Roblox

This combo of the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile lands in the lower-middle portion of the tested field for Roblox. The data places this pairing at rank 2250 out of 3711 tested combos, meaning roughly 60% of the tested configurations deliver higher average frame rates in this specific title. The rank is not a reflection of absolute hardware weakness; rather, it highlights how Roblox's engine rewards certain architectural traits over raw compute throughput. The CPU is an exceptionally strong part, sitting in the 95th percentile among all tested processors, while the GPU sits in the 67th percentile among all tested graphics cards. This discrepancy suggests the frame rate ceiling here is primarily set by the graphics processor, not the processor. The combination's overall rank is dragged down by the GPU's mid-pack standing, despite the CPU's top-tier classification. Benchmark results indicate that this pairing is best suited for high-refresh 1080p play or smooth 1440p experiences, with 4K being playable but not competitive at the highest settings.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank of 2250 out of 3711 combos places this system in the bottom 40% of all tested hardware pairings for Roblox. This is a notable outcome given the individual components' profiles. The CPU alone is in the 95th percentile of all processors, a top-tier result, while the GPU is in the 67th percentile. The gap between these two percentiles is telling. In a game like Roblox, which often relies on a blend of single-thread performance and GPU fill rate, the weaker link becomes the bottleneck. The data shows that the GPU's relative position among its peers is significantly lower than the CPU's, leading to a combined rank that does not reflect the CPU's prowess.

Looking at the CPU's nearest rivals, the picture is one of tight competition. The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 posts an average benchmark score of 77740. This is 1.6% higher than the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX and the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P, both of which score around 76500. It is also 2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX. However, it trails the Intel Core i9-14900K by 1.7%, which scores 79097. These are all minuscule margins, indicating that the CPU is performing exactly as expected for a high-end mobile part, but the competition is fierce at this level.

On the GPU side, the RTX 4060 Mobile's average score of 22729 places it in a virtual tie with its nearest rivals. It is 0.7% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, 1.3% behind the Intel Arc B580, and 0.8% and 1.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile, respectively. These deltas are within a 2% band, showing that the GPU is a solid mid-range performer. The issue is that this mid-range performance, relative to the entire GPU landscape, is what anchors the combo's rank. The CPU is a top-5% part, but the GPU is a top-33% part, and the combined result is a mid-pack rank.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is the primary frame rate limiter in this configuration. Its specifications show a 128-bit memory bus paired with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, yielding 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is the same memory bandwidth figure as the CPU's system memory, which is an interesting symmetry but does not change the fact that the GPU's bandwidth is a constraining factor at higher resolutions. The GPU's boost clock is 1890 MHz, and it features 3072 shading units, 96 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. The FP32 throughput is 11.61 TFLOPS.

In Roblox, the measured FPS data shows that the GPU's performance scales as expected with resolution. At 1920x1080, the GPU is able to push frame rates well above 200 FPS on most settings, indicating it has enough raw power for the game's typical workload at that resolution. However, the drop from 1440p to 4K is significant. At 2560x1440 High, the average is 174 FPS, but at 3840x2160 High, it drops to 99 FPS. This 43% reduction in frame rate demonstrates that the GPU's pixel throughput and memory bandwidth are being stressed by the higher pixel count. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is not a limiting factor at these settings, as Roblox is not a VRAM-heavy title, but the bandwidth and compute are.

The GPU's performance relative to its peers is also relevant. The data shows it is essentially a dead heat with the RTX 2080 and Arc B580. This means the 4060 Mobile is a competent 1080p and 1440p card, but its 67th percentile standing indicates that a significant number of GPUs outperform it. For Roblox specifically, this means the GPU will handle the game's stylized graphics with ease at lower resolutions, but the Ultra preset at 4K will push it to its limits. The measured 80 FPS average at 3840x2160 Ultra is the lowest result in the entire dataset, confirming that the GPU is the component that bends first.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is a formidable processor that provides far more headroom than the game requires. With 16 cores and 32 threads based on the Zen 5 architecture, it boasts a boost clock of 5.10 GHz and a 64 MB L3 cache. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score is 35314, and its single-core score is 2044. The Geekbench scores are similarly strong, with a multicore result of 20992 and a single-core result of 2464. These numbers place it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it is faster than 95% of tested processors.

