Road 96
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 187 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 63 | 81 | 100 | 137 |
| 1440p QHD | 120 | 154 | 191 | 259 |
| 1080p Full HD | 189 | 241 | 298 | 405 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Road 96 with Intel Core Ultra 7 155H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, In-Depth Analysis
Road 96 is not a demanding title, and the measured results for the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 confirm this, with the combo landing at rank 1742 out of 2903 tested combinations. The data shows a system that is heavily GPU-limited at higher resolutions but capable of delivering exceptionally high frame rates at 1080p, making the experience smooth across most settings. The key takeaway is that this pairing is more than adequate for the game, with the primary trade-off occurring between visual fidelity at 4K and the pursuit of very high refresh rates at 1080p.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals a clear and predictable pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases, which is typical for a game like Road 96 that is not particularly demanding. At 1080p with Ultra settings, the combo produces an average of 83 FPS. Moving to 1440p at the same Ultra preset, the average drops to 53 FPS, a reduction of 30 FPS. At 4K Ultra, the average falls further to 28 FPS, which is a significant 55 FPS below the 1080p result. This steep decline indicates that the rendering load scales heavily with pixel count, and the RTX 4060’s 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory interface become the limiting factors.
The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a roughly 36% performance hit on the Ultra preset, while the jump from 1440p to 4K incurs an additional 47% drop. This non-linear scaling suggests that at 4K, the GPU is struggling to maintain the same level of efficiency, likely due to memory bandwidth constraints and the sheer number of pixels being processed. For example, the High preset at 1080p delivers 106 FPS, but at 1440p it drops to 67 FPS, and at 4K it plummets to 36 FPS. The pattern is consistent across all settings presets, confirming that resolution is the dominant factor in this game’s performance profile.
The data indicates that the CPU is not a bottleneck at any resolution tested. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 179 FPS, which is an extremely high frame rate that would stress many CPUs, but the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H with its 16 cores and 22 threads is clearly able to keep up. The fact that the frame rate scales down smoothly through the resolution steps suggests that the GPU is the limiting component from 1440p upward. At 1080p, even with the highest settings, the system remains well within the CPU’s capabilities, as evidenced by the 83 FPS Ultra result. This points to a balanced pairing where the CPU provides ample headroom for the GPU to do its work.
The 4K results are the most telling for understanding the system’s limits. At 4K Medium, the average FPS is 44, with a minimum of 38 and a maximum of 51, showing some variance but still playable. However, at 4K Ultra, the average drops to 28 FPS, which is below the generally accepted threshold for smooth gameplay. The 4K Low preset manages 60 FPS, hitting a common target for console-like performance, but the visual compromise is substantial. These numbers suggest that for a consistently smooth 4K experience, users would need to stick to Low or Medium settings, and even then, the frame rates are not particularly high.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture and features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s. The GPU has a base clock of 1830 MHz and a boost clock of 2460 MHz, with its 3072 shading units delivering 15.11 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. These specifications place the card in the 61st percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17639. In the context of Road 96, the GPU’s role is clearly the primary determinant of frame rate, particularly at higher resolutions.
The VRAM capacity of 8 GB is sufficient for Road 96 at 1080p and 1440p, but the measured FPS drops at 4K suggest that memory bandwidth might be a limiting factor. The 128-bit bus and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest for a modern GPU, and at 4K, the increased texture data and pixel throughput can saturate this connection. The data shows that at 4K Medium, the average FPS is 44, which is a 47% drop from the 1440p Medium average of 83 FPS. This significant reduction aligns with the memory system struggling to keep up with the increased resolution demands.
The RTX 4060’s boost clock of 2460 MHz is relatively high, and the card’s 115 W TDP suggests it can sustain these clocks under load. The measured performance at 1080p, where the card delivers 179 FPS on Low and 106 FPS on High, indicates that the GPU has plenty of raw compute power for this game. However, the transition to 4K reveals the card’s limits, as the pixel rate of 118.1 GPixel/s and texture rate of 236.2 GTexel/s are not enough to maintain high frame rates at that resolution. The card’s DirectX 12 Ultimate support and 24 RT cores are irrelevant for this title, as Road 96 does not appear to use ray tracing, based on the data provided.
