Rust
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 79 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 30 | 39 | 46 | 69 |
| 1440p QHD | 50 | 66 | 78 | 117 |
| 1080p Full HD | 73 | 96 | 114 | 169 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Rust with AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, In-Depth Analysis
# FAQ
Q: What is the combo rank for this system in Rust?
A: The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ranks 1408 out of 2953 tested combinations in Rust.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?
A: The Ryzen 7 9850X3D has an average benchmark score of 58386. It is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M (58323), 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i9-14900 (58115), 0.2% behind the Intel Xeon w5-2545 (58504), and 0.7% behind the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 (58826).
Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all GPUs?
A: The RTX 3060 Ti sits at the 59th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 16129.
Q: What is the maximum average FPS achievable at 1080p with this combo?
A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the system achieves 169 FPS average, which is the highest measured average FPS across all tested configurations.
Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and what is its memory clock?
A: The RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a memory clock of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) and a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.
Q: What is the CPU's core and thread configuration, and its boost clock?
A: The Ryzen 7 9850X3D has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz.
---
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS data across four settings presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—at three resolutions provides a clear picture of where this combo delivers the best experience. At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves 169 FPS average, while Medium hits 114 FPS, High drops to 96 FPS, and Ultra falls to 73 FPS. The jump from Low to Medium costs 55 FPS, but the visual improvement is substantial for most users. However, the Medium preset also shows a minimum FPS of 97 and a maximum of 131, indicating a tightly controlled frame delivery that avoids severe dips.
For 2560x1440, the Low preset delivers 117 FPS average, Medium reaches 78 FPS, High drops to 66 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 50 FPS. At 3840x2160, the situation becomes more constrained: Low yields 69 FPS, Medium averages 46 FPS (with a minimum of 39 and maximum of 53), High falls to 39 FPS, and Ultra slides to 30 FPS.
Based on these numbers, the best experience at 1080p is the Medium preset, as it provides 114 FPS average with a minimum of 97 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay while retaining more visual fidelity than Low. At 1440p, Low at 117 FPS is the most responsive option, but Medium at 78 FPS still clears the 60 FPS threshold comfortably; for users prioritizing visual quality, Medium is the balanced pick. At 4K, only Low (69 FPS) maintains playable frame rates, and even Medium (46 FPS) dips below 60 FPS, making Low the only reasonable choice for competitive play. The data indicates that this combo is best suited for 1080p Medium or 1440p Low/Medium, depending on whether responsiveness or image quality takes precedence.
---
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS progression from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 reveals how the system scales across resolutions. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 169 at 1080p to 117 at 1440p (a 30.8% reduction) and then to 69 at 4K (a 41.0% reduction from 1440p). This steep decline suggests the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions, as the pixel count quadruples from 1080p to 4K, and the RTX 3060 Ti's 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are taxed heavily.
At Medium settings, the averages are 114 FPS at 1080p, 78 FPS at 1440p (a 31.6% drop), and 46 FPS at 4K (a 41.0% drop from 1440p). High settings show 96 FPS at 1080p, 66 FPS at 1440p (a 31.3% drop), and 39 FPS at 4K (a 40.9% drop). Ultra settings start at 73 FPS at 1080p, fall to 50 FPS at 1440p (a 31.5% drop), and reach 30 FPS at 4K (a 40.0% drop from 1440p).
The consistent percentage drops across all settings—roughly 31% from 1080p to 1440p and 40% from 1440p to 4K—indicate that the scaling is resolution-bound rather than settings-bound. This pattern points to the GPU as the primary limiter at higher resolutions; the CPU's high single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2228) is sufficient to feed the GPU at 1080p, but the RTX 3060 Ti's compute throughput (16.20 TFLOPS FP32) cannot sustain high frame rates as pixel counts increase. The 4K Ultra result of 30 FPS is particularly telling—it halves the 1080p Ultra score, showing that the GPU is saturated and cannot compensate for the additional pixel workload.
---
How This Combo Ranks
The combo rank of 1408 out of 2953 tested configurations places this system in the 47.7th percentile of all combinations tested in Rust. This mid-pack ranking reflects a pairing of a top-tier CPU with a mid-range GPU. The Ryzen 7 9850X3D sits at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 58386, while the RTX 3060 Ti is at the 59th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 16129.
In the context of Rust, this ranking suggests that the system is competitive but not exceptional. The CPU's performance is within 0.7% of its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, and 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i9-14900. This narrow margin indicates that the CPU is not the bottleneck in most scenarios. Meanwhile, the GPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 9060 (0.7% faster), AMD Radeon Pro 5600M (1.4% faster), AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (1.4% faster), and AMD Radeon R9 370X (1.7% faster). These small deltas show that the RTX 3060 Ti is firmly in a competitive cluster, but its 59th percentile ranking means it trails a significant portion of the GPU field.
Given that the combo ranks roughly in the middle of all tested combinations, the data suggests that other pairings with faster GPUs (e.g., higher-tier Ampere or newer architectures) would likely achieve higher FPS in Rust, while this system's performance is constrained by the GPU's capabilities at higher resolutions and settings. The 1408th position out of 2953 is a solid but unremarkable result, indicating that this combo is a balanced mid-range option rather than a high-end performer.
