Rust

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D pairing in Rust delivers a performance profile that is heavily dictated by resolution and settings, with the data showing a clear transition from CPU-bound behavior at lower resolutions to GPU-bound behavior at 4K. This analysis breaks down the measured results, the roles of each component, and offers practical settings guidance based solely on the benchmark data.

FAQ

Q: How does this combo rank overall in Rust?

A: The combination ranks 119th out of 2953 tested combos, placing it in the top 4% of all configurations tested for this game.

Q: What is the best-case average FPS this combo can achieve?

A: The highest measured average FPS is 199, recorded at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This drops to 175 at 2560x1440 Low and 141 at 3840x2160 Low.

Q: Is the RTX 5090 D or the Ryzen 7 5700X the limiting factor at 1080p?

A: The data suggests the CPU becomes the primary constraint at lower resolutions. At 1920x1080, the average FPS only improves from 145 at Ultra to 199 at Low, a 54 FPS gain, whereas the GPU has far more headroom, as evidenced by its performance at higher resolutions.

Q: What is the largest FPS drop from Low to Ultra settings?

A: The most significant drop occurs at 3840x2160, where the average FPS falls from 141 on Low to 61 on Ultra, a reduction of 80 FPS. This indicates the GPU is heavily taxed at 4K with maxed-out settings.

Q: Are there any FPS measurements with minimum and maximum values?

A: Yes, the Medium settings preset is the only one with complete min/max FPS data across all resolutions. At 1920x1080, the FPS ranges from 145 to 196; at 2560x1440, from 128 to 173; and at 3840x2160, from 81 to 109.

Q: How does the RTX 5090 D compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The RTX 5090 D has an average benchmark score of 77712. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT, scores 76904, placing the RTX 5090 D 1.1% ahead. Conversely, the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB scores 79605, which is 2.4% higher.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D is a monstrous GPU, and its role in Rust’s performance is directly tied to the resolution and graphical settings being used. The card carries 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, yielding a massive 1.79 TB/s of memory bandwidth. The 32 GB frame buffer is far beyond what Rust typically requires, meaning VRAM capacity will not be a limiting factor in any of the measured scenarios. The GPU's clock speeds are listed as a base of 2017 MHz and a boost of 2407 MHz.

The data shows that the RTX 5090 D is the dominant factor in performance at 4K. At 3840x2160, we observe a clear scaling of FPS with settings: the average FPS is 61 at Ultra, 80 at High, 95 at Medium, and 141 at Low. The jump from Medium to Low (a 46 FPS increase) shows how much headroom is available when reducing the graphical load. The GPU's immense power is also evident at 2560x1440, where it manages an average of 103 FPS at Ultra and 175 FPS at Low. This demonstrates that at lower resolutions, the GPU is capable of producing very high frame rates, but its full potential is only truly tested at 4K with demanding settings.

The GPU's synthetic benchmark scores are equally impressive. It achieves 44065 in Passmark G3D and 14326 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. While these are not gaming-specific metrics, they confirm the GPU's raw compute power. Its average benchmark score of 77712 places it in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs. However, it's important to note the comparison to its nearest rivals: it is only 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT and 2.4% behind the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB in these aggregate scores, indicating that while this is a top-tier card, the synthetic landscape is competitive. In practice, the 4K Ultra result of 61 FPS shows that even this GPU can be brought to its knees by Rust’s most demanding settings.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X is a Zen 3-based processor with 8 cores and 16 threads. It has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. Its 32 MB of shared L3 cache is beneficial for gaming workloads. The CPU's role in Rust becomes increasingly apparent as the resolution decreases, where the GPU renders frames so quickly that the CPU becomes the bottleneck for frame generation.

Looking at the synthetic benchmarks, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 13184 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1499 in single-core. It sits in the 79th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 27578. The data shows it is exactly on par with the Intel Core i5-12600K, which also scores 27578, and is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800. This indicates that the CPU is a solid, mid-to-high-range performer but not the absolute fastest available.

The impact of the CPU on Rust’s performance is most visible at 1920x1080. At this resolution, the average FPS increases from 145 at Ultra to 199 at Low, a 54 FPS improvement. However, this is a smaller absolute gain than the 80 FPS jump seen at 4K when moving from Ultra to Low. This suggests that at 1080p, the CPU is starting to limit the maximum achievable FPS. The fact that the FPS at 1080p Ultra (145) is higher than at 4K Ultra (61) shows the GPU is the primary constraint at 4K. But the 1080p Low result of 199 FPS is the ceiling for this combo, implying that the CPU cannot push frame rates much higher, even with a less demanding GPU workload. In contrast, at 4K, the GPU is so heavily taxed that the CPU has plenty of headroom, and we see a much larger performance swing based on GPU settings.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Ryzen 7 5700X and RTX 5090 D achieves a rank of 119 out of 2953 tested combos in Rust. This places it in the top 4% of all configurations tested, which is an exceptionally strong showing. This high ranking reflects the RTX 5090 D's raw power, which is able to compensate for the more modest Ryzen 7 5700X, especially at higher resolutions where the GPU load is heavier.

