Roblox

Roblox

AVERAGE FPS
60
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 60 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Estimated performance. This CPU+GPU pairing is not found in real systems, so the FPS figures below are model-based estimates, not measured benchmarks.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 26 32 36 40
1440p QHD 46 56 64 70
1080p Full HD 68 84 95 105

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 40
3840x2160 Medium 36
3840x2160 High 32
3840x2160 Ultra 26
2560x1440 Low 70
2560x1440 Medium 64
2560x1440 High 56
2560x1440 Ultra 46
1920x1080 Low 105
1920x1080 Medium 95
1920x1080 High 84
1920x1080 Ultra 68

Roblox with Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX + AMD Radeon 760M, In-Depth Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX paired with the AMD Radeon 760M delivers a playable but constrained Roblox experience, with performance that scales predictably with resolution and settings. The data indicates that this integrated graphics solution is best utilized at 1080p, where it consistently exceeds 60 FPS, while 4K gaming remains marginal at best. The combination ranks 2999 out of 3010 tested combos in this title, placing it near the bottom of the performance spectrum, yet the measured frames still provide a functional experience for a sandbox game that is not graphically demanding.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data makes a clear case for using the Medium preset at 1920x1080 as the optimal balance between visual quality and performance. At this setting, the combo achieves an average of 95 FPS with a minimum of 81 FPS and a maximum of 110 FPS. This is the only preset at 1080p that provides a full set of measured frames including the minimum and maximum, indicating stable performance. The Low preset at 1080p delivers a higher average of 105 FPS, but the jump to Medium only costs 10 FPS on average while providing noticeably better visuals. The High preset drops to 84 FPS average, which is still smooth, but the 11 FPS loss from Medium to High is less justifiable than the 10 FPS gain from High to Low.

At 2560x1440, the Medium preset remains the recommended choice, delivering an average of 64 FPS with a minimum of 54 FPS and a maximum of 73 FPS. This maintains a playable experience above the 60 FPS threshold on average, though the minimum dips below it. The Low preset at 1440p achieves 70 FPS average, but the Medium preset again offers a superior visual experience for a modest 6 FPS average reduction. The High preset at 1440p falls to 56 FPS average, which is below the 60 FPS target, making it less desirable. The Ultra preset at 1440p is not recommended, as it drops to 46 FPS average, which is noticeably less fluid.

For 4K resolution at 3840x2160, no preset provides a truly smooth experience. The Low preset achieves the highest average at 40 FPS, followed by Medium at 36 FPS, High at 32 FPS, and Ultra at 26 FPS. The Medium preset at 4K does have a measured minimum of 31 FPS and a maximum of 41 FPS, but all of these figures fall below the 60 FPS threshold. The data suggests that 4K should be avoided for this combo, and if forced to choose, the Low preset offers the best average frame rate at 40 FPS. Overall, the Medium preset at 1080p is the clear winner, providing the highest playable quality point before performance degrades significantly.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon 760M is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, built on a 4 nm process node at TSMC. It features 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster output units, along with 8 ray tracing cores. The GPU operates with a base clock of 800 MHz and a boost clock of 2599 MHz, delivering a pixel rate of 41.58 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 83.17 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is rated at 5.323 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at the same 5.323 TFLOPS due to a 1:1 ratio. The GPU's memory is system shared, meaning its size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all dependent on the host system's memory configuration, which in this case is DDR5 dual-channel with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

The GPU's benchmark scores place it in the 35th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 6019. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6400 with an average score of 6001 and a deltaPct of 0.3, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M at 6000 with a deltaPct of 0.3, and the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server at 5996 with a deltaPct of 0.4. The NVIDIA Quadro P2000 scores 6049 with a deltaPct of -0.5. These figures indicate the Radeon 760M is roughly on par with a discrete GTX 770M or an entry-level RX 6400, which helps contextualize its Roblox performance. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 400, while Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores are 20255 and 30336 respectively. Passmark DirectX tests show scores of 19 for DX10, 52 for DX11, 25 for DX12, and 65 for DX9, with a G2D score of 890 and G3D score of 5310. The GPU compute score is 2840.