In the context of Roblox, the CPU's role is to feed the GPU with draw calls and handle game logic. The game is known for being more sensitive to single-core performance than multi-core scaling. The Ryzen AI Max+ 395's single-core performance, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 score of 2044, is top-tier. This is reflected in the high frame rates at 1080p, where the CPU is not the bottleneck. At 1920x1080 Low, the combo achieves 325 FPS, which is likely near the engine's internal limits or the point where the GPU becomes the limiter even at low settings.

The CPU's multi-core strength is a safety net for more complex Roblox experiences. User-generated worlds can have heavy scripting and physics, which can utilize multiple threads. The 35314 multicore score suggests that this CPU will maintain stable frame rates even in the most complex scenarios. However, the measured FPS data shows that the CPU is not the limiting factor in the tested configurations. The frame rate differences between settings at the same resolution are entirely attributable to GPU load. For instance, at 2560x1440, the jump from Low (217 FPS) to High (174 FPS) is a 20% decrease, which is a GPU-side cost. The CPU is capable of driving even higher frame rates, but the GPU cannot deliver them.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The benchmark data provides a complete grid of results across four resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the combo produces its highest frame rates. The Low preset averages 325 FPS, which is exceptionally high. The Medium preset averages 296 FPS, with a minimum of 251 FPS and a maximum of 340 FPS. The High preset averages 261 FPS, and the Ultra preset drops to 212 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a 35% reduction in frame rate, which is a significant cost for the visual fidelity improvements of the Ultra preset.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain very playable. The Low preset averages 217 FPS, a 33% drop from the 1080p Low result. The Medium preset averages 197 FPS, with a minimum of 168 FPS and a maximum of 227 FPS. The High preset averages 174 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 141 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1440p is also 35%, showing a consistent scaling pattern. Notably, the 1440p Medium result of 197 FPS is higher than the 1080p Ultra result of 212 FPS, showing that resolution scaling and setting scaling interact in a predictable manner.

At 3840x2160, the GPU begins to struggle. The Low preset averages 123 FPS, which is still smooth. The Medium preset averages 112 FPS, with a minimum of 95 FPS and a maximum of 128 FPS. The High preset averages 99 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 80 FPS. The drop from 1080p Low to 4K Low is 62%, from 325 FPS to 123 FPS. The drop from 1080p Ultra to 4K Ultra is also steep, from 212 FPS to 80 FPS, a 62% decrease. This consistent 62% reduction across all settings when moving from 1080p to 4K indicates a clear resolution-dependent bottleneck.

The min FPS data is only available for the Medium preset at each resolution. At 1080p, the min is 251 FPS, at 1440p it is 168 FPS, and at 4K it is 95 FPS. These minimums show that the frame time consistency is good, with no severe stutters or drops, even at 4K. The 4K Medium minimum of 95 FPS is still above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, suggesting that the game remains playable even under load. The lack of min/max data for other settings does not allow for a full analysis of frame pacing, but the available data points indicate a stable experience.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance rank of this CPU and GPU combination for Roblox?

A: The combo ranks 2250 out of 3711 tested combinations, placing it in the lower half of all tested systems for this game. This rank is primarily influenced by the GPU's mid-pack standing, as the CPU is in the top 5% of all processors.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the main bottleneck for this game?

A: The benchmark data indicates the GPU is the limiting component. The CPU is in the 95th percentile of all processors, while the GPU is in the 67th percentile. The frame rate scaling across resolutions and settings follows a pattern consistent with GPU load, not CPU limitations.

Q: How does the RTX 4060 Mobile compare to its closest rivals in benchmark scores?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 22729. It is 0.7% behind the RTX 2080 (22895) and 1.3% behind the Intel Arc B580 (23021). It is 0.8% ahead of the RX 7700 XT (22549) and 1.3% ahead of the RTX 5060 Mobile (22435). These are all very close results.

Q: Can this system play Roblox at 4K resolution?

A: Yes, the data shows 4K is playable. At 4K Low, the average FPS is 123, and at 4K High, it is 99 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K averages 80 FPS. These are all above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded in the dataset?

A: The highest average FPS is 325, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low settings preset. The High preset at 1080p still delivers 261 FPS, showing that the system can easily handle high refresh rate monitors.

Q: How much faster is the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 compared to the Intel Core i9-14900K?

A: The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is actually slower. The Intel Core i9-14900K has an average score of 79097, which is 1.7% higher than the Ryzen's 77740. The Ryzen is faster than the other listed rivals, such as the Ryzen 9 8945HX, by 2%.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings preset depends on the target resolution and refresh rate. For 1920x1080, all presets deliver high frame rates. The Ultra preset at 212 FPS is still exceptionally smooth and is the recommended choice for users with a 144Hz or 240Hz monitor who want the best visual quality. The High preset at 261 FPS is better suited for 240Hz or 360Hz displays, as it provides a 23% frame rate increase over Ultra with a moderate reduction in visual fidelity. The Low preset at 325 FPS is only necessary for competitive play at the highest refresh rates.

For 2560x1440, the High preset is the best balance. It averages 174 FPS, which is smooth on a 144Hz monitor. The Ultra preset averages 141 FPS, which is also playable but with a 19% performance penalty. The Medium preset at 197 FPS is the choice for users with a 165Hz or 180Hz display, as it offers a significant frame rate boost. The Low preset at 217 FPS is not necessary unless aiming for maximum competitive performance. The data suggests that High is the sweet spot for 1440p, offering a 23% improvement over Ultra while maintaining high visual quality.

At 3840x2160, the Medium preset is the recommended starting point. It averages 112 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS standard and provides a comfortable margin. The Low preset at 123 FPS offers a small 10% boost over Medium. The High preset at 99 FPS is still smooth, but the Ultra preset at 80 FPS is the only setting that approaches the minimum playable threshold. For a consistent 60 FPS experience with headroom for demanding scenes, the Medium preset is the most reliable option, as its minimum FPS is 95. The High preset's average of 99 FPS is close to that minimum, suggesting it may dip below 60 FPS in complex worlds.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate data reveals a clear pattern of scaling across resolutions. From 1920x1080 to 2560x1440, the average FPS drops by approximately 33% across all settings. For example, High drops from 261 FPS to 174 FPS, and Low drops from 325 FPS to 217 FPS. This is a consistent reduction that aligns with the increase in pixel count from roughly 2 million to 3.7 million, a 73% increase in pixels. The frame rate drop is less than the pixel increase, suggesting that the GPU is not purely pixel-bound at these resolutions and benefits from other efficiencies.

The scaling from 2560x1440 to 3840x2160 is more severe. The average FPS drops by approximately 43% across all settings. The High preset drops from 174 FPS to 99 FPS, and the Low preset drops from 217 FPS to 123 FPS. This is a much steeper decline than the 1080p to 1440p transition. The pixel count increase from 1440p to 4K is 125%, but the frame rate drops by only 43%. This indicates that the GPU is becoming increasingly bottlenecked by its memory bandwidth and pixel fill rate at 4K, but it is still managing to scale better than the raw pixel increase would suggest.

The overall trend shows that the limiting component is the GPU, as the frame rate scaling is consistent with its capabilities. The CPU's role in resolution scaling is minimal, as the same CPU is able to drive frame rates that are 62% higher at 1080p compared to 4K. The data shows that the GPU's performance is the primary variable in the resolution scaling equation. The 4K results, particularly the 80 FPS average at Ultra, highlight the GPU's limits. The 1080p results, with 325 FPS on Low, show that the CPU is capable of far more than the GPU can deliver at higher resolutions. This analysis confirms that for this game, the RTX 4060 Mobile is the component that determines the playable resolution and settings.