The Medium

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT pairing delivers a consistent, if not spectacular, experience in The Medium. The data shows this combo achieves a 44th percentile ranking relative to other tested configurations, indicating a system that will handle the game's horror atmosphere without pushing high refresh rate territory at demanding settings. This analysis breaks down exactly how the CPU and GPU contribute to the measured frame rates.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, using the 5 nm process. With a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, it provides a solid foundation for gaming. Its 32 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support (with 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth) are modern specifications that prevent the processor from becoming a bottleneck in most gaming scenarios. The CPU has a benchmark percentile of 83 versus all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32750, placing it firmly in the upper tier of available processors.

In the context of The Medium, a game that relies on fixed camera angles and pre-rendered transitions between two simultaneous worlds, the CPU's role is primarily to feed the GPU with draw calls and manage the game's logic. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 and single-core score of 3072 illustrate strong computational throughput. The data suggests the 7400F is more than capable of handling the game's demands; the measured FPS figures do not indicate any CPU-related stutter or frame pacing issues, even at lower resolutions where CPU load is typically higher. The processor's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-14600T (deltaPct 0.1) and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (deltaPct -0.2), showing that its raw compute performance is essentially on par with those chips. For a game like this, the 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient, and the high boost clock ensures responsive performance for the game's scripting and AI. The CPU is not the limiting factor in this configuration; rather, it provides a stable platform for the GPU to operate at its full potential.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is the primary driver of FPS in The Medium. This GPU is based on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with the Navi 22 chip, built on a 7 nm process. It features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. This VRAM capacity is a significant asset for The Medium, which is known for its "dual-world" rendering technique that can be memory-intensive. The GPU's boost clock is rated at 2600 MHz, with a game clock of 2495 MHz, contributing to its FP32 performance of 13.31 TFLOPS. The GPU has a benchmark percentile of 71 versus all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26011.

The data shows that the RX 6750 XT is the component that dictates the gaming experience, especially at higher resolutions and settings. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS drops to 27, while at 1080p Low, it reaches 115 FPS. This wide variance is a clear indicator that the GPU's compute and memory subsystems are being taxed heavily by the game's visual fidelity. The 12 GB VRAM buffer is sufficient for the game's needs, as there are no measured anomalies that would suggest memory swapping or texture pop-in. The GPU's nearest rivals, according to benchmark scores, include the AMD Radeon R9 M395X (deltaPct 0.5) and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile (deltaPct 1.1), though these are mobile or older parts that do not directly compete in the same performance segment. The RX 6750 XT's 40 ray accelerators are present, but the performance data indicates that the game's heavy use of rasterization and post-processing effects are more impactful on the final frame rate than ray-traced effects.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

In the specific benchmark database for The Medium, this configuration of the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT ranks at position 1292 out of 2911 tested combos. This places the combo in the 44th percentile of all tested systems, meaning that 56% of tested configurations performed better. This is a moderate result, indicating that while the system is capable of playing the game, it is not a top-tier performer. The ranking suggests that there are many other CPU and GPU pairings that can achieve higher frame rates, likely due to more powerful GPUs or newer architectures.

The rank of 1292 is a holistic measure that considers all the measured FPS data points across resolutions and settings. The fact that this combo sits just below the median of all tested combos is telling. It suggests that the RX 6750 XT, while a capable card, is positioned in the mid-range of GPUs that were tested with The Medium. The CPU is not dragging the system down, as its individual percentile (83) is much higher than the combo's overall rank. This implies that the GPU is the primary differentiator here. If a user were to pair this CPU with a higher-tier GPU, the resulting combo rank would likely improve significantly. Conversely, pairing this GPU with a weaker CPU might yield a similar rank, as the GPU would still be the limiting factor in most scenarios. The data supports the conclusion that this is a balanced, mid-range gaming system, not a high-end enthusiast setup.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of the system's capabilities across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the system starts at an average of 115 FPS on Low settings, which is very smooth. Moving up to Medium yields an average of 72 FPS (with a min of 61 and max of 83), which is still excellent for a horror game. High settings produce an average of 52 FPS, and Ultra drops to 41 FPS. This shows that at 1080p, the system can easily handle the game, and even Ultra settings are playable, though not at high refresh rates.