The Radeon 760M's role in Roblox is the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the GPU can keep up with the CPU's frame generation, but as resolution increases, the GPU's workload grows, and the frame rates drop accordingly. The boost clock of 2599 MHz is relatively high for an integrated solution, but the limited number of shading units and the system-shared memory bandwidth constrain its ability to handle higher pixel counts. The data shows that the GPU is capable of producing 105 FPS at 1080p Low, but this drops to 70 FPS at 1440p Low and 40 FPS at 4K Low, demonstrating a clear resolution scaling pattern tied to the GPU's fill rate and memory constraints.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a consistent and predictable drop as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. At the Low preset, the average FPS goes from 105 at 1080p to 70 at 1440p, a reduction of 35 FPS or approximately 33%. From 1440p to 4K, the average drops further to 40 FPS, another 30 FPS reduction or roughly 43%. This scaling pattern indicates that the GPU is the bottleneck at higher resolutions, as the CPU's workload remains constant regardless of resolution. The 1080p to 1440p transition costs about 0.3 FPS per vertical pixel increase, while the 1440p to 4K transition costs about 0.2 FPS per vertical pixel increase, showing that the GPU's fill rate limits are being approached.

For the Medium preset, the average FPS decreases from 95 at 1080p to 64 at 1440p, a 31 FPS drop, and then to 36 at 4K, another 28 FPS drop. The High preset sees averages of 84 at 1080p, 56 at 1440p, and 32 at 4K, with each step down representing a loss of 28 FPS and 24 FPS respectively. The Ultra preset exhibits the most severe scaling, going from 68 at 1080p to 46 at 1440p, a 22 FPS drop, and then to 26 at 4K, a 20 FPS drop. This pattern suggests that at lower settings, the GPU is less stressed, allowing for higher absolute frame rates, but the relative percentage drop from 1080p to 4K is more pronounced at higher settings.

The limiting component analysis is clear: at 1080p, the frame rates are high enough that the CPU or other system components might occasionally bottleneck, but as resolution increases, the GPU's workload becomes dominant. The fact that the 1080p Low preset achieves 105 FPS while the 4K Low preset only reaches 40 FPS indicates that the GPU's rendering capabilities are the primary constraint. The system-shared memory, which relies on the CPU's DDR5 bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, further compounds this issue at 4K where memory bandwidth demands are higher. The data supports the conclusion that this combo is best suited for 1080p gaming, with 1440p being a compromise, and 4K being largely impractical for smooth gameplay.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution to play Roblox with this combo?

A: The measured data shows that 1920x1080 provides the best experience, with all presets achieving average frame rates above 68 FPS. At 2560x1440, only Low and Medium presets exceed 60 FPS on average, while at 3840x2160, all presets fall below 41 FPS, making 1080p the clear recommendation.

Q: How does the Ultra preset compare to Medium at 1080p?

A: At 1080p, the Ultra preset averages 68 FPS, which is 27 FPS lower than the Medium preset's 95 FPS average. The Medium preset also provides a minimum of 81 FPS and a maximum of 110 FPS, while the Ultra preset has no minimum or maximum data, suggesting less stable performance for a significant frame rate cost.

Q: Is the AMD Radeon 760M comparable to any discrete GPU?

A: Based on average benchmark scores, the Radeon 760M scores 6019, which is 0.3% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 6400 at 6001 and 0.3% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M at 6000. It is 0.5% lower than the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 at 6049, placing it in the same performance tier as these older discrete options.

Q: Can this combo handle 4K Roblox?

A: The data indicates 4K performance is marginal at best. The highest average at 3840x2160 is 40 FPS on the Low preset, with Medium at 36 FPS, High at 32 FPS, and Ultra at 26 FPS. These frame rates are below the 60 FPS target and would likely result in a less responsive experience.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and High at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 70 FPS, while the High preset averages 56 FPS. This represents a 14 FPS difference, or a 20% reduction in frame rate when moving from Low to High settings, which may not be worth the visual improvement for some users.

Q: How does the combo rank among all tested configurations?

A: This combination of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX and AMD Radeon 760M ranks 2999 out of 3010 tested combos in Roblox, placing it in the bottom 0.4% of all configurations. This ranking reflects the integrated GPU's limitations rather than the CPU's capabilities.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX is a 20-core, 20-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process node at TSMC. It has a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W. The CPU features a cache hierarchy of 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports DDR5 memory via a dual-channel interface with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The processor's benchmark scores are strong, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 63173. In Cinebench R23, it scores 40642 in multi-core and 5737 in single-core, while in Cinebench R20, it scores 17069 multi-core and 2409 single-core. Passmark tests show a multithread score of 47985, a single-thread score of 4500, and a physics score of 2978.

The CPU's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-13790F with an average score of 63080 and a deltaPct of 0.1, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G at 63331 with a deltaPct of -0.2, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 at 62839 with a deltaPct of 0.5, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX at 62738 with a deltaPct of 0.7. These figures show the 265HX is essentially tied with its closest competitors, with performance deltas of less than 1% in all cases. The CPU's data compression score is 511817, data encryption is 39472, extended instructions are 40741, and it can find 406 prime numbers per test. Floating point math scores 161605, integer math scores 126954, and random string sorting scores 62458.

In Roblox, the CPU's role is to feed the GPU with draw calls and physics calculations. Given that the combo ranks 2999 out of 3010, the CPU is clearly not the limiting factor, as its computational power far exceeds what Roblox requires for a sandbox game. The 20-core design and high boost clock of 5.30 GHz ensure that even the most complex user-generated content in Roblox will not strain the CPU. The Passmark physics score of 2978 suggests it can handle the game's physics simulation without issue. The CPU's high multi-threaded performance, as evidenced by the 40642 Cinebench R23 score, is irrelevant to Roblox's frame rates, which are constrained by the GPU's 5.323 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The data confirms that upgrading the GPU would provide a much larger performance boost in Roblox than any CPU change.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for Roblox with the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX and AMD Radeon 760M is as follows:

At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves an average of 105 FPS. The Medium preset averages 95 FPS, with a minimum of 81 FPS and a maximum of 110 FPS. The High preset averages 84 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 68 FPS. This resolution provides the highest frame rates across all settings, with the Low preset being the only one to exceed 100 FPS on average. The Medium preset offers the most complete data set, indicating stable performance within a 29 FPS range from minimum to maximum.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 70 FPS. The Medium preset averages 64 FPS, with a minimum of 54 FPS and a maximum of 73 FPS. The High preset averages 56 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 46 FPS. The step down from 1080p to 1440p costs between 21 and 28 FPS depending on the preset, with the Low preset suffering the largest absolute loss of 35 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1440p is the only one that falls below 50 FPS, indicating it should be avoided at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 40 FPS. The Medium preset averages 36 FPS, with a minimum of 31 FPS and a maximum of 41 FPS. The High preset averages 32 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 26 FPS. All 4K presets fall below the 60 FPS threshold, with the Ultra preset being particularly unplayable at 26 FPS. The Medium preset at 4K provides the only minimum and maximum data, showing a tight 10 FPS range, which suggests consistent performance but at a low frame rate level.

The data shows a clear hierarchy: 1080p is the only resolution where all presets are playable, 1440p is viable only at Low and Medium settings, and 4K is not recommended for any preset. The frame rate drops from 1080p to 1440p average 28 FPS across all presets, while the drop from 1440p to 4K averages 27 FPS, showing a near-linear scaling pattern with resolution. This consistency indicates that the GPU's rendering pipeline is the bottleneck, with the CPU providing ample headroom at all times. The Ultra preset at 4K, at 26 FPS, is exactly 25% of the 1080p Low preset's 105 FPS, illustrating the dramatic impact of resolution on this integrated GPU's performance.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX

Cores / Threads 20 / 20
Base Clock 2600 MHz
Boost Clock 5300 MHz
TDP 55W
Socket Intel BGA 2114
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon 760M

VRAM System Shared System Shared
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2599 MHz MHz
TDP 15 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX + AMD Radeon 760M in Roblox

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 40.0
3840x2160 Medium 36.0
3840x2160 High 32.0
3840x2160 Ultra 26.0
2560x1440 Low 70.0
2560x1440 Medium 64.0
2560x1440 High 56.0
2560x1440 Ultra 46.0
1920x1080 Low 105.0
1920x1080 Medium 95.0
1920x1080 High 84.0
1920x1080 Ultra 68.0

Roblox with 760M + Other CPUs

See how Roblox performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with iUltra 7 265HX + 760M

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.