Roblox

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 combination delivers consistently high frame rates in Roblox, with the data showing that the CPU's modern architecture is more than sufficient for the game's demands. The Ryzen 5 7400F, a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 processor based on the Raphael architecture, operates on the AMD Socket AM5 platform. It has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, providing strong single-thread performance that is crucial for a game like Roblox, which often relies on a limited number of heavily tasked threads. The processor's cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 per core, with a shared 32 MB L3 cache. This configuration helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores, reducing latency and improving responsiveness in gameplay.

The measured results confirm that the CPU is not a bottleneck in this pairing. For instance, at 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 252 FPS, which is a very high frame rate that indicates the CPU can feed the GPU efficiently. Even at the demanding 4K resolution with Ultra settings, where the GPU is typically the limiting factor, the system still produces an average of 62 FPS. The CPU's performance is further contextualized by its benchmark scores. In Cinebench R23, it scores 21,765 in multi-core and 3,072 in single-core. This places it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, ranking it above average. Its average benchmark score of 32,750 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals, including the Intel Core i5-14600T (32,707) and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (32,812), with delta percentages of 0.1% and -0.2% respectively. This indicates that while the 7400F is a capable processor, its performance is very much in line with other mid-range options, and its strength in Roblox comes from its excellent single-threaded capabilities rather than an overwhelming multi-core lead.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Ryzen 5 7400F's specifications are well-suited for Roblox's engine. The game's physics and game logic often operate on a single primary thread, making the processor's high boost clock of 4.70 GHz particularly important. The 12 threads provided by the 6 cores also allow for background tasks and other game systems to run without interfering with the main simulation thread. The processor's Zen 4 architecture, built on a 5 nm process by TSMC, is efficient and allows for these high clocks. The 65 W TDP means that the CPU is power-efficient, a factor that contributes to stable performance without excessive thermal throttling in typical desktop configurations.

Data from the measured FPS shows how the CPU's role changes with settings. At 1080p Low, the average FPS is 252. This suggests that the CPU is capable of generating a very high number of frames per second, far exceeding the refresh rate of most monitors. As the resolution increases to 4K, the average FPS drops significantly across all settings. For example, at 4K Low, the average is 95 FPS, and at 4K High, it is 77 FPS. This drop is primarily due to the increased load on the GPU, not the CPU. The CPU is still capable of delivering high frame rates, but the GPU cannot keep pace at higher resolutions. The data shows a clear trend: the CPU's performance headroom is vast, and the GPU becomes the limiting component as resolution and graphical fidelity increase.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

In the database of tested combinations for Roblox, the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 combo ranks 2,474 out of 3,010 tested combos. This places it in the lower half of all tested systems, which is a direct consequence of the GPU's age and performance tier. While the CPU is a modern and capable processor, the GTX 1070 is an older, end-of-life product. The rank is determined by the overall performance of the combo, which is heavily influenced by the GPU in a graphics-intensive game like Roblox, especially at higher resolutions.

The rank of 2474 suggests that while this combo is perfectly playable, it is not competitive with systems using newer, more powerful graphics cards. For instance, a combo with a top-tier modern GPU would likely rank much higher. The CPU's percentile of 83 indicates that the processor itself is well above average, but the combo's rank is dragged down by the GPU. This analysis is supported by the fact that the GPU's percentile is 47, meaning it is below the median of all GPUs in the database. The combo's rank is a holistic measure, and in this case, the GPU's limitations prevent the system from achieving a higher position. The data shows that the CPU is not the limiting factor; the GPU is the primary reason for the combo's rank.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The resolution scaling data provides a clear picture of where the performance bottleneck lies. At 1080p, the system is heavily CPU-bound. The average FPS at 1080p Low is 252, which drops to 203 at High and 165 at Ultra. This is a significant drop, but even at Ultra, the frame rate is very high. The differences between settings at 1080p are relatively small in absolute terms, indicating that the GPU has enough headroom to handle the increased graphical load without a massive FPS penalty. The CPU is generating frames so quickly that the GPU is the primary constraint, but it is an older card and cannot fully utilize the CPU's potential.

Moving to 1440p, the load shifts to the GPU. The average FPS at 1440p Low is 168, which drops to 135 at High and 110 at Ultra. This is a substantial reduction compared to 1080p, showing that the GPU is now working much harder. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 58 FPS, indicating that the GPU's performance scales with the settings. At 4K, the GPU becomes the definitive bottleneck. The average FPS at 4K Low is 95, which drops to 77 at High and 62 at Ultra. The difference between 1080p Low (252 FPS) and 4K Low (95 FPS) is a 62% reduction, which is a classic sign of a GPU-limited scenario. The CPU's performance is consistent, but the GTX 1070's 8 GB of VRAM and 256-bit memory bus are insufficient to maintain high frame rates at 4K. The data clearly shows that the GTX 1070 is the limiting component at all resolutions above 1080p, and even at 1080p, the system's performance is capped by the GPU's capabilities.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo achieves in Roblox?

A: The highest average FPS is 252, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: At what resolution and settings does the system drop below 60 FPS?

A: The system does not drop below 60 FPS in any of the measured data. The lowest average FPS recorded is 62 at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings.

Q: How does the CPU's performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 32,750. It is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14600T, 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, and 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. It is 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The GPU's percentile is 47, meaning it performs better than 47% of all GPUs in the database.

