Rust
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 116 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 49 | 62 | 73 | 104 |
| 1440p QHD | 79 | 105 | 124 | 173 |
| 1080p Full HD | 110 | 146 | 171 | 194 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Rust with AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX produces a compelling, if lopsided, dataset in Rust. The processor, a 6-core/12-thread Zen 3 part, sits at the 78th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU, a 24 GB RDNA 3 flagship, ranks at the 85th percentile. This configuration lands at rank 232 out of 1717 tested combos in this game, placing it in the top 13.5% of all pairings. The measured frames per second reveal a system that is heavily GPU-bound at higher resolutions but increasingly CPU-limited as resolution drops, making the choice of settings the primary lever for performance.
FAQ
Q: What is the average FPS at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings?
A: The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings is 109.5. This is the lowest frame rate recorded at this resolution, indicating a significant performance cost for the highest visual fidelity.
Q: How does the CPU's multi-threaded performance compare to its nearest rival?
A: The Ryzen 5 5600GT has an average benchmark score of 20740. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-10700, scores 20746, resulting in a deltaPct of 0. This indicates the two processors are effectively tied in overall average performance.
Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded in the dataset?
A: The highest average FPS recorded is 193.9, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This represents the maximum frame rate headroom available with this combination.
Q: How much faster is the GPU's Geekbench Vulkan score compared to its OpenCL score?
A: The Radeon RX 7900 XTX achieves a Geekbench Vulkan score of 192597, while its OpenCL score is 189573. The Vulkan score is approximately 1.6% higher than the OpenCL score.
Q: At which resolution does the frame rate drop below 60 FPS on High settings?
A: At 3840x2160 with High settings, the average FPS is 62.4. While this is above 60, it is the only High settings row in the dataset below 100 FPS. The Ultra preset at this resolution falls to 49.2 FPS.
Q: What is the boost clock speed of the CPU in this combo?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT has a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. Its base clock is 3.60 GHz, and it features 16 MB of L3 cache.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX is the dominant component in this pairing, and its specifications dictate the performance envelope. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1929 MHz and a boost clock of 2498 MHz, with a game clock rated at 2365 MHz. It is equipped with 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 384-bit bus, yielding a substantial memory bandwidth of 960.0 GB/s. This memory capacity is a defining feature, allowing the card to handle high-resolution textures and large datasets without capacity-related stutters.
The sheer compute power of the RX 7900 XTX is evident in its 61.39 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, driven by 6144 shading units. In Rust, this translates to strong raw fill rates, particularly at higher resolutions. The data confirms this: at 2560x1440, average FPS scales from 79.4 on Ultra to 173.4 on Low. The delta between these presets (94 FPS) shows that the GPU has ample headroom to push frames when visual load is reduced, but the CPU becomes the limiting factor at lower resolutions. At 1920x1080, the difference between Low (193.9 FPS) and Ultra (109.5 FPS) is 84.4 FPS, a smaller absolute gap than at 1440p, suggesting the CPU is starting to constrain the GPU's output. The GPU's 85th percentile ranking among all GPUs supports its role as a high-end part, though its nearest rivals in benchmark scores include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, which bracket its performance.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the Ryzen 5 5600GT and the RX 7900 XTX achieves a rank of 232 out of 1717 tested combos in Rust. This places the pairing in the top 13.5% of all configurations tested for this game, a strong result. The ranking reflects a synergy where the GPU is powerful enough to drive high frame rates, but the CPU's performance level prevents the combo from climbing higher.
