Medium preset achieves 75.8 FPS, and at 4K, the Medium preset achieves 64 FPS. The High preset at 1440p falls short at 55.3 FPS, so Medium is the highest settings tier that reliably exceeds 60 FPS at both resolutions.
Q: How does the RX 9070 XT compare to its nearest rivals in this game?
A: The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 26795 is 0.1% lower than the AMD Radeon Pro 575 and 0.2% higher than the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile. These deltas are negligible, but the RX 9070 XT’s 16 GB memory and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth provide more headroom for the game’s high-resolution textures.
Q: Is 4K gaming feasible with this configuration?
A: Yes, but only on lower presets. The Low preset at 3840x2160 produces 97.3 FPS, and the Medium preset produces 64 FPS. The High and Ultra presets at 4K produce 46.2 FPS and 38 FPS respectively, which may be acceptable on variable refresh rate displays.
Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p?
A: The Low preset averages 150.8 FPS, while Ultra averages 52.6 FPS. This 98.2 FPS gap represents a 65% reduction in framerate, indicating that Ultra settings impose a significant load on the GPU’s shading units and ROPs.
Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations?
A: The combination ranks 394th out of 1689 tested combos in The Medium, placing it in the top 23% of all systems. This ranking reflects strong overall performance, though it is not in the top tier for 4K Ultra gaming.
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 + AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT combination holds a rank of 394 out of 1689 tested combos in The Medium, placing it in the 77th percentile of all systems. This rank is driven primarily by the GPU’s strong rasterization performance, as the RX 9070 XT’s 82nd percentile standing among all GPUs outweighs the CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking. The combo’s position is not surprising given that the game’s fixed camera angles and moderate CPU demands allow the GPU to dominate the performance envelope.
Relative to the CPU’s nearest rivals, the Ryzen 5 7600 performs nearly identically to the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D (0.2% higher average score) and Intel Core i9-12900HK (0.2% lower), which means swapping the CPU for any of these would not meaningfully alter the combo’s rank in this title. The GPU’s nearest rivals, including the AMD Radeon Pro 575 and NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile, are not gaming parts and would perform worse in this title despite similar synthetic scores. The RX 9070 XT’s 16 GB memory and 48.66 TFLOPS FP32 throughput give it a clear advantage in The Medium’s texture-heavy scenes.
The rank of 394 suggests that this combo is well-suited for high-refresh 1080p and 1440p gaming, as evidenced by the 150.8 FPS at 1080p Low and 93.4 FPS at 1080p Medium. At 4K, the combo remains viable but requires preset compromises, with Medium being the highest setting that maintains 60 FPS. The data indicates that this configuration is a strong mid-to-high tier option, ranking in the top quarter of all tested systems while leaving headroom for more demanding titles that may require lower resolutions or settings. The measured FPS values across all presets and resolutions show a system that is balanced for 1440p gaming, with 4K support available for users willing to adjust settings.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 7600
AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7600 + AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT in The Medium
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 97.3 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 64.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 46.2 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 38.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 126.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 75.8 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 55.3 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 46.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 150.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 93.4 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 65.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 52.6 |
The Medium with Ryzen 5 7600 + Other GPUs
See how The Medium performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
The Medium with RX 9070 XT + Other CPUs
See how The Medium performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 7600 + RX 9070 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.