---
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti plays a decisive role in this combo's Rust performance, particularly as resolution and settings increase. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s, which is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming but becomes strained at 4K, where the measured average FPS drops to 39 at High settings and 30 at Ultra. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective), and the GPU's boost clock is 1665 MHz, with a base clock of 1410 MHz.
The GPU's compute capabilities—16.20 TFLOPS FP32, 4864 shading units, 152 TMUs, and 80 ROPs—are reflected in the benchmark scores: PassMark G3D score of 20349, DirectX 12 score of 78, and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2626. These numbers indicate a GPU that is capable of handling modern titles at 1080p and 1440p, but the 4K results show its limitations. The RTX 3060 Ti's 59th percentile ranking among all GPUs (average benchmark score of 16129) places it below many current-generation parts, and the measured FPS in Rust confirm this: at 4K, even Low settings only yield 69 FPS, while Medium drops to 46 FPS.
The GPU's VRAM capacity of 8 GB is a potential bottleneck in Rust, a game known for its large open-world environments and high texture demands. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS of 30 suggests the GPU is both compute-bound and memory-bound, as the 448.0 GB/s bandwidth may not be sufficient to feed the 8 GB of VRAM efficiently at high resolutions. The data indicates that the RTX 3060 Ti is the limiting component in this combo, as the CPU's strong performance cannot compensate for the GPU's mid-range capabilities at higher settings.
---
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a detailed view of performance across all resolutions and settings:
3840x2160 (4K):
- Low: 69 FPS average
- Medium: 46 FPS average (minimum 39, maximum 53)
- High: 39 FPS average
- Ultra: 30 FPS average
2560x1440 (1440p):
- Low: 117 FPS average
- Medium: 78 FPS average (minimum 67, maximum 90)
- High: 66 FPS average
- Ultra: 50 FPS average
1920x1080 (1080p):
- Low: 169 FPS average
- Medium: 114 FPS average (minimum 97, maximum 131)
- High: 96 FPS average
- Ultra: 73 FPS average
At 1080p, the system delivers strong performance, with Low hitting 169 FPS and Medium maintaining 114 FPS with a minimum of 97 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay even in demanding scenes. High settings still clear 60 FPS at 96 FPS, while Ultra drops to 73 FPS, which is playable but less fluid. The 1440p results show a clear step down: Low remains excellent at 117 FPS, Medium is solid at 78 FPS, but High (66 FPS) and Ultra (50 FPS) begin to show strain. At 4K, the system struggles to maintain 60 FPS at any setting, with Low reaching 69 FPS, Medium at 46 FPS, High at 39 FPS, and Ultra at 30 FPS.
The minimum FPS data for Medium settings—97 at 1080p, 67 at 1440p, and 39 at 4K—reveals that frame dips are more pronounced at higher resolutions, indicating that the GPU's resources are stretched thinner. The maximum FPS values (131 at 1080p, 90 at 1440p, 53 at 4K) show that even the best-case scenarios at 4K cannot reach the averages of 1080p Medium, underscoring the GPU's limitations.
---
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D is a high-end desktop processor based on the Zen 5 architecture (Granite Ridge), built on a 4 nm TSMC process. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The CPU's cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 96 MB of shared L3 cache, which is particularly beneficial for gaming workloads that rely on frequent data access. The 120 W TDP and DDR5 memory support (dual-channel, 89.6 GB/s bandwidth) round out a specification sheet that places it at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs.
In Rust, the CPU's role is evident in the 1080p results, where the system achieves 169 FPS at Low settings and 114 FPS at Medium. These numbers indicate that the CPU is not a bottleneck at lower resolutions, as the Ryzen 7 9850X3D's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2228) and multi-thread capability (Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22807) are more than sufficient to drive the GPU. The PassMark single-thread score of 4704 further confirms its strength in lightly-threaded workloads, which are common in Rust's simulation and world-tick logic.
However, the data shows a clear shift at higher resolutions. As the resolution increases, the FPS drops proportionally across all settings, indicating that the GPU becomes the limiting factor. The CPU's benchmark scores—PassMark multi-thread score of 41318, integer math score of 123140, and floating-point math score of 81998—suggest it has ample headroom, but the RTX 3060 Ti cannot keep pace at 4K, where even Low settings only reach 69 FPS. This is consistent with the combo's overall ranking of 1408 out of 2953, as the CPU's performance is far above the GPU's, creating an imbalance that favors lower resolutions and settings.
The CPU's 96 MB L3 cache is a notable feature for Rust, which is known for its complex entity interactions and large world states. The data indicates that this cache size contributes to the CPU's ability to maintain high frame rates at 1080p, where the 169 FPS Low result demonstrates minimal stutter or frame drops. At higher resolutions, the CPU's role diminishes, as the GPU's workload dominates, and the measured FPS becomes a direct reflection of the RTX 3060 Ti's capabilities rather than the CPU's processing power.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti in Rust
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 69.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 46.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 39.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 30.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 117.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 78.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 66.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 50.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 169.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 114.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 96.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 73.0 |
Rust with Ryzen 7 9850X3D + Other GPUs
See how Rust performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Rust with RTX 3060 Ti + Other CPUs
See how Rust performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 9850X3D + RTX 3060 Ti
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.