The GPU’s benchmark scores provide additional context. Its Passmark G3D score of 19545 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2302 are respectable for a mid-range card, but the nearest rivals list shows it is closely matched with older and integrated solutions like the AMD Radeon HD 7790 and AMD Radeon 780M, with delta percentages of -0.2% and 0.3% respectively. This indicates that the RTX 4060’s performance is not exceptional in absolute terms, but it is more than sufficient for Road 96’s modest requirements. The measured FPS numbers confirm this, as the card can easily handle the game at 1080p and 1440p, but it struggles to maintain playable frame rates at 4K Ultra.
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 combination is ranked 1742 out of 2903 tested combos for Road 96. This places the pairing in the lower half of the database, which might seem surprising given the strong 1080p results. However, this ranking is likely influenced by the fact that many other tested combos include more powerful desktop GPUs or higher-end mobile parts that can achieve better 4K performance. The rank of 1742 suggests that while this combo is competent, it is not among the top performers for this specific game.
To understand this ranking, it is helpful to look at the individual component benchmarks. The CPU has an average benchmark score of 32697 and sits in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, which is a strong showing. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-14600T with a delta of 0% and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 with a delta of 0.1%, indicating that the Ultra 7 155H is well-matched with these mid-range processors. The GPU, on the other hand, has an average benchmark score of 17639 and is in the 61st percentile, which is more modest. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon HD 7790 and AMD Radeon 780M, showing that the RTX 4060 is not a high-end part.
The combo rank of 1742 out of 2903 likely reflects the GPU’s limitations at 4K, which is a resolution where many high-end combos excel. At 1080p and 1440p, this pairing would likely rank much higher, but the database ranking considers all resolutions. The fact that the combo is in the 60th percentile (1742/2903 ≈ 60%) aligns closely with the GPU’s 61st percentile ranking, suggesting that the GPU is the primary factor in the overall ranking. The CPU’s higher percentile does not compensate for the GPU’s mid-range position in a game that is heavily GPU-bound at higher resolutions.
The data shows that this combo is a solid mid-range option for Road 96, capable of delivering high frame rates at 1080p and good performance at 1440p, but it is not a top-tier performer. The ranking is a reminder that for a game like this, the GPU is more important than the CPU, and the RTX 4060’s 61st percentile position is the main reason for the combo’s mid-pack placement. Users with this pairing should expect a smooth experience at 1080p and 1440p, but they will need to compromise on settings at 4K.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive picture of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the system delivers an average of 179 FPS on Low, 131 FPS on Medium, 106 FPS on High, and 83 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset shows a minimum of 111 FPS and a maximum of 151 FPS, indicating a stable frame time with minimal variance. These numbers are all well above the threshold for smooth gameplay, and even the Ultra preset at 83 FPS is excellent for a 1080p display.
At 2560x1440, the performance drops significantly but remains playable. The Low preset averages 114 FPS, which is still very high, while Medium averages 83 FPS with a minimum of 71 and a maximum of 96. High averages 67 FPS, and Ultra drops to 53 FPS. The 1440p results show a clear step-down from 1080p, with the Ultra preset losing 30 FPS compared to its 1080p counterpart. For users with a 1440p monitor, the Medium or High presets would provide a good balance of visual quality and frame rate, as both remain above 60 FPS.
The 4K results are where the system begins to struggle. The Low preset averages 60 FPS, which is exactly at the standard target, but the Medium preset drops to 44 FPS with a minimum of 38 and a maximum of 51. High averages 36 FPS, and Ultra falls to 28 FPS. None of the 4K presets except Low achieve a consistently smooth 60 FPS, and even Medium shows dips below 40 FPS. The variance in the Medium preset, from 38 to 51 FPS, indicates that the frame rate is not stable at this resolution, which could lead to noticeable stuttering in fast-paced scenes.