The CPU's performance is a critical factor in this ranking. With an average benchmark score of 20740, the 5600GT is effectively tied with the Intel Core i7-10700, which scores 20746 (0% deltaPct). It is also very close to the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X, which scores 20680 (0.3% faster than the 5600GT). This places the processor in a competitive mid-range tier. However, the GPU is a top-tier part, and the data suggests the CPU holds the combo back. For instance, the 5600GT's passmark single-thread score is 3348, while its multithread score is 20325. In Rust, which is known for being CPU-intensive, the single-thread performance is likely a bottleneck at lower resolutions, preventing the RX 7900 XTX from reaching its full potential. The combo rank of 232, while good, indicates that many other pairings with faster CPUs achieve higher frame rates, despite having similar or even less powerful GPUs.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings balance depends heavily on the target resolution. The data shows a clear hierarchy: Low settings always provide the highest frame rate, followed by Medium, then High, with Ultra being the most demanding.
For 3840x2160, the High preset yields an average of 62.4 FPS, which is playable but near the threshold for high-refresh-rate monitors. The Medium preset at 73.4 FPS offers a better balance, providing a 17.6% improvement over High while likely maintaining acceptable visual quality. Ultra at this resolution drops to 49.2 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay. The Low preset at 103.9 FPS is the only way to achieve a high refresh rate experience at 4K, but it sacrifices significant visual fidelity.
At 2560x1440, the High preset achieves 104.8 FPS, which is excellent for most users. Medium provides a substantial boost to 124.1 FPS, a 18.4% increase, making it the recommended choice for those seeking higher frame rates without a major visual downgrade. Ultra at 79.4 FPS is still playable but not ideal for competitive play. The Low preset at 173.4 FPS is the best option for esports-level responsiveness.
For 1920x1080, the Medium preset at 171.1 FPS is the sweet spot. It offers a massive 57.4% performance increase over High (145.7 FPS) while retaining more visual detail than Low. The Low preset at 193.9 FPS provides the absolute highest frame rate, but the incremental gain over Medium is only 13.3%. Ultra at 109.5 FPS remains viable for those who prioritize image quality over frame rate. The data indicates that Medium settings at 1080p provide the best experience for the majority of users, balancing visual quality with a frame rate that exceeds the refresh rate of most monitors.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of performance across resolutions and settings.
At 3840x2160, the RX 7900 XTX shows its strength but is challenged by the resolution's pixel count. The average FPS figures are as follows:
- Ultra: 49.2 FPS
- High: 62.4 FPS
- Medium: 73.4 FPS
- Low: 103.9 FPS
This represents a 111.2% performance swing from Ultra to Low. The jump from Medium to Low is particularly significant, a 41.6% increase, indicating that the GPU's shading units are heavily taxed at 4K.
At 2560x1440, the performance scales more favorably:
- Ultra: 79.4 FPS
- High: 104.8 FPS
- Medium: 124.1 FPS
- Low: 173.4 FPS
The gap between Ultra and Low is 118.4%, showing that the GPU has more headroom at this resolution. The High to Medium step provides a 18.4% improvement, while Medium to Low offers a 39.7% jump. This resolution shows a balanced scaling pattern, suggesting the CPU and GPU are working in better harmony than at 4K.
At 1920x1080, the frame rates are high, but the scaling pattern reveals CPU limitations:
- Ultra: 109.5 FPS
- High: 145.7 FPS
- Medium: 171.1 FPS
- Low: 193.9 FPS
The performance delta from Ultra to Low is 77.1%, which is smaller than at higher resolutions. This indicates that the Ryzen 5 5600GT is becoming a bottleneck. The difference between Medium and Low is only 13.3%, suggesting that the CPU cannot feed the GPU enough data to utilize its full potential at lower settings. The 5600GT's 16 MB of L3 cache and 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth are likely constraining factors here, as Rust's simulation and entity logic are heavily dependent on these resources. The data suggests that at 1080p, the GPU is not the limiting factor, and further frame rate gains would require a faster CPU.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX in Rust
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 103.9 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 73.4 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 62.4 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 49.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 173.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 124.1 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 104.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 79.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 193.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 171.1 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 145.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 109.5 |
Rust with Ryzen 5 5600GT + Other GPUs
See how Rust performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Rust with RX 7900 XTX + Other CPUs
See how Rust performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 5600GT + RX 7900 XTX
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.