At 2560x1440, the performance scales down as expected. Low settings still deliver a high average of 97 FPS. Medium settings provide an average of 61 FPS (min 52, max 70), which is the sweet spot for a 60 Hz monitor. High settings average 43 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to 34 FPS. At 1440p, the GPU becomes more stressed, and the difference between Medium and High is significant (61 vs 43 FPS), suggesting that the visual fidelity jump at this resolution is costly. The data indicates that 1440p High is borderline for smooth gameplay, while Medium is the recommended preset for a consistent experience.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the RX 6750 XT begins to struggle. Low settings are the only preset that provides a comfortable average of 76 FPS. Medium settings average 48 FPS (min 40, max 55), which is playable but not ideal for fast-paced action. High settings average 34 FPS, and Ultra settings average just 27 FPS. The 4K results clearly show the limits of this GPU. The jump from Low to Medium at 4K is a 28 FPS loss (76 to 48 FPS), which is a significant performance hit for a modest visual improvement. The data suggests that 4K is only viable with Low settings for a smooth experience, or Medium for a cinematic 30-40 FPS target.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The FPS scaling across resolutions is a textbook example of GPU-bound performance. Moving from 1080p to 1440p to 4K, the average FPS drops consistently across all settings. For example, on Low settings, the system goes from 115 FPS at 1080p to 97 FPS at 1440p and finally to 76 FPS at 4K. This represents a 34% drop in FPS from 1080p to 4K. On Medium settings, the drop is from 72 FPS at 1080p to 61 FPS at 1440p and 48 FPS at 4K, a 33% reduction. This consistent percentage drop is a strong indicator that the GPU's rendering pipeline is the bottleneck.

If the CPU were the limiting factor, we would expect to see a much smaller drop in FPS when increasing resolution, because the CPU's workload (draw calls, physics) remains relatively constant regardless of resolution. Instead, the FPS scales almost linearly with the number of pixels rendered, which is a direct consequence of GPU fill-rate and memory bandwidth limitations. The RX 6750 XT's 432.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth and 166.4 GPixel/s pixel rate are being saturated at 4K, leading to the lower frame rates. The data does not show any signs of CPU throttling or a "CPU ceiling" at 1080p, where the FPS would plateau. Instead, the FPS continues to increase at 1080p, indicating the CPU has headroom to spare. This analysis confirms that the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is the definitive limiting component in this system for The Medium.

FAQ

*Q: Can this system run The Medium at 4K with playable frame rates?*

A: Yes, but only with significant compromises. The data shows that at 4K with Low settings, the system averages 76 FPS, which is smooth. At Medium settings, the average drops to 48 FPS, which is playable but may feel less responsive, and High/Ultra settings (34 and 27 FPS) are not recommended for a comfortable experience.

Q: What is the best resolution for a 60 FPS experience?

A: The data indicates that 1440p with Medium settings is the optimal target for a stable 60 FPS experience, as it averages 61 FPS with a minimum of 52 FPS. At 1080p, Medium settings average 72 FPS, which is even smoother, but 1440p offers a higher pixel density.

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F CPU a bottleneck for the RX 6750 XT?

A: No. The benchmark data shows the CPU has a high percentile (83) and the FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K is uniform, indicating a GPU bottleneck. The CPU's performance is sufficient to keep up with the GPU's output demands.

Q: How does this combo compare to other systems in the database?

A: This specific combo ranks 1292nd out of 2911 tested combinations, placing it in the 44th percentile. This means it performs better than 44% of tested systems but is outclassed by the majority.

*Q: Is 12 GB of VRAM enough for The Medium at high settings?*

A: The measured data does not indicate any VRAM-related issues. The system achieves its highest FPS at Low settings and drops as settings increase, which is a normal performance curve. There is no evidence of memory capacity being a limiting factor at 1080p or 1440p.

Q: What preset should be used for 1440p gaming?

A: The Medium preset is the best choice. It averages 61 FPS with a minimum of 52 FPS, which is above the 50 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. High settings drop to 43 FPS, which is a noticeable reduction in fluidity.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured data, the optimal experience for this hardware depends on the target resolution. For 1080p, the High preset (52 FPS) offers a good balance of visual quality and performance, though Ultra (41 FPS) is still playable if visual fidelity is the priority. For 1440p, the Medium preset (61 FPS) is the clear winner, as it is the only preset that consistently stays above the 60 FPS mark. The High preset at 43 FPS is acceptable for a slower-paced horror game, but Medium provides a safer margin for fluctuating scenes. For 4K, the Low preset (76 FPS) is the only reasonable choice for a smooth experience. The Medium preset (48 FPS) is viable for those who prefer a more cinematic feel and can tolerate occasional dips to 40 FPS, but the visual jump from Low to Medium is not worth the 28 FPS loss. In summary, the data suggests that 1440p Medium is the "sweet spot" for this configuration, offering a high-resolution, high-detail experience without compromising frame rate.