The data also reveals how the settings presets scale with resolution. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 96 FPS (179 to 83), showing a significant impact from the settings. At 1440p, the difference is 61 FPS (114 to 53), and at 4K, it is 32 FPS (60 to 28). This narrowing gap at higher resolutions is due to the GPU becoming the bottleneck, as the pixel count increases and the settings have less relative impact. The RTX 4060’s 8 GB VRAM and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p, but at 4K, the card is clearly overworked.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend heavily on the target resolution. For 1080p users, the Ultra preset is the best choice, as it delivers an average of 83 FPS, which is smooth and leaves headroom for any potential dips. The High preset at 106 FPS is also excellent, offering a higher frame rate for competitive play, but Ultra provides the best visual experience without sacrificing performance. The Medium preset at 131 FPS and Low at 179 FPS are overkill for most displays, as they exceed the refresh rate of typical 1080p monitors (usually 144 Hz or 165 Hz). Therefore, Ultra is recommended for 1080p, as it maximizes visual quality while maintaining a high frame rate.
For 1440p, the High preset at 67 FPS is the recommended starting point, as it provides a good balance of visual fidelity and smoothness. The Medium preset at 83 FPS is also a strong option, offering a higher frame rate with a slight reduction in visual quality. The Ultra preset at 53 FPS is playable but may not be ideal for users who prefer a consistently high frame rate, while the Low preset at 114 FPS is unnecessary unless the user prioritizes frame rate above all else. Given that the game is an adventure title, the visual quality is important, so High is the best compromise at 1440p.
At 4K, the recommendations are more constrained. The Low preset at 60 FPS is the only setting that achieves a stable 60 FPS average, but it comes with significant visual compromises. The Medium preset at 44 FPS is a better visual option, but the frame rate dips to 38 FPS, which may be noticeable. The High and Ultra presets at 36 FPS and 28 FPS respectively are not recommended, as they fall below the playable threshold for most users. For 4K, the Low preset is the safest choice for smooth gameplay, while Medium is acceptable if the user can tolerate occasional frame rate drops. The data clearly shows that this combo is not well-suited for 4K gaming at higher settings.
The measured rows also indicate that the RTX 4060’s 8 GB VRAM is not a limiting factor at 1080p and 1440p, as the frame rates are consistently high. At 4K, the VRAM might be a concern, but the data does not explicitly show a VRAM capacity issue; instead, the performance drop is more likely due to the GPU’s compute and bandwidth limits. For the best experience, users should target 1080p Ultra or 1440p High, as these configurations deliver the highest frame rates while maintaining visual quality. The 4K resolution should be avoided or used with the Low preset for a playable experience.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is a mobile processor with 16 cores and 22 threads, based on the Meteor Lake architecture. It has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU’s benchmark scores are strong, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15028 and a single-core score of 1743. Its Passmark multithread score is 24873, and its single-thread score is 3468, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. These numbers indicate a capable processor that should not bottleneck a mid-range GPU like the RTX 4060.
In Road 96, the CPU’s role is minimal, as the game is not particularly CPU-intensive. The measured FPS at 1080p Low, which is the most CPU-bound scenario, reaches 179 FPS, suggesting that the Ultra 7 155H has plenty of headroom. The processor’s 22 threads and high boost clock of 4.80 GHz ensure that it can handle any single-threaded or multi-threaded workloads the game presents. The fact that the frame rates scale consistently with resolution and settings, without any unexpected dips, indicates that the CPU is not a limiting factor in any of the tested configurations.
The CPU’s nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-14600T and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, with average benchmark scores of 32707 and 32662 respectively, which are nearly identical to the Ultra 7 155H’s 32697. This shows that the CPU is in a competitive mid-range tier, but its performance is more than sufficient for Road 96. The Passmark data for the CPU shows strong results in integer math (86870) and floating point math (63703), which are relevant for general processing but less so for gaming. The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking confirms that it is a solid performer, and in this game, it provides a stable foundation for the GPU.
The data suggests that the CPU’s 16 cores and 22 threads are overkill for Road 96, as the game likely uses only a few threads. However, this excess capacity ensures that there are no frame drops due to CPU limitations, even at high frame rates. The CPU’s boost clock of 4.80 GHz is particularly important for gaming, as it provides high single-thread performance, which is often the key metric for game engines. Overall, the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H plays a supportive role in this combo, ensuring that the RTX 4060 can reach its full potential without being held back by the processor.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 7 155H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 in Road 96
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 63.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 81.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 100.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Low | 137.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 120.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 154.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 191.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 259.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 189.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 241.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 298.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 405.0 |
Road 96 with RTX 4060 + Other CPUs
See how Road 96 performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 7 155H + RTX 4060
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.