The ranking is particularly impressive given that the CPU is not a top-tier part. The Ryzen 7 5700X's average benchmark score is 27578, and it is exactly matched by the Intel Core i5-12600K. The fact that this combo ranks so high suggests that for Rust, the GPU is a far more significant contributor to overall performance, especially when targeting 1440p or 4K. The data shows that the RTX 5090 D, while only 1.1% ahead of its nearest rival in aggregate GPU benchmarks, is more than capable of pushing the combination to a top-120 finish. This ranking also implies that if the CPU were upgraded to a more powerful model, this combo would likely rank even higher, as the 1080p results suggest the CPU is a limiting factor in that specific scenario. The overall percentile ranking of the CPU (79th) versus the GPU (92nd) highlights the differential in performance class, yet the combo's rank of 119th shows the GPU’s dominance in this specific game.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a detailed look at how this combo performs across different resolutions and settings. The data is consistent, showing that higher resolutions and higher settings both reduce average FPS.

1920x1080:

• Ultra: Average 145 FPS. This is a playable frame rate for most users, but it's not the highest this combo can achieve.
• High: Average 161 FPS. A solid improvement over Ultra, offering a 16 FPS gain.
• Medium: Average 171 FPS, with a minimum of 145 and a maximum of 196. This shows a wider variance, but the average is strong.
• Low: Average 199 FPS. This is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo at any resolution or setting. It represents the CPU-limited ceiling.

2560x1440:

• Ultra: Average 103 FPS. This drops from the 1080p Ultra result, indicating the GPU is now doing more work.
• High: Average 136 FPS. A significant 33 FPS gain over Ultra, making it a strong choice for high-refresh-rate 1440p monitors.
• Medium: Average 151 FPS, with a minimum of 128 and a maximum of 173. This is a well-balanced setting for competitive play.
• Low: Average 175 FPS. This is a great result, providing very high frame rates for esports-style play.

3840x2160 (4K):

• Ultra: Average 61 FPS. This is the most demanding scenario, and the combo just barely achieves a 60 FPS average. This is not ideal for smooth 4K gaming.
• High: Average 80 FPS. A substantial 19 FPS improvement over Ultra, making it a much more comfortable 4K experience.
• Medium: Average 95 FPS, with a minimum of 81 and a maximum of 109. This is the best 4K option for a high-refresh-rate display, as it maintains a solid average and keeps minimums above 80.
• Low: Average 141 FPS. This shows that even at 4K, the GPU has remarkable headroom when settings are reduced.

The data shows a clear pattern: at 1080p, the CPU is a limiting factor, and the FPS gains from lowering settings are relatively modest. At 4K, the GPU is the main driver, and the FPS gains from lowering settings are much more pronounced. The 1440p results represent a balanced middle ground.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend heavily on your target resolution and refresh rate. The data shows that the Medium preset offers a strong balance of visual quality and performance, but the best choice varies.

For 4K (3840x2160): The Ultra preset is barely playable at 61 FPS average, which is not recommended for a smooth experience. The High preset at 80 FPS is a significant improvement and is the minimum recommended for a playable 4K experience. However, the Medium preset, with an average of 95 FPS and a minimum of 81 FPS, is the best choice for 4K gaming. It provides a high, stable frame rate that is suitable for most displays and avoids the performance dips seen at higher settings. The Low preset is not necessary at 4K, as Medium already provides excellent performance.

For 1440p (2560x1440): This resolution offers the most flexibility. The Ultra preset at 103 FPS is very good, but the High preset at 136 FPS is the sweet spot for high-refresh-rate 1440p monitors. It offers a significant performance boost over Ultra with a minimal visual compromise. The Medium preset at 151 FPS is also an excellent choice for competitive play where maximum frame rates are desired. The Low preset at 175 FPS provides the absolute highest performance but may be visually less appealing.

For 1080p (1920x1080): At this resolution, the CPU is the primary bottleneck. The Ultra preset at 145 FPS is already very fast, but the High preset at 161 FPS is a better choice for high-refresh-rate monitors. The Medium preset at 171 FPS is the best balance for most users, as it provides a very high average FPS and the data shows a minimum of 145 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay. The Low preset at 199 FPS is only useful for competitive players who prioritise the absolute maximum frame rate over visual fidelity.

In summary, the Medium settings preset is the most consistent performer across all resolutions, offering a strong balance of visual quality and frame rate. For users with high-refresh-rate monitors, dropping to High or Low at 1440p or 1080p will yield higher FPS, but for a stable 4K experience, Medium is the clear winner. The Ultra preset is only truly viable at 1080p, and even then, it is not the best choice for maximum performance.