Q: What is the difference in average FPS between 1080p Low and 4K Low?

A: The average FPS at 1080p Low is 252, and at 4K Low it is 95. This is a difference of 157 FPS.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to be the bottleneck at 1440p?

A: At 1440p, the GPU is the likely bottleneck. The average FPS drops from 168 at Low to 110 at Ultra, showing the GPU's performance scales directly with the settings load.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 is the older, end-of-life component in this pairing. It is based on the Pascal architecture and uses the GP104 chip, manufactured on a 16 nm process by TSMC. The GPU has 1,920 shading units, 120 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. It comes with 8 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 256.3 GB/s. The base clock is 1506 MHz, and the boost clock is 1683 MHz. This configuration allows for a pixel rate of 107.7 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 202.0 GTexel/s, with a peak FP32 performance of 6.463 TFLOPS.

In Roblox, the GPU's role is to render the game's simple, blocky graphics. The GTX 1070 is more than capable of handling this at 1080p and 1440p, as shown by the high FPS figures. However, its limitations become apparent at 4K. The 8 GB of VRAM is sufficient for Roblox at any setting, but the GPU's raw compute power is not enough to maintain high frame rates at 4K. The data shows that at 4K Ultra, the average FPS is 62, which is significantly lower than the 165 FPS at 1080p Ultra. This 103 FPS drop highlights the GPU's scaling limitations. The GPU's benchmark scores reflect its mid-range status. In Passmark G3D, it scores 13,498, and in Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 22,121. Its average benchmark score is 9,780, placing it in the 47th percentile. Its nearest rivals, such as the AMD FirePro W5000 (9,803) and NVIDIA Quadro M2000M (9,832), have very similar scores, with delta percentages of -0.2% and -0.5% respectively. This shows that the GTX 1070 is a solid but dated performer, and its performance is a limiting factor for the combo's overall ranking.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured data, the optimal settings depend on the user's resolution and preference for frame rate versus visual quality. At 1080p, the Ultra preset provides an excellent experience with an average of 165 FPS. This is high enough for smooth gameplay on most monitors, and it offers the best visual fidelity. The High preset at 1080p yields 203 FPS, which is even smoother but with slightly reduced graphics. For users with high refresh rate monitors (144Hz or higher), the High preset is a better choice to take full advantage of the display. The Medium preset at 1080p gives 230 FPS with a minimum of 195 FPS, which is also a great option for competitive play. The Low preset at 252 FPS is the fastest, but it sacrifices visual quality for performance that is likely unnecessary for most users.

At 1440p, the Ultra preset averages 110 FPS, which is playable but not as smooth as 1080p. The High preset at 135 FPS is a better balance for 1440p, providing a good mix of performance and visual quality. The Medium preset at 153 FPS is also a strong choice, with a minimum of 130 FPS ensuring consistent performance. The Low preset at 168 FPS is the fastest but again sacrifices visuals. At 4K, the choices are more constrained. The Ultra preset averages 62 FPS, which is borderline playable but may feel less smooth. The High preset at 77 FPS is a better experience for 4K, while the Medium preset at 87 FPS is the best balance, with a minimum of 74 FPS ensuring it rarely dips below 60. The Low preset at 95 FPS is the fastest but offers the lowest visual quality. Considering the data, the Medium preset at 1080p or 1440p offers the best overall experience, balancing high frame rates with acceptable visual quality and providing a minimum FPS that is still very high. For 4K, the Medium preset is recommended to maintain a stable frame rate above 70 FPS.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The following is a detailed breakdown of the measured average FPS for each resolution and settings combination.

1920x1080:

• Ultra: The average frame rate is 165 FPS. This is the highest quality setting and provides a very smooth experience.
• High: The average frame rate is 203 FPS. This is a significant improvement over Ultra, offering a smoother experience with a slight reduction in visual fidelity.
• Medium: The average frame rate is 230 FPS, with a minimum of 195 FPS and a maximum of 264 FPS. This setting provides a very high frame rate with no significant drops.
• Low: The average frame rate is 252 FPS. This is the fastest setting at this resolution, prioritizing performance over all else.

2560x1440:

• Ultra: The average frame rate is 110 FPS. This is a playable frame rate for most users, though not as high as at 1080p.
• High: The average frame rate is 135 FPS. This is a good balance between performance and quality at this resolution.
• Medium: The average frame rate is 153 FPS, with a minimum of 130 FPS and a maximum of 176 FPS. This setting offers a consistently high frame rate.
• Low: The average frame rate is 168 FPS. This is the fastest setting at this resolution.

3840x2160:

• Ultra: The average frame rate is 62 FPS. This is the lowest average frame rate in the dataset but is still technically playable.
• High: The average frame rate is 77 FPS. This setting provides a smoother experience than Ultra at 4K.
• Medium: The average frame rate is 87 FPS, with a minimum of 74 FPS and a maximum of 100 FPS. This is the recommended setting for 4K, as it maintains a frame rate well above 60 FPS.
• Low: The average frame rate is 95 FPS. This is the fastest setting at 4K, showing that the GPU can still produce a high frame rate when the graphical load is reduced.

The data shows a consistent pattern: as resolution increases, the average FPS decreases across all settings. The gaps between settings also widen at higher resolutions, indicating the GPU is the bottleneck. The system is capable of very high frame rates at 1080p, and its performance at 4K is adequate for casual play.