Roblox

# FAQ

Q: What is the combo rank of the Intel Core i7-14700K with the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT in Roblox?

A: This combination ranks 988th out of 1800 tested combos in Roblox, placing it near the middle of the pack despite the hardware's individual strengths.

Q: How much faster is the RX 6700 XT compared to its closest rival in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The RX 6700 XT's average benchmark score is 33721, which is 0.7% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 6800 (33493) but 1% lower than both the AMD Radeon HD 7950 (34050) and AMD Radeon RX 480 (34059).

Q: What is the difference in average benchmark scores between the Core i7-14700K and its nearest rival?

A: The Core i7-14700K scores 70074 on average, essentially tied with the Intel Core i7-14700KF (70104, 0% delta) and the AMD EPYC 9115 (69887, 0.3% delta), while trailing the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X (70420) by 0.5%.

Q: What is the maximum average FPS achieved at 1080p with this combo?

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 366.9 at 1920x1080 with Low settings, showing the CPU's headroom when the GPU load is minimal.

Q: How much VRAM does the RX 6700 XT have, and what memory type does it use?

A: The GPU features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s.

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the Intel Core i7-14700K?

A: The CPU has 20 cores and 28 threads, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz.

---

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT serves as the primary rendering engine in this Roblox configuration. Its RDNA 2.0 architecture, built on a 7 nm process, includes 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2321 MHz, a game clock of 2424 MHz, and a boost clock of 2581 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). This translates to a pixel rate of 165.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 413.0 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance of 13.21 TFLOPS.

In Roblox, the GPU's role is clearly demonstrated by the measured frame rates across settings. At 4K Ultra, the combo produces 92.5 FPS, while at 1080p Low it reaches 366.9 FPS — a span that reflects how the GPU's compute resources scale with resolution and settings. The GPU's 12 GB of VRAM is more than sufficient for Roblox's asset streaming, as evidenced by the consistent frame rates even at Ultra settings across all resolutions. The card's benchmark percentile of 77 versus all GPUs indicates it sits comfortably above average, though its nearest rivals show it is not class-leading: the RX 6800 trails by only 0.7%, while the HD 7950 and RX 480 lead by 1% each in average score. The 40 ray accelerators on the RX 6700 XT are present but largely unused in Roblox, which does not rely heavily on ray-traced effects, so the card's rasterization strength — a 13.21 TFLOPS FP32 figure — carries the workload.

The data suggests the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions, particularly at 4K Ultra where the frame rate drops to 92.5 FPS. At lower resolutions like 1080p Low, the GPU delivers 366.9 FPS, which is close to what the CPU can feed it, indicating that the GPU is far from saturated. This creates an interesting dynamic: Roblox's simple geometry and lighting mean the RX 6700 XT's raw throughput — 384.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth and 165.2 GPixel/s pixel fill — is more than adequate for the game, but the frame rate ceiling at 4K suggests the GPU still becomes the bottleneck when pixel count increases.

---

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern of scaling from 1080p to 4K. At High settings, the average frame rate drops from 297.9 FPS at 1920x1080 to 200.8 FPS at 2560x1440, then to 113.3 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a 62% reduction from 1080p to 4K. Low settings show a similar trend: 366.9 FPS at 1080p, 247.8 FPS at 1440p, and 138.6 FPS at 4K — a 62.2% drop. Medium settings decline from 337.6 FPS at 1080p to 223.2 FPS at 1440p and 124.8 FPS at 4K, a 63% decrease. Ultra settings fall from 239.9 FPS at 1080p to 160.1 FPS at 1440p and 92.5 FPS at 4K, a 61.4% reduction.

The consistency of these percentage drops — all hovering around 61-63% — indicates that the scaling behavior is uniform across settings, which points to the GPU becoming progressively more constrained as resolution increases. The fact that the frame rates at 1080p are extremely high (above 239 FPS even at Ultra) suggests the CPU (Core i7-14700K with 20 cores and 28 threads) is not a limiting factor at this resolution; the GPU can process frames faster than the CPU can issue draw calls. However, at 4K, the GPU's pixel throughput becomes the bottleneck, with the 165.2 GPixel/s pixel rate being taxed by the 8.3 million pixels per frame at 3840x2160.

The scaling data implies that Roblox is not a heavily threaded workload — the CPU's high single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6287) is more relevant than its multi-core prowess (44534 in the same test). At 1080p, the frame rate is likely limited by the CPU's ability to process game logic and physics, while at 4K, the GPU's fill rate takes over. This dual-limiter behavior is evident in the 366.9 FPS ceiling at 1080p Low, which is likely near the CPU's maximum frame output for this game, whereas 4K Ultra's 92.5 FPS is constrained by the GPU's rendering capabilities.

---

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers the following average frame rates: Low settings produce 366.9 FPS, Medium settings yield 337.6 FPS, High settings reach 297.9 FPS, and Ultra settings achieve 239.9 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 127 FPS, indicating that settings have a significant impact at this resolution, with Low being 52.9% faster than Ultra.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates are: Low at 247.8 FPS, Medium at 223.2 FPS, High at 200.8 FPS, and Ultra at 160.1 FPS. The spread narrows slightly to 87.7 FPS between Low and Ultra, with Low being 54.8% faster than Ultra. This suggests that at 1440p, the GPU is starting to feel the load, but the CPU still keeps frame rates above 160 FPS even at Ultra.

At 3840x2160, the results are: Low at 138.6 FPS, Medium at 124.8 FPS, High at 113.3 FPS, and Ultra at 92.5 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra shrinks to 46.1 FPS, with Low being 49.8% faster than Ultra. This compression of the performance gap indicates that the GPU is becoming the primary bottleneck at 4K, as settings changes have less relative impact when the pixel fill rate is the limiting factor.

The data shows that the frame rate drops are not linear across settings. At 1080p, moving from Low to Medium costs 29.3 FPS, from Medium to High costs 39.7 FPS, and from High to Ultra costs 58 FPS. At 4K, the same transitions cost 13.8 FPS, 11.5 FPS, and 20.8 FPS respectively. This pattern reveals that at higher resolutions, the incremental cost of each settings tier diminishes, reinforcing the GPU-bound nature of 4K gameplay.

---

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank of 988 out of 1800 tested combinations places this configuration in the 54.9th percentile of all tested systems in Roblox. This is a surprisingly modest ranking given the individual component strengths — the CPU sits at the 96th percentile versus all CPUs, and the GPU at the 77th percentile versus all GPUs. The discrepancy suggests that Roblox's performance is heavily influenced by factors beyond raw compute, such as single-threaded performance and memory latency.

The CPU's nearest rivals show it is well-matched with top-tier processors: the Intel Core i7-14700KF scores 70104 (0% delta), the AMD EPYC 9115 scores 69887 (0.3% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X scores 70420 (-0.5% delta). This means the CPU is performing as expected for its class. Similarly, the GPU's nearest rivals — the RX 6800 at 33493 (0.7% delta), HD 7950 at 34050 (-1% delta), RX 480 at 34059 (-1% delta), and RTX A5000 at 33294 (1.3% delta) — show the GPU is also performing near its expected level.

Given that both components perform at their expected levels relative to their peers, the 988th rank out of 1800 combos indicates that Roblox does not heavily reward the combination of a high-end CPU with a mid-range GPU. The game likely benefits more from a balanced pairing where the GPU is not held back by CPU limitations, but in this case, the CPU's 20 cores and 28 threads are more than sufficient, and the GPU's 13.21 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is the key performance driver. The rank suggests that many lower-spec combos achieve similar frame rates in Roblox, because the game's performance ceiling is set by factors like single-core CPU speed and memory bandwidth, rather than multi-core or GPU compute capabilities.

---

CPU Role

The Intel Core i7-14700K is a 20-core, 28-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, with a 33 MB shared L3 cache and 2 MB L2 cache per core. The CPU's memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, with a dual-channel memory bus, and it has an integrated UHD Graphics 770.

In Roblox, the CPU's role is primarily about single-threaded performance, as the game's engine is not heavily multithreaded. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6287 and Geekbench single-core score of 2932 demonstrate strong single-thread capabilities, while the multi-core scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core of 44534 and Geekbench multi-core of 18896) are less relevant for this title. The PassMark single-thread score of 4472 further confirms the CPU's strength in this area.

The measured frame rates at 1080p — particularly the 366.9 FPS at Low settings — suggest that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with a high number of frames per second, but there is a ceiling. The fact that 1080p Ultra produces 239.9 FPS versus 366.9 FPS at Low indicates that the CPU is not the sole bottleneck; the GPU's workload increases with settings, and the CPU has headroom even at Ultra. However, the CPU's 20 cores and 28 threads are likely overkill for Roblox, as the game probably only uses a few threads. The 33 MB L3 cache helps with data locality, but the game's simple geometry means cache misses are less impactful than in more complex titles.

The CPU's nearest rivals show it is competitive with top-tier server and desktop processors, but in Roblox, this does not translate to a top-100 combo rank. The data implies that the CPU is not the limiting factor at any resolution, as frame rates remain high even at 4K Ultra (92.5 FPS), which is more likely GPU-bound. The CPU's 5.60 GHz boost clock is particularly beneficial for Roblox's single-threaded render loop, allowing for high frame rates at lower resolutions.

---

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the best experience depends on the target resolution and refresh rate. At 1920x1080, all settings are playable, with Low at 366.9 FPS, Medium at 337.6 FPS, High at 297.9 FPS, and Ultra at 239.9 FPS. For a 144 Hz monitor, Ultra settings are still well above the refresh rate, making it the best choice for visual quality without sacrificing smoothness. For a 240 Hz display, High settings (297.9 FPS) are sufficient, while Medium (337.6 FPS) provides a margin for frame drops.

At 2560x1440, the situation is similar: Ultra produces 160.1 FPS, which exceeds 144 Hz, so Ultra is recommended for the best visual experience on a 144 Hz monitor. For 165 Hz or 240 Hz displays, High settings (200.8 FPS) or Medium (223.2 FPS) are better options, as they maintain frame rates above the refresh rate with only a modest visual penalty compared to Ultra.

At 3840x2160, the recommendation changes. Ultra yields 92.5 FPS, which is below 100 FPS and may feel less smooth on high-refresh displays. Medium settings (124.8 FPS) provide a better balance, staying above 120 FPS. Low settings (138.6 FPS) are the highest frame rate option, but the visual quality reduction may be noticeable. For a 60 Hz 4K display, Ultra at 92.5 FPS is still well above the refresh rate, so it is the best choice for maximum visual fidelity. For 120 Hz or 144 Hz 4K displays, Medium (124.8 FPS) is the recommended setting, as it offers a 34.9% improvement over Ultra while maintaining a higher frame rate than High (113.3 FPS) by only 10.1 FPS.

The data indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor at 4K, so dropping from Ultra to Medium yields a 34.9% frame rate increase (from 92.5 to 124.8 FPS), which is a significant improvement for competitive play. At 1080p, the CPU is more likely the limiter, so settings have a larger impact on frame rates, and the recommendation is to favor visual quality since the CPU can still deliver high frame rates even